Respect their dignity or risk of theft? Singaporeans divided on whether maid's belongings should be checked
SINGAPORE: A local Reddit user sought advice on whether they should go through their helper's luggage and belongings on the last day that she is employed with them, adding that they had been advised to do so to check for theft. This sparked a debate between commenters.
In a post on r/askSingapore from last week, u/kouroubao wrote that they wanted to hear from 'more seasoned employers out there what the standard practice is and if anyone regretted not checking.'
Many local Reddit users have weighed in, some saying they would prefer to treat them with dignity.
'It's really up to you. I know people who have done it and people who didn't. For me, I didn't because anything important or worth more, it's locked away. If she wants to take anything lying around, it's replaceable for me. I just want to treat my employees with a little dignity,' one wrote.
Others, however, shared their particular negative experiences with helpers and encouraged the post author to do so, as it would be better to be safe than sorry. They told stories of how helpers were able to figure out safe combination codes and take away cash and other valuables, turn off nanny cams, and even place some jewelry into a cake, which, fortunately, the helper forgot in the fridge and wasn't able to bring with her.
There is a fine line to tread, however, between ensuring that a helper does not steal and riding roughshod over her rights. Employers can be debarred by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) for abusive behavior against domestic helpers. How long a debarment lasts depends on the severity of the offence. And in Singapore, where a helper is often a necessity and not a luxury, especially when both husband and wife are working and there are young children, elderly relatives, or both, in the house, not having a helper can be very difficult indeed.
What do the experts say? According to the MOM website, one way to secure your home is to prevent theft from taking place.
'You would need to advise your MDW (Migrant Domestic Worker) of the serious consequences of theft. It is a criminal offence in Singapore and the police will be involved. Offenders will be blacklisted and not be able to work in Singapore,' K Jayaprema, the President of the Association of Employment Agencies (Singapore) says .
Also, as one blog reminds us, 'Privacy is a fundamental human right recognised in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, and anyone, including our helpers, deserves privacy just like we do… There is no need to check on their personal belongings unless you have reasonable doubt or proof that they are committing acts of theft and so on.' /TISG
Read also: Maid says her employer did not give her Labour Day off, even though her contract includes PH entitlements
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Body of missing Briton found in lift shaft in Malaysia
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysian police confirmed on Thursday (Jun 5) that the body of a man found a day earlier in a Kuala Lumpur lift shaft was that of a British backpacker who was missing for more than a week. Jordan Johnson-Doyle, 25, was last seen on May 27 at a bar in an upmarket suburb in the capital, sparking a police probe and a frenzied search by his parents. Police on Wednesday afternoon "received information that a man was found lying on his back in the lift (shaft) on the ground floor of a (building) construction site," Kuala Lumpur police chief Rusdi Mohd Isa said in a statement. Fire and rescue services recovered the body, which was sent for a post mortem, he added. "The results found that the cause of death was a chest injury sustained from a fall from height," Rusdi said. "No criminal elements were found at the scene and the case has been classified as a sudden death report," he said, adding the body was identified by the victim's uncle based on a tattoo. Brickfields district police chief Ku Mashariman Ku Mahmood confirmed to AFP that Johnson-Doyle was identified as the victim. Johnson-Doyle, a software engineer, was last seen on May 27 in the bustling Bangsar district, known for its nightlife, trendy bars and cafes. Johnson-Doyle's mother Leanne Burnett, 44, told the Free Malaysia Today news website that her husband had travelled to Kuala Lumpur to look for their son, adding that the family was "distraught" over his disappearance.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Jail for man who punched taxi driver for overtaking him
SINGAPORE: Angry after a taxi driver overtook him, a man alighted from his car to confront the driver at a traffic junction. During the argument, Silas Yu Ming'En reached through the 66-year-old taxi driver's window to unbuckle his seatbelt, tried to force open the door, and threw punches at him. The 41-year-old Singaporean was jailed for five days on Thursday (Jun 5). He was also fined S$2,500 (US$1,900) for another incident in which he got into a dispute with a man who told him not to be rude. He pleaded guilty to two counts of voluntarily causing hurt, with one count of using threatening behaviour taken into consideration for his sentencing. On Apr 9, 2024, the taxi driver was driving along Choa Chu Kang North 5 when he came to a stop behind Yu at a traffic junction. After the traffic light turned green, the taxi driver overtook Yu as he found Yu to be slow. When the cars came to another halt, this time at the traffic junction of Choa Chu Kang North 5 and Choa Chu Kang Street 53, Yu alighted from his car to approach the taxi driver. The taxi driver lowered his window after Yu knocked on it, and a heated verbal argument ensued. He then demanded that the taxi driver get out of his vehicle. When the latter refused, Yu tried to force open the door. Yu then reached through the open window in an attempt to unfasten the victim's seat belt, and threw punches at the victim, who bled from his right arm as a result. The victim was examined at a polyclinic later that day and was found to have a superficial abrasion on his right arm. SECOND INCIDENT Separately, on Dec 29, 2024, Yu was at a food court in Bukit Panjang Plaza when he brushed past a 30-year-old man while saying "excuse me". Perceiving his behaviour to be rude and inappropriate, the victim tapped Yu on the shoulder and said: "Can you don't be so rude?' He then left. But Yu confronted the victim and pushed him twice on the chest, causing the victim to hit his lower back against a pillar. Although the man tried to put some distance between Yu and himself, Yu continued to pursue him. The victim pushed Yu back before members of the public intervened. The victim sustained a bruise on his lower back from the incident. Yu offered to pay restitution to both victims, but the taxi driver was unable to quantify his medical expenses. Meanwhile, Yu compensated the other victim about S$160. Reading from a letter in court, Yu, who did not have a lawyer, apologised for his behaviour and said he took full responsibility. "I deeply regret any harm caused," Yu said, adding that he would learn from the experience and would not repeat such behaviour.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Man fined S$5,000 for providing dog 'staycay' services at unlicensed boarding facility
SINGAPORE: A facility that provided "staycay" services for dogs did not have the licence to do so. During an inspection, however, seven dogs were found being boarded at Urban K9 SG's Tessensohn Road premises on staycations. A director of Urban K9, Loke Wei Kang, was fined S$5,000 (S$3,900) on Wednesday (Jun 4) over the company's lack of a licence to operate a dog boarding facility. As the person in charge of overall operations at Urban K9, Loke was fully aware that the facility needed a dog boarding licence as he was informed of the requirement in 2023, a National Parks Board (NParks) prosecutor told the court. However, Loke failed to ensure that Urban K9 was licensed. He admitted to a breach under the Animals and Birds (Licensing of Farms) Rules. Loke was one of the directors at Urban K9, which operated a dog training and care business. It advertised these services in addition to dog staycations on its website. Owners could leave their dogs at Urban K9's premises overnight as part of its staycation service. Customers would typically leave their dogs at Urban K9 when they went overseas on holidays. According to court documents, NParks received feedback on the death of a golden retriever boarded at Urban K9 in January 2023. NParks then began investigations into Loke and Urban K9. In May 2023, the Animal and Veterinary Service, which is under NParks, informed Loke that Urban K9 required a dog boarding licence. However, Loke continued his business as usual. In July 2024, NParks received further feedback regarding the mistreatment of an animal boarded at Urban K9. Officers conducted an unannounced inspection on Jul 24, 2024, and found nine dogs there. Seven of these dogs were there for Urban K9's "staycay" services, even though the facility had no boarding licence. According to investigations, the number of dogs on staycations there could be between 15 and 20 during peak periods. Court documents did not state the outcome of investigations into the mistreatment allegations. Loke, who appeared in court without a lawyer, said in mitigation that he was the only person at Urban K9 who took steps to get the facility licensed, although he acknowledged that he did this when NParks' investigations were already in their latter stages. He added that he eventually obtained certifications for pet management and care in October last year. He said he was taking steps to move forward and had stopped offering boarding services as the lease for Urban K9's premises ends this month. Loke told the court he would be moving into new premises and would apply for the proper licence as he "starts afresh".
