Why do we keep expecting rate cuts, even when the RBA tells us not to?
At the time, mortgage holders had endured 13 interest rate hikes since May 2022, and the cash rate had sat at 4.35 per cent since November 2023. Even though the February rate cut was 'just' 0.25 per cent, it was welcome.
To many – economists and financial experts, in particular – it was also a sign of things to come. When another rate cut followed in May, it all but confirmed the belief that a steady trimming of rates lay ahead, and indeed, going into last week's RBA meeting, the financial market was giving a 96 per cent chance of another cut.
As we all know, that didn't happen, and many people – especially those who were predicting a cut – were very unhappy. While the disappointment was understandable, I found the shock that poured out after the announcement frankly baffling.
At the February press conference by Governor Michele Bullock after the first interest rate cut in almost two years was announced, someone asked if Australian households could expect consecutive cuts throughout the rest of the year. If you rewind and look at what she said, it's clear the governor warned us all – pretty strongly – that we shouldn't get our hopes up.
She called the prospect of consecutive cuts 'unrealistic', and added that 'the market is expecting quite a few more interest rate cuts by the middle of next year; about three more on top of this. Whether or not that eventuates is going to depend very much on the data – our feeling at the moment is that that is far too confident'.
When suddenly our rate cut daydream was no longer on the table, people understandably were pretty unhappy.
As if that were not clear enough, Bullock added: 'I want to be clear that today's decision does not imply that further rate cuts along the lines suggested by the market are coming'. She also said: 'We have to be careful not to get ahead of ourselves'.
There are some very valid reasons for why experts were caught off guard by last week's decision (namely, the jobs figures, which many now see as proof the decision by the RBA and Bullock was wrong).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
18 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Webjet fined $9m for misleading Aussie travellers after the ACCC took the online travel agency to Federal Court
A major Australian travel company has been fined $9m for misleading Aussies about the price of flights and booking confirmations after an investigation from the consumer watchdog. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) in November took online travel agency (OTA) Webjet to Federal Court for misleading advertisements it ran between 2018 and 2023 that excluded compulsory fees. Webjet also admitted it misled 118 customers between 2019 and 2024 by providing flight bookings for travel plans it had not actually confirmed. The OTA then asked for additional payments upwards of $2120 for customers to complete the booking. Webjet has since handed back this money. ACCC chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said the investigation into Webjet began after a traveller complained about a ticket price advertised as 'from $18' ended costing three times as much after fees were added. 'We took this case because we considered that Webjet used misleading pricing by excluding or not adequately disclosing compulsory fees in its ads,' Ms Cass-Gottlieb said. 'Seeking to lure in customers with prices that don't tell the whole story is a serious breach of the Australian Consumer Law.' The OTA hit customers with a 'servicing fee' and a 'booking price guarantee' fee ranging between $34.90-$54.90 per booking. These additional fees were not disclosed in Webjet's social media posts and varied depending on where the traveller was heading. Some users had to scroll to the fine print near the bottom of the screen in their booking to see information about the fees. 'Retailers must ensure their advertised prices are accurate,' Ms Cass-Gottlieb said. "They should clearly disclose additional fees and charges." These fees made up 36 per cent of Webjet's total revenue from November 2018 to November 2023. The consumer watchdog noted that Webjet had co-operated with the ACCC throughout the investigation, admitted liability and agreed to make joint submissions to the Court about orders, including the penalty.
9 News
an hour ago
- 9 News
Australia's nervous Trump tariff wait almost over
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here The so-called "reciprocal" tariffs were paused for 90 days, and the White House has recently announced deals with a slew of partners, including the UK , China , Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, Japan and, as of this morning, the European Union. However, an Australian deal is yet to be announced ahead of the pause expiring on Friday. Donald Trump's tariffs have caused uncertainty in financial markets. (Getty) Australia is currently subject to a baseline 10 per cent tariff, but what that figure will be as of Friday is unclear. Trump said last week he would be sending out letters to roughly 200 countries this week unilaterally setting a range of tariff rates. "It's basically going to say, you're going to pay 10 per cent, you're going to pay 15 per cent, you're going to pay maybe less, I don't know," Trump told reporters. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese criticised Trump's tariffs when they were first imposed. (Dominic Lorrimer) Trump reacted positively to the news, saying on his Truth Social account: "Now, we are going to sell so much to Australia because this is undeniable and irrefutable Proof that US Beef is the Safest and Best in the entire World." Albanese and China's President Xi Jinping in Beijing earlir this month. (Huang Jingwen/Xinhua via A) Meanwhile, talks between the United States and China are still ongoing, with officials from both nations set to meet this week. Trump slapped a 145 per cent tariff on imports from China in April, prompting Beijing to respond with a 125 per cent duty on the United States. In the aftermath of Trump's tariffs, China called for greater trade cooperation with Australia, which was reiterated when Prime Minister Albanese undertook a state visit to China earlier this month. "Protectionist measures are on the rise in the world, and China and Australia are committed to advancing trade and investment liberalisation and facilitation," Chinese Premier Li Qiang said after meeting with Albanese. CONTACT US
Courier-Mail
an hour ago
- Courier-Mail
‘Words are f***': China's Aus turf war explodes
Don't miss out on the headlines from Motoring. Followed categories will be added to My News. BYD's Australian boss has taken to social media to blast claims from rival Chinese car brand Chery that accuse BYD, MG and Geely of copying its hybrid technology – calling the suggestion F*** in a fiery LinkedIn post. The outburst comes after Carsales published an article quoting Chery Australia COO Lucas Harris, who said competing Chinese brands like BYD were '100 per cent' copying the company's so-called 'Super Hybrid' powertrain technology. Harris told Carsales this during the launch of Chery's Tiggo 7 and Tiggo 8 hybrid SUVs. The Carsales story referenced BYD's new Shark 6 ute, MG's HS Super Hybrid, and Geely's incoming Starray EM-i Super Hybrid, all of which use similar naming conventions and drivetrain logic, with varying claims about efficiency, battery backup, and petrol-electric switching. RELATED: China ramps up Aussie takeover BYD has produced more than 10 million hybrid and electric cars. Picture: Supplied But Harris said, 'No, they're copying us … 100 per cent they are.' 'Maybe we should be flattered that some of our competitors decided to copy our technology, or the name of our technology, because their technology is not the same.' The article and Harris's comments provoked an immediate and rare response from BYD Australia General Manager Wing You, who posted a screenshot of the article with a blunt remark. 'Emmmmm, very interesting!' he wrote on LinkedIn. 'They are very lucky by internal rules, we cannot negatively comment on other brands; however, I need to say, this GENTLEMEN's words are F***!.' MORE: Aussies 'not ready' for advanced driver tech BYD Australia general manager Mr Wing You fired back at rival Chery in a now taken down LinkedIn post, calling the hybrid copycat claims 'F***!'. Picture: Supplied The LinkedIn post has since been taken down, however BYD CMO Kate Hornstein confirmed that the automaker was the first globally to introduce plug-in hybrid technology with the launch of the F3DM in 2008. 'Before the launch of the SEALION 6 plug-in hybrid SUV in mid-2024, the term 'Super Hybrid' was used in the Australian market. Anything that suggests otherwise is misleading and risks confusing consumers who deserve clear, fact-based information to support their vehicle choices,' she said. In the Carsales interview, Harris told journalist Ally Lawrence that Chery took possession of the 'Super Hybrid' name more than 12 months ago in Europe. However, trademark records confirm the name 'Super Hybrid' and 'Super Hybrid System' is active in the United Kingdom, registered to Chery Automobile Co., Ltd., but it was only lodged in April 2025, not a year prior. Chery has pending trademark applications for the term in several other jurisdictions, including Thailand, Brazil and Australia. BYD applied to trademark its DM-i hybrid system in multiple countries, including the United States, Australia and Brazil as early as December 2024 – months before Chery's UK filing and most recently in the UK in May 2025. MORE: The end of travel as we know it The 2025 Chery Tiggo 7 launched in Australia this month, with the brand claiming its powertrain is being copied by rival Chinese automakers. Picture: Thomas Wielecki Harris told Carsales that Chery claimed to have possession of the 'Super Hybrid' name over 12 months ago in Europe; however, Harris admitted that BYD beat it to the Aussie market with the Shark 6 dual-cab ute. It uses a system called Dual Mode Intelligent (DM-i) in the Shark 6, with the car capable of driving in EV or hybrid mode without performance loss. In comparison, Chery's version is branded CHS or SHS depending on the model, promises better driveability when unplugged, with Harris claiming rival plug-in-hybrids (PHEVs) become 'awful to drive' when battery levels dip. 'Noise goes up considerably, the power delivery and driving feeling is significantly worse; and the fuel economy is just awful,' Harris told Carsales. 'That's a big difference with our technology; you can drive it around and never, ever, ever plug it in, and you'll have no deteriorated performance at all. 'You won't suffer any negative consequences by not plugging it in.' No formal legal action has been flagged. Originally published as 'Words are f***': China's Aus turf war explodes
