Not a single stretch was free from potholes, MP Tejasvi Surya after TCS 10K Run in Bengaluru
Surya said he ran in the Mumbai Marathon two months ago and the experience was incredible. 'And today (Sunday), it hurt so much to see our city like this,' he lamented.
Stating that he has written the letter not only as an MP from Bengaluru, but as an angry and disappointed citizen and participant of the race on Sunday. He said most participants share the angst. 'While it was a matter of great pride to see close to 40,000 people, including some of the world's best athletes, senior citizens, participate in the event, it was equally disappointing to witness the state of our city's roads and public infrastructure - right in the heart of the CBD (Central Business District).'
He said, 'CBD roads, which are supposed to be the best roads in the city, are in an absolutely pathetic state - like the roads in the rest of the city. Not a single stretch was free of potholes. Many runners stumbled, sprained their ankles and some even got injured. Senior citizens struggled to even walk without risking a fall.' He said the wheelchair participants had to be assisted throughout the route, not because of their condition but because of our city's unforgiving infrastructure.
Garbage dumps at multiple locations, stinking corners and broken footpaths painted a very poor image of Brand Bengaluru, he said. Pointing that many runners look forward to the race, he said, 'They (runners) train, travel and participate with excitement. What we offered them was an obstacle race instead of a world-class experience. We were hosting a Gold Label event, certified by the World Athletics body with athletes from around the world. What image did we portray of our city? Is it so difficult to ensure a bare minimum - pothole-free, clean roads at least for one of the city's premier events? Every road of the city looks like a construction site - dusty, potholed and lifeless.'
Holding Bengaluru development minister and BBMP commissioner directly responsible, answerable and accountable for this state of affairs, Surya said, 'I urge you to take this matter seriously, not just for the sake of the TCS 10K or marathons, but for every citizen of Bengaluru who negotiates these roads daily.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Karnataka high court tells govt to file status reporton pending Sakala applications
Bengaluru: The Karnataka high court has directed the state govt to file a status report on the number of pending applications under the Sakala Services Act. The date on which such applications were filed and the estimated time required for their disposal also need to be indicated in the report, which should be filed in four weeks, a division bench comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice CM Joshi observed in their order. The next hearing will take place on Oct 29. The court was hearing a PIL filed by S Gowri Shankar, a resident of Bengaluru. The petitioner requested the court to pass an order to the effect that interest or penalties levied on property owners due to delays by BBMP should be returned to the taxpayers or adjusted against future taxes. However, the court declined to accept this request. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru "We are not persuaded to accept that any such prayer can be considered in a vacuum. In the event any particular taxpayer is aggrieved by the imposition of interest despite delays on the part of the authorities, he would be entitled to seek appropriate remedies," the bench observed. In his petition filed in 2022, Gowri Shankar also said the process to claim a refund should be formulated and communicated to eligible property owners. He sought that all pending Sakala appeals should be immediately disposed of, along with the disbursal of compensation to eligible applicants and actions initiated against wilful defaulters.
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
'Why do you always lie?': Bengaluru residents slam DK Shivakumar's garbage cleanup claims
Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar took to X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday to announce significant progress in Bengaluru's ongoing garbage management efforts, declaring that over 9,700 of 10,354 complaints received via the BBMP helpline have been resolved. DK Shivakumar said 654 pending complaints are currently under "high-priority clearance".(X/@AkashUpadhye) He said 654 pending complaints are currently under "high-priority clearance" and emphasized the government's commitment to a "Swachcha, sustainable Bengaluru." The Congress leader added that CCTV surveillance and stricter accountability measures are being rolled out to tackle violations and improve sanitation enforcement across the city. (Also Read: Karnataka railway clerk suspended after ignoring passengers for 15-minute phone chat, video goes viral) 'A cleaner Bengaluru starts with action,' Shivakumar posted. 'We're strengthening our commitment with new accountability measures.' How did residents react? However, the announcement sparked a wave of criticism from Bengalureans online, many of whom challenged the accuracy of the claims and expressed frustration over continued neglect in their areas. '9,700 complaints is enough to show the mirror,' one user commented. 'What proactive steps is the government taking to ensure a cleaner Bengaluru?' Another user shared a photo of a garbage dump from JP Nagar 8th Phase and wrote, 'Complained multiple times. No one cares.' Several responses highlighted ongoing issues in various neighborhoods, including Sarakki Lake, Ashtalaxmi Layout, and areas lacking basic sanitation infrastructure. One user alleged that BBMP field staff often close complaints without addressing them, remarking, 'Even if I say there is garbage in your bedroom, they'll close it without checking.' Another user offered a more constructive take, urging authorities to equip and train sanitation workers better, while also calling on citizens to segregate waste and share responsibility. Despite the BBMP's claims of a large-scale cleanup operation and promises of enforcement, the ground reality shared by residents paints a starkly different picture. (Also Read: Bengaluru Peripheral Ring Road landowners demand justice after 20-year wait. 'No award, no rehabilitation')
Indian Express
3 days ago
- Indian Express
Do Indian cities need a dedicated urban transport cadre?
— Jacob Baby BJP MP Tejasvi Surya has raised urban mobility issues in the Lok Sabha and proposed the creation of a specialised All India Service Cadre for the urban transport sector. The idea may appear bureaucratic at first glance, but it raises an important question: who exactly is responsible for managing urban transport in Indian cities? Let's understand. Urban transport in Indian cities can be termed as 'institutional and constitutional orphan'. It does not find explicit mention in any of the three constitutional lists (Union, State, and Concurrent). While 'urban planning' is a state subject, and 'highways' and 'railways' fall under the Union, urban transport cuts across both. In 1986, the subject of urban transport was formally transferred to the Ministry of Urban Development, now the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA). As a nodal ministry for urban transport, the Ministry appointed an Officer on Special Duty (OSD) for Mass Rapid Transit Systems (MRTS) to oversee upcoming metro rail projects. These were typically senior railway engineers with deep project execution experience on metro systems. Over time, this evolved into the OSD (Urban Transport), a position occupied by several bureaucrats who played a vital role in piloting policies, such as the National Urban Transport Policy (2006), Metro Policy (2017), and managing centrally funded urban transport projects in several cities. The Ministry was also involved in training and capacity building programmes to train town planners and professionals through projects like the Sustainable Urban Transport Project (GEF-SUTP). Yet, despite these interventions, Indian cities today face governance issues in the urban transport sector. Responsibilities are divided across municipal corporations, metro rail corporations, State Transport Undertakings (STUs), Regional Transport Offices (RTOs), and parastatal agencies. Each works with its own logic, data, and priorities, often without a shared vision. Professionals trained in urban transport engineering, planning, or policy backgrounds are dispersed across consultancies, academia, civil society organisations, and think tanks. While these actors have made valuable contributions, the absence of a unified administrative structure suggests that cities lack a dedicated corps of officers who can anchor long-term strategies, facilitate coordination among stakeholders, and lend continuity to policy frameworks. This is where the idea of a dedicated All India Urban Transport Service gains traction. Similar in spirit to the Indian Forest Service or the Indian Statistical Service, such a cadre would comprise professionals trained in transport policy, planning, finance, and infrastructure management. The idea of Unified Metropolitan Transport Authorities (UMTAs) was long recommended by the National Urban Transport Policy (2006), the 12th Five-Year Plan's Working Group on Urban Transport and the Metro Rail Policy (2017). They have repeatedly emphasised the need for UMTA to act as nodal agencies for coordinated transport governance. The Delhi government is planning to set up a UMTA to ensure seamless integration and efficient urban mobility. According to officials, the transport department is working on an Urban Transport Policy under which a unified body and a task force would be set up to coordinate with the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), and Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC), and other transportation-managing authorities. Several other states, like Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala, and Assam, have introduced legislations to establish UMTAs in their metropolitan regions. However, UMTAs in some cities have reportedly been hampered by several issues, including: — Legal ambiguities — Lack of inter-agency coordinating mechanisms — Jurisdiction of UMTA, and — Institutional turf protection. In this context, several cities across the world offer examples of unified urban transport governance. Cities such as London, Vancouver, Singapore, Paris, etc. have lead institutions equipped with professionals to handle the complexities of urban transport. For instance, Transport for London (TfL) is responsible for the management and coordination of urban transport in the city. The idea of a dedicated cadre is not unprecedented. The High-Level Committee on Urban Planning Report (2023), for instance, recommended the creation of an All India Urban and Regional Planning Service, alongside a national town planning legislation. The rationale was similar: to develop a professional, permanent institutional presence in cities that can address complex and evolving urban challenges with the necessary expertise and stability. While municipal commissioners currently fulfill many of these responsibilities in cities, they have limited tenures and are usually generalist than specialists. A dedicated cadre of urban professionals can address issues of continuity, state capacity and professional competence. In addition, the proposed All India Service for Urban Transport could draw from global examples and tailor it to address the complexities of Indian cities in various ways such as: — Officers from this cadre could provide expertise on policy, planning, regulation and operation of urban transport at the city or metropolitan levels — They could support city governments, help establish and manage UMTAs, and foster coordination among various agencies — Administrative training and support could be sought from the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) — In addition to technical competencies, focus on building collaborations with local leaders and elected representatives would be crucial, and — The success of such a cadre would depend a lot on enabling the 74th Constitutional Amendment that empowers urban local authorities to set up bodies like UMTAs. That said, a note of caution. The administrative system already faces challenges that often obstruct, rather than enable, good governance. Adding a new cadre without addressing existing administrative and capacity constraints could add another layer of complexity. Moreover, urban transport is not merely an engineering problem: it is a deeply social, political, and environmental one. Therefore, any institutional reform would need to be responsive to local context, adaptability, and citizen participation. In the end, the idea of an All India Urban Transport Service is not a silver bullet to address urban transport problems in Indian cities. However, it could be seen as a first step towards addressing the issues of capacity and professional expertise in urban transport planning at city or metropolitan level. Urban transport in Indian cities can be termed as 'institutional and constitutional orphan'. Why? Indian cities today face governance issues in the urban transport sector. Do you think the idea of a dedicated All India Urban Transport Service would help address this? Support your answers with examples. What was the rationale behind an All India Urban and Regional Planning Service recommended by the High-Level Committee on Urban Planning Report (2023)? While Delhi is planning to set up a UMTA, several other states, like Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala, and Assam, have introduced legislation to establish UMTAs in their metropolitan regions. What kind of issue do UMTAs face in several cities? (Jacob Baby is a doctoral researcher in Concordia University, Canada, and explores matters related to urban planning in India.) Share your thoughts and ideas on UPSC Special articles with Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
