logo
Francis Verreault-Paul elected to head the Assembly of First Nations Quebec-Labrador

Francis Verreault-Paul elected to head the Assembly of First Nations Quebec-Labrador

CBC26-02-2025

Francis Verreault-Paul from the Innu community of Mashteuiatsh has been elected to head the Assembly of First Nations Quebec-Labrador (AFNQL).
Verreault-Paul secured 21 votes in a single round of voting Tuesday in Quebec City. With 36 of the 43 community chiefs casting ballots, he received approximately 58 per cent of the vote. He needed more than half to win the election.
In second place, Constant Awashish from the Atikamekw community of Opitciwan received the support of 11 chiefs, followed by Cathy Martin from Listuguj and Monik Kistabish, who each garnered the support of two chiefs.
Verreault-Paul has served as Ghislain Picard's chief of staff for the past two years. Picard, a well-known figure who held the AFNQL leadership for 33 years, decided not to run for another term this year.
The election campaign officially launched on Feb. 11. Typically lasting two weeks, it mostly unfolds behind the scenes as only the 43 community chiefs can vote.
Four candidates were vying for the position, including Kistabish from the Algonquin reserve of Pikogan.
The vote comes after relations between Picard and the Quebec government grew tense. In recent years, Picard repeatedly called out the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) government for its strained relations with First Nations.
In a 2022 opinion piece in La Presse, he labelled the CAQ "the government of missed opportunities."
A year later, in a 2023 year-end interview, he doubled down, pointing to new political proposals from Quebec that he described as paternalistic.
And last month, in an open letter announcing his departure, he wrote that hardly a week goes by without his dealings with government authorities dragging him back to the hard-fought legal battles of the 1970s to defend Indigenous rights.
According to Neashish and Champoux, the law firm overseeing the election, each candidate had 15 minutes to present to the assembly, in line with AFNQL's electoral procedures.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A First Nations Power Authority Could Transform Electricity Generation for IndigenousNations
A First Nations Power Authority Could Transform Electricity Generation for IndigenousNations

Canada Standard

timean hour ago

  • Canada Standard

A First Nations Power Authority Could Transform Electricity Generation for IndigenousNations

First Nations across British Columbia have developed renewable electricity projects for decades. Yet they've experienced significant barriers to implementing, owning and managing their own electricity supply. That's because there have been few procurement policies in place that require their involvement. While municipalities are allowed to own and operate electricity utilities in B.C., First Nations are not [ pdf ], writes at team of experts and advocates at The Conversation. The Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) in B.C. requires that First Nations are provided with opportunities for economic development without discrimination. Many First Nations in B.C. view the development of renewable electricity projects on their lands-like hydro power, solar panels, wind turbines and transmission lines-as a way to achieve social, environmental and economic goals that are important to their community. These goals may include powering buildings in the community, creating economic development and local jobs, earning revenue, improving access to affordable and reliable electricity or using less diesel. Related: First Nations Power Authorities Could Show Path to Energy Justice The study shares the story of a coalition of First Nations and organizations that advocated for changes to electricity regulations and laws to give Indigenous communities more control to develop renewable electricity projects. Interviews with knowledge holders from 14 First Nations offer insight into motivations behind their calls for regulatory changes. The coalition includes the Clean Energy Association of B.C., New Relationship Trust, Pembina Institute, First Nations Power Authority, Nuu-Chah-Nulth Tribal Council, and the First Nations Clean Energy Working Group. View our latest digests Almost all electricity customers in B.C. are served by BC Hydro, the electric utility owned by the provincial government. The coalition argues that applying DRIPA to the electricity sector should allow First Nations to form a First Nations power authority. Such an organization would provide them with control over the development of electricity infrastructure that aligns with their values and would also help B.C. meet its greenhouse gas reduction targets. In the Re-Imagining Social Energy Transitions CoLaboratory (ReSET CoLab) at the University of Victoria, the team analyzed regulatory documents from the B.C. Utilities Commission, and advocacy documents and presentations for discussion developed by the coalition. Six proposed First Nations power authority (Indigenous Utility) models were identified: A capacity building point-of-contact model streamlines the development of renewable electricity projects to sell power to the provincial utility. For example, the First Nations Power Authority in Saskatchewan was formed for this purpose by SaskPower. This would be the most conformative model. It would provide vital networks and connections to First Nations while allowing BC Hydro and the British Columbia Utilities Commission to maintain full control over the electricity sector. In the second model, called a "put" contract, a B.C. First Nations Power Authority represents First Nations wishing to develop renewable electricity projects. Whenever the province needs to build new electricity generation projects to meet growing electricity demand, a portion of the new generation is developed by the First Nations authority. In the third model, First Nations build and operate electricity transmission and distribution lines to allow remote industrial facilities and communities to connect to the electricity grid. This is called "Industrial Interconnection." For example, the Wataynikaneyap Power Transmission line in Ontario is a 1,800-kilometre line that provides an electricity grid connection for 17 previously remote nations. Twenty-four First Nations own 51 per cent of the line, while private investors own 49 per cent. In the fourth model, the B.C. First Nation Power Authority acts as the designated body for various opportunities in the electricity sector, such as the development of electricity transmission, distribution, generation or customer services. This model is referred to as "local or regional 'ticket' opportunities." Fifth, the First Nation Power Authority develops renewable electricity projects and distributes electricity from these projects to customers as a retailer, or under an agreement through the BC Hydro electricity grid. For example, Nova Scotia Power's Green Choice program procures renewable electricity from independent power producers to supply to electricity customers. Sixth, new utility is formed in B.C., owned by First Nations, that owns and operates electricity generation, transmission and distribution services and offers standard customer services in a specific region of B.C. (called a "Regional Vertically-Integrated Power Authority"). Most of these models would require changes to regulations. The sixth and most transformative model would provide First Nations with full decision-making control over electricity generation, transmission and distribution. It would also give them the ability to sell to customers and require extensive changes in electricity regulation. First Nations knowledge-holders told us that a lack of reliable power, high electricity rates, lack of control over projects on their traditional lands and the need for resilience in the face of climate events were motivations for taking electricity planning into their own hands. They also expressed that varied factors motivate community interest in renewable energy: improving the quality of life for community members; financial independence; mitigating climate change; protecting the environment; reducing diesel use and providing stable and safe power for current and future generations. First Nations are already seeking to capitalize on the benefits of renewable energy by developing their own projects within the current regulatory system. Most of those we spoke to see a First Nations power authority in B.C. as a means to provide opportunities for economic development without discrimination - and to achieve self-determination, self-reliance and reconciliation by addressing the root causes of some of the colonial injustices they face by obtaining control over the electricity sector on their lands. This article , first published at The Conversation on June 4, was co-authored by David Benton, an adopted member and Clean Energy Project Lead of Gitga'at First Nation and Kayla Klym, a BSc student in Geography at the University of Victoria. Source: The Energy Mix

Letters: Why is Trump the felon allowed into Canada for G7 summit?
Letters: Why is Trump the felon allowed into Canada for G7 summit?

Montreal Gazette

time8 hours ago

  • Montreal Gazette

Letters: Why is Trump the felon allowed into Canada for G7 summit?

It seems impossible to observe next week's G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alta., without thinking of the mistreatment some Canadians and others have received at the hands of U.S. authorities. Consider the recent case of the Canadian woman jailed in Georgia in part for driving without a driver's licence though she held a valid Ontario licence. Or Trump's bellicose slanders against Latin Americans the U.S. deported to foreign lands in atrocious conditions without due process. Will Canadians receive U.S. President Donald Trump at the G7 with open arms or with elbows up? And why is Trump, a convicted felon, being allowed entry into Canada, which he is openly seeking to undermine? It is time to send a petition, signed by thousands, to the U.S. ambassador. It may well be that protests will occur in Alberta, but for those unable to make it, there must be other ways Canadians can express their discontent over the bully's arrival. Carl Hager, Gatineau CAQ ignores global realities Bill 84 smacks of de souche supremacy with Immigration Minister Jean-François Roberge's boast that Quebec's the new integration law relegates multiculturalism to the 'limbo of history.' The CAQ government seems determined to legislate against two immutable realities — that English is the lingua franca of the world and that multiculturalism is the way of the world. Instead of reckoning with these realities, Quebec is retreating into an ethnocentric enclave rather than facing a future framed by ever more global connectivity. It's as though Quebec has surrendered to its own self-absorption at the expense of a more expansive trajectory for la belle province. George McArthur, Montreal Garneau set lofty example Thank you to Peter F. Trent for a beautiful tribute to an exceptionally wonderful man. Marc Garneau was truly everything that is wonderful in a human being and exemplified all that is best in a Canadian. His passing leaves those who had the good fortune to meet him with much sadness, but also with the hope that others will be inspired to follow his path, particularly with his ease in French and English. One does not need one parent from each background, as he had. We need a proper education system with wonderful teachers throughout Canada who ensure everyone is perfectly fluent in French and English. Learning languages is easier at an early age — and at any age, is good for the mind and makes life more interesting and enjoyable. A truly bilingual Canada is a wonderful base for the many cultures that add to our mosaic. Where there is a will, there is a way, and it is more important than ever when we want to present a strong, united Canada forever. Sandra Sterling, Snowdon Submitting a letter to the editor Letters should be sent by email to letters@ We prioritize letters that respond to, or are inspired by, articles published by The Gazette. If you are responding to a specific article, let us know which one. Letters should be sent uniquely to us. The shorter they are — ideally, fewer than 200 words — the greater the chance of publication. Timing, clarity, factual accuracy and tone are all important, as is whether the writer has something new to add to the conversation. We reserve the right to edit and condense all letters. Care is taken to preserve the core of the writer's argument. Our policy is not to publish anonymous letters, those with pseudonyms or 'open letters' addressed to third parties. Letters are published with the author's full name and city or neighbourhood/borough of residence. Include a phone number and address to help verify identity; these will not be published. We will not indicate to you whether your letter will be published. If it has not been published within 10 days or so, it is not likely to be.

Two communities seeking better roads in Ring of Fire, reject new mining law
Two communities seeking better roads in Ring of Fire, reject new mining law

National Observer

time9 hours ago

  • National Observer

Two communities seeking better roads in Ring of Fire, reject new mining law

Two First Nations that signed deals with the provincial government to improve access to the Ring of Fire are speaking out against a new Ontario law that seeks to ease mineral extraction in the northern region. Aroland First Nation Chief Sonny Gagnon said his community objects to the law known as Bill 5, which seeks to speed up development in the face of pressure from the United States. The legislation passed last week and allows Ontario to suspend provincial and municipal laws by creating so-called special economic zones for certain projects it chooses, such as new mines. "We do not stand with Ontario in support of Bill 5," Gagnon said in a statement. "We do stand in support of the other First Nations in Ontario who are opposed to Bill 5 and working to have it thrown out." Ontario intends to name the mineral-rich Ring of Fire as the first such zone, but the law has created a firestorm of anger among many First Nations. They say they want to be involved in development, but that the new law violates their treaty rights and ignores their concerns. Aroland signed a shared-prosperity agreement with the province in January for major upgrades to roads that lead to the proposed roads to the Ring of Fire, a 5,000-sq-km region about 450 kilometres north of Thunder Bay, Ont. Two First Nations that signed deals with the provincial government to improve access to the Ring of Fire are speaking out against a new Ontario law that seeks to ease mineral extraction in the northern region. Aroland sits outside the Ring of Fire region with access to the provincial highway system that ends near its territory. Premier Doug Ford has trotted out Gagnon's name at least five times in recent weeks in defense of Bill 5. Ford also often points to Marten Falls First Nation and Webequie First Nation, which are the lead proponents for three roads that will connect their remote communities to the provincial highway system. One of them would connect the Eagle's Nest site in the Ring of Fire, a proposed mine owned by Australian mining giant Wyloo, to the other two roads. "There's going to be a group that doesn't want anything done," Ford said last week. "Well, good, don't do it then. There's going to be another group in the middle that says, 'Boy, let's see what happens.' And then there's the progressive group that's saying, 'Let's get it done,' like Chief Sonny from Aroland — and Webequie and Marten Falls." Gagnon said Aroland has never consented to mining the Ring of Fire. Rather, part of the agreement was designed to give road access to its neighbouring First Nation, Marten Falls. Marten Falls and Webequie First Nation are fly-in communities that have a month or so of winter road access. "Aroland has never said Marten Falls cannot build a road so that it is no longer remote; if they want to have road access to the highway system like we do, they should be able to," Gagnon said. "But that has to be done right – with proper assessment and protection measures and Aroland involvement and consent. The agreement with Ontario is about that, and some necessary electrical power to our community. We were to get funding to support that initiative and so far we have received nothing and instead have spent our own dollars trying to ensure our community has basic services.' Aroland does not consent to that road being used for mining companies, he added. "We have consistently in writing indicated that no such decision on what happens to the Ring of Fire should be made until the regional assessment being conducted now and being co-led by many First Nations, including Aroland, is complete, and indicates that mining in this sensitive and vulnerable peatlands region is safe for humanity, for us, for wildlife, climate and water," Gagnon said. "We don't yet know that. More important – Ontario does not yet know that." Ford took issue with Gagnon's comments. "Does he want the $200 million electricity deal that we handed over to him? Does he want to get off diesel because they live on diesel? Does he want a road that they can actually leave their community and drive? Does he want a community centre? Does he want a hockey arena inside that community centre? The answer is 1,000 per cent yes," Ford said Monday at Intersect/25, an event hosted by The Globe and Mail. Ford said he will be speaking to Gagnon shortly. "Mark my words in this room, he will be moving forward with us, not because of me, not because of pressuring me, because he's a smart man, and he understands his community needs to prosper," Ford said. Marten Falls First Nation also has an agreement with the province on roads, and its chief says he cannot support the law as it is written — though he hopes Ontario can correct course with consultation. Chief Bruce Achneepineskum said he is feeling conflicted. "I'm not OK with this bill," he told The Canadian Press in an interview. On the one hand, he and his community want road access built so they do not have to rely on winter roads. Last year, the frozen road only lasted a month as the winter road season keeps shrinking, he said. Marten Falls also wants to be in the driver's seat for any development in its territory, Achneepineskum said. "Our intent is to take the lead on development in our area and with that we're still in discussions with government on how to move forward," he said. "We don't agree with everything that government says and does. So we're taking it on an approach that's based on a negotiation." Marten Falls First Nation has been working on environmental assessments for the roads. One of the assessments has been in development for going on six years, though about half that time was lost due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Achneepineskum said. "Sometimes, you think to yourself, that is a really long time," he said. Ford, Indigenous Affairs Minister Greg Rickford and Energy and Mines Minister Stephen Lecce have said the province will consult First Nations on the new law throughout the summer. Achneepineskum said he is willing to listen to the province and give them time to get Bill 5 right, but, like many other First Nations have said, he wanted the province to consult with them on the language in the legislation rather than starting those conversations after it is already law. "I have to support Aboriginal and treaty rights that other First Nations are talking about because, in principle, that's what we're fighting for also: to have our rights and interests in our traditional area — and that includes the Ring of Fire — recognized," Achneepineskum said. Webequie's chief was not available to talk, as he continues to deal with a wildfire that has forced the evacuation of his entire community to southern Ontario.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store