Nick's Place to close Amherst Street location
In a post on Facebook, Nick Ananiadis, son of owner Peter Ananiadis, said the restaurant at 504 Amherst St. will be closing its doors on Feb. 22 due to an unforeseen rent increase.
'My dad has worked 7 days week for as long as I can remember,' Nick said in the post. 'Both him and Amy Ananiadis built this business from the ground up and have provided for me and my sister. This was my culinary school and provided me with more life lessons than any book could ever teach me.'
Mister Sizzle's to close current, future locations by end of month
Peter will be retiring sometime this month, according to another post made by Nick.
Nick's Place serves breakfast, brunch and lunch with special attention to Greek and American food. It boasts 4.1 stars out of 5 with 143 reviews on Yelp.
Nick's Place Express at 2466 Elmwood Ave., owned by Nick Ananiadis, will remain open.
Its hours are 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. Monday and Sunday and 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. Wednesday through Saturday.
Kayleigh Hunter-Gasperini joined the News 4 team in 2024 as a Digital Video Producer. She is a graduate of Chatham University.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's order to block 'woke' AI in government encourages tech giants to censor their chatbots
Tech companies looking to sell their artificial intelligence technology to the federal government must now contend with a new regulatory hurdle: prove their chatbots aren't 'woke.' President Donald Trump's sweeping new plan to counter China in achieving 'global dominance' in AI promises to cut regulations and cement American values into the AI tools increasingly used at work and home. But one of Trump's three AI executive orders signed Wednesday — the one "preventing woke AI in the federal government' — also mimics China's state-driven approach to mold the behavior of AI systems to fit its ruling party's core values. Several leading providers of the AI language models targeted by the order — products like Google's Gemini, Microsoft's Copilot — have so far been silent on Trump's anti-woke directive, which still faces a study period before it gets into official procurement rules. While the tech industry has largely welcomed Trump's broader AI plans, the anti-woke order forces the industry to leap into a culture war battle — or try their best to quietly avoid it. 'It will have massive influence in the industry right now,' especially as tech companies 'are already capitulating' to other Trump administration directives, said civil rights advocate Alejandra Montoya-Boyer, senior director of The Leadership Conference's Center for Civil Rights and Technology. The move also pushes the tech industry to abandon years of work to combat the pervasive forms of racial and gender bias that studies and real-world examples have shown to be baked into AI systems. 'First off, there's no such thing as woke AI,' she said. 'There's AI technology that discriminates and then there's AI technology that actually works for all people.' Molding the behaviors of AI large language models is challenging because of the way they're built. They've been trained on most of what's on the internet, reflecting the biases of all the people who've posted commentary, edited a Wikipedia entry or shared images online. 'This will be extremely difficult for tech companies to comply with,' said former Biden official Jim Secreto, who was deputy chief of staff to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, an architect of many of Biden's AI industry initiatives. 'Large language models reflect the data they're trained on, including all the contradictions and biases in human language.' Tech workers also have a say in how they're designed, from the global workforce of annotators who check their responses to the Silicon Valley engineers who craft the instructions for how they interact with people. Trump's order targets those 'top-down' efforts at tech companies to incorporate what it calls the 'destructive' ideology of diversity, equity and inclusion into AI models, including 'concepts like critical race theory, transgenderism, unconscious bias, intersectionality, and systemic racism.' For Secreto, the order resembles China's playbook in 'using the power of the state to stamp out what it sees as disfavored viewpoints." The method is different, with China relying on direct regulation through its Cyberspace Administration, which audits AI models, approves them before they are deployed and requires them to filter out banned content such as the bloody Tiananmen Square crackdown on pro-democracy protests in 1989. Trump's order doesn't call for any such filters, relying on tech companies to instead show that their technology is ideologically neutral by disclosing some of the internal policies that guide the chatbots. 'The Trump administration is taking a softer but still coercive route by using federal contracts as leverage,' Secreto said. 'That creates strong pressure for companies to self-censor in order to stay in the government's good graces and keep the money flowing.' The order's call for 'truth-seeking' AI echoes the language of the president's one-time ally and adviser Elon Musk, who frequently uses that phrase as the mission for the Grok chatbot made by his company xAI. But whether Grok or its rivals will be favored under the new policy remains to be seen. Despite a 'rhetorically pointed' introduction laying out the Trump administration's problems with DEI, the actual language of the order's directives shouldn't be hard for tech companies to comply with, said Neil Chilson, a Republican former chief technologist for the Federal Trade Commission. 'It doesn't even prohibit an ideological agenda,' just that any intentional methods to guide the model be disclosed, said Chilson, who is now head of AI policy at the nonprofit Abundance Institute. 'Which is pretty light touch, frankly.' Chilson disputes comparisons to China's cruder modes of AI censorship. 'There is nothing in this order that says that companies have to produce or cannot produce certain types of output,' he said. 'It says developers shall not intentionally encode partisan or ideological judgments. That's the exact opposite of the Chinese requirement.' So far, tech companies that have praised Trump's broader AI plans haven't said much about the order. OpenAI on Thursday said it is awaiting more detailed guidance but believes its work to make ChatGPT objective already makes the technology consistent with what the order requires. Microsoft, a major supplier of email, cloud computing and other online services to the federal government, declined to comment Thursday. Musk's xAI, through spokesperson Katie Miller, a former Trump official, pointed to a company comment praising Trump's AI announcements as a 'positive step' but didn't respond to a follow-up question about how Grok would be affected. Anthropic, Google, Meta, and Palantir didn't immediately respond to emailed requests for comment Thursday. AI tools are already widely used in the federal government, according to an inventory created at the end of Biden's term. In just one agency, U.S. Health and Human Services, the inventory found more than 270 use cases, including the use of commercial generative AI platforms such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini for internal agency support to summarize the key points of a lengthy report. The ideas behind the order have bubbled up for more than a year on the podcasts and social media feeds of Sacks and other influential Silicon Valley venture capitalists, many of whom endorsed Trump's presidential campaign last year. Much of their ire centered on Google's February 2024 release of an AI image-generating tool that produced historically inaccurate images before the tech giant took down and fixed the product. Google later explained that the errors — including one user's request for American Founding Fathers that generated portraits of Black, Asian and Native American men — was the result of an overcompensation for technology that, left to its own devices, was prone to favoring lighter-skinned people because of pervasive bias in the systems. Trump allies alleged that Google engineers were hard-coding their own social agenda into the product, and made it a priority to do something about it. 'It's 100% intentional,' said prominent venture capitalist and Trump adviser Marc Andreessen on a podcast in December. 'That's how you get Black George Washington at Google. There's override in the system that basically says, literally, 'Everybody has to be Black.' Boom. There's squads, large sets of people, at these companies who determine these policies and write them down and encode them into these systems.' Sacks credited a conservative strategist for helping to draft the order. 'When they asked me how to define 'woke,' I said there's only one person to call: Chris Rufo. And now it's law: the federal government will not be buying WokeAI,' Sacks wrote on X. Rufo responded that, in addition to helping define the phrase, he also helped 'identify DEI ideologies within the operating constitutions of these systems.' Matt O'brien, The Associated Press Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
Inflation Outpaces Wage Growth For Over 40% Of Americans
Topline Wage growth for a large swath of Americans is being outpaced by the rate of inflation, according to data from Indeed, which reported people with low- and middle-paying jobs are likely feeling the most pressure. US Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has said he would like to wait to see the impact of ... More President Donald Trump's tariffs before making changes to interest rates. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Key Facts Purchasing power for 57% of U.S. workers increased last year, according to Indeed, leaving 43% lagging behind the rise in cost of living. While annual wage growth remains just above the annual rate of inflation, which grew to 2.7% in June, 'the gap between the two is the narrowest it's been in 12 months' Indeed added. Wage growth has usually remained faster than the pace of inflation during periods of normal market conditions in the last few years, according to data from the Atlanta Fed's wage growth tracker. As 'jobs at the low-to-middle end of the pay spectrum' are likely feeling the crunch of reduced purchasing power, wages of higher-paying jobs have typically grown the fastest in the past year, though Indeed notes annual growth among those jobs have receded in recent months. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We're launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day's headlines. Text 'Alerts' to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here. Contra Overall wage growth remains 'healthy and above inflation,' Indeed noted, even though many low- and middle-wage jobs have experienced pay increases at or below the pace of inflation. What Kinds Of Jobs Have The Fastest-Growing Wage Growth Since Last Year? Jobs in electrical engineering topped Indeed's list of fastest-growing wages with a 'much higher-than-average annual advertised pay growth of 6.3%' Wage growth of electrical engineering jobs was followed by legal (5.1%), marketing (5.1%), project management (4.6%), mathematics (4.5%) and IT operations (4.4%). What Kinds Of Jobs Have The Slowest-Growing Wage Growth Since Last Year? Physicians and surgeons led the way in slowest growing wage growth with a 0.8% increase since last year, which was followed by driving jobs (1%). Other slow-growing categories include arts and entertainment (1.2%), software development (1.4%), beauty and wellness (1.6%) and logistic support (1.7%). What To Watch For The impact of President Donald Trump's tariff policy on American households. A Yale University report published this month found the president's policy could cost U.S. households an additional $2,400 this year as tariffs may potentially trigger a 1.8% increase in short-term prices for consumers. The tariffs could cause other economic impacts, such as a rise in the unemployment rate and a drop in the U.S. gross domestic product. Key Background Low-paying jobs experienced their largest wage gains as the economy charged back from the throes of the COVID-19 pandemic's early days, with annual growth spiking as high as 7.5% in October 2022, according to the Atlanta Fed's wage growth tracker. That rate of wage gains dropped to 3.7% last month. June's 2.7% inflation rate was the highest level since February. Trump has pushed Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to cut interest rates as inflation has approached the Fed's long-term target of 2%, but the Associated Press notes the current inflation figures will 'make it more likely that the central bank will leave rates where they are,' citing Powell's desire to understand the impact of Trump's tariffs before making any moves. Further Reading Trump's New Tariffs Could Cost Households $2,400 This Year, Analysis Finds (Forbes) Inflation Rose More Than Expected Last Month As Trump's Tariffs Raise Prices (Forbes)
New York Times
28 minutes ago
- New York Times
Shaheen Backs Trump U.N. Pick After Deal to Release Frozen Foreign Aid Funds
After Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, cast the tiebreaking vote on Thursday to advance President Trump's nominee for American ambassador to the United Nations to the floor, she cited an unusual reason. Part of her decision to vote Michael Waltz's nomination out of the panel, she said, was that he 'represents a moderating force with a distinguished record of military service and an extensive background in national security policymaking.' At a time when top national security officials in Mr. Trump's administration have sought to decrease the United States' footprint around the world, Ms. Shaheen said, Mr. Waltz 'did not represent himself to me as someone who wants to retreat from the world — and this is a quality I value in nominees.' But Ms. Shaheen, who has broken with her party to back other Trump administration nominees in the past, also gave another justification for supporting Mr. Waltz. In exchange for her vote, she said she had won an assurance from officials that the administration would release $75 million it had frozen for the World Food Program and the International Organization on Migration. That includes $50 million for disaster relief in Haiti, including 'lifesaving food for 250,000 individuals at risk of extreme/acute malnutrition' as well as public health programs, according to her office. The other $25 million was for food distribution efforts in Nigeria. The deal, reported earlier by Axios, was remarkable not so much because of how open Ms. Shaheen was about disclosing it, but because she had to bother making it in the first place. The money, after all, had already been approved by Congress and signed into law. But given the Trump administration's aggressive moves to unilaterally freeze federal spending in defiance of Congress, particularly foreign aid, a side deal was needed to ensure that the funding would be spent. 'Saving lives through American assistance globally is not only the right thing to do, but it advances our national security and economic interests around the world,' Ms. Shaheen said on Thursday. Ms. Shaheen cast the tiebreaking vote after Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, voted against advancing Mr. Waltz's nomination out of committee. He said he had done so because the former congressman voted in 2020 to constrain Mr. Trump's ability to remove troops from Afghanistan.
