Capital Jewish Museum shooting: Witness describes what suspect did after attack, ‘He grabbed a red keffiyeh…'
A man who was at the Jewish event in Washington, D.C., when two Israeli Embassy staff members were shot dead on Wednesday night, May 21, has described the events that transpired after the attack. The suspect has been identified as Elias Rodriguez of Chicago.
Yoni Kalin, who was at the event, told Fox 5 DC that he heard gunshots and then saw 'somebody run in.' 'The security guard happened to let this guy in,' Yoni said. 'I guess they were thinking that he was a victim, and he was covered in rain. He was clearly in trauma. He was in shock. Some of the people at the event brought him water. They sat him down. 'Are you okay? Were you shot? What happened?' And he's like, 'Somebody call the cops, bring the cops in.' So about 10 minutes later, when the cops actually came in, he said, 'I did this.' He said, 'Sir, I'm unarmed.''
Yoni added, 'He put his, put his hands up, he grabbed a red keffiyeh out of his pocket and started the 'Free Palestine' chant.' He added that the suspect continued to yell 'Free Palestine' while being dragged out of the building. 'I tried to hand his keffiyeh back because I didn't really realize that he murdered two people,' Yoni said.
The event where the shooting took place was largely focused on how to build a coalition to help Gazans, BBC reported. JoJo Kalin, a board member of the American Jewish Committee who organized the event, said, 'I'm not going to lose my humanity over this or be deterred. And that Israelis and Palestinians both still deserve self determination and [it is] just deeply ironic that that's what we were discussing. It was bridge building and then we were all hit over the hide with such hatred.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Hamas claims killing 12 fighters, Israeli group says they were aid staff
A unit of the Hamas-run police force said it killed 12 members of an Israeli-backed militia after detaining them early Thursday in the Gaza Strip. Hours earlier, an Israel-supported aid group said Hamas attacked a bus carrying its Palestinian workers, killing at least five of them. The militia, led by Yasser Abu Shabab, said its fighters had attacked Hamas and killed five militants but made no mention of its own casualties. It also accused Hamas of detaining and killing aid workers. It was not immediately possible to verify the competing claims or confirm the identities of those killed. The Israeli military circulated the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation 's statement on its social media accounts but declined to provide its own account of what happened. Aid initiative already marred by controversy and violence The aid group's operations in Gaza have already been marred by controversy and violence since they began last month, with scores of people killed in near-daily shootings as crowds headed toward the food distribution sites inside Israeli military zones. Witnesses have blamed the Israeli military, which has acknowledged firing only warning shots near people it said approached its forces in a suspicious manner. Earlier this week, witnesses also said Abu Shabab militiamen had opened fire on people en route to a GHF aid hub, killing and wounding many. The United Nations and major aid groups have rejected the Israeli and U.S.-backed initiative, accusing them of militarising humanitarian aid at a time when experts say Gaza is at risk of famine because of Israel's blockade and renewed military campaign. Last week, Israel acknowledged it is supporting armed groups of Palestinians in what it says is a move to counter Hamas. Abu Shabab's militia, which calls itself the Popular Forces, says it is guarding the food distribution points set up by the Israeli- and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in southern Gaza. Aid workers say it has a long history of looting UN trucks. GHF has denied working with the Abu Shabab group. They were aid workers' In a statement released early Thursday, the foundation said Hamas had attacked a bus carrying more than two dozen local Palestinians working side-by-side with the US GHF team to deliver critical aid near the southern city of Khan Younis. We condemn this heinous and deliberate attack in the strongest possible terms, it said. These were aid workers. Humanitarians. Fathers, brothers, sons, and friends, who were risking their lives everyday to help others. It did not identify the men or say whether they were armed at the time. Israel and the United States say the new system is needed to prevent Hamas from siphoning off aid from the long-standing UN-run system, which is capable of delivering food, fuel and other humanitarian aid to all parts of Gaza. UN officials deny there has been any systematic diversion of aid by Hamas, but say they have struggled to deliver it because of Israeli restrictions and the breakdown of law and order in Gaza. UN officials say the new system is unable to meet mounting needs, and that it allows Israel to use aid as a weapon by controlling who has access to it and by essentially forcing people to relocate to the aid sites, most of which are in the southernmost city of Rafah, now a mostly uninhabited military zone. Some fear this could be part of an Israeli plan to coerce Palestinians into leaving Gaza. Hamas says it killed traitors Hamas has also rejected the new system and threatened to kill any Palestinians who cooperate with the Israeli military. The killings early Wednesday were carried out by the Hamas-run police's Sahm unit, which Hamas says it established to combat looting. The unit released video footage showing several dead men lying in the street, saying they were Abu Shabab fighters who had been detained and killed for collaborating with Israel. It was not possible to verify the images or the claims around them. Mohammed Abu Amin, a Khan Younis resident, said he was at the scene of the killings and that crowds were celebrating them, shouting God is greatest and condemning those killed as traitors to the Palestinian cause and agents of Israel. Ghassan Duhine, who identifies himself as a major in the Palestinian Authority's security forces and deputy commander of the Abu Shabab group, posted a statement online saying they clashed with Sahm and killed five. He denied that the images shared by Sahm were of Abu Shabab fighters. The Palestinian Authority, led by rivals of Hamas and based in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, has denied any connection to the Abu Shabab group, but many of the militiamen identify themselves as PA officers. Mounting lawlessness as Israel steps up military campaign Israel renewed its offensive in March after ending a ceasefire with Hamas and imposed a complete ban on imports of food, fuel, medicine and other aid before easing the blockade in mid-May. The ongoing war and mounting desperation have plunged Gaza into chaos, with armed gangs looting aid convoys and selling the stolen food. The Hamas-run police force, which maintained a high degree of public security before the war, has largely gone underground as Israel has repeatedly targeted its forces with airstrikes. The military now controls more than half of the territory. The war began when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 hostage. They are still holding 53 captives, less than half of them believed to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel's military campaign has killed over 55,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which has said women and children make up more than half of the dead. It does not say how many of those killed were civilians or combatants. Israel's offensive has flattened large areas of Gaza and driven around 90% of the population of roughly 2 million Palestinians from their homes. The territory is almost completely reliant on humanitarian aid because nearly all of its food production capabilities have been destroyed.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
What is the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation? Israel-backed aid group blames Hamas for attacking workers; UN warns aid distribution is being militarised
A deadly attack on aid workers in southern Gaza has drawn sharp condemnation from a US- and Israel-backed relief group, which accused Hamas of targeting its Palestinian staff as they travelled to distribute humanitarian aid, reports the New York Times. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which began operating in late May, said a bus carrying around two dozen of its workers came under fire on Wednesday night. At least five people were reportedly killed and others wounded, with some possibly taken hostage. 'We condemn this heinous and deliberate attack in the strongest possible terms,' the group said in a statement. 'These were aid workers. Humanitarians. Fathers, brothers, sons, and friends, who were risking their lives every day to help others.' The group is run by American contractors but is backed by Israeli authorities. It said it held Hamas "fully responsible" for the killing of its "dedicated workers who have been distributing humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people." It urged the international community to speak out against the assault. 'Tonight, the world must see this for what it is: an attack on humanity,' the foundation added. The GHF has previously accused Hamas of threatening its staff and obstructing aid delivery. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like เทรด CFDs ด้วยเทคโนโลยีเทรดสุดล้ำ และ รวดเร็วกว่า IC Markets สมัคร Undo On Saturday, it reported that it was 'impossible to proceed' with its distribution because of Hamas interference. In turn, Hamas has rejected the accusations and questioned the group's neutrality, calling the foundation 'nothing more than a propaganda front for the Israeli occupation army.' Violence near aid sites has also been reported. Earlier on Wednesday, shootings in central Gaza left several dead and dozens injured, according to health officials and emergency workers. The incidents occurred near a distribution centre run by the GHF. The Israeli military said it had fired warning shots at potential threats before dawn but denied daytime fire on civilians. The Palestine Red Crescent Society blamed Israeli gunfire for some of the casualties. 'Most victims had injuries from shell fragments, although some also had bullet wounds,' said spokesperson Nebal Farsakh. The actual death toll remains unclear. GHF said its centre was closed at the time of the early morning shooting and it could not confirm what had occurred, but it did reopen later that day. The organisation has asked the media not to confuse its operations with military activity. 'Do not confuse the public by reporting on GHF operations in the same breath as Israeli military operations far removed from distribution sites,' it said. The group's origins have added to the controversy. GHF's close association with Israeli authorities has led to criticism from international humanitarian bodies. The United Nations and others have accused Israel of militarising aid distribution and said the foundation undermines the independence expected of humanitarian groups. Israel has long accused Hamas of looting aid meant for civilians. However, the UN says there is no clear evidence of systematic diversion by the militant group. It has instead pointed to broader lawlessness and the impact of Israel's 80-day aid blockade earlier this year, which led to extreme food shortages and a collapse of basic services. The foundation has vowed to continue working. 'Despite this heinous attack, we will continue our mission to provide critical aid to the people of Gaza,' it said.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
UK may ease family visa income rule after 'Tax on Love' criticism
The UK government is reviewing its family visa rules, including the current minimum income requirement of £29,000, after strong public and expert criticism. The Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) has submitted its findings to the Home Office, recommending changes to ease the burden on British citizens and settled residents who wish to bring their foreign spouses to the UK, according to a report by BBC. First introduced in 2012 and raised in 2024, the income threshold is meant to reduce net migration. However, it has been criticised for breaking up families and ignoring the economic contributions of foreign partners once in the UK. Campaign group Reunite Families UK, based in Bristol, shared evidence with MAC highlighting the mental health toll on children who are separated from one parent due to the rules. "Children are the biggest victims of these rules," said Caroline Coombs, co-founder and executive director of the group. She urged the government to consider the lived experiences behind the numbers: "We ask her to look to that evidence – those very real-life experiences – when it comes to making her decisions which could ultimately make or break British citizens and settle residents' family life." The MAC review received over 2,000 responses, the highest in its consultation history. It explored income ranges between £23,000 to £25,000 as more realistic for maintaining family life without imposing economic strain. It noted that a lower threshold could increase migration by up to 8,000 people but stressed that this must be weighed against the social cost of family separation. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) As per the BBC report, Green Party MP Carla Denyer called the income threshold a "cruel tax on love" that "tears families apart and puts untold stress on those with the misfortune to simply fall in love with someone who is not from this country." Live Events MORE STORIES FOR YOU ✕ UK job market slowdown raises concerns for international students UK tightens student visa rules: Shorter stays, stricter checks, fewer perks « Back to recommendation stories I don't want to see these stories because They are not relevant to me They disrupt the reading flow Others SUBMIT Professor Brian Bell, Chair of MAC, acknowledged the challenge of balancing economic costs with family rights. "There is a cost to the UK economy and UK taxpayers of having this route, and we should just be honest about that and say there is a trade-off," he said. "But... people who say 'we should set it at very high numbers to make sure that we don't lose any money' ignore the massive impact that has on families." The Home Office stated it is reviewing the committee's recommendations and will respond in due course.
