logo
Developing Countries Decry "Problematic" Loss And Damage Finance Gap As Global 'Fill The Fund' Campaign Launched

Developing Countries Decry "Problematic" Loss And Damage Finance Gap As Global 'Fill The Fund' Campaign Launched

Scoop11-07-2025
July 10, 2025
Developing country representatives on the Board of the UN's Fund for responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD) have issued a critical joint statement expressing concerns over the scale and status of resources, noting that a lack of transparency from contributors is 'severely limiting' the ability to program funds and reducing confidence in the long-term commitment of partners. The statement was issued during the Fund's 6th Board Meeting in Cebu, Philippines.
The statement from the developing country constituency highlights that while funding needs for economic damages alone are estimated to be around USD 395 billion in 2025, only USD 348 million is currently available in the Fund. This comes after total pledges of USD 788.68 million, revealing a significant gap between promises and payments. The constituency underscored the "urgent and immediate need for new, additional, predictable and adequate financial resources" to help developing countries respond to escalating climate disasters.
The developing country constituency maintains its position that the Fund must program at least USD 100 billion a year by 2030 as a minimum and called for the Board to shift its priorities towards launching an initial capitalization and replenishment process that goes "far beyond the initial pledges.'
The press conference featured an important video statement from H.E. Jotham Napat, Prime Minister of Vanuatu, who highlighted the need to scale up funds to address the actual needs of developing countries.
NEW Global Campaign - 'FILL THE FUND' Launched: In direct response to this crisis of inaction, a global coalition of climate justice movements and civil society groups representing thousands of organizations launched 'Fill The Fund,' a new global campaign to demand wealthy nations and corporate polluters meet their historical responsibility to pay for the climate crisis.
H.E. Jotham Napat, Prime Minister of Vanuatu, in a recorded statement: "Pledges alone cannot rebuild what has been erased by the climate crisis in Vanuatu and across the world. A single cyclone caused over $500 million in damages, yet we are capped at receiving just $20 million a year from the Loss and Damage Fund.
'The question now is whether the fund will be able to mobilize the scale of resources needed to meet the moment and deliver—especially when we consider that children in developing countries suffer more than $400 billion in impacts annually."
Elena Cristina Pereira Colindres, FRLD Board Member (Honduras), speaking on behalf of the G77 constituency: "The current financial situation and the lack of clarity on the overall scale of the Fund will likely affect the start-up phase and the long-term scaled financing needed from the Fund.
'We therefore raise the question of whether the Board should now shift its priorities towards launching an initial capitalisation and replenishment process of new, additional, predictable, and adequate resources at a scale that goes far beyond the initial pledges."
Richard Sherman, Co-Chair, FRLD Board (South Africa), speaking in his national capacity: "We have to build the abacus, so to speak, of the fund's financial architecture: how we mobilize money, how we bank contributed funds, and how we disperse money to countries. Although this is a small step, it has a big, big, big footprint.
'We need to continue our work with vigilance, and with the support of civil society all around the world, to ensure the fund remains accessible, open, and inclusive—which is not necessarily a simple thing to do."
Ambassador Elizabeth Thompson, FRLD Board Member (Barbados): "Middle-income nations like Barbados are on the frontlines of climate impacts, yet we often cannot access the finance needed. When Hurricane Beryl struck us, we lost 90% of our fishing fleet and significant coastal infrastructure.'
'That is why the Board's decision in Barbados this past April was a critical step forward: it established the Barbados Implementation Modalities (BIM) and, crucially, ensured that 50% of the funding goes to LDCs and SIDs as grants, not loans."
Daniel Lund, FRLD Board Member (Fiji): "Our red line—the imperative to keep the global average temperature rise below 1.5 degrees—is on the brink of being breached. Recent science suggests that an overshoot may be unavoidable.'
"This must be a fund that works differently and thinks differently; one that can effectively work with national systems and be responsive to the needs on the ground. We must incentivize social protection and avoid the fragmentation and administrative burden that the current project-based financing regime continues to create."
Harjeet Singh, Convenor of the new Global Campaign 'Fill The Fund' on Loss and Damage Finance, and Founding Director of Satat Sampada Climate Foundation: said at the launch event: 'The creation of this Fund was a historic victory, but it will be a meaningless one if it is not filled with new, additional, and accessible public grants. This campaign will unite the voices of thousands of organizations to demand that developed countries stop shirking their responsibilities.
"The 'Fill The Fund' campaign will coordinate global advocacy, track pledges and payments through a public dashboard, and mobilize citizens to pressure governments ahead of key moments, including the COP30 climate conference in Belém, Brazil.'
Claire Miranda, Deputy Program Manager for Climate Justice, APMDD (Philippines) and member of the Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice (DCJ): "It is significant that the FRLD Board is meeting here in Cebu, one of the cities hardest hit by Super Typhoon Rai in 2021, which left a vast trail of death and devastation across our country.
'Bringing the Board discussions here is not just symbolic; it is a reminder of who this fund must serve. But symbolism is not enough. We need substance. We need decisions that move us from delay to delivery, from pledges to actual contributions, and from rhetoric to real reparations. We need to fill the fund."
Tasneem Essop, Executive Director, Climate Action Network International: 'The establishment of the Loss and Damage Fund was a major political achievement, thanks to the leadership and pressure from civil society and developing countries. However, the real test will be how this Fund is filled. With increasingly devastating climate impacts, felt mainly in the Global South, we are talking billions, not millions, that are needed for recovery and rebuilding.
'Rich nations, who caused harm historically, must pay up. We are talking about public, grants-based finance. The attempts by the World Bank to get the private sector involved in financing the Fund is yet another escape clause for rich nations. You cannot profit off of suffering. Rich nations must pay their dues. They can find the money to fund wars and subsidise fossil fuels, so there can be no argument that there is no money.'
Brandon Wu, Director of Policy and Campaigns, ActionAid USA: "When rich countries say they don't have the money to contribute to global climate solutions, it's a bluff. In this fiscal year alone, the US government plans to spend nearly $200 billion on border security and immigration enforcement. That is almost 11,000 times more than its paltry $17.5 million contribution to the Loss and Damage Fund - money that will go towards persecuting everyday people rather than supporting their needs.
"This has never been about a lack of resources; it has always been about a lack of political will. When those in power decide something is a priority, they can mobilize untold amounts of money at the drop of a hat. It's time that rich countries choose to prioritize survival and dignified life for billions of people around the world. Living up to their obligations to contribute to the FRLD is a core part of that choice."
Liane Schalatek, Associate Director, Heinrich Böll Foundation Washington, DC, said: 'Only 358 million US Dollar in the bank when at least the same number in billions is needed per year – this is the sad state of efforts to mobilize financing to #FillTheFund for responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD).
'Announced with much fanfare at COP28 in Dubai 20 months ago, developed countries have so far failed to fulfill their legal obligation and moral duty to help marginalized people and vulnerable communities in developing countries to cope with ever more devastating extreme weather events with hurricanes, floods and droughts, glacier melt and sea level rise, and more and more lives and livelihoods lost. No more excuses and evasions.
'We need public grant finance delivered to the Fund in the billions as a matter of urgency and climate justice. If countries in the Global North can find money for military expansion, subsidizing fossil fuels, beefing up border controls and tax gifts for the richest, they can summon the resources to #PayUp4LossAndDamage - NOW!'
Chiara Liguori, Climate Justice Senior Policy Adviser, Oxfam GB: 'The establishment of the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage in 2022 was hailed as a historic moment. But little money has followed since then. We have only seen more excuses and delaying tactics.
'What would be really historic now is for rich countries to live up to their responsibilities, honour their obligations and pay up for the losses and damages they have caused. Only this would ensure justice to the people left displaced, hungry or sick by the reckless behaviour of the richest and biggest polluters.'
Lien Vandamme, Senior Campaigner, Center for International Environmental Law, said: 'States and corporations with historic and current responsibility for the climate crisis have legal obligations to pay for the damage. While we celebrated the historic step taken at COP27 to establish a Loss and Damage Fund, this fund remains an empty shell and people and communities on the frontlines of the climate crisis have yet to receive the first penny.
'2025 is the year to change this: as countries are discussing how to scale up resources of the Loss and Damage Fund, international courts are confirming State obligations to repair climate and environmental harm, at home and abroad. COP30 must tie all of this together and deliver a clear path forward towards the urgent delivery of hundreds of billions needed annually. The delay must end and polluters must pay.'
Brenda Mwale, Finance Lead, Loss and Damage Collaboration, said: 'Adequate funding for the Loss and Damage fund is not merely a financial necessity; it constitutes human rights and legal imperative to address the disproportionate impacts of climate change on vulnerable nations. Sufficient resources are essential for supporting recovery efforts, and ensuring a more equitable global response to climate-induced disasters.
'The current state of resources in the Fund highlights the reluctance of developed countries to assume responsibility and support frontline communities at the scale required. This issue should be treated with urgency and see the delivery of Loss and Damage scale of at least 400 billion USD a year. The response to COVID-19, demonstrated the capacity and availability of resources to support vulnerable communities. The money is there! '
Ineza Umuhoza Grace & Nicolas Gaulin, Global Coordinators, Loss & Damage Youth Coalition, said: An empty Fund means more droughts, floods, and temperature extremes. An empty Fund means broken homes, displaced families, and unchecked destruction and disease. An empty Fund means foregoing development to pay for a crisis the primary victims didn't create. An empty Fund means developed countries continue to downplay and reject their historical responsibility in fueling the climate crisis. An empty Fund means no trust in real action. Developing countries and frontline communities have the right to new, additional, predictable, public, grants-based and easily accessible funds to survive and thrive.
'These funds are neither charity, nor development aid or investment opportunities. These funds are meant for equitable climate action that addresses real pain at the frontlines. Nothing short of trillions will rectify this egregious breach of justice and global solidarity, consistently perpetuated by a collective of wealthy nations. The Fund must be filled today, tomorrow, and until it matches the scale of needs on the ground.
Nithi Nesadurai, Director & Regional Coordinator, Climate Action Network Southeast Asia, said: 'Given the increasing frequency of extreme weather events and their rising intensity, which are aggressively adding to the loss and damage being incurred in the developing world in particular, it is imperative that developed countries meet their obligations by contributing significantly to the Fund with immediate effect. Delay tactics cannot be tolerated anymore.'
Dr. Isatis M. Cintron-Rodriguez, Founder and Director, Climate Trace, Puerto Rico, said: "Trust is in high demand and as the currency for climate justice it hinges on developed countries stepping up with public finance that is new, additional, high quality, non-debt inducing, and commensurate with the harm incurred. Anything less risk turning a promise into betrayal for the world's most affected communities."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI data centre market to reach USD $933.76 billion by 2030
AI data centre market to reach USD $933.76 billion by 2030

Techday NZ

time20 hours ago

  • Techday NZ

AI data centre market to reach USD $933.76 billion by 2030

The global artificial intelligence data centre market is projected to experience significant growth driven by the increasing demand for AI workloads, data explosion, and big data analytics. Research from MarketsandMarkets estimates that the worldwide AI data centre market will rise from USD $236.44 billion in 2025 to USD $933.76 billion by 2030, registering a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 31.6% throughout the forecast period. Market drivers This growth is primarily attributed to the surging demand for AI workloads across multiple industries, including healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. These sectors increasingly rely on high-performance computing infrastructures to manage complex algorithms and process large-scale data sets in real time. In response, companies are making investments in data centres optimised for artificial intelligence, which incorporate advanced hardware such as GPUs, TPUs, and storage systems capable of supporting intense computational loads. Such investments aim to address both the performance needs of AI tasks and the growing quantities of data generated by digital transformation initiatives. While demand is growing, the establishment of AI-centric data centres involves considerable costs. These include the need for specialised hardware, advanced cooling mechanisms to manage the substantial heat generated by high-performance servers, and a workforce with expertise in AI operations and maintenance. This cost barrier may prove significant, particularly for small and mid-sized enterprises looking to adopt AI infrastructure. An emerging trend within the segment is the adoption of environmentally sustainable practices. Organisations are implementing green AI data centres that focus on energy efficiency and reduced carbon footprints as part of efforts to address both cost and regulatory pressures related to sustainability. Compute servers lead The compute server segment is anticipated to command the highest market share in the AI data centre market during the forecast window. Compute servers play a crucial role in deploying AI workloads, especially in domains such as deep learning, natural language processing, and computer vision. These applications require substantial computational power for both training and inference, typically delivered by servers outfitted with GPUs, TPUs, or custom AI accelerators. These advanced servers enable parallel processing and real-time analysis of data, making them an integral component for enterprises deploying AI at scale. As the demand for automation, advanced analytics, and new digital services grows, the market for compute servers tailored for AI purposes continues to expand. Another important factor is the increasing use of AI in hyperscale data centres, which process large volumes of data on a continuous basis. To satisfy these computational requirements, compute servers are increasingly considered the backbone of modern AI data centre architectures. Their reliability and performance are central to the operation of scalable, high-capacity AI systems. Enterprise adoption increases The enterprise segment is projected to register the highest CAGR in the AI data centre market over the forecast period. This is attributed to the widespread digital transformation across industries and a growing emphasis on intelligent, data-driven decision-making for business processes. Enterprises are increasingly deploying AI workloads for a variety of applications, such as predictive maintenance, customer analytics, fraud detection, and automation of routine business tasks. To support these initiatives, many are investing in data centres that are specifically optimised for AI, offering the required computational power and scalability. While hyperscale technology providers have already established robust AI infrastructure, a transition is seen in enterprises actively developing or collaborating to build AI-focused data centre capacity in pursuit of maintaining competitiveness. Industry-specific examples include financial institutions leveraging AI data centres for real-time risk assessment, while healthcare organisations use them for expediting diagnostics and drug discovery. The AI data centre market is witnessing strong growth due to the rising demand for AI workloads across healthcare, finance, and manufacturing sectors. These workloads require high-performance computing infrastructure to process complex algorithms and large-scale data sets in real-time. Companies are investing in AI-optimized data centres that integrate GPUs, TPUs, and advanced storage systems to meet this demand. However, one main constraint is the high implementation cost associated with setting up AI-centric data centres, including investment in specialised hardware, advanced cooling systems, and skilled personnel. This can be a barrier, particularly for small and mid-sized enterprises. An emerging opportunity lies in the increasing adoption of green AI data centres as organisations focus on sustainability and energy efficiency. The growth of AI-as-a-Service (AIaaS) platforms is also granting mid-sized and smaller enterprises access to advanced AI technologies without requiring hefty upfront infrastructure investments. Additionally, government incentives targeted at promoting digital innovation and AI utilisation in sectors such as manufacturing and transportation are further encouraging enterprise spending on AI-capable data centres. With enterprises increasingly transitioning to hybrid cloud and edge computing models, the requirement for data centre infrastructure that is robust, secure, and energy-efficient is accelerating. These trends are expected to underpin the strong market growth expected in the coming years.

Accenture acquires Aristal to boost Southeast Asia banking tech
Accenture acquires Aristal to boost Southeast Asia banking tech

Techday NZ

time20 hours ago

  • Techday NZ

Accenture acquires Aristal to boost Southeast Asia banking tech

Accenture has completed the acquisition of Aristal, a Malaysia-based consultancy with expertise in financial services and digital transformation, in an effort to broaden its capabilities across Southeast Asia. This acquisition represents Accenture's first banking-focused purchase in Malaysia and is part of a wider programme to expand its presence in the region's financial services sector. Regional pressure Banks and financial institutions across the Asia-Pacific, including New Zealand, are facing increasing challenges to modernise legacy systems and increase digital adoption, partly in response to changing economic conditions at both the regional and global levels. Founded in 2006, Aristal has provided advisory services in core banking transformation and has led significant IT and business change initiatives for financial institutions in Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand. Its expertise spans system migrations, regulatory compliance, and post-merger integrations, challenges that many banks in Southeast Asia are actively addressing. "With deep expertise in core banking systems, Aristal has helped banks upgrade outdated platforms, improve operations, and deliver better customer experiences - capabilities that will strengthen Accenture's financial services offerings," said Paul Ng, Financial Services Lead, Southeast Asia at Accenture. "Their experience implementing core banking platforms, designing operating models, and supporting post-merger integration will enhance our ability to help banks across Southeast Asia transform faster and operate more efficiently." Following the acquisition, Aristal's team of 30 professionals will join Accenture's Financial Services practice in Malaysia. According to both companies, the integration of Aristal's industry experience with Accenture's broader technology and managed services portfolio should enable more comprehensive delivery of transformation projects for banks in the region. Market trends The global core banking market is expected to reach USD $28.8 billion by 2027, and financial institutions in Southeast Asia are advancing their efforts to replace ageing technology and enhance digital offerings. New Zealand's banks, subject to scrutiny over ageing infrastructure and the quality of digital services, are observing such developments as a reminder of the necessity for ongoing investment in updating core systems. "This acquisition expands our pool of experienced professionals in Malaysia and strengthens our ability to support clients driving core banking transformation," said Azwan Baharuddin, Country Managing Director for Accenture in Malaysia. "It reflects our commitment to developing local talent and helping clients harness the power of technology, data, and AI to reinvent how they operate, compete, and grow in an increasingly dynamic banking landscape." Lin Kok Liong, Managing Director of Aristal, commented on the wider opportunities the deal presents for Aristal staff and clients alike. "Joining Accenture opens up tremendous opportunities for our team here in Malaysia to grow and contribute on a larger stage. By integrating into Accenture's global network of innovation and talent, we're not only expanding our own capabilities but also enhancing the value we can deliver to clients locally." Strategic moves The acquisition follows other strategic decisions by Accenture in Southeast Asia, including purchasing Singapore-based Percipient's digital twin banking technology and launching the AI Refinery Engineering Hub, with an aim of supporting digital transformation on a large scale for financial services providers. No financial details regarding the Aristal transaction have been disclosed. Follow us on: Share on:

Cafe Owner Protests Punakaiki Parking Charges
Cafe Owner Protests Punakaiki Parking Charges

Scoop

time2 days ago

  • Scoop

Cafe Owner Protests Punakaiki Parking Charges

A Punakaiki café owner is urging the Conservation Department to rethink its plan to charge for parking at the famous Pancake Rocks on the West Coast. Grant Parrett told a meeting of the West Coast Tai o Poutini Conservation Board this week (subs: Tuesday 22/7) that parking charges create de facto entry fee to (Paparoa) National Park, which was unlawful. Conservation Minister Tama Potaka has asked for a trial of paid parking to boost revenue. DOC is aiming to launch a pilot programme in October at Punakaiki, Franz Josef and White Horse Hill at Aoraki Mt Cook. Project manager John Dore told the Board that DOC had serious budget pressures including a 30 percent shortfall in funding for its visitor network and a huge deficit in the amount available for biodiversity. 'For protection of all endangered species we have a budget of $300 million - but a need of $2.3 billion," Mr Dore said. Climate events in the last few years had added $90 million in costs, he added. Paid parking was a tool used internationally in nature parks and would help manage overcrowding at busy sites, he told the Board. But Mr Parrett said the move would turn public conservation land into a Wilsons-style parking lot, and urged the Board to oppose it. 'However you label it, it's a National Park entry fee; it contravenes the National Parks Act and it diminishes DOC's social license to operate.' There were no free parks at Punakaiki because they had been removed to make room for the new Visitor Centre development and people would have no option but to pay to walk around the Pancake Rocks, Mr Parrett said. Unlike Franz Josef or Aoraki Mt Cook, Punakaiki was not a tourist destination but a stop-off attraction for people driving the scenic Coast Road, and for most of the year there was no congestion or capacity problem in the carpark, he said. 'Parking fees will disadvantage local people who call in for a coffee or to stretch their legs, and we don't want this,' he said. While DOC owned the land, taxpayers had funded the $45 million Dolomite Point Visitor Centre development and the building was gifted by the last Government to manawhenua, NgatiWaewae, who now leased office space back to DOC. The public has paid for this development and costs should be kept low, he said. "I am surprised that the iwi has supported the paid parking trial … unless they stand to benefit from it," Mr Parrett said. If people had to pay for parking they might be less likely to pay for Ngati Waewae's interactive visitor experience inside, he suggested. Ngati Waewae's representative on the Conservation Board, Francois Tumahai, objected. 'I disagree with everything you've said. The cost of the building was not $45 million and we're not getting a cent from the project. In the early days we suggested we might provide (parking) wardens … that's it.' Mr Parrett suggested it would be good if the iwi put out a statement to that effect in the interests of transparency. The iwi leader responded: 'You're the one causing all the grief - you put it out." Board chair Dr Mike Legge closed off the discussion and thanked Mr Parrett for his contribution to the public forum. The Dolomite Point Visitor Centre, funded by the Provincial Growth Fund, was budgeted to cost $26 million but the project – including the new carparks – received a funding boost of $15 million in 2023 and cost a total of $40.9 million. The paid parking trial, including charging technology and upgrades to carparks at the three sites, is being funded by $3.8 million from the International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy. DOC plans to release its pricing strategy early next month and hold public drop-in sessions at Punakaiki, Franz Josef and Aoraki in mid August. Submissions close on August 26 for Punakaiki, and September 30 for Aoraki. *The National Parks Act 1980 gives the public freedom of entry and access to the parks "so that they may receive in full measure the inspiration, enjoyment, recreation and other benefits that may be derived from mountains, forest, sounds, seacoasts, lakes, rivers and other natural features.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store