Bill filed in NC Senate seeks $150 million for housing efforts in Helene-impacted areas
Senate Bill 200, which was filed by state senators Warren Daniel (R-Burke), Tim Moffitt (R-Henderson), and Julie Mayfield (D-Buncombe), proposes 'an act to appropriate additional funds to the North Carolina Housing Trust Fund' to assist with hurricane relief.
PREVIOUS: Another $500M for Hurricane Helene relief in North Carolina passes key hurdle
The 'nonrecurring funds' would amount to $150 million for the 2025-26 fiscal year — all dedicated to housing support for portions of the state affected by Hurricane Helene, which left extreme devastation to western North Carolina in late September 2024.
If passed through the General Assembly, this bill would go into effect on July 1.
Earlier this week, the North Carolina House unanimously approved a measure that would spend another $500 million toward Hurricane Helene recovery efforts. If enacted, the bill would add to the funds the Republican-controlled General Assembly already voted in late 2024 to spend on disaster recovery activities following the historic flooding in the mountains.
RELATED: NC Governor Stein requests $20 billion in Helene recovery funds
But Democratic Gov. Josh Stein, who took office in January, requested earlier this month that legislators approve more than double that amount — $1.07 billion. He says those funds can't wait until conventional state budget negotiations likely would wrap up early this summer and that struggling businesses, displaced residents and public school students need help now.
GOP lawmakers agree more funds need to move fast to the region, but say they want to be careful about maximizing federal matching funds and avoiding mistakes after previous storms. They also agree with Stein that more Helene aid will be approved in the months ahead.
— The Associated Press contributed to this report
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
26 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
California voters will decide redistricting in November, escalating battle with Trump and Texas
SACRAMENTO — Ratcheting up the pressure in the escalating national fight over control of Congress, the California Legislature on Thursday approved a November special election to ask voters to redraw the state's electoral lines to favor Democrats and thwart President Trump's far-right policy agenda. The ballot measure, pushed by Gov. Gavin Newsom and other state and national Democratic leaders, is the latest volley in a national political brawl over electoral maps that could alter the outcome of the 2026 midterm elections and the balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives. If voters approve the redrawn lines on Nov. 4, Democrats in the Golden State would see the odds tilted further in their favor, while the number of California Republicans in the House could be halved. Newsom initially said that new electoral districts in California would only take effect if another state redrew its lines before 2031. But after Texas moved toward approving its own maps this week that could give the GOP five more House seats, Democrats stripped the so-called 'trigger' language from the amendment — meaning that if voters approve the measure, the new lines would take effect no matter what. The ballot measure language, which asks California voters to override the power of the independent redistricting commission, was approved by most Democrats in the Assembly and the Senate, where they hold supermajorities. California lawmakers have the power to place constitutional amendments on the statewide ballot without the approval of the governor. Newsom, however, is expected later Thursday to sign two separate bills that fund the special election and spell out the lines for the new congressional districts. Democrats' rush to the ballot marks a sudden departure from California's 15-year commitment to independent redistricting, often held up as the country's gold standard. The state's voters stripped lawmakers of the power to draw lines during the Great Recession and handed that partisan power to a panel of independent citizens whose names are drawn in a lottery. The change, Democrats said, was forced by an extraordinary change in circumstances: After decades of the United States redrawing congressional lines once a decade, President Trump and his political team have leaned on Republican-led states to redraw their district lines before the 2026 midterm elections to help Republicans retain control of the House. 'His playbook is a simple one: Bully, threaten, fight, then rig the rules to hang onto power,' said Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas. 'We are here today because California will not be a bystander to that power grab. We are not intimidated, and we are acting openly, lawfully, with purpose and resolve, to defend our state and to defend our democracy.' Republicans in the state Assembly and the state Senate criticized Newsom's argument that Democrats must 'fight fire with fire,' saying retaliation is a slippery slope that would erode the independent redistricting process California voters have chosen twice at the ballot box. 'You move forward fighting fire with fire, and what happens? You burn it all down,' said Assembly Minority Leader James Gallagher (R-Yuba City). He said Trump was 'wrong' to push Gov. Greg Abbott to redraw Texas' lines to benefit Republicans, and so was California's push to pursue the same strategy. State Senate Majority Leader Lena Gonzalez (D-Long Beach), who co-authored the bill drawing the proposed congressional districts, said Democrats had no choice but to stand up, given the harm the Trump administration has inflicted on healthcare, education, tariffs and other policies that affect Californians. 'What do we do? Just sit back and do nothing?' Gonzalez said. 'Or do we fight back and provide some chance for our Californians to see themselves in this democracy?' Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones (R-Santee) said the effort is 'a corrupt redistricting scheme to rig California's elections' that violates the 'letter and the spirit of the California constitution.' 'Democrats are rushing this through under the guise of urgency,' Jones said. 'There is no emergency that justifies this abuse of process.' Three Assembly Democrats did not vote in favor of the constitutional amendment. Jasmeet Bains (D-Delano), who is running for Congress against Rep. David Valadao (R-Hanford) in the San Joaquin Valley, voted no. Progressive Caucus chair Alex Lee (D-San Jose), and Dawn Addis (D-Morro Bay), did not vote. Democrats will face an unusual messaging challenge with the November ballot measure, said Matt Lesenyie, an assistant professor of political science at Cal State Long Beach. The opponents of mid-decade redistricting are stressing that the measure would 'disadvantage voters,' he said, which is 'wording that Democrats have primed Democrats on, for now two administrations, that democracy is being killed with a thousand cuts.' 'It's a weird, sort of up-is-down moment,' Lesenyie said. Trump's political team began pressuring Abbott and Texas Republicans in early June to redraw the state's 38 congressional districts in the middle of the decade — which is very uncommon — to give Republicans a better shot at keeping the House in 2026. 'We are entitled to five more seats,' Trump later told CNBC. Some Texas Republicans feared that mid-decade redistricting could imperil their own chances of reelection. But within a month of the White House floating the idea, Abbott added the new congressional lines, which would stack the deck against as many as five Texas Democrats in Congress, to the Legislature's special session in July. By mid-July, Newsom was talking about California punching back. In an interview with the progressive news site the TN Holler, Newsom said: 'These guys, they're not f—ing around. They're playing by a totally different set of rules.' Democrats in Texas fled the state for nearly two weeks, including some to California, to deny Republicans the quorum they needed to pass the new lines. Abbott signed civil arrest warrants and levied fines on the 52 absent Democrats while they held news conferences in California and Illinois to bring attention to the fight. While the Texas drama unfolded, consultants for the campaign arm of House Democrats in California quietly drew up maps that would further chop down the number of Golden State Republicans in Congress. The proposed changes would eliminate the district of Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Corona) and dilute the number of GOP voters in four districts represented by Reps. Doug LaMalfa, Kevin Kiley, David Valadao and Darrell Issa. The Democrats agreed to return to Texas last week and pointed to California's tit-for-tat effort as one measure of success, saying the Golden State could neutralize any Republican gains in Texas. Since then, other Republican-led states have begun to contemplate redistricting too, including Indiana, Florida and Missouri. Trump's political allies are publicly threatening to mount primary challenges against any Indiana Republican who opposes redrawing the lines. In California, the opposition is shaping up as quickly as the ballot measure. California voters received the first campaign mailer opposing the ballot measure a day before the Legislature voted to approve it. A four-page glossy flier, funded by conservative donor and redistricting champion Charlie Munger Jr., warned voters that mid-decade redistricting is 'weakening our Democratic process' and 'a threat to California's landmark election reform.' Republicans have also gone to court to try and stop the measure, alleging in an emergency petition with the state Supreme Court that Democrats violated the state Constitution by ramming the bills through without following proper legislative procedure. The high court Wednesday rejected the petition. A wave of legal challenges are expected, not only in California but in any state that reconfigures congressional districts in the expanding partisan brawl. Assemblymember Carl DeMaio (R-San Diego) said Thursday morning that a lawsuit challenging the California ballot measure would be filed in state court by Friday evening. He said Republicans also plan to litigate the title of the ballot measure and any voter guide materials that accompany it. And, he said, if voters approve the new lines, 'I believe we will have ample opportunity to set the maps aside in federal court.'
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Doggett won't seek reelection if new Texas maps pass legal muster
Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) said Thursday that if the courts approve the Republican congressional maps in Texas, he will not seek reelection in the redrawn 37th Congressional District. 'If the courts give Trump a victory in his scheme to maintain control of a compliant House, I will not seek reelection in the reconfigured CD37, even though it contains over [two-thirds] of my current constituents,' Doggett said in a statement. The proposed map, which gives Texas Republicans five congressional seats, draws Doggett and Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) into the same Austin-area district. A matchup would have pitted the 78-year-old Doggett, who was the first House Democrat to call on former President Biden to drop his presidential bid last year, against the 36-year-old Casar, who chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Doggett had previously been pushing Casar to run in the redrawn 35th congressional district The move was perceived by some Texas Democrats as Doggett waving the white flag in the redistricting battle before the new map was officially passed by the state Legislature. 'I had hoped that my commitment to reelection under any circumstances would encourage Congressman Casar to not surrender his winnable district to Trump,' Doggett said in his statement on Thursday. 2024 Election Coverage 'While his apparent decision is most unfortunate, I prefer to devote the coming months to fighting Trump tyranny and serving Austin rather than waging a struggle with fellow Democrats. If Trump extreme gerrymandering prevails, I wish Congressman Casar the best,' he continued. Casar currently represents the state's 35th Congressional District, which includes parts of the San Antonio metro area, as well as parts of Austin. Doggett represents the 37th District, which includes the majority of the city of Austin and some of its suburbs. Under the proposed new maps, the 37th Congressional District would become more Democratic, while the new 35th District would become more conservative and include less than 10 percent of Casar's current constituents. The new 37th District would include roughly two-thirds of Doggett's constituents, while the rest would come from Casar's Austin-area constituency, including the City Council seat he held from 2015-22.
Boston Globe
26 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
California lawmakers pass first of three bills to counter Texas in nationwide fight over election maps
Advertisement California lawmakers say their new Democrat-leaning maps — adding as many as five blue seats — are necessary to respond to what they view as a power grab by Texas House Republicans, who approved a new map Wednesday night that would give their party an edge in winning as many as five new GOP seats in Congress. The Texas Senate is expected to follow suit by Friday, sending the measure to Republican Governor Greg Abbott for his signature. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The California Assembly bill, ACA 8, passed with the required two-thirds vote of 57-20. It was the first of three related measures that were being concurrently debated by the California Assembly and Senate early Thursday. Democrats hope to pass all three bills by Thursday afternoon and send them to Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom, who plans to sign them immediately. Advertisement A short time after the Assembly voted, the California Senate passed its first redistricting bill, AB 604, which outlined the new congressional maps that the voters will be asked to consider on the November ballot. The Senate bill passed 30-9 in a party-line vote. California state Senator Lena Gonzalez, an author, called it a 'reasonable and rational response to the anti-democratic actions of the Republican Party as they attempt to rig our congressional elections.' Senate Republicans argued that California's independent commission is the best way to do redistricting and should not be set aside, even temporarily. 'The ends don't justify the means,' state Senator Tony Strickland, a Republican, told his Democratic colleagues. 'You know this is not good for democracy in California.' California has more hurdles in its process than in Texas, because the state constitution requires that an independent nonpartisan panel draw its congressional maps. Thursday's bills create a proposed constitutional amendment that would come before voters in November, allowing them to bypass that commission and approve the Democratic-leaning maps. 'This isn't politics as usual. It's an emergency for our democracy. And we're acting now to save our future,' Newsom wrote on X Thursday. Republican lawmakers in California tried several parliamentary maneuvers to delay the vote. The Republican leader of the California Assembly, James Gallagher, noted in his speech on the floor Thursday morning that the state's voters weighed in against gerrymandering, through ballot measures in 2008 and 2010, and created the state's independent redistricting commission that aims to draw nonpartisan lines. 'Twice, they told us they want independent redistricting, fair representation,' Gallagher told his colleagues on the Assembly floor. 'You move forward fighting fire with fire - what happens? You burn it all down. And in this case, it affects our most fundamental American principle: representation.' Advertisement Originally, Democratic lawmakers said in the bill that the changes to California's maps would kick in only if Texas or another Republican-controlled state gives final approval to changes in its own map. But they amended the bill Thursday morning to remove that trigger language and any mention of Texas or other states. Democrats were working on a tight deadline because the orders for the special election must be transmitted to California Secretary of State Shirley Weber, a Democrat, by Friday to get the measure on the November ballot. Newsom and his Democratic allies in the Legislature insist that they still support the independent redistricting committee process, which was created by voter-approved ballot measures in 2008 and 2010 and is popular with the state's voters. But they argue that their partisan response to Texas is necessary to check the power of Trump, who urged Texas's governor to redraw his state's maps. Republicans hold a 219-212 US House majority with four vacancies. Democratic control would give the opposition power to thwart Trump's legislative agenda and launch investigations into him and his administration. GOP leaders in the California Legislature have argued that Democrats controlling the process have allowed little transparency, even shrouding the identities of the lawmakers involved in drawing the new district lines. 'This is a battle between people and politicians,' Gallagher said in an interview Wednesday. 'The people spoke very loudly in California twice, saying they didn't want politicians drawing district lines, that they wanted the people to have that power. And I think that very deeply ingrained mindset in California voters is going to win out in the end." Advertisement
