CPI Thrissur district meet concludes; K.G. Sivanandan new district secretary
A 57-member district council and 50 representatives to the upcoming CPI State conference were also elected during the meet.
The district conference has passed a resolution demanding the reinstatement of the Planning Commission, an institution once crucial to country's balanced development planning, and urged the Centre to uphold its constitutional responsibilities in maintaining healthy Union-State relations.
Centre-State relations
The resolution alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led administration is deliberately weakening the Centre-State relations and centralising power as part of a larger Sangh Parivar agenda. The discontinuation of the Planning Commission, a body that once played a key advisory role in strategising national development and welfare programmes, was described as a politically motivated move, especially targeted at States where the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has little political footing.
By replacing the Commission with NITI Aayog and simultaneously denying financial aid to States like Kerala, the Centre is allegedly crippling progressive development models, the party stated.
Despite being consistently ranked at the top in indicators like health, education, and social welfare, even in the NITI Aayog's own reports, Kerala is being financially squeezed by the Centre, the resolution claimed. The CPI pointed out that the State has witnessed a shortfall of ₹2,942.29 crore in Central revenue share between 2023 and January 2025 . The 15th Finance Commission's recommendations are being ignored and the ₹12,000 crore annual GST compensation Kerala was entitled to has been discontinued, the conference said.
Cultural complex
The meet demanded a cultural heritage complex in Thrissur. The resolution pointed out that Thrissur has, for more than half a century, been home to the State's most prestigious official cultural institutions, including the Kerala Sahitya Akademi, Kerala Sangeetha Nataka Akademi, and Lalithakala Akademi, Kerala Kalamandalam and Unnayi Warrier Smaraka Kalanilayam.
The district's contribution extends beyond the arts. It is etched into the social and political fabric of modern Kerala through landmark struggles like the Guruvayur Satyagraha, the Kuttan Kulam protest for social justice, the Veloor Manimalarkavu women's liberation movement, the Pariyaram farmers' agitation, and labour movements in Anthikad and Amballur.
Thrissur was also the land of action of visionary leaders like E.M.S. Namboodiripad and C. Achutha Menon. In light of this profound cultural, literary, artistic, political, and social heritage, the CPI district conference has urged the Kerala government to establish a comprehensive cultural heritage complex here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
Clean mobility crossroads: Why states side with EVs over hybrids
India's push for clean mobility is hitting a fork in the road, as states increasingly diverge from the Centre's approach to supporting all types of clean vehicles. The growing divide, evident in automobile policies in various states, has also set the stage for intense lobbying, as rivals vie for policy support. At the central level, the view is to treat electric and hybrids equally when it comes to incentives. But states are having different thoughts. Key states like Maharashtra, Karnataka and Madhya Pradesh have decided to reserve incentives for battery EVs (BEVs) in their automobile policies for 2025, a Mint review found. Chhattisgarh recently tweaked a 2022 policy to explicitly remove incentives for hybrids. While Uttarakhand and Delhi had toyed with incentives for hybrids in their draft policies, the former is now reconsidering its position, a person aware of the matter said. State choice 'In Para 3 of the said rule, the phrase 'Hybrid electric vehicles will be eligible to receive 50% of the purchase incentive amount given to a fully electric vehicle' should be replaced with 'No subsidy will be given to any type of hybrid vehicles'," Chhattisgarh government said on 29 May. Union ministers have backed equal treatment for both EVs and hybrids. "Under the FAME-II Scheme, EV and hybrid versions of electric four-wheelers were allowed for incentivization. Similarly, in the case of the PM E-Drive scheme, a hybrid version of e-ambulances, that is, electric plug-in hybrid & strong hybrid, shall be incentivized," Union heavy industries minister H.D. Kumaraswamy said in a June 6 interview. Union road minister Nitin Gadkari too has backed both hybrid and ethanol-powered cars. While EV makers demand incentives should be reserved for zero-tailpipe emission vehicles, hybrid makers say their vehicles are far more fuel-efficient than conventional ICE vehicles, and that they serve as a bridge to a cleaner future. Few takers According to analysts at HSBC Global Research, at the end of 2024, only five states and union territories had incentivized sales of hybrid vehicles, which included Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan, Chandigarh and Chhattisgarh. With the withdrawal of hybrid incentives in Chhattisgarh, the number has reduced to four. Incentives by Delhi and Uttarakhand haven't been implemented yet, with final EV policy notification expected in months ahead. With states charting their own course to clean mobility through targeted policies, the hybrid lobby led by Maruti Suzuki has locked horns with the EV lobby led by Tata Motors and Mahindra and Mahindra. 'We believe that government incentives should be directed toward technologies that require support to bridge a funding gap and accelerate innovation. Incentives are most effective when they help emerging technologies reach scale and maturity—particularly those that contribute meaningfully to long-term sustainability goals," a Tata Motors spokesperson said in response to queries on policy stance of state governments. Bridge to future Maruti Suzuki argues that promoting hybrids can reduce pure diesel and petrol vehicle sales, leading to an overall reduction in pollution. Rahul Bharti, senior executive officer, corporate affairs at Maruti Suzuki, said, "EV penetration in India is still around 3%. While all efforts should be made to maximize this, it still leaves 97% unaddressed. If we have to achieve the national objectives of decarbonization and oil import reduction, this 97% cannot be ignored. A technology like Strong Hybrid reduces CO₂ emission by 26-32% and improves fuel efficiency by 35-44% over pure petrol/diesel. However, it has a viability gap which needs to be addressed, as many countries of the world and many Indian states are already doing by incentivizing hybrids." The reluctance among states to include incentives for hybrid vehicles comes at a time when the automobile industry is locked in a sharp contest over a provision in Delhi's EV policy. Mint reported on 30 May that top automakers including Tata Motors, Mahindra and Mahindra and Hyundai Motor India Ltd had approached the heavy industries ministry and federal thinktank Niti Aayog after the Delhi government proposed to include incentives for hybrid vehicles on par with EVs in its upcoming EV policy. Tata Motors, MG Motor India, Mahindra and Mahindra and Hyundai Motor India are India's leading EV manufacturers. Maruti Suzuki, Toyota India and Honda Cars India are the only companies offering hybrids. Policy dilemma 'In India, the broader policy consensus so far has been not to incentivize hybrids, with most benefits reserved only for BEVs," said Nikhil Dhaka, vice-president at consultancy firm Primus Partners. As companies slug it out, independent experts are also split on whether or not to incentivize hybrid vehicles. '(Not incentivizing hybrids) could be a missed opportunity, especially since our EV infrastructure is still developing. Only a few states like Delhi and Uttarakhand have taken steps to support strong and plug-in hybrids by offering some incentives," Dhaka of Primus Partners said, adding hybrids can reduce fuel use and emissions right away, making them a useful option while India builds a stronger EV ecosystem. Sharif Qamar, associate director of transport and urban governance at The Energy and Resources Institute (Teri), differed. 'The objective of the EV policy is to cut down emissions of vehicles and also contribute to improving the air quality," he said. 'When it comes to the emission reduction objective, currently, only zero-tailpipe emission vehicles need to be prioritized. Incentives should be crafted to encourage players to move towards zero emission vehicles." Meanwhile, both hybrids and EVs have gained traction in India. In FY25, 107,000 electric cars and 83,000 hybrid vehicles were sold, both growing 18% each.
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Delhi Air Foulest Among Serial Offenders
New Delhi: Delhi remains the most polluted among the 130 non-attainment cities (those that have consistently failed to meet air quality standards) in the National Clean Air Programme (NCAP), despite a 15% improvement in PM10 levels over seven years. The city also utilised only 22.5% of the funds released to combat air quality under NCAP and 15th Finance Commission. The Union environment ministry provided this information while replying to questions asked by two members of the Lok Sabha. The ministry's reply said that the annual average PM10 level in Delhi had dropped from 241 micrograms per cubic metre in 2017-18 to 203 micrograms per cubic metre in 2024-25. This is still the highest in the country, second only to Patna, which recorded 167 micrograms per cubic metre. The national standard for annual average PM10 concentration is 60 micrograms per cubic metre. PM10 pollutants the coarser aerosols that penetrate deep into the lungs and sources may vary from transport and dust to industrial emissions and burning. The reply, however, dubbed the improvement "notable". In four of the major non-attainment cities, Delhi did better than Chennai (12% improvement), even if it had a PM10 concentration of a mere 58 units. "As per recent data, there has been notable improvement in PM10 levels in major Indian cities. Mumbai has shown improvement in PM10 levels with a 44% reduction in 2024-25 compared with 2017-18, followed by Kolkata (37%) and Delhi (15%)," stated the ministry reply. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi The reply also stated that Rs 62 crore was sanctioned for action under NCAP and the 15th Finance Commission in 2019-20. Of this, just Rs 13.9 crore has been utilised to date. The reply listed measures taken to control pollution in Delhi, including the use of cleaner fuel and formulation of Graded Response Action Plan. "To address vehicular emissions, govt has taken proactive measures such as the introduction of BSVI fuel norms for vehicles from April 1, 2018, in Delhi and from April 1, 2020, for the rest of the country, introduction of a vehicle scrapping policy and the promotion of electric vehicles and charging infrastructure through various central schemes," the reply stated. It added that the Commission for Air Quality Management also directed Delhi govt to migrate public transport services, especially buses in NCR, to cleaner modes and ordered other anti-pollution measures, like getting brick kilns to adopt zig-zag technology, banning pet coke and furnace oil as industrial fuel, use of piped natural gas for industries and installation of anti-smog guns and dust control measures in the city. Launched in Jan 2019, NCAP aims to reduce PM10 concentrations by 20-30% by 2024, 2017 being the base year. It was later extended to 2026 with a revised target of a 40% reduction against the 2017 level.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Karnataka government begins ‘Know GST' campaign to address small traders' UPI concerns
Bengaluru: Facing backlash from unregistered traders over Goods & Services Tax (GST) enforcement based on Unified Payments Interface (UPI) transactions, Karnataka govt has launched a statewide outreach programme to create awareness about GST. The commercial taxes department began the campaign — titled Know GST — with the first workshop held in Koramangala Monday. GST rules mandate that traders should register if their annual turnover exceeds Rs 40 lakh for goods or Rs 20 lakh for services. Earlier this month, the commercial taxes department tracked around 14,000 traders using UPI data and found that many had accepted payments beyond these thresholds. Notices were sent, triggering panic, as traders were allegedly asked to pay tax arrears from 2021-22 onwards, with some cases reaching close to Rs 40 lakh. Many traders stopped accepting QR payments, switching to cash, which affected digital transactions in the city. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru Unregistered traders have formed a forum under Karnataka Karmika Parishat (KKP) and called for a strike on July 23 and 24. They have also planned a complete shop shutdown on July 25, threatening to stop selling essential goods such as milk. "Most traders who received notices are owners of bakeries and condiment stores. UPI transactions include personal payments too, so they don't reflect business exactly. The commercial taxes department was in a slumber since GST rolled out in 2017 and has suddenly woken up to claim arrears. The move is arbitrary and illegal," KKP president Ravi Shetty Byndur said. CM's assurance Chief minister Siddaramaiah, who holds the finance portfolio, has assured traders he will take up the issue with the Centre at the next GST council meeting. He has also asked the department to address traders' concerns, prompting the Know GST campaign. "The objective is just to get eligible traders registered. Misinformation is being spread by people with vested interests. The notices we served aren't tax demands — we haven't assessed the tax yet. We are only asking traders to submit transaction details," said commercial taxes commissioner Vipul Bansal. Byndur, however, dismissed this claim and said they have received tax demands. The department has set up a helpline (1800 425 6300) to let traders report harassment or bribery. Workshops will soon be expanded across the state. According to Byndur, however, officials have threatened traders with penalties for non-compliance since 2021-22. He accused the department of trying to divide traders by launching the campaign after the strike call. Larger trade bodies such as the Federation of Karnataka Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FKCCI) have backed the agitators. "It's unfair to demand tax suddenly from small traders without educating them. FKCCI will stand by the traders," its president MG Balakrishna said. Dept clarifies, but traders unsatisfied Several small traders Monday expressed dissatisfaction with the clarification issued by the commercial taxes department, saying it failed to address their concerns over the recent GST filing notices. More than 70 traders attended the session organised by the department and argued that the enforcement would hurt their margins and increase the burden on small businesses. Traders said the official explanation lacked clarity and didn't offer any assurance of relief or exemption for smaller players. At the session, addressed by Meera Suresh Pandit, joint commissioner, commercial taxes (administration), several vendors raised questions. The officials responded by saying they were only implementing central rules that have existed since 2017. Here are some key issues raised: Business is already in losses A trader who has been supplying goods to smaller shops for 25 years said: "Because of too much competition and high prices, business is already low. We're barely making profits. Why the new taxation? It will only hurt traders more." Pandit responded: "This isn't something we implemented. It is part of the GST rules from 2017. After UPI transactions increased, the govt asked us to implement them. The buyer will be paying you taxes for the goods for which you will be paying us. States like Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu have already enforced this." Too much for small traders A kirana store owner from central Bengaluru asked: "Don't you think the taxes are too much for a small trader? Why can't you relax the rules to Rs 1 crore for goods and Rs 50 lakh for services?" The official replied: "We sent the representations as communication, not final notices. If traders think the rates are high, they can submit a representation to the govt through associations like FKCCI. A decision will be taken by the higher authorities." My income is Rs 11L, why did i get a notice? A 40-year-old small shop owner said: "I sell cool drinks and cigarettes. My yearly income is Rs 11.7 lakh, but I still received a notice asking me to pay GST." The official responded: "If your income is below the tax slab, you can step into the office help desk with your receipts and income proof. We can withdraw the certificate if it is found that you are not liable."
