Rayadurgam constituency to be developed with Rs 300 cr
He made these remarks during the 'First Step in Good Governance' programme held on Friday at Erragunta village in Kanekal mandal of Rayadurgam constituency.
Minister Keshav was joined by Government Whip and Rayadurgam MLA Kalava Srinivasulu and other dignitaries at the event.
Addressing the gathering, Keshav announced that proposals worth Rs300 crore have been submitted for the development of Rayadurgam constituency. He reiterated that the same level of priority given to Uravakonda would be extended to Rayadurgam. Acknowledging local challenges, he stated that despite difficulties, the Malyam Bridge project has been sanctioned and is underway.
To benefit farmers, approximately Rs35 crore was being spent on urgent works in the HLC Canal, extending from the constituency to the Pennobulam Dam.
The Minister highlighted the dire financial situation inherited by the current government, noting that a Central government survey identified Andhra Pradesh as the only State in India unable to incur further debt.
He described managing monthly expenses as a significant challenge, akin to financial struggles faced by women in households. Despite the previous government's financial mismanagement, he credited Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu's astuteness and experience for putting the State back on the path of progress. He added that the government was actively working to attract large companies for investments, which will generate employment and boost State's income.
Keshav emphasized their dedication to working tirelessly, understanding the hardships faced by the poor. He acknowledged Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu's continuous guidance as crucial during these challenging times.
He asserted that welfare schemes like 'Talliki Vandanam' have been expanded, pensions increased by Rs1,000 in one go, and financial assistance for farmers under the 'Annadata Sukhibhava' scheme will be provided soon.
He pointed out, 'We have doubled welfare and increased development tenfold compared to the past.' He specifically mentioned that while HLC works were neglected for five years, their government has undertaken them, and Rs70 lakh has been spent on cement roads in Erragunta village.
Government Whip and Rayadurgam MLA Kalava Srinivasulu said that the coalition government, under Chandrababu Naidu's leadership, was working tirelessly for public welfare. He stated that the government, elected with the trust and blessings of the people, was striving to eradicate poverty.
Later, Minister Payyavula Keshav and Whip Kalava Srinivasulu inaugurated a Primary Health Centre (PHC) at Erragunta village, built at a cost of Rs1.7299 crores. Subsequently, they inspected the Under Tunnel (UT) works in the HLC Canal near the Yennerangaswamy Temple in the village.
With the canal water set to be released soon, they reviewed the progress of the works. Engineers informed them that most of the work was completed, and there would be no issues with water distribution.
The Minister announced that water would be supplied to the HLC and Handri-Neeva canals starting July 15th, instructing that remaining works be completed by then to ensure smooth water distribution.
The event was attended by Market Yard Chairman Hanumanta Reddy, local leaders, and party workers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
P Chidambaram on Trump's tariffs: ‘We do not have to bend over or be defiant… It is difficult but we must persevere'
The sudden announcement of President Donald Trump's 25% tariffs on Indian goods from August 1, with an additional but unspecified 'penalty' for its defence and energy imports from Russia has put a lot of stress on the Narendra Modi government. This move, coming just ahead of an impending trade agreement, could pull down the economy and cast a shadow on India-US ties, experts say. Former Union Minister and senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, who has served as Finance minister for four terms and was also the Commerce and Industry minister, talks to The Indian Express of the tightrope that India must now walk on the negotiations. He speaks of the Operation Sindoor debate in Parliament as well. Excerpts: How do you see President Trump's tariffs and penalty on certain imports from Russia? He (Trump) has set August 1 as a deadline. What I gather is the negotiations are not going forward in the way that we expect. But he is a very impulsive President. Therefore, he announced it two days before the August 1 deadline. Be that as it may… I just read that in the last few hours, he has said 'Whether we will charge the tariff that I announced' and 'We will let you know by this week'… Whatever he meant by that. Therefore, although he has announced a 25% tariff, whether he will stick to that, I cannot say. How does India navigate ties with a President who you call impulsive? France, the UK and some Latin American countries are dealing with President Trump and the United States. They do not take a defiant attitude. At the same time, they do not bend over. We have to maintain our position and tell the United States that we are willing to negotiate. Negotiating a trade agreement with the United States is not easy. It is painstaking. The big obstacle is that we had — and in many cases still have — is high tax. As a result of that, the trade balance between the United States and India is almost $45 billion in our favour. We can say the same thing about our trade with other countries, where the trade balances in favor of the other country. But that is part of the world of commerce… We will have to deal with it. We do not have to bend over. At the same time, we do not have to be defiant. Japan and Korea have trade deals with the US. Is that the best way to navigate the situation? There is a difference. Japan is a developed country. South Korea is a developed country. They have a wider basket of exports. They have also freed imports to a large extent. Therefore, it is easier for them to open up a little more in exchange for the United States opening up a little more. We were a closed economy. In fact, when I took over as Commerce minister, we were completely closed. We have opened it significantly but not to the extent of developed countries. It is more difficult for us to enter into a trade agreement with the United States than Japan and South Korea. There are other countries in the same league as India. They will also find it difficult to enter into trade agreements with the United States. But we have to persevere, and we have to go through the exercise. Some countries have announced reciprocal tariffs. Those are bargaining chips. China has done it. That is a kind of a bluff or bravado which President Trump also indulges in. So, should India avoid that route? No, we are not in the position to do that. We have to negotiate. We have to make it plain that we will negotiate. Coming to the debate in Parliament on Operation Sindoor and its aftermath… How do you see the discourse? And are there unanswered questions after three days of debate? The unanswered question is: Why did we accept the ceasefire immediately and without conditions? See the Armed forces have made sacrifices, fought bravely and made sacrifices. They may not have lost any lives, but they have lost military hardware. If the Armed forces made some military gains, no doubt about it. I acknowledged it in my intervention in Parliament… But if you accepted a ceasefire — let us assume voluntarily — why did you accept it immediately and without conditions? That is the question I would ask. What conditions? I do not know. The military must be involved. The Foreign Ministry must be involved. The Home Ministry must be involved. And the Water Ministry must be involved. And we should have made a list of demands and told Pakistan 'you indicate whether these demands can be met partially or wholly, and then we will agree to a ceasefire'. But without being in government, without knowing the actual situation on the ground… How can I spell out the conditions… But an unconditional ceasefire and an immediate ceasefire… Seems to me, we are frittering away the military gains. The Opposition alleges US president played a role in bringing about a ceasefire? That is a separate question. I do not want to jump to that conclusion, but that is a separate question. Here is a President of the United States saying — for the 31st time today — that he is the one who brought about the end of the war and the ceasefire. Now, the government rebukes the Opposition. I do not want you to rebuke President Trump, at least rebut him. This is the demand. Stand up in Parliament and say 'President Trump did not speak to me, did not mediate, did not bring about a ceasefire. It is our decision, one we took voluntarily'. Of course, President Trump will say something after that, but at least for Indian parliament and Indian public opinion, that statement must be made. So, Mr Rahul Gandhi is absolutely right. He is saying that it should be said in Parliament. That is all. In Lok Sabha, Home Minister Amit Shah referred to a recent interview you gave to The Quint in which you said the BJP administration was giving a clean chit to Pakistan. You said that the Pahalgam attackers could be homegrown terrorists. What did I say? What has the NIA (National Investigation Agency) investigation revealed? They are unwilling to disclose what the NIA has done all these weeks. Have they identified the terrorists? And I said give us what the NIA has found. That is not doubting the NIA… Just asking for information. I know — and I believe — that there are infiltrating terrorists. I said so in the Rajya Sabha. There are Pakistani infiltrating terrorists, but they are also India-based terrorists. Take Pahalgam… On April 26, the J&K administration demolished a number of houses on the ground that were owned by terrorists. Now, who are those terrorists? If they own houses in India, they must be India-based terrorists. Secondly, in June, the NIA arrested two people. The names have come out today… On the ground, they were harboring the three suspected infiltrating terrorists. Who are those two guys? They are India-based terrorists, or India based extremists. The Mumbai Suburban train attack (in 2006)… Who committed that? India-based militants. Mumbai Zaveri Bazaar (blast) in 2011 was India-based terrorists. Therefore, I maintain that there are infiltrating terrorists as well as India-based terrorists. Just tell us what the NIA has found. The government has now neutralised three people, and the Home Minister announced it in Parliament. I accepted. During the debate in both the Houses, senior ministers hit out at the Congress to argue that the party had always been soft on Pakistan and terrorism. How do you see that kind of a counter attack? This is not a counter attack. For the people of India, these are completely irrelevant. You start from 1947 and say Congress gave away Pakistan. Anybody who makes that statement has no idea of the historical events between 1942 to 1947. Then, you say we gave away PoK (Pakistan Occupied Kashmir). Again, the person who says that has no understanding, no knowledge, of historical events. At the end of this three-day debate on Operation Sindoor, is the Opposition satisfied? As many members have said… Not only the Congress, but the DMK, TMC, CPM, AAP, RJD… They have asked a number of questions, and according to them, they have not been answered satisfactorily. *This week, there were acquittals in two big terror cases — the Mumbai train bombings and the Malegaon bomb blast. It was under your tenure as Home Minister that NIA was set up. How do you see the challenge when high-profile terror cases fall like this in courts. Because I was in the Home ministry, I have said that no political comment is required in a criminal court proceeding. I am a trained lawyer. I believe that the judiciary is independent. The prosecution is independent. The investigating officer is independent. In these cases, the cases were registered and investigated initially by the Maharashtra police. I think one case was transferred to the NIA. So, where is the political comment on the criminal court proceeding or the outcome of the criminal court case?
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
Buldi-Koradi Metro Plan Triggers Real Estate Buzz
Nagpur: Even before the blueprint is ready, the proposed Sitabuldi to Koradi Metro corridor — part of Metro Phase 3 expansion — has triggered a flurry of discussions across Nagpur. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now From real estate circles to residential localities along the stretch, speculations around station placement, construction format, and the impact on property values are gaining momentum. Construction alignment is one of the most hotly discussed topic. Senior Metro officials clarified that underground construction will only be chosen when absolutely unavoidable due to significantly higher costs. However, the first 3km of the corridor — beginning from Kasturchand Park — may need to go underground due to existing flyovers and dense urban infrastructure. After that, the line is likely to shift to at-grade and then elevated formats, said a senior official. The 11.5km corridor is one of the four high-capacity MRTS corridors proposed under the Comprehensive Mobility Plan (CMP) prepared by MahaMetro in collaboration with RITES. According to sources, Metro guidelines mandate one station approximately every 1 to 1.5km, which means around 10 stations are likely along this stretch — though exact locations will depend on population density and land availability. After studying Metro DPRs and consulting officials, the estimated cost for Phase 3 is around Rs300 crore per kilometre, bringing the total projected expenditure to approximately Rs3,500 crore. Currently, ridership projections suggest the corridor will cater to 5,600 passengers per hour per direction (PHPDT) in 2031, increasing to 11,800 PHPDT by 2054. Daily ridership is expected to grow from 0.65 lakh in 2031 to 1.47 lakh by 2054 — indicating the strategic importance of this corridor in connecting key northern residential zones to the city centre. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now While no Detailed Project Report (DPR) has been prepared yet, officials confirmed that the proposal is under review, with a 15-day window given for stakeholder suggestions. Only after this period will the tendering process begin for the preparation of a DPR. The Metro expansion has triggered renewed interest in the real estate market along the corridor. Residents are curious about whether a station will be located near their neighbourhood, and how it might affect property prices. Developers are also eyeing opportunities for transit-oriented development (TOD), which typically leads to densification, commercial growth, and better urban infrastructure. Though the buzz is high, authorities caution that no final decisions have been made. The current phase involves gathering inputs from multiple stakeholders — including urban planners, local bodies, and citizens. Only after this will a DPR be commissioned, which will determine the final route, construction plan, and station locations. For now, the Sitabuldi–Koradi Metro remains one of the city's most anticipated urban mobility developments — one that could reshape Nagpur's northern growth corridor in the years to come.
New Indian Express
20 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Telangana Minister Uttam urges REC to reduce interest on Rs 16K crore irrigation loans
HYDERABAD: Irrigation Minister N Uttam Kumar Reddy on Wednesday urged the Rural Electrification Corporation Limited to reduce interest rates and extend repayment tenure on the Rs 16,000 crore irrigation loans. The minister held a meeting with REC Chairman and Managing Director Jitendra Srivastava in Delhi. Special Chief Secretary of Finance Sandeep Kumar Sultania also participated in the discussions. During the meeting, the minister urged REC to consider reducing the interest rates on the existing loan portfolio and to increase the loan repayment tenure, which would provide the state with much-needed fiscal flexibility and breathing room to continue its developmental agenda without disruptions. Highlighting the strategic importance of irrigation infrastructure in Telangana's agrarian economy, the minister emphasised that easing the repayment conditions would not only help the state manage its finances more effectively but also enable timely completion of critical projects that directly impact lakhs of farmers. The CMD and senior officials of REC responded positively to the request and assured the minister that the corporation would sympathetically examine the proposal submitted by the Telangana government. The state government had borrowed approximately Rs 16,000 crore from REC for the execution of various large-scale irrigation projects aimed at ensuring water security for agriculture and rural development. However, the loans were sanctioned at relatively high interest rates and with shorter repayment cycles, which are now placing considerable strain on the state's financial resources. Seeks extension of repayment tenure During a meeting with REC CMD Jitendra Srivastava in Delhi, Irrigation Minister N Uttam Kumar Reddy also urged the corporation to extend repayment tenure, which he said would provide the state with much-needed fiscal flexibility to continue its developmental agenda.
