Budget 2025-26: auto sector faces mixed fortunes amid tariff reforms, carbon tax
While the government touts these reforms as steps toward export-led growth and trade liberalisation, industry stakeholders are voicing concerns about the adverse impact on local manufacturing.
Under the new budget, Additional Customs Duty (ACD) and Regulatory Duty (RD) are set to be reduced to zero by 2030. The fifth schedule will be eliminated, and Customs Duty (CD) will be capped at 15%.
Budget 2025-26: Pakistan targets 4.2% growth as Aurangzeb presents proposals 'for a competitive economy'
It will be reduced to zero percent by 2030. These changes, according to the government, are part of a long-term National Tariff Programme aimed at boosting exports and ensuring smoother access to global supply chains.
However, domestic players fear the reforms could weaken Pakistan's already fragile local manufacturing base.
'The new carbon tax will increase vehicle prices, while reduced RD on imported cars will make them cheaper — making imports more attractive and local manufacturing less competitive,' a senior official from a local car manufacturing company said.
Meanwhile, Mashood Khan, an auto sector expert, warned that the reforms reflect IMF directives rather than domestic industrial priorities.
'The downward trend in ACD, RD, and CD will likely hit local manufacturing instead of boosting exports. Without a thriving domestic industry, our import bill will rise and foreign reserves will suffer,' he said, urging the finance minister to revisit the policy before parliamentary approval.
Khan added that auto parts and related industries would face significant challenges without a clear strategy to support industrialization. 'It's unclear how exports will grow without strengthening the local base,' he noted.
Offering a more optimistic view, Shafiq Ahmed Shaikh, an automobile consultant and former Pak Suzuki official, welcomed the overhaul. 'This is a good move. A gradual reduction in duties will help Pakistan integrate with global markets and secure better FTAs and PTAs,' he said.
He noted that duties could fall from 20% to 15% over the next five years and emphasised that aligning tariffs with international norms would bring policy stability and encourage export-oriented investments.
However, Shaikh cautioned that the removal of the 12.5% concessional sales tax on vehicles under 850cc would hurt lower- and middle-income consumers.
The standard 18% sales tax will apply, increasing prices of small hatchbacks. Pak Suzuki, which leads the market in this segment due to its Alto 660cc, will be most affected.
Aurangzeb defended the move, arguing that automakers were not passing on the tax benefit to consumers, making the concession ineffective.
Key highlights of Pakistan budget for 2025-26
Osama Naeem, an auto analyst at AKD Securities, said, 'RD on vehicles above 3,000cc will be slashed from 90% to 50%, but details for lower engine sizes are awaited. This reduction in RD will hurt local assemblers who face competition from cheaper imports.'
He further said the ACD cut would impact imported completely built units (CBUs) more than local manufacturers, as the latter apply it primarily on parts and raw materials.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
14 hours ago
- Business Recorder
PARTLY FACETIOUS: Prosecution not always necessarily weak
'When one door opens and the other closes, you are probably in jail.' 'Hey, I hope that is not a backhanded comment on recent judicial decisions by the anti-terrorist court…' 'No it's not backhanded –it's like the International Monetary Fund front loaded or handed if you will comment.' 'But protesters cannot go around destroying public property, I mean that requires some reprisal if you will.' 'Right, but the prosecution was very weak and failed to provide any evidence against…..' 'As weak as when the Deputy Prime Minister got exonerated from the court after hand writing a 40-page affidavit implicating his benefactor, his counterpart Samdhi, his….' 'Shut up anyway, I urge all Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaaf convicts to see the glass as half full.' 'From jail?!' 'Yes, look at the terms: free three meals a day are provided, you do not have to pay for electricity, you do not need gas whose price is as high as electricity now, free laundry service….' 'Don't be facetious.' 'You have to deal with whatever life doles out to you, and you know what: nine times out of ten you are responsible for where you are at.' 'I agree with that, did you hear the line: what do you call poetry written in jail: Prose and Cons!' 'I prefer what do you call it when a prisoner takes his own mug shot? The answer is a cellfie.' 'I have another: why are inmates so angry all the time? Cause they have bad cell service.' 'Anyway, there are some very famous celebrities who are currently in our jails – though I am not sure whether they have access to VIP jails or not.' 'Talk of our obsession with elite capture. I mean VIP jails! Are there such jails anywhere else in the world! Anyway did you hear the one about what do you call a celebrity in jail? A celebrity.' 'Not funny. But I heard VIP cells come with attached inmates who provide service associated with domestic-helpers… you know, clean up and….' 'I would pass on that! I mean convicted murderers!!' 'I reckon that those who committed non-violent crimes are used to provide service to the VIPs.' 'So why did the belt get arrested?' 'Because it no longer fit the inmate….see he gained weight and….' 'No because he held up the pants.' 'I don't get it.' 'Perhaps you need a jail visit to understand.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
14 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Exports to US to face 19pc tariffs
ISLAMABAD: Pakistani exports to the US would face 19 percent tariffs (as opposed to the forgoing less than 10 percent) from the initially proposed 29 percent by President Trump, so noted the official statement released by the Finance Ministry, however there was no mention of reciprocal tariffs on US exports to Pakistan. On Business Recorder's query to Director General Media of Finance Ministry on any reciprocal tariffs that may be imposed on US exports to Pakistan, he stated that 'the Commerce Ministry was leading the technical discussion during the Pak-US talks. The delegation is currently travelling and would provide further details once it returns to the country.' Pakistan on Friday termed the trade deal a 'balanced and forward-looking approach' by the US authorities and further contended that the agreement keeps Pakistan competitive relative to other South and Southeast Asian countries and this tariff level is expected to support Pakistan's export potential, especially in key sectors such as textiles, which remain the backbone of the country's export economy. Pakistan, US conclude trade deal; Washington to help Islamabad develop 'massive' oil reserves Executive Order dated 31st July 2025 issued by the White House titled 'Further Modifying the Reciprocal Tariff Rates' noted Pakistan will face lower tariffs than other regional competitors including India 25 percent, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka at 20 percent. However, no other regional country, including India and China, has reached a trade agreement with the US yet. The countries that have reached an agreement, apart from Pakistan include the UK (10 percent tariffs against the proposed 25 percent), Vietnam (20 percent against 46 percent originally proposed), Indonesia (19 percent against 32 percent proposed), Philippines (19 percent against 20 percent proposed), Japan (15 percent against 25 percent proposed), EU (15 percent against 30 percent) and South Korea (15 percent against 25 percent). Pakistan, US strike 'win-win' trade deal, says Aurangzeb The statement further noted that the Ministry of Finance, in close coordination with relevant stakeholders, believes that the current tariff arrangement presents a significant opportunity to expand Pakistan's footprint in the US market. It is now essential for Pakistani exporters and trade bodies to adopt an aggressive and focused marketing strategy to capitalize on this development. In addition to textiles, there is substantial potential for growth in other sectors, and the government is committed to facilitating exporters through policy support, market intelligence, and trade promotion initiatives. 'The government of Pakistan looks forward to further positive engagements and close cooperation with the United States in the areas of investment, artificial intelligence, crypto currency, mines & minerals, energy, and other emerging sectors. Pakistan will continue to engage closely with President Trump and the US administration to promote the shared goals of economic development and mutual prosperity,' the statement noted. Pakistan exports to the US were $6.028 billion in fiscal year 2024-25 against exports of $5.444 billion in 2023-24. The imports from the US into the country during last fiscal year were recorded at $2.350 billion against $1.875 billion in 2023-24. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Tax-to-GDP ratio: flawed debate
There has been persistent pressure on successive Pakistani Governments by policymakers, especially those affiliated with multilateral donor agencies, to increase the Percentage Tax-to-GDP ratio. It is true, that the fiscal deficit continues to increase. However, the assumption that it is a tax shortfall that grows the deficit needs to be challenged — Nadeem Ul Haque & Raja Rafi Ullah, The Odd Fascination with Tax-to-GDP Ratio (PIDE Knowledge Brief No. 78:2022) 'If we want lower taxes for growth, then spending must be curtailed so that governments won't need so much money. The next time you hear a politician promise another tax break for some special group of taxpayers, think how much that hurts the economy and you as a taxpayer. It's time to simplify the system and reduce its onerous impact that undermines economic growth' — Jack M. Mintz, the Palmer Chair of Public Policy, School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Canada The recent claim by the Chairman of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) that for the recently-ended fiscal year (FY) 2024-25 its tax-to-GDP ratio improved by 1.5 percent needs reconsideration [in FY 2024 FBR's tax-to-GDP ratio was 8.8 percent and not 9.5 percent, which was of total national taxes]. It is well-known that the debate over tax-to-GDP ratio in Pakistan has always been lopsided, failing to take into account the fact that the Pakistani nation remains the most heavily taxed in the entire region. Adding insult to injury, the citizens in return even do not get clean drinking, what to speak of free education, decent healthcare, affordable housing/transport and social protections like universal pension for all, out of taxes paid by the citizens. In federal tax collection by the FBR, there has been an overwhelming reliance on indirect taxation [even under the garb of direct income taxation through presumptive and minimum tax regimes through withholdings on a number of transactions having no nexus with income], without evaluating its impact on the economy and life of the less privileged sections of society. This flawed tax policy has been contributing towards the rich-poor divide as well expanding inequalities in income/wealth distribution. In the face of declining income tax contribution in GDP of less than 3 percent (after excluding indirect ones levied under Income Tax Ordinance, 2001), the finance minister of successive regimes — civil and military alike — and Revenuecracy have been making tall claims about 'impressive' (sic) increase in taxes before the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and elsewhere. The reality of this 'impressive' performance has been exposed in various columns by these scribes. However, the IMF and World Bank in the past kept mum, as they were party to portraying all-good 'projection saga' during the era the Uncle Sam needed Pakistan; first for dismemberment of the then USSR and later for imposing New World Order in the name of 'War on Terror' (sic). Back in 1995, the then Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif, claimed during a meeting, held in Washington on October 21, 2015, with that time Managing Director of IMF, Ms. Christine Lagarde, 'We have achieved the highest tax-to-GDP ratio and Pakistan's economy has been stabilising due to prudent policies of my government'. This claim was diametrically opposite to what was stated by the then Auditor General of Pakistan (AGP) in his report making 'astonishing disclosure' that the tax-to GDP ratio of FBR 'reached its lowest level on the conclusion of the World Bank funded Tax Administration Reform Project (TARP)'. It was strange that in the presence of report of AGP, our Prime Minister, his finance minister and other 'financial experts' were trying to convince the IMF that 'all is well'. Nawaz Sharif on assuming the power for the third time as prime minister gave unprecedented tax waivers and concessions to the non-filers and tax evaders—even then, his amnesty schemes miserably failed. It could only yield Rs. 1.3 billion! In these columns efforts have been made to explain reasons for the poor tax collection. However, the citizens for the last many decades rightly raise the question, 'Do you know how rulers play havoc with the taxpayers' money'? They insist that we must calculate cost to national exchequer in providing tax-free perquisites and benefits to indomitable militro-judicial-civil-complex and public office holders in the form of palatial residences, army of servants, expensive cars, golf courses, rest houses etc. They call on first ending this colossal wastage of funds and money spent on fruitless foreign tours, state banquets etc. and then debate the issue of low tax-to-GDP ratio. Although in these columns a detailed roadmap for reforming the existing tax system and raising taxes to the level of Rs 30 trillion is presented, the self-styled stalwarts and wizards sitting in Ministry of Finance (MoF) and FBR want 'advice' and 'assistance' from IMF and World Bank despite. Needless to say, they miserably failed in the past to reform tax system. The situation can aptly be described what great Urdu poet Mir Taqi Mir said in the following couplet: Mir kya sada hein beemar howe jis key sabab, usi attar key londey sey dawa letey hein (What a simple soul is Mir; he seeks cure from the healer's boy who is the cause of his ailment). It is tragic that in a country where billions of rupees are made in speculative transactions in real estate and shares, tax-to-GDP ratio has been pathetically low hovering around ten percent for over a decade. Those who matter in the land are least bothered to tax undocumented economy and counter benami transactions. The mighty sections of society are engaged in these transactions and FBR being their handmaid has no intention to tax them. The definition of the term, 'business' given in section 2(10) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, covers 'adventure in the nature of trade'. However, our tax machinery is sitting idle causing enormous loss to the national exchequer by not bringing adventures in the nature of trade (speculative transactions) in real estate and shares into tax ambit. The elected representatives (sic), in fact, clipped the power of FBR to tax speculative transactions in real estate as adventure in the nature of trade by including immoveable property in the definition of 'capital asset' through Finance Act, 2012 with effect from tax years 2013. Earlier, they have been giving undue tax exemptions on gains arising on speculative transactions in shares and stocks. Higher tax-to-GDP ratio in industrialised countries is primarily due to the higher level of revenue from social security, payroll taxes, corporate taxes and taxes on domestic consumption while taxes collected from international trade and non-tax revenue are lower. In contrast, in Pakistan the major portion of revenue comes from indirect taxes, particularly taxes on international trade and domestic consumption, while direct taxes have a pathetic share [4.3 percent of GDP in FY 2024 that included 50 percent pass through withholding taxes]. The extending of extraordinary tax-free benefits to the powerful classes, failure to tap actual tax potential, indulgence in wasteful expenditure and funding of inefficient public sector enterprises are continuously pushing the country to more and more expensive borrowings — both internal and external. The unrelenting huge fiscal deficit and rising quantum of debt are the major source of macro-economic imbalances over the last many years. Making the things worse, the growth-retarding tax policy is playing havoc with stagnant economy. Sole stress on oppressive indirect taxes is not only widening the rich-poor divide, but has also failed to enable Pakistan to reduce even revenue deficit—we are not mobilising enough to meet current expenditure. The question is: where does the fault lies? Even the World Bank-IMF funding and 'guidance' has failed to bring desired results. Who is responsible for the prevailing pathetic state of affairs? Our debt burden has increased monstrously, fiscal deficit is simply unmanageable, inflation is crushing the poor, taxes are evaded and avoided by the rich and whatsoever is collected is wasted by the rich and mighty. What a tragedy that the elites (ashrafiya) not only evade taxes but also thrive at taxpayers' expense. They are the de facto beneficiaries of all the State's resources—generated mainly by the suppressed land-less tillers and diligent industrial workers. Pakistan is not a poor country — the State's kitty is empty because of colossal wastage of taxpayers' money on unproductive expenses (perks and perquisites of ruling elites) and non-exploitation of vital natural resources as well unwillingness of the rich to pay income tax. The absentee landowners (they include mighty generals who have been allotted State lands under one pretext or the other during the last many decades) have been resisting proper personal taxation on their enormous income and wealth. An unholy anti-people trio of indomitable militro-judicial-civil complex, inefficient politicians and greedy businessmen—controlling and enjoying at least 90 percent the State resources—contribute below 1 percent towards national revenue collection but is beneficiary of 90 percent of available national resources. The existing exploitative, rotten, regressive, ill-directed and unfair tax system is rapidly widening the existing divide between the rich and the poor. The lack of political will to tax the rich and the mighty remains our dilemma — not scarcity of resources. Equity demands higher taxes from those who have higher income and wealth, but in Pakistan since the first martial law all fiscal policies have decreased tax burden on the rich and increased its incidence on the poor. Pakistan's tax-to-GDP ratio at FBR level alone can rise to 20 percent, if we bring 5 million ultra-rich into tax net, heavily tax speculative transactions in real estate (it will promote construction industry as prices of land will come down), tax all speculative deals at stock exchanges (it will induce genuine investment in companies, withdraw all tax-free perquisites given to militro-judicial-civil complex and public office holders and confiscate untaxed assts. The existing tax system is highly unjust. It protects the rich and mighty having monopoly over economic resources. The common people are paying an exorbitant sales tax of 18 percent (in fact 35-55 percent on finished imported goods after mandatory value addition and income tax at source) on essential commodities as well as Rs 80 per litre as petroleum and environment levies on petrol/diesel but the mighty sections of society such as big industrialists, landed classes, generals and bureaucrats are paying no wealth tax/income tax on their colossal assets/incomes. Our present tax revenue potential, if monstrous black economy is dealt with iron hand, is not less than Rs 30 trillion provided that the existing tax base is made wider and equitable, black economy is discouraged, tax machinery is completely overhauled and exemptions and concessions available to some privileged sections of society are withdrawn. However, this is not possible without simplification of the tax system [FBR, tax potential & enforcement—I, Business Recorder, March 5, 2021, and FBR, tax potential & enforcement—II, Business Recorder, March 7, 2021]. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
