logo
Education ministry seeks explanation from JNU V-C for skipping key conference without approval

Education ministry seeks explanation from JNU V-C for skipping key conference without approval

Time of India27-07-2025
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The Ministry of Education has sought an explanation from Jawaharlal Nehru University Vice-Chancellor Santishree Dhulipudi Pandit regarding her absence at a key conference, according to sources.It was noted that Pandit had skipped the conference of Vice-Chancellors of Central Universities without formal approval, they said.There was no immediate response from the JNU Vice-Chancellor on the issue."Her absence was viewed seriously. In such circumstances, Vice-Chancellors are required to take prior approval. There was a conference at JNU coinciding with the Vice-Chancellors' conference. But it should have been kept in mind that the invite for this conference was extended much in advance," a source said.The Ministry of Education organised a two-day conference of Vice-Chancellors of Central Universities in Kevadia, Gujarat from July 10-11.The conference, as part of events to mark the five years of implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, brought together heads of Central universities to review institutional progress and collectively shape the path ahead.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's punitive India tariff spoils PM Modi's Russian oil math
Trump's punitive India tariff spoils PM Modi's Russian oil math

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Trump's punitive India tariff spoils PM Modi's Russian oil math

Bloomberg Live Events Bloomberg (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel A US decision to double tariffs on Indian goods as punishment for ongoing purchases of Russian crude leaves the world's third-largest oil consumer in a tight spot and its refiners in disarray, but the move is unlikely to prompt a radical rethink in New Prime Minister Narendra Modi, it's a dilemma that has cast the spotlight on an uncomfortably large oil import bill — as well as the dangers of walking a geopolitical tightrope in an age of exceptional New Delhi yields to the threat, it could jeopardize a long-standing relationship with Moscow that extends beyond energy, and it would give up a strategic advantage that provided vital fiscal space. If Modi allows refiners to keep buying, as his defiant response and domestic pressure would suggest, he instead courts a direct blow to the economy and damaged ties with the country's top trade partner, risking far more than he might saved a modest $3.8 billion in the year to March on oil purchases as discounts on Russian crude narrowed, according to ratings agency ICRA. But it exported roughly $87 billion worth of goods to the US in 2024.A well-supplied oil market, plus less attractive discounts for Moscow's flagship Urals crude, mean that in theory Modi has space to wean the country off Russian oil entirely, dialing back imports that have surged dramatically since 2022. But practice could prove quite different, as his top opponent and party peers line up to criticize US tactics, stirring nationalist fervor.'It's very, very unlikely that Indian oil imports from Russia will go to zero,' said Vandana Hari, founder of consultancy Vanda Insights. 'Everyone understands Trump's aim is to try and pressure Putin, but to do it with a gun on India's shoulder is not going down well with New Delhi.'US President Donald Trump — eager to slash the US's trade deficit with India and, simultaneously, to gain traction in discussions with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin to end the conflict in Ukraine — has demanded that India stop 'fueling the war machine' with purchases of discounted Russian barrels. He threatened earlier this week to impose punitive levies on top of a planned 25% that kicks in later this week. Washington confirmed on Wednesday an extra 25% would be added within 21 the absence of official guidance, Indian refining executives expect an increase in buying from the US as talks continue, but also expressed caution. State-owned processors, which tend to purchase Russian crude through spot deals, are already staying on the sidelines, according to people with direct knowledge of their procurement plans. They asked not to be named as they are not authorized to speak to the like Indian Oil Corp., Bharat Petroleum Corp. and Hindustan Petroleum Corp. have instead stepped into the spot market over the past week to buy a variety of grades from alternative suppliers — including the US, Nigeria and the United Arab Emirates — seeking cargoes for prompt longer-term supplies, Asian traders expect Indian refiners to approach Middle Eastern producers such as Saudi Arabia and Iraq. With year-long contracts typically negotiated near the close of the Indian fiscal year ending in March, buyers will likely be able to seek small incremental volume adjustments from the likes of Saudi Arabian Oil Co., known as absent a full sanctioning of Russian oil, no one in the industry has yet pointed to a formal or a wholesale India has not been a significant importer of Russian crude, depending more heavily on the Middle East. All that changed in 2022, after the invasion of Ukraine and a $60-per-barrel price cap imposed by the Group of Seven nations that aimed to limit the Kremlin's oil revenues while keeping supplies flowing eschews sanctioned crude from Iran or Venezuela, but this was a permitted bargain and purchases leapt higher, often at the expense of more traditional suppliers like Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Nigeria. Russia, which accounted for a negligible portion of India's total imports in 2021, today makes up around 37%, according to data analytics firm Kpler. That's made India one of the two dominant buyers of Russian crude, along with officials argue that the shift helped to prevent a supply crunch and to cool sky-high prices — and until now the US seemed to agree. On a visit to India last year, Treasury officials described the price cap as 'a mechanism for India and other partners to access Russian oil at discounted prices.' The focus was on guaranteeing supply, and there would be no effort to curb Indian purchases, they decision to abruptly move away from that position — without imposing fresh sanctions — has left the government nonplussed, with officials warning that removing Russia would push global oil prices to more than double from their current levels, a warning that harks back to sharp moves in timing, though, has been fortuitous for India, making it at least possible to curb Russian imports. Oil is trading at under $70 and is plentiful, thanks to a move by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries to return more barrels to the market. It has the option to add more. That leaves choices for a buyer that remains a key source of future demand growth — even if that means being forced to rebuild some relationships.'If you look at the size of India's trade with the US, and look at how much savings India gets from buying Russia crude, it's pretty clear what India would do,' said Warren Patterson, head of commodities strategy at ING Groep NV in Singapore. 'Are you going to risk up to $87 billion worth of exports to the US in order to save a few billion from oil discounts?'Discounts on Russian oil have certainly narrowed. In May, Indian buyers paid $4.50 a barrel less for their Russian crude imports than they did for Saudi purchases. That's far less impressive than back in 2023, when the gap exceeded $23 a barrel, even though India is a price-conscious market.'The economic cost of shifting suppliers away from Russia is not actually that big,' said Shilan Shah of Capital Economics. 'It feels like a political decision rather than an economic one. India doesn't want to be seen caving to Trump's demands. India and Russia have pretty longstanding trade relations, which I think India would be keen to maintain.'Assuming the full tariff is in fact implemented, the lasting headache here may be for Russian producers, left to find other buyers for India's roughly 1.8 million barrels per day of purchases. China has shown itself happy to take sanctioned oil — but has also long demonstrated its eagerness to retain diverse supply to guarantee energy security. It has little appetite to become dependent on Russian crude, cheap or China may take just enough crude to at least cushion the blow for global oil markets as India winds down, leaving no other substantial buyers to fill the gap.'China will be very, very careful about soaking up all the Russian crude that's being diverted from India,' Vanda Insights' Hari said. 'The oil will likely be offered at deeper discounts. But, if China absorbs a substantial amount, guess where Trump's eye will turn next?'

Class 8 NCERT Book Skips Tipu Sultan, Anglo-Mysore Wars; Centre Explains Decision
Class 8 NCERT Book Skips Tipu Sultan, Anglo-Mysore Wars; Centre Explains Decision

India.com

time3 hours ago

  • India.com

Class 8 NCERT Book Skips Tipu Sultan, Anglo-Mysore Wars; Centre Explains Decision

The exclusion of Tipu Sultan, Haidar Ali, and the Anglo-Mysore wars from the updated NCERT Class 8 Social Science textbook has sparked debate in Parliament. The central government clarified that individual states have the freedom to add content related to regional figures and historical events to their school syllabus. According to media reports, Responding to a question in the Rajya Sabha on Wednesday, Minister of State for Education Jayant Chaudhary said, 'Education being a subject in the Concurrent List of the Constitution and the majority of schools being under the jurisdiction of the State Governments, the respective State Government may adopt or adapt NCERT textbooks or develop their own textbooks based on the National Curriculum Framework. The states have flexibility to provide more coverage about regional personalities and events in their textbooks." Trinamool Congress MP Ritabrata Banerjee raised the question, asking whether the new Class 8 textbook leaves out references to Tipu Sultan, Haidar Ali, and the Anglo-Mysore wars of the 1700s in the chapter on India's colonial history, and sought reasons for their exclusion. NEP 2020 Policy In a written response, Minister Jayant Chaudhary stated that the updated Class 8 Social Science textbook (Part 1) was created based on the guidelines of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and the National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCFSE) 2023. 'The new textbook comprises four themes: India and the World: Land and the People; Tapestry of the Past; Governance and Democracy; Economic Life Around Us," he added further. Pedagogical approaches in textbooks Jayant Chaudhary said, 'Personalities featured in these themes have been included contextually and in accordance with curricular objectives. The textbook introduces new pedagogical approaches, emphasizes refined classroom practices, and presents a focused syllabus. These textbooks encourage students to explore more through experiential learning, undertake fieldwork, and focus on evidence-based understanding. The approach adopted for the Middle Stage (Grades 6 to 8) is to provide only a broad survey of Indian civilization from prehistoric times all the way to Independence.' The revised textbook, released last month, includes a section on early resistance movements against British colonial rule before the 1857 revolt. It highlights events like the Sannyasi-Fakir rebellion, the Kol uprising, the Santhal rebellion, and several peasant revolts from the 1800s. However, the new edition does not mention the four Anglo-Mysore wars or the resistance led by Tipu Sultan and Haidar Ali against the East India Company — topics that were previously included in the chapter on the expansion of British rule in India.

Parliament panel flags ‘slow pace' in setting up of skill labs in schools
Parliament panel flags ‘slow pace' in setting up of skill labs in schools

Hindustan Times

time3 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Parliament panel flags ‘slow pace' in setting up of skill labs in schools

A Parliamentary standing committee on Wednesday raised concerns over the 'slow pace' in setting up skill labs in schools under the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship's (MSDE) Skill India programme, noting that only 858 labs in schools had been established till March 2025, short of the target to set up 1,200 labs by December 2024, despite all necessary equipment being delivered for 1,194 labs. Students of at a skill lab in a school in Ludhiana. (HT Photo) The Standing Committee on Labour, Textiles, and Skill Development, in its report on the MSDE's response to the 2024–25 budget recommendations, has asked the ministry to regularly follow up with relevant agencies to ensure the remaining 336 labs are set up within the next six months. The committee also asked the MSDE to ensure arrangements for delivery and setting up of equipment for six labs in Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh, which got delayed due to adverse weather conditions. Under its flagship scheme – SANKALP (Skill Acquisition and Knowledge Awareness for Livelihood Promotion) – MSDE launched the project in June 2024 to establish two vocational skill labs each in 400 Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs) and 200 Eklavya Model Residential Schools (EMRSs) in line with the recommendations of National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. The aim of these labs is to equip students with practical, industry-relevant skills to support their school-to-work transition. A Request for Proposal (RFP) for the supply and installation of equipment was issued by the National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC) on the Government e-Marketplace (GeM) portal in June 2024, and the contract was awarded in September 2024. The panel has also flagged concerns over the SANKALP scheme, citing underutilisation of funds, low placement rates, and slow progress on key targets. SANKALP, a World Bank-assisted, centrally sponsored scheme launched in 2018, is aimed at strengthening institutional mechanisms for skill development and enhancing access to quality training across the country. The parliamentary panel flagged key concerns in the implementation of the SANKALP scheme, noting that nearly ₹760 crore out of the ₹1,980 crore sanctioned remained unutilised, with states like Bihar and West Bengal using just 5% of their allocations, resulting in the completion of only 19 of the 65 projects under the national component. The panel also criticised the MSDE for poor placement outcomes – only 40% of trained candidates secured jobs, with some districts faring worse. It called for stronger industry linkages and more market-aligned training. The panel also expressed concern over the slow rollout of Skill India International Centres, with just 2 of the 30 centres announced in Budget 2023–24 made operational, and urged the ministry to fast-track the remaining centres within a set timeframe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store