EFF reshuffles leadership to boost organisational strength ahead of 2026 elections
The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) have announced a series of significant leadership appointments across several provinces, aimed at reinforcing discipline, sharpening leadership capacity, and deepening grassroots organisational presence.
The party said the shake-up is intended to "refine the EFF's leadership machinery, deepen accountability," and ensure its structures are "well-coordinated, administratively sound, and financially efficient" in preparation for intensified electoral engagement.
The changes, were effected in strict accordance with Section 14 of the EFF Constitution, following resolutions taken at the 2nd Central Command Team (CCT) Meeting of the 3rd National People's Assembly (NPA), held in Bela Bela earlier this month.
EFF spokesperson Sinawo Thambo said the appointments are part of 'decisive organisational interventions to reinforce, consolidate, and sharpen leadership capacity,' and a reflection of the party's continued commitment to building a mass-based, ideologically coherent movement grounded in the struggles of the working class and the poor.
''The EFF remains steady in its revolutionary mission: to build a mass-based, militant, and disciplined organisation that is firmly rooted in the struggles of the working class and the poor, and that will deliver true economic freedom in our lifetime,'' said Thambo.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
McKenzie says he won't apologise for 'racist' posts even if Ramaphosa asks
Sport, arts and culture minister Gayton McKenzie has changed his tune and says he won't apologise for allegations of racism after old tweets using the K-word to refer to black people resurfaced. Political parties including the EFF, DA and ATM have called for President Cyril Ramaphosa to remove him as minister and demanded that he apologise. McKenzie previously apologised on his X, but speaking to eNCA on Tuesday, he said he would not apologise for something he hasn't done, even if Ramaphosa asks him. 'I can't ask for forgiveness for something I didn't do. Why am I asking for forgiveness for some of the nonsense things I said about guys and swearing at some guys, not racism. I won't apologise,' he said. 'Why would I apologise for something I didn't do? Even if the president says I must apologise for racism, I will not, because I wasn't racist. Must I be so desperate for a job that I start apologising for stuff? No. I'm another type of guy.'
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
EFF demands action from Tshwane City Manager over security guard insourcing
City Manager Johann Mettler has been accused of undermining a council resolution to insource security guards. Image: File Tshwane City Manager Johann Mettler has come under fire from the EFF for allegedly undermining a 2019 council resolution to insource security guards. The party accused Mettler of introducing bureaucratic obstacles, citing a recent memorandum by the Tshwane Metro Police Department (TMPD) requiring security guards to reapply for positions. The memorandum was issued following the recent advertisement of 200 metro police positions by the municipality. Party leader Obakeng Ramabodu said the EFF deems this process unnecessary, particularly since contract security guards were previously promised permanent positions. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The party demanded that Mettler immediately scrap the re-application requirements for workers already on the insourcing list and urgently process the intake of remaining security guards. Ramabodu called on Mettler to adhere fully with the council resolution and make a public commitment to finalise outstanding insourcing by the 2025/2026 financial year. The EFF's demands, outlined in a letter to Mettler, accuse the city of showing contempt for workers, disregarding council decisions, and disrespecting the dignity of public servants subjected to exploitative conditions. Ramabodu said: 'The EFF Tshwane caucus demands a written response from the city manager within seven days, providing the full complement of the insourcing process — where it stands, how far it has progressed, and with full transparency and accountability. We will not tolerate games or vague statements.' Municipal spokesperson Lindela Mashigo did not specifically respond to the EFF's accusations against Mettler. Instead, he stated that the city has decided to develop its in-house capacity as part of a strategic plan to reduce its dependence on contracted services. He said the decision forms part of a broader initiative to strengthen operational efficiency, improve service delivery, and ensure greater control over critical functions. 'By investing in internal resources, the city seeks to enhance its ability to respond swiftly to community needs and maintain consistent standards of work without the limitations often associated with outsourced arrangements,' he said. According to Mashigo, the city's approach is expected to yield long-term benefits, including cost savings, skills development, and improved institutional knowledge within the city's workforce. 'By empowering its own teams with the necessary tools, training and expertise, the city will be better positioned to deliver sustainable solutions, maintain infrastructure effectively, and provide reliable services to residents. The move marks a decisive step towards self-reliance and resilience in municipal operations,' he said. On Workers Day, the EFF and ActionSA met with security guards at Church Square in the Pretoria CBD, where they promised training to security guards who were previously hired without adequate training, as well as equipping them with the necessary tools. Last month, the FF Plus called for an investigation into the qualifications of 1,283 security guards appointed in Tshwane in 2021, expressing concerns over their alleged lack of adequate training.
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
National Dialogue or National Waste? South Africa should learn from China's digital dialogue success
As South Africa gears up for its much-talked-about National Dialogue, set to kick off with a costly convention this week, one cannot help but wonder why the government insists on pouring millions into fancy gatherings when China has shown a smarter, cheaper way to gather public input through simple online platforms, especially when lessons from the COVID-19 era prove that virtual engagement is not only possible but effective for all South Africans. Image: File photo By Edgar Legoale As South Africa gears up for its much-talked-about National Dialogue, set to kick off with a costly convention this week, one cannot help but wonder why the government insists on pouring millions into fancy gatherings when China has shown a smarter, cheaper way to gather public input through simple online platforms, especially when lessons from the COVID-19 era prove that virtual engagement is not only possible but effective for all South Africans. The high cost of South Africa's talk shop President Cyril Ramaphosa announced the National Dialogue in his 2025 State of the Nation Address, painting it as a grand coming-together of government, political parties, civil society, business, labour, traditional leaders, women, youth, and community voices to shape the country's vision for the next 30 years. It sounds noble, a chance to rebuild trust after years of division and economic woes. The first step, the National Convention, runs from 15 to 17 August 2025 at the University of South Africa in Pretoria, bringing in about 1 000 delegates to set the agenda. But here's the thing: the whole process is budgeted at a whopping R700 million, a figure that has sparked outrage across the board. The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba, have slammed it as outrageous and wasteful, especially when South Africans are battling a brutal cost-of-living crisis, high unemployment, and rising crime. Mashaba called it a 'wasteful exercise,' and many agree, pointing out that we already know the problems – poverty, inequality, corruption, and poor service delivery – without needing expensive talk shops. Even seven leading foundations pulled out, citing rushed planning and a loss of citizen focus, while others label it a sham funded by foreign donors to create fake legitimacy. Ramaphosa has promised to scale down costs, but with the convention going ahead as planned, it's hard to see how much will really change. The Presidency clarified that costs cover logistics like venue hire, transport, and catering for delegates, but in a country where millions go hungry, spending big on hotels and flights feels tone-deaf. This isn't just about money; it's about exclusion. With only 1 000 spots at the convention, how many ordinary voices from rural areas or townships will truly be heard? The process claims to be inclusive, but many people argue it's putting the cart before the horse, ignoring the need for a clear follow-up to the National Development Plan and risking political point-scoring in the Government of National Unity (GNU). This isn't the first time we've seen such initiatives; think of the Codesa talks in the 1990s. But today, with digital tools at our fingertips, why stick to outdated, pricey methods? I believe this is how it must be done: redirect that R700 million to something tangible, like kick-starting the long-overdue Fezile Dabi University in Parys or Sasolburg, which could transform education and job opportunities in the Free State's Fezile Dabi District. The district's Integrated Development Plans highlight the need for higher education infrastructure, and with costs for building a university campus potentially starting in the hundreds of millions, this funding could lay the foundation for a facility offering programmes in key areas like engineering and agriculture, benefiting underserved communities. Lessons from COVID-19: We went online then, why not now? If there's one thing the COVID-19 pandemic taught us, it's that South Africans can adapt to online ways of connecting and sharing ideas. During those tough times from 2020 to 2022, everything shifted virtual – schools held classes on Zoom, businesses ran meetings via Microsoft Teams, and even government consultations happened through webinars and apps. Millions of us were glued to our screens, participating in national dialogues on health, economy, and recovery plans without leaving home. Platforms like WhatsApp groups, Facebook Live, and government portals allowed widespread input on issues like vaccine rollout and economic stimulus. Why not apply the same now for the National Dialogue? It was proven effective, cost nothing extra, and reached people in remote areas with just a smartphone and data. I believe this is how it must be done: embrace the digital shift we mastered during COVID to make consultations truly accessible and affordable, avoiding the waste we're seeing today. China's smart, low-cost approach to public input Contrast this with China, where the government just wrapped up a massive online consultation for its 15th Five-Year Plan, set to run from 2026 to 2030. They collected over 3,113,000 suggestions from citizens – three times more than the previous plan in 2020 – all through free, accessible digital platforms. No lavish conventions, no delegate flights or catering bills; just websites like People's Daily, Xinhua, and CCTV, plus local government portals and the 'Study to Strengthen the Nation' app. This app alone, launched in 2019, has 345 million registered users and sees 700 million daily visits, offering free content like books, courses, and news while letting people submit ideas easily. The consultation ran from 20 May to 20 June 2025, covering topics from tech innovation and diplomacy to education, employment, rural development, and environmental protection. Real people shared practical ideas: one user suggested stronger tobacco control with better signs and reporting channels, noting China's 23.2% smoking rate and the dangers of secondhand smoke. Another called for stricter food safety oversight, banning harmful pesticides and setting up traceability systems from farm to table. A third worried about student loans with high interest rates, urging restrictions to protect young people from debt traps. And someone pushed for more child-rearing subsidies, like tax deductions and better maternity insurance for informal workers. President Xi Jinping hailed it as 'exemplary practice of comprehensive process popular democracy,' urging deep listening to the masses to build a better life. Suggestions were capped at 4 000 words, with an email option for longer ones, making it simple and inclusive. This digital method reached millions without wasting a cent on venues or travel, proving that broad participation doesn't need big budgets. Why not go digital like China? The comparison is stark. China's approach is modern, efficient, and truly mass-based, harnessing technology to gather wisdom from everyday folks. South Africa's National Dialogue, while well-intentioned, risks becoming another talk fest that drains public funds without delivering real change. We've got the tools – think of apps like the eNatis system or even social media platforms where South Africans already voice their views daily. Why not create a free online portal for suggestions on our national priorities, linked to government websites and apps? It could cover everything from job creation and crime-fighting to education and healthcare, reaching far more people than a Pretoria convention ever could. I believe this is how it must be done: follow China's lead by launching a dedicated app or website for ongoing public input, ensuring every submission is tracked and responded to, turning dialogue into action. For instance, the Central University of Technology (CUT) in the Free State has its own innovation hub, including the Centre for Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing (CRPM), which is a leading research and innovation centre in advanced manufacturing and 3D printing. They could easily develop or host such a digital platform for free, leveraging their expertise in technology and innovation to create a user-friendly tool that collects suggestions nationwide without any cost to the government. To make it even more accessible, we can involve major banks like FNB, Standard Bank, Absa, Nedbank, and Capitec to come on board. Surely, these banks can do this for free as part of their corporate social responsibility – featuring a dialogue link or dedicated tab in their apps where users can submit ideas after logging in securely. Millions of South Africans already use banking apps daily for transactions, so adding a simple submission form for national suggestions would reach a massive audience without extra development costs. Other ways to expand this include partnering with telecom giants like Vodacom, MTN, and Telkom to integrate submission features in their customer apps or via SMS portals for those without smartphones. Government services apps, such as the SASSA grant app or the Home Affairs e-services platform, could also host tabs for input, ensuring even the most vulnerable participate. Universities and tech hubs across the country, like those at Wits or UCT, could contribute by creating open-source tools or hosting virtual town halls. Social media integrations, such as WhatsApp bots or Facebook forms, would allow quick submissions, while community radio stations could promote SMS-based inputs for rural areas. I believe this is how it must be done: build a multi-platform ecosystem that combines free tech from institutions like CUT's innovation hub, bank apps for secure access, and everyday tools like telecom and social media to make the dialogue truly inclusive and cost-effective. Is it because our leaders fear losing control in a digital space, or perhaps because physical events allow for patronage and photo ops? Or maybe it's just old habits dying hard in a bureaucracy that's slow to embrace tech. Whatever the reason, pouring R700 million into this – even if scaled down – feels like a slap in the face to struggling taxpayers. China shows it's possible to consult widely without breaking the bank, fostering 'popular democracy' that feels genuine and actionable. South Africa, it's time to wake up. Why waste millions on dialogues that exclude most of us when a digital revolution could include everyone? Adopt China's model, save the money for real fixes like building Fezile Dabi University or hiring more police, and let the people's voices flow freely online. Anything less is just more empty promises in a country that can no longer afford them. Edgar Legoale is chief servant at Edgar Legoale Foundation | Activist | Media Consultant | PR and Communications Strategist | Crisis Comms Expert. Image: Supplied * Edgar Legoale is chief servant at Edgar Legoale Foundation | Activist | Media Consultant | PR and Communications Strategist | Crisis Comms Expert. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media. BUSINESS REPORT
