Meta won't tweak pay-or-consent model further despite risk of EU fines, sources say
The European Commission last month warned Meta of possible daily fines after being told that the U.S. social media giant would only make limited changes to its model to comply with the European Union's Digital Markets Act.
The Facebook owner was hit with a 200-million-euro ($234 million) fine in April after the EU antitrust enforcer said its pay-or-consent model breached the DMA from when it was introduced in November 2023 to November 2024.
Meta had tweaked the model in November 2024 to use less personal data for targeted advertising, which prompted additional EU scrutiny and the subsequent Commission comments in June. The DMA seeks to curb the power of Big Tech via a list of dos and don'ts.
Meta will not propose additional changes unless circumstances change, the people with direct knowledge of the matter said on Friday.
That in turn will likely result in fresh EU antitrust charges in the coming weeks and daily fines following shortly, of as much as 5% of Meta's average daily worldwide turnover starting from June 27, one of the sources said, although a final decision has yet to be made.
Meta shares were down 1.7% in mid-session after the Reuters story was published.
Meta declined to comment and pointed to previous statements where it said it is confident that it complies with the DMA, that its range of choices to Europeans go beyond the DMA's requirements and that the Commission is discriminating against its business model.
The Commission declined to comment.
($1 = 0.8553 euros)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Ukraine: Zelenskyy shakes up leadership amid Trump's 'peace' push; Shmyhal out as PM, Svyrydenko in
In a major political shakeup, Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal has resigned after over five years in office. President Zelenskyy has nominated Yulia Svyrydenko, the current First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economy, as his successor. If confirmed, she'll become Ukraine's second female Prime Minister. Known for managing Ukraine's wartime economy and international aid efforts, her nomination comes at a critical time as Ukraine battles war, economic strain, and EU ambitions. Show more Show less
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Good progress on EU FTA talks, less so on ASEAN pact review: Government officials
The next few months is going to see a flurry of activity, with various teams of Indian negotiators actively seeking to sign new trade agreements with countries and regions such as the U.S. and European Union (EU) and amend the existing deal with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), according to government officials. During a press briefing on Tuesday (July 15, 2025), senior officials in the Ministry of Commerce and Industry said that India was seeing 'good progress' in its negotiations with the EU, and less satisfactory progress on the review of the free trade agreement with the ASEAN. They also said that the Fall deadline for a Bilateral Investment Treaty with the U.S. was still in place. 'With regard to the EU, we have just finished the 12th round last week that was on Friday,' Special Secretary in the Ministry of Commerce and Industry Satya Srinivas said. 'We have exchanged our market access offers on services and non-services.' Mr. Srinivas said that the negotiators on both sides could close a 'couple of chapters' of the deal and that they held long discussions on other chapters where there was a divergence. 'We had some sort of understanding that emerged on a few of those divergent issues,' he added. 'All in all, it was a very productive round. I think we did cover a large number of areas and it will be the EU's turn to come to India for the next round in the first week of September.' Regarding the India-U.S. trade deal, the Commerce Ministry officials confirmed that a team from India is currently in Washington to negotiate the deal, their third such visit in the last few months. They reiterated the Fall deadline for the conclusion of a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). The Hindu has learnt that the Indian team has taken sectoral specialists this time around to address minute issues. According to sources, U.S. President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariff letters over the last week haven't had any effect so far. 'If you look at the tariffs today, there are only announcements of tariffs,' a source aware of the negotiations told The Hindu. 'They have not come into effect. Except for the 10% baseline tariff, which is applicable for all countries, no other reciprocal tariff is there for any other country, except for China. China has got a 20% fentanyl tariff over and above this 10% baseline tariff.' Apart from this, the U.S. has imposed sectoral tariffs on iron, steel, auto, and auto components, which range from 25-50%. 'The U.S. trade data shows that the fall in imports the country has faced are largely in these sectors, and in imports from China,' the source further said. 'U.S. imports from all other countries are either staying the same or growing.' Special Secretary in the Ministry of Commerce and Industry Rajesh Agrawal said that teams from India and ASEAN have held nine rounds of meetings so far. 'The progress thus far has been chequered and we would have liked much more progress,' Mr Agrawal said. 'But the good part is we are moving on many aspects, especially on customs and trade facilitation. We are moving on technical cooperation, and there are discussions around market access.' He added that the next two rounds are expected to be in New Delhi in August, and in Malaysia in October, respectively. 'We hope in these two rounds we should be able to see good progress and try to reach some kind of conclusion by the time the ASEAN-India Summit takes place in end-October,' he said. 'The endeavour is in that direction.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
CERC rejects CESC's 300 MW hybrid power tariff bid over procedural lapses
The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) has rejected a petition by CESC Ltd seeking approval for the adoption of tariff for the long-term procurement of 300 MW power from grid-connected wind-solar hybrid projects, citing non-compliance with competitive bidding guidelines. The power utility had failed to obtain prior approval for deviations in the bidding process from the appropriate authority, which in this case should have been the Centre and not the West Bengal government, the CERC said in its report. CESC sought to adopt a tariff of Rs 3.81 per kWh for the hybrid power procurement. "We reject the adoption of the tariff so discovered, as the petitioner has not complied with the bidding guidelines under Section 63 of the Electricity Act. The petitioner may go for re-bidding, if so advised, strictly in accordance with the guidelines issued under Section 63 of the Act," the CERC said in the order. CESC had floated the tender on November 8, 2024, for procuring 150 MW wind-solar hybrid power with a greenshoe option for an additional 150 MW, aiming to meet its renewable purchase obligations . The project was proposed to be located in Mandsaur in Madhya Pradesh. The final tariff was discovered through competitive bidding and an e-reverse auction conducted on December 27, 2024. Purvah Green Power Pvt Ltd, a subsidiary of CESC, emerged as the successful bidder for the entire 300 MW capacity. CESC did not respond to requests for comments till the time of filing of this report. The Commission noted that despite being aware from a previous case (Petition No. 365/AT/2024) that approval for deviations in inter-state transmission system (ISTS)-connected projects must be obtained from the central government, CESC proceeded with approvals from the West Bengal government. The Commission also observed that CESC had misled the state government by not disclosing the ISTS nature of the project and continued the tender process despite being aware of the requirement to approach the Centre. "The Commission had condoned this requirement once as an exception, but cannot make the exception a rule," the order said, referring to a previous instance where similar deviations were allowed in view of exigencies. "Acceptance of the petitioner's prayers in the instant petition would not be in consonance with the principles as contained in Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003," it added. CESC defended the higher-than-average tariff by citing two key advantages in the winning bid. First, the project promised a higher Capacity Utilisation Factor (CUF) of 50 per cent, well above the usual 30 per cent for comparable hybrid projects. Additionally, the bidder committed to completing the project within 20 months, shorter than the standard 24-month timeline, which CESC claimed could result in potential savings of Rs 0.02 per kWh. The Commission further pointed out that awarding the entire 300 MW capacity to a related party. "Another interesting point to note is that in response to the RfS in Petition 365/AT/2024 as well as the present petition, the bidders participating in the bids are precisely the same, and the winning bidder, being a wholly owned subsidiary of the petitioner, is also the same. While this could be a coincidence, it raises a question mark on transparency," the order noted. The Commission also rejected CESC's justification of the higher tariff on the grounds of higher capacity utilisation and project timelines, noting that the company's comparison of the discovered tariff with short-term prices in the Green Day-Ahead Market (G-DAM) was misplaced. CERC clarified that such comparisons are not valid under the guidelines, which require benchmarking against tariffs discovered through long-term competitive bidding. The July 9 order advised CESC to go for re-bidding strictly in accordance with the guidelines issued under Section 63 of the Electricity Act.
