Takeaways of US-Japan deal include potential gains for Trump, Ishiba and EU
Here's a closer look at the early takeaways:
* The deal stabilizes the global trade outlook by imposing a 15% tariff on Japanese goods — down from a threatened 25% — while Japan commits to investing $550 billion in the U.S. economy, a boost to U.S. jobs. It almost certainly averts a worst-case scenario for the Japanese economy. Moreover, if it signals that the balance of U.S. tariff rates are likely to settle in that range, Jefferies Chief Economist and Strategist for Europe Mohit Kumar said: "the world can live with 15% or so tariffs."
* Trump gains some political capital ahead of November 2026 midterm elections by reinforcing his 'America First' trade stance and potentially bolstering his influence with industrial and agricultural constituencies while avoiding the market instability that loomed under earlier tariff threats. Still, not every U.S. constituency was happy with the announcement. The decision has angered the Detroit Three automakers, who still face a 25% levy on significant segments of their non-U.S. produced vehicles.
* For Ishiba, the deal is a diplomatic and economic win amid domestic political turbulence. Just days earlier, Japan's ruling coalition lost its majority in upper house elections.
* Analysts say the deal could serve as a benchmark for other economies negotiating with Washington, including the EU and China, both facing August tariff deadlines.
* American exporters could gain broader access to Japan's markets, especially in autos and agriculture — sectors vital to U.S. economic growth.
* Global financial markets are rallying led by automakers. Stocks of major Japanese firms surged following the announcement, and capital inflows are expected to continue as investors seek exposure to Japan's innovation-led growth.
* Despite the investment commitments, the deal may not significantly reduce the U.S. trade deficit with Japan in the short term. Critics argue that without stronger enforcement mechanisms or structural reforms, the imbalance could persist.
* A 15% tariff, though lower than the threatened 25%, still represents a significantly higher import tax for consumer goods, especially for cars and electronics, which are heavily imported to the U.S. from Japan. Yale Budget Lab last week estimated the overall average U.S. tariff rate under Trump's policy shifts has climbed to around 20% from between 2% and 3% prior to his return to the White House in January.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
A somber tribute in photos: New York City police honor officer Didarul Islam
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Panama official files lawsuits against owner of ports at centre of US-China struggle
Panama's comptroller general has lodged two cases with the country's supreme court against the owners of two ports at the centre of a geopolitical struggle between the US and China, in a move likely to be seen as a victory for Donald Trump in his attempt to rid the Panama canal of Chinese influence. The decision follows a failed attempt to sell the ports to a consortium headed by US investment fund BlackRock and Swiss shipping firm MSC. The two ports, at each end of the Panama Canal, were originally awarded to Hong Kong based firm CK Hutchison in 1997. They entered the geopolitical spotlight on 20 January when Trump used his inauguration speech to vow he would 'take back' the canal from supposed Chinese influence. The very same day, Anal Flores, the comptroller general, announced he would begin an audit of the ports' owner, Panama Ports Company. In March, BlackRock, the world's biggest asset management company, announced it was working with MSC to acquire Panama Ports Company and 41 other ports in CK Hutchison's global portfolio. The parties to the deal agreed a deadline of 27 July to finalize details of the acquisition. But the sale of these strategic assets did not go down well in Beijing. On 28 March China's anti-trust regulator said it would review the deal 'to protect fair competition in the market and safeguard the public interest'. Earlier this month the Wall Street Journal reported that the Chinese government had threatened to block the deal unless COSCO, a local shipping giant, was included as a veto-holding member of the takeover consortium. On Wednesday, Flores said that Panama Port's contract was 'unfair' and 'abusive'. He claimed that the company had not paid sufficient royalties to the government and that its 25 year extension, signed in 2023, was made without the necessary authorizations. One case lodged with the supreme court seeks to nullify the contract, the other seeks to declare it unconstitutional. In response to media speculation that COSCO would be included in the deal he said 'it doesn't seem correct that in other [parts of the world] there are people negotiating the future of assets that belong to us, the Panamanians'. Panama's president José Raúl Mulino said on Thursday, that he supported Flores' decision – which he claimed had nothing to do with the ongoing struggle over the ports' ownership. However, the timing of the announcement is convenient for the US-backed consortium. Should the court cases prove successful, the contracts for port operations would have to be re-tendered and with Panama having exited China's Belt and Road Initiative in April, it would seem likely the successful bid will come from a US firm or an ally country. Nullifying the PPC contract and re-tendering the operation of the ports would offer Panama to potentially redesign the contract terms to be more beneficial to the state. However, the country could also find itself exposed to litigation from CK Hutchison which could potentially argue it is tantamount to a politically motivated expropriation.
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Inside Trump's $200M White House ballroom project
By President Donald Trump is finally getting his White House ballroom. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced on Thursday that construction would begin in September on a 90,000 square foot addition to the East Wing that would include Trump's long sought-after ballroom. The Daily Mail reported in April that Trump had started pitching the construction of a White House ballroom in 2010 - back when President Barack Obama was in office and before he launched his own political career. 'For 150 years, presidents, administrations and White House staff have longed for a large event space on the White House complex that can hold substantially more guests then currently allowed,' Leavitt said at Thursday's briefing. 'President Trump has expressed his commitment to solving this problem on behalf of future administrations and the American people.' Leavitt said the new ballroom would reside in the current East Wing of the White House, explaining that the building would be 'modernized' when asked if portions of the East Wing, originally constructed in 1902, would be torn down. The current East Wing, which is detached from the main White House residence, houses the offices of the first lady, the White House Military Office and the White House Visitors Office. A second story had been added in 1942. Leavitt said the staff of those offices would be relocated during construction. The ballroom project is expected to be finished before the end of Trump's term, she also said. 'President Trump and other donors have generously committed to donating the funds necessary to build this approximately $200 million structure,' Leavitt said. When Trump originally pitched the ballroom, to top Obama adviser David Axelrod in 2010 - amid the Gulf oil spill, which Trump also volunteered to plug - Axelrod later said he didn't remember the now-president offering to pay for the project. During a subsequent interview on Rush Limbaugh's radio show, Trump voiced annoyance that the Obama White House wouldn't take him up on his offer. Trump - then a real estate developer - offered to build the Obamas a ballroom because he didn't like the look of the tents first lady Michelle Obama was erecting on the South Lawn to host state dinners. 'And I see that the White House - the White House, Washington, D.C. - when a dignitary comes in from India, from anywhere, they open up a tent. They have a tent. A tent!' Trump told Limbaugh, later referring to it as a 'lousy looking tent.' In her remarks Thursday, Leavitt echoed the tent dig. 'The White House is one of the most beautiful and historic buildings in the world, yet the White House is currently unable to host major functions honoring world leaders and other countries without having to install a large and unsightly tent approximately 100 yards away from the main building's entrance,' she said. 'The White House ballroom will be a much-needed and exquisite addition of approximately 90,000 total square feet of innately designed and carefully crafted space with a succeeded capacity of 650 people, which is a significant increase from the 200-person seated capacity in the East Room of the White House,' Leavitt added. Mock-ups of the design were almost immediately available on the White House's website, with Leavitt holding up several visuals in the briefing room for reporters. The gilded interior design looks similar to ballroom additions Trump has constructed at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida and the Old Post Office in Washington, D.C., which for several years was the Trump International Hotel.
