logo
Homework by Geoff Dyer: Airfix models and Action Man dolls

Homework by Geoff Dyer: Airfix models and Action Man dolls

Irish Times13 hours ago
Homework: A Memoir
Author
:
Geoff Dyer
ISBN-13
:
978-1837261987
Publisher
:
Canongate
Guideline Price
:
£20
To discover that Geoff Dyer has reached the memoir-of-his-childhood years is to be abruptly mugged by the passage of time. Surely Geoff Dyer can't be, as Wikipedia solemnly informs me that he is, now in his middle sixties? Not Geoff Dyer, of all people? Surely he's still thirtyishly slacking his way around Benares, subsisting on daal and magic mushrooms, or haplessly seeking out transcendence at a rave in Stuttgart?
By this I suppose all I mean is that Dyer is the sort of writer whom many readers discover in their twenties, and that he is the sort of writer who seems to tell you important things about what life could, or should, be like. His books seem to suggest that you can indeed get away with it: that you can mooch around foreign cities taking drugs and having sex, and that when you emerge from this pleasant matrix of not actually doing anything, you will have written a string of good books about what it means to be alive.
[
Did nobody actually read this book before it went to print?: The Emperor of Gladness by Ocean Vuong
Opens in new window
]
But the pleasant matrix of not actually doing anything isn't really what Dyer's books are about. Dyer's recurrent postures, on the page, of thwartedness, laziness and incompetence (in Out of Sheer Rage, he famously wrote a book about failing to write a book about DH Lawrence) bely the iron will, and the distinctively literary intelligence, that have now helped him to create an extensive shelf of books. Comic self-deprecation, in its various modes, is simply the prose method that allows this sunny enthusiast to get at his true subject, which is preoccupation.
Dyer is the laureate of preoccupation. His books have ostensible subjects: the first World War in The Missing of the Somme
(1994), slackerish travel in Yoga for People Who Can't be Bothered to Do It
(2003), photography in The Ongoing Moment
(2005), Andrei Tarkovsky in Zona (2012)… But their actual subject is a preoccupation familiar to anyone who has ever developed a consuming interest in a niche subject – an obsession, that is, of the kind we half-damn and half-praise by calling 'nerdish'.
READ MORE
Dyer has long since grasped that such preoccupations might look like distractions but are actually the most basic stuff of consciousness itself: what we like to think about when we think about what we like.
Homework, Dyer's 19th book, is therefore not just an account of his childhood and adolescence but an account of his childhood and adolescent preoccupations: Airfix models, toy soldiers, collectible stamps included in packets of Brooke Bond tea, Action Man dolls, a Dawes Red Feather racing bike, Chelsea FC paraphernalia, the albums of Yes and Hawkwind, fantasy paperbacks by Michael Moorcock… The material furnishings, that is, of a postwar English childhood.
'Material' is the key word. Homework begins with an epigraph from Raymond Williams, the great theorist of postwar English life and its material changes. 'Great confusion is caused if the real childhood memory is projected, unqualified, as history,' this epigraph ends; it tells us what Dyer is up to in his book. His hobbyist anatomy of childhood obsessions – wearisome at points – adds up to a metonymic account of postwar British history; confusion is welcomed, as confusion always is in Dyer's work, as closer to the truth than clarity.
Dyer – born to working-class parents in 1958 – grew up in Cheltenham, in an England still shaped at all levels of experience by the war. Cataloguing his toy guns, Dyer notes that 'Everything which is wartime had been metal was, in our version, remoulded in plastic' – and this is also an account of the England of the 1960s. 'Airfix offered a complete childhood vision of war on land, sea, and air,' he writes; the model kits 'represented in miniature a much larger process of reproduction and representation of war that dominated our childhood.'
[
Kevin Power: I took a deep dive into Irish literary magazines and would do it again without hesitation
Opens in new window
]
Homework – the title evoking school but also the basic dialectic of working-class life at that time – follows the course of maturity itself by starting with toys and taking gradual cognisance of parents. Dyer's father served in India during the second World War but never spoke about it; in Dyer's account, the privations of wartime left his parents with a deep sense of secrecy, thrift and defeat, a kind of 'subsistence existentialism'; they were 'citizens of a psychological GDR'.
Dyer's parents are movingly memorialised, here. But it is difficult not to feel that Dyer's programmatic hedonism, in life and in art, is a refutation of his parents' anhedonic thriftiness – and thus of the shadow of the war. In the book's closing pages, Dyer discovers literature, studies hard, gets into Oxford, and begins the painful process of becoming something other than a postwar working-class kid from Cheltenham – a process that ends, of course, with him writing this book about being a postwar working-class kid from Cheltenham. Out of Sheer Nostalgia? No. More like Out of Sheer History.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Homework by Geoff Dyer: Airfix models and Action Man dolls
Homework by Geoff Dyer: Airfix models and Action Man dolls

Irish Times

time13 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Homework by Geoff Dyer: Airfix models and Action Man dolls

Homework: A Memoir Author : Geoff Dyer ISBN-13 : 978-1837261987 Publisher : Canongate Guideline Price : £20 To discover that Geoff Dyer has reached the memoir-of-his-childhood years is to be abruptly mugged by the passage of time. Surely Geoff Dyer can't be, as Wikipedia solemnly informs me that he is, now in his middle sixties? Not Geoff Dyer, of all people? Surely he's still thirtyishly slacking his way around Benares, subsisting on daal and magic mushrooms, or haplessly seeking out transcendence at a rave in Stuttgart? By this I suppose all I mean is that Dyer is the sort of writer whom many readers discover in their twenties, and that he is the sort of writer who seems to tell you important things about what life could, or should, be like. His books seem to suggest that you can indeed get away with it: that you can mooch around foreign cities taking drugs and having sex, and that when you emerge from this pleasant matrix of not actually doing anything, you will have written a string of good books about what it means to be alive. [ Did nobody actually read this book before it went to print?: The Emperor of Gladness by Ocean Vuong Opens in new window ] But the pleasant matrix of not actually doing anything isn't really what Dyer's books are about. Dyer's recurrent postures, on the page, of thwartedness, laziness and incompetence (in Out of Sheer Rage, he famously wrote a book about failing to write a book about DH Lawrence) bely the iron will, and the distinctively literary intelligence, that have now helped him to create an extensive shelf of books. Comic self-deprecation, in its various modes, is simply the prose method that allows this sunny enthusiast to get at his true subject, which is preoccupation. Dyer is the laureate of preoccupation. His books have ostensible subjects: the first World War in The Missing of the Somme (1994), slackerish travel in Yoga for People Who Can't be Bothered to Do It (2003), photography in The Ongoing Moment (2005), Andrei Tarkovsky in Zona (2012)… But their actual subject is a preoccupation familiar to anyone who has ever developed a consuming interest in a niche subject – an obsession, that is, of the kind we half-damn and half-praise by calling 'nerdish'. READ MORE Dyer has long since grasped that such preoccupations might look like distractions but are actually the most basic stuff of consciousness itself: what we like to think about when we think about what we like. Homework, Dyer's 19th book, is therefore not just an account of his childhood and adolescence but an account of his childhood and adolescent preoccupations: Airfix models, toy soldiers, collectible stamps included in packets of Brooke Bond tea, Action Man dolls, a Dawes Red Feather racing bike, Chelsea FC paraphernalia, the albums of Yes and Hawkwind, fantasy paperbacks by Michael Moorcock… The material furnishings, that is, of a postwar English childhood. 'Material' is the key word. Homework begins with an epigraph from Raymond Williams, the great theorist of postwar English life and its material changes. 'Great confusion is caused if the real childhood memory is projected, unqualified, as history,' this epigraph ends; it tells us what Dyer is up to in his book. His hobbyist anatomy of childhood obsessions – wearisome at points – adds up to a metonymic account of postwar British history; confusion is welcomed, as confusion always is in Dyer's work, as closer to the truth than clarity. Dyer – born to working-class parents in 1958 – grew up in Cheltenham, in an England still shaped at all levels of experience by the war. Cataloguing his toy guns, Dyer notes that 'Everything which is wartime had been metal was, in our version, remoulded in plastic' – and this is also an account of the England of the 1960s. 'Airfix offered a complete childhood vision of war on land, sea, and air,' he writes; the model kits 'represented in miniature a much larger process of reproduction and representation of war that dominated our childhood.' [ Kevin Power: I took a deep dive into Irish literary magazines and would do it again without hesitation Opens in new window ] Homework – the title evoking school but also the basic dialectic of working-class life at that time – follows the course of maturity itself by starting with toys and taking gradual cognisance of parents. Dyer's father served in India during the second World War but never spoke about it; in Dyer's account, the privations of wartime left his parents with a deep sense of secrecy, thrift and defeat, a kind of 'subsistence existentialism'; they were 'citizens of a psychological GDR'. Dyer's parents are movingly memorialised, here. But it is difficult not to feel that Dyer's programmatic hedonism, in life and in art, is a refutation of his parents' anhedonic thriftiness – and thus of the shadow of the war. In the book's closing pages, Dyer discovers literature, studies hard, gets into Oxford, and begins the painful process of becoming something other than a postwar working-class kid from Cheltenham – a process that ends, of course, with him writing this book about being a postwar working-class kid from Cheltenham. Out of Sheer Nostalgia? No. More like Out of Sheer History.

Kneecap owe Keir Starmer, the BBC and Helen from Wales a thank you
Kneecap owe Keir Starmer, the BBC and Helen from Wales a thank you

Irish Times

timea day ago

  • Irish Times

Kneecap owe Keir Starmer, the BBC and Helen from Wales a thank you

Helen from Wales won Glastonbury . She didn't sing or dance or chant a death threat. She held up her phone and live-streamed the whole Kneecap show on TikTok, 'even burning her finger on the overheating device', reported the Sun admiringly, 'to bring the music to the masses'. Kneecap hailed her as a 'legend'. From which you might infer that earning legend status can be nice work. But Helen Wilson is a very modern kind of legend. She surprised herself by thrashing the crusty old BBC at its own game – though it's arguable if 1.7 million people actually watched or just liked her livestream as opposed to the 7,200 who definitely watched. It also left Keir Starmer looking like the infamous 1990s judge who inquired if Gazza (the world-famous footballer and also the plaintiff) might be an operetta called La Gazza Ladra. The BBC probably workshopped 10 impossible ways to livestream the Kneecap gig, ie to bleep out any recurrences of calls to kill your local Tory MP – for which the band subsequently apologised to the families of two murdered MPs – while weighing accusations of censorship alongside the terror-related charges against a band member (for allegedly displaying a flag in support of Hizbullah and saying 'up Hamas, up Hizbullah'). It eventually settled on releasing an edited form on iPlayer, saying it was due to fears it would breach 'editorial guidelines' on impartiality. The wonder is that the thousands of attendees fulminating about censorship didn't respond as Helen did with her TikTok stream, which is now being lionised as another near-lethal shot across the BBC/MSM's bows. Glastonbury forbids the unauthorised recording and disseminating of live performances but Helen isn't worried. Some things are too important not to be heard, she says. READ MORE If Kneecap's pro-Palestine stance is noisy and relentless (reflecting in principle the impotent fury of many people, young and old), it's right up there with the band's marketing nous. Among the many stunts designed to 'p**s off' just about everyone, they brought a PSNI Land Rover with them to the Sundance film festival last year (where their semi-autobiographical film with a Gerry Adams cameo won the audience award) and found a place called Provo to have their picture taken with it. 'It ended up that we were on the front of all the magazines, because of that jeep,' Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh (Mo Chara) told The Guardian. The alleged Hizbullah flag-waving incident was preceded by a social media image posted by the band of a member reading the Hizbullah leader's writings. Their official website leads with quotes from the Los Angeles Times – 'reminiscent of early Eminem' – saying the band has 'built up a notoriety for themselves which hasn't been seen in Irish music for many years'. So it's fair to say that they've leant into the notoriety – but not without a heap of marketing gifts from British officialdom along the way. The band won a legal action against the UK government when the latter overruled the awarding of a £14,250 grant to them under a scheme that supports UK-based music acts abroad. But there's nothing to beat the clamour around a prime minister's condemnation – until you compound it with the agonising decisions faced by a state-funded broadcaster. When asked if he thought Kneecap should perform in Glastonbury, Starmer could have refused to comment, on the grounds that there was an ongoing case. Instead he pronounced that the band's performance would not be 'appropriate …'. The rest was wildly predictable. No edgy band wants to be declared 'appropriate' by anyone, never mind a grey prime minister, in a world where the US president uses f**k for emphasis. So naturally the show became the most anticipated set of the weekend. The field around the stage was closed early to prevent a crush. Far from softening its cough, the band heightened the drama by showing a video montage of its enemies, including Sharon Osborne calling them a hate group, then kicked off a chant of 'F**k Keir Starmer' in a charged, triumphant gig . Hardly original as chants go – two songs with that title already exist – but it did the job. The sum total of Starmer's and the BBC's achievement was to ratchet up the protesting and ensure that any artist worth their inappropriate tag would shout 'Free Palestine' (at least) during a set, have a Palestinian flag on stage or be wearing a keffiyeh. And no one sussed that the act just before Kneecap, a self-described 'violent punk' London duo Bob Vylan, hitherto unknown to the masses – until the hapless BBC streamed them live and failed to pull the plug – would make the Irish band's act look almost puppyish. 'Sometimes we have to get our message across with violence', said frontman Bobby Vylan, who led a chant of 'death, death to the IDF'. British police are investigating both performances, though legal experts believe it's futile since the accused's intent at the time – what he intended to happen or believed might happen as a result of his words – decides the matter. So legal vindication once again most likely – although it's worth noting that Bob Vylan are paying the professional and financial price in terms of being dropped by their management, cancelled shows and revoked US tour visas. Long-time music critics writing about Kneecap blend admiration with caution. The Glastonbury lead-up was 'a perfect example of how quickly stories can become overheated in 2025″, writes The Guardian's Alexis Petridis . 'Vastly more people now have an opinion about Kneecap than have ever heard their music, which is, traditionally, a tricky and destructive position for a band to find themselves in.' [ Kneecap would not face prosecution under new Irish anti-terrorism laws, Minister insists Opens in new window ] But who loaded fuel on to the stories? Keir Starmer surprised us – again – by failing to consider his own contribution while delivering a petty told-you-so to the self-flagellating BBC: 'I said that Kneecap should not be given a platform and that goes for any other performers making threats or inciting violence ...' For Kneecap, the upshot of the weekend is a coveted invitation to take the main stage at Electric Picnic . 'This is going to be a special one,' said the festival about its sudden announcement. That's show business.

John Boyne on Bring the House Down by Charlotte Runcie: Toxic masculinity steals the show
John Boyne on Bring the House Down by Charlotte Runcie: Toxic masculinity steals the show

Irish Times

time3 days ago

  • Irish Times

John Boyne on Bring the House Down by Charlotte Runcie: Toxic masculinity steals the show

Bring the House Down Author : The Borough Press ISBN-13 : 9780008688011 Publisher : Charlotte Runcie Guideline Price : £16.99 One of the most talked about television shows this year has been Netflix 's Adolescence . Toxic masculinity lay at the heart of that programme, albeit in the form of a 13-year-old boy. Charlotte Runcie's debut novel Bring the House Down explores similar territory, only with a character some 20 years older who is so oblivious to his mistreatment of women that its exposure seems as surprising to him as it is to everyone else. The premise is brilliant: Alex Lyons, a well-known theatre critic, reviews a one-woman show by Hayley Sinclair at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival. He hates it – to be fair, it does sound terrible – then goes to a bar where he writes an eviscerating, one-star review, files it with his editor for publication the next day, and then, by chance, runs into the performer . They chat and share a drink before going back to the flat he's sharing with a colleague, the novel's narrator Sophie, where they have sex. At no point does he tell her who he is or what he's done. The following morning Hayley reads the review and all hell breaks loose. [ Adolescence: Why can't we look away from Netflix's hypnotic hit? Opens in new window ] I don't want to give away exactly how Hayley wreaks her revenge, but suffice to say that the third chapter of this extraordinary book left me open-mouthed with a mixture of horror and laughter. From there, the book focuses on the remaining weeks of the festival, when Hayley becomes a star, Alex becomes a pariah, and Sophie becomes increasingly estranged from her boyfriend while growing closer to her disgraced friend. Runcie spares us no detail of Alex's colourful love life over the years but, wisely, she never allows her anti-hero to have committed any actual crimes. He's just a good-looking guy with a privileged upbringing and a great job who's spent his adult life using women for his own sexual gratification while never giving their feelings a second thought. Refusing to accept any responsibility for the pain he's caused, he continues to defend his behaviour in ways that only add to his downfall. READ MORE Alex's reaction to being challenged by people he considers his social and intellectual inferiors reminded me of the arrogance and narcissism of the former television actor turned right-wing provocateur Laurence to task on Question Time in 2020, Fox was so outraged at being criticised for his ill-informed views on race that he effectively imploded, losing his career and decrying on social media how England is overrun by foreigners, burning Pride flags, posting unflattering pictures of women who've called him out, and losing multiple libel cases. Fox has learned nothing from his public disgrace and Alex feels deliberately created in his image, not least because he's also the son of a famous English thespian and has grown up surrounded by acting royalty. His sense of entitlement is astonishing, as is his utter conviction that in reviewing plays, and condemning most of them, he is, 'elevating the culture'. Which he's not. Only the artist can elevate or degrade the culture; the critic simply comments upon it. Bring the House Down is a powerful read, although there were a few moments that might have been excised. At times, Runcie – herself a former theatre reviewer for The Telegraph – allows Sophie's festival anecdotes to feel more like autobiography than fiction, such as when a US journalist expresses her disbelief that she has no formal training. And when Hayley, towards the end of the book, remarks that 'women are the strongest creatures on the planet', a character could have questioned this generalisation. After all, there are plenty of awful women out there, just as there are plenty of awful men, and decency is not restricted to one sex or the other. A few years after the #MeToo scandals, Bring the House Down is a timely reminder that even though the news cycle has moved on, the behaviour that inspired it continues, courtesy of men such as Andrew Tate , Donald Trump or Conor McGregor , and a global media that hangs off their every word, amplifying their voices despite their having treated women in ways that anyone with any moral convictions would decry. Politicians fell over themselves to tell people they watched Adolescence with their teenage sons. They could do worse than buy them a copy of this novel as well.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store