logo
Air Force tests unarmed nuclear missile in pre-dawn video

Air Force tests unarmed nuclear missile in pre-dawn video

Yahoo19-02-2025

The Air Force conducted a test launch of an unarmed Minuteman III missile early Wednesday to help ensure its land-based nuclear force still operates safely and effectively.
Airmen from Air Force Global Strike Command launched the intercontinental ballistic missile from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California at 1 a.m. Pacific Standard Time, the department said. The Minuteman missile carried no nuclear payload but was instead equipped with a test re-entry vehicle that was designed to transmit readings.
The missile flew about 4,200 miles at speeds of more than 15,000 mph to the Ronald Reagan Ballistic Missile Defense Test Site at the Marshal Islands' Kwajalein Atoll. Personnel at the test site, which is run by Army Space and Missile Defense Command, collected radar, optical and telemetry data as the missile closed in, to measure how well it worked.
'Today's Minuteman III test launch is just one of the ways the Department of the Air Force demonstrates the readiness, precision, and professionalism of U.S. nuclear forces,' acting Air Force Secretary Gary Ashworth said. 'It also provides confidence in the lethality and effectiveness of the nation's nuclear deterrence mission.'
The Air Force's arsenal of roughly 400 Minuteman III ICBMs is a crucial component of the nation's nuclear triad, along with bombers and submarines that can also carry and deploy nuclear weapons.
The Minuteman III system is more than 50 years old and rapidly approaching the end of its life. The Air Force and Northrop Grumman are working on a replacement for the Minuteman III, the LGM-35A Sentinel, which is intended to start being deployed in the 2030s.
But the ground-based systems for Sentinel — particularly its control infrastructure — proved to be more complicated than the Pentagon originally expected, and anticipated future costs ballooned. This set off alarm bells in the Pentagon and Congress in early 2024, and the program went under an intensive review.
The military ultimately decided last summer Sentinel was too crucial to cancel, and that the Air Force must continue developing it to replace the Minuteman III. But the Pentagon ordered the Air Force to restructure the program and bring those anticipated costs down.
The restructuring of Sentinel will likely delay it several years, Pentagon officials said in 2024, which means the Air Force must continue relying on Minuteman III longer than expected. Andrew Hunter, the Air Force's then-acquisition chief, said in July 2024 the Air Force will 'do what it takes to sustain Minuteman III to meet these warfighter requirements in the interim,' before Sentinel is ready.
Col. Dustin Harmon, commander of the 377th Test and Evaluation Group at Vandenberg that oversaw the test launch, said the data collected from the test 'is crucial for maintaining Minuteman III while we pave the way for Sentinel.'
Air Force going 'line by line' to bring down nuclear missile costs
'During this test, we collected and analyzed performance and other key data points to evaluate current missile system competencies,' Harmon said. 'This allows our team to analyze and report accuracy and reliability for the current system while validating projected missile system improvements.'
This test was in the works for months, the Air Force said, and is the latest in a series of more than 300 other such test launches that the department regularly conducts.
Vandenberg's Western Range is the main testing ground for Global Strike's ICBMs. In a video the Air Force released shortly after the test, a silo cover at Vandenberg can be seen sliding open before the test Minuteman launches in a burst of fire and roars into the pre-dawn sky.
The missile was randomly selected from the Air Force's arsenal at F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming. Airmen transported the missile more than 13,000 miles to Vandenberg and reassembled it there for the test.
Other Minuteman III missiles are based in Colorado, Montana, Nebraska and North Dakota, spread out across nearly 32,000 miles.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Air Force: Starship to cause few environmental impacts at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station
Air Force: Starship to cause few environmental impacts at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Air Force: Starship to cause few environmental impacts at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station

Would launching up to 76 massive SpaceX Starship rockets atop Super Heavy boosters per year — accompanied by up to 152 sonic-boom-producing landings — generate few significant environmental impacts from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station's Launch Complex 37? That's what a newly released Air Force draft environmental impact statement determined. However, Charlie Venuto, past president of the Merritt Island Wildlife Association, worries how Starship's thunderous noise and vibrations will affect ecologically threatened Southeastern beach mice and nesting sea turtles — along with air and water quality — across the nonprofit's namesake 140,000-acre national wildlife refuge and Canaveral National Seashore. The draft EIS acknowledged that Starship-Super Heavy launches and sonic booms from Launch Complex 37 would constitute a "community annoyance" for areas like Cape Canaveral, Titusville and Cocoa Beach. And in a move cheered by MIWA officials, the study eliminated from further analysis the thought of building new Starship launch complexes at two greenspace areas at the Cape, citing high potential of endangered species and archaeological sites. Cape Canaveral: Is there a launch today? Upcoming SpaceX, Axiom, ULA rocket launch schedule at Cape Canaveral "The refuge has more endangered and threatened species than any other refuge in the continental U.S. So you know, we have an obligation. I know, working on shuttle, that was always a major concern," Venuto said. He was manager of environmental safety for USBI, NASA's prime contractor for shuttle solid rocket boosters. "We wanted to maintain that balance between technology and nature. And it seemed like we did a pretty good job of that," Venuto said. SpaceX seeks regulatory permissions to start launching Starship rockets from Launch Complex 37 at the Space Force installation and pad 39A at NASA's neighboring Kennedy Space Center. The enormous economic undertaking will generate at least $1.8 billion of capital investment and generated about 600 new full-time jobs by 2030, Gov. Ron Desantis' office announced. The Air Force's 176-page draft environmental impact statement analyzed potential environmental, social, economic, historic and cultural ramifications from redeveloping about 230 acres of Launch Complex 37 to support Starship-Super Heavy operations starting next year, including launches and booster landings. United Launch Alliance previously used LC-37 to send up hulking triple-core Delta IV Heavy rockets. The last Delta IV Heavy launched in April 2024. Starship infrastructure includes two concrete launch pads, launch mounts, twin 600-foot integration towers, twin 225-foot-diameter landing pads, and landing catch towers. In addition to up to 76 annual Starship launches, the draft EIS examined 76 yearly Starship static-fire tests, 76 Super Heavy static-fire tests, 76 Super Heavy landings and 76 Starship landings. The draft EIS said Starship would have no significant impact on wildlife from LC-37, though "some federally protected species would be exposed to light, vehicle traffic, noise (including sonic boom overpressures), vibration, and heat during launch operations." What's more, the study determined Starship operations would not have significant impact on air quality, the maritime transportation system, hearing damage, structural damages, groundwater or surface waters. The Air Force draft EIS eliminated consideration of building a new Launch Complex 50 for Starship operations from greenspace at the northern portion of Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. This is "an area with high potential for endangered species and archaeological sites," the study said. Also eliminated was the potential, unbuilt 175-acre Launch Complex 49 near KSC's northern border, in proximity to Playalinda Beach. This land is part of the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge and managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. During a FLORIDA TODAY interview, Venuto and MIWA President Nancy Bray praised those moves. "The good news we were glad to hear was that they were going to repurpose these facilities," Venuto said of LC-37. "We felt that was impressive. That was good thought: Use the infrastructure that you have, and build on that. So we applauded that." Bray logged a 34-year NASA career, serving as KSC's director of spaceport integration and services. SpaceX is also developing a Starship-Super Heavy site there at pad 39A, pending environmental approval and issuance of a Federal Aviation Administration vehicle operator license. The goal: Conduct up to 44 annual launches and 88 landings from KSC. In a June 2024 letter to the FAA, the MIWA — which boasts roughly 2,500 paid members and interested "constituents" — expressed holistic concerns about Starship-Super Heavy in light of cumulative rocket-launch impacts across the Cape. That includes Blue Origin's heavy-lift New Glenn rockets, the second of which could launch as soon as Aug. 15. Plus, SpaceX seeks permission to boost Falcon rocket launches from 50 to up to 120 from Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. "The SpaceX facility on Roberts Rd. continues to expand and there are many build projects at the KSC Visitors Center. There are several other construction projects planned for KSC and CCSFS," the letter said. "The cumulative affects to water quality, air quality (including damage to the stratospheric ozone layer), habitat destruction, ability to practice conservation management techniques such as controlled burns, and increased carbon emissions need to be examined in total," the letter said. Bray and Venuto said they will monitor the Starship environmental permitting process during the coming months. Now, officials are collecting public comments on the Air Force draft EIS for the Launch Complex 37 proposal. Officials will conduct three Brevard County public hearings to present information, answer questions and collect comments. Hours are 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., with formal presentations starting at 5:30 p.m. July 8 in Titusville: American Police Hall of Fame and Museum, 6350 Horizon Drive. July 9 in Cape Canaveral: Radisson Resort at the Port, 8701 Astronaut Blvd. July 10 in Cocoa: Dr. Joe Lee Smith Recreation Center, 415 Stone St. In addition, a virtual meeting will be available from July 15 to 28 at Public comments can be submitted through July 28 at and by emailing contactus@ with the subject line 'SpaceForceStarshipEIS.' Or, mail comments to CCSFS Starship EIS, 5401 W. Kennedy Blvd. #300, Tampa FL 33609. Starship operations would have a beneficial impact on Brevard County's economy, decreasing unemployment and likely increasing the median income in the area, the draft EIS said. "Up to 450 additional full-time employees or contractors would be needed to support launch activities 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, throughout the year," the study said of LC-37 operations. In addition, Starship launches from the Space Force station would "increase the space launch mission capability of the (Department of Defense), NASA, and other federal and commercial customers and enhance the resilience and capacity of the nation's space launch infrastructure, while promoting a robust and competitive national space industry," the study said. Noise represented the study's lone known potential significant cumulative effect — which it labeled a "community annoyance" for areas like Cape Canaveral, Titusville and Cocoa Beach. To mitigate noise, SpaceX would: Employ sound suppression systems, such as water deluge and flame diverters. Work with Space Launch Delta 45 to notify the community of noise and sonic boom events. Structural damage claims would be investigated, with claimants compensated according to FAA regulations, the Commercial Space Launch Act and Air Force policy. On that topic, the Cape Canaveral City Council is partnering with the Florida Institute of Technology on an upcoming $10,019 rocket launch impact study. Researchers will install sensor suites this summer at buildings across the beachside city to collect data on decibel levels, vibrations and air quality before, during and after all launches from the Cape. Starship-Super Heavy's noise, vibrations and sonic booms will likely adversely affect Southeastern beach mice and Florida scrub-jays, per the draft EIS. SpaceX would develop monitoring plans in coordination with Space Launch Delta 45 and USFWS to better understand noise and overpressure impacts on these threatened species. "Southeastern beach mouse habitat permanently lost during construction would be mitigated by providing funding to offset the loss of habitat at an offsite location in accordance with an agreement with the USFWS. This mitigation would also benefit Florida scrub-jay habitat," the draft EIS said. Similarly, SpaceX would submit a lighting management plan to minimize effects on sea turtle nesting and hatchlings. For the latest news from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and NASA's Kennedy Space Center, visit Another easy way: Click here to sign up for our weekly Space newsletter. Rick Neale is a Space Reporter at FLORIDA TODAY. Contact Neale at Rneale@ Twitter/X: @RickNeale1 Space is important to us and that's why we're working to bring you top coverage of the industry and Florida launches. Journalism like this takes time and resources. Please support it with a subscription here. This article originally appeared on Florida Today: Merritt Island refuge backers concerned about Starship wildlife impacts

Suit filed over lack of transparency on rocket testing plans at Johnton Atoll
Suit filed over lack of transparency on rocket testing plans at Johnton Atoll

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Suit filed over lack of transparency on rocket testing plans at Johnton Atoll

The Center for Biological Diversity has filed suit against U.S. government agencies for failing to release public records on plans to land rockets at Johnston Atoll National Wildlife Refuge. More specifically, the national nonprofit filed a complaint in U.S. District Court in Hawaii over the failures of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Department of the Air Force to comply with Freedom of Information Act requests. Those FOIA requests were filed April 7, but neither agency complied within 30 business days as required, the suit says. The Air Force announced plans months ago to build two landing pads at Johnston, a U.S. incorporated territory about 800 miles southwest of Honolulu, for the project. The atoll, a seabird refuge, is within the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument, and the plan has sparked concern among numerous conservation groups over the potential destruction to its ecology. While not formally announced, Elon Musk's SpaceX Starship is being considered for the project. 'Landing massive rockets in one of the most isolated and valuable habitats for seabirds would be as destructive and irresponsible as it sounds, ' said Maxx Phillips, the center's Hawaii and Pacific Islands director, in a statement. 'That's exactly why the military and SpaceX are trying to keep this project's details hidden from the public. This project threatens to destroy a site that millions of seabirds need for nesting and overwintering, all in the name of military logistics and Elon Musk's profit.' In March, the U.S. Air Force issued a notice of intent to build and operate two landing pads at Johnston for up to 10 reentry vehicle landings per year over four consecutive years. A draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI ) were initially expected to be available for public review in early April, but has been delayed to an unknown date. The Center for Biological Diversity said it requested certain documents pertaining to the proposed construction at Johnston Atoll due to the likelihood of substantial environmental impacts on essential fish habitat, migratory birds, and other protected species. 'The Johnston Atoll and the surrounding Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument protect vital nesting habitat for seabirds, shallow coral reefs, and marine habitat, ' said the Center in its suit. 'Roughly a million seabirds use the Johnston Atoll for feeding, nesting, and resting, and it is home to a variety of wildlife throughout the year.' These include bird species such as red-tailed tropicbirds, red-footed boobies and great frigatebirds, and endangered species such as green sea turtles and Hawaiian monk seals, which are known to be present at times in the waters and on the island. The USFWS declined to comment due to ongoing litigation. The Air Force said the EA and FONSI would be out later this year, with no specific date. Phillips said the FOIA suit is part of an effort to gain more transparency from the agencies on their plans. The FOIA process has strict timelines and clear procedures in place. 'We filed the lawsuit because the USFWS and Air Force are unlawfully holding public records related to—from our standpoint—a deeply concerning proposal to operate rocket landing pads at Johnston, ' Phillips said. 'The public deserves to know when and how the government is putting fragile ecosystems at risk, especially for places like Johnston Atoll that have no permanent residents to speak for them.' One concern includes the impacts of the loud noise from rockets on sensitive species such as Hawaiian monk seals. The Center said the thriving seabird population at Johnston today is only possible after a decade of efforts by the USFWS to eradicate invasive yellow crazy ants, which wreaked havoc on birds, causing blindness, injury and death. Johnston, known as Kalama to Hawaiians, was used by the military in earlier decades to launch nuclear weapons tests, as well as for the storage of the defoliant Agent Orange and destruction of chemical weapons. The yellow crazy ants ended up at Johnston as a result of earlier human activity, but since the military pulled out 20 years ago, the atoll is now recovering. 'This isn't just about rocket testing, ' Phillips said. 'It's about protecting endangered species, honoring conservation efforts already paid for by taxpayers, and defending our shared natural heritage. If we don't demand accountability now, we risk losing one of the Pacific's last wildlife sanctuaries.' The U.S. Air Force project is part of a 'rocket cargo vanguard ' program exploring the use of commercial rockets for rapid, global military cargo delivery. The use of rocket cargo could 'fundamentally alter the rapid logistics landscape, connecting materiel to joint warfighters in a fraction of the time it takes today, ' said Chief of Space Operations Gen. John W. 'Jay ' Raymond in an earlier news release about the program. 'In the event of conflict or humanitarian crisis, the Space Force will be able to provide our national leadership with an independent option to achieve strategic objectives from space, ' Raymond said. But conservation groups have been rallying against the project, saying that rocket testing poses serious risks, including contamination, debris, noise pollution and the potential for failed landings within protected waters. The Pacific Islands Heritage Coalition launched a petition strongly objecting to the plan, calling for a full environmental impact statement. The number of signatures since the petition's launch in March has doubled, with more than 3, 700 signatures as of Friday. The Center says SpaceX has had a history of inadequate environmental review and recurring harm to sensitive and ecologically critical habitat on national wildlife refuge lands, including several explosions. On April 20, 2023, the Center said, a SpaceX rocket exploded next to the Boca Chica Wildlife Refuge in south Texas, igniting a 3.5-acre brush fire and hurling concrete and metal into tidal flats. 'All shorebird nests surveyed after the accident showed damage or missing eggs, consistent with being hit with debris, ' said the center in its news release. At the time, the center, along with the American Bird Conservancy, Surfrider Foundation and other groups sued the Federal Aviation Administration for allowing the expansion of such operations without more detailed environmental study. SpaceX has already had a series of failed landings this year, including on Jan. 17 and March 6, which disrupted commercial flights and rained debris over the Caribbean islands. The latest SpaceX Starship rocket test flight failed last week—when it spun out of control about halfway through its flight after launching from Texas. The center is also part of a suit filed by Earthjustice challenging the legality of Trump's executive order opening the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument to commercial fishing. 'Since the start of Trump's second term, the Center has pursued numerous strategic Freedom of Information Act lawsuits seeking public records about the administration's destructive anti-­environment agenda, ' said the center. 'The records sought include emails and other documents detailing plans to accelerate logging in national forests, carry out mass firings and dismantle protections for the nation's wetlands.' The center said the requested records would help the public understand the project's scope and whether the environmental study adequately examines its risks. It expects to receive records due to the Johnston suit in the next two to three months.

Why Jeff Bezos Might Emerge As The Biggest Winner In The Trump-Musk Feud
Why Jeff Bezos Might Emerge As The Biggest Winner In The Trump-Musk Feud

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Why Jeff Bezos Might Emerge As The Biggest Winner In The Trump-Musk Feud

NASA and Pentagon officials have taken swift action to urge competitors of Elon Musk's SpaceX, including Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin, to expedite the development of alternative rockets and spacecraft following the public feud between President Donald Trump and Musk. What Happened: The government officials were taken aback by Musk's response to Trump's threat. Musk, in turn, threatened to cease flying its Dragon spacecraft, a critical component of NASA's astronaut transportation to the International Space Station. Although Musk later retracted this threat, it caused significant concern among NASA and Pentagon officials, according to a report by The Washington Post. Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Following the public disagreement, government officials have approached commercial space companies, including Rocket Lab, Stoke Space and Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin, to inquire about the readiness of their rockets for government missions. During Trump's first term, he frequently criticized the Bezos-owned Washington Post. However, in March, Trump praised Bezos' move to make significant changes with the Washington Post and said, 'He's trying to do a real job.' SpaceX, a major recipient of government contracts, is responsible for transporting astronauts and cargo to the ISS, launching Pentagon satellites, and developing intelligence agency satellites. The growing tension between Musk and Trump intensified after the White House withdrew Musk-ally, Jared Isaacman's nomination for NASA It Matters: This recent development underscores the potential impact of political tensions on the space industry. It also highlights the increasing competition in the sector, with companies like Blue Origin making significant strides in their space exploration efforts. Just recently, Blue Origin unveiled a new vehicle for lunar and Martian missions, further cementing its position as a key player in the industry. Bezos' Blue Origin has been a key player in the space industry, competing directly with SpaceX. Bezos has also made moves in the satellite internet market, launching the first operational satellites for his ambitious Project Kuiper, which directly challenges Musk's Starlink. Meanwhile, Bezos has been making efforts to improve his relationship with Trump, a move that could potentially impact Amazon's (NASDAQ:AMZN) sprawling business. The Amazon founder appears to be seeking a reset by visiting Mar-a-Lago, contributing $1 million to Trump's inauguration and reportedly signing a $40 million documentary deal with First Lady Melania Trump. Read Next: Are you rich? Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. These five entrepreneurs are worth $223 billion – they all believe in one platform that offers a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends Image via ShutterstockUp Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Why Jeff Bezos Might Emerge As The Biggest Winner In The Trump-Musk Feud originally appeared on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store