Corner Modi Over Trump's Claim, Pahalgam and Bihar Voter List Row: Cong's Monsoon Session Strategy
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
12 minutes ago
- Hans India
Karnataka Deputy CM DK Shivakumar Highlights Unwavering Congress Commitment, Takes Veiled Swipe At Siddaramaiah
Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar has emphasized his unwavering commitment to the Congress party, marking 37 years of dedicated service while subtly drawing attention to the contrasting political journey of Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, who transitioned from the Janata Dal (Secular) to Congress. At 63 years old, Shivakumar highlighted his deep-rooted connection with the party, stating that he has matured alongside the Congress organization. His comments appear strategically timed amid ongoing speculation about potential power-sharing arrangements within the Karnataka government, subtly positioning himself as the more loyal party member compared to Siddaramaiah, who joined Congress in 2006 after his tenure with the Janata Parivar. The Deputy Chief Minister reflected on his political career, which spans eight consecutive terms in the state assembly, emphasizing that his allegiance has remained constant from his early political days. He stressed the importance of maintaining organizational roots, suggesting that abandoning one's foundational connections leads to fruitless outcomes. This philosophy appears to underscore his criticism of leaders who have switched political affiliations during their careers. Shivakumar credited his appointment as Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee chief to the trust placed in him by former Congress president Sonia Gandhi. He described his three-year tenure in this role as a period of complete dedication toward dismantling the BJP's governance in Karnataka, which he referred to as the "double engine" government. His efforts, he claimed, were instrumental in restoring Congress power in the state. The Deputy Chief Minister portrayed his contribution to the party's electoral victory as wholehearted, suggesting that his personal investment was crucial to bringing the current government to power. This assertion reinforces his claim to a significant role in Karnataka's political landscape and potentially strengthens any argument for greater responsibility or recognition within the state leadership structure. In addressing ongoing discussions about potential leadership changes, Shivakumar praised Sonia Gandhi's 2004 decision to decline the Prime Minister's position, describing it as an extraordinary political sacrifice that remains unparalleled in Indian politics. Without directly naming individuals, he observed that while some leaders are willing to share power, many others refuse to do so, even at the grassroots panchayat level. These remarks come at a crucial time when questions about a possible rotation of the chief ministerial position in Karnataka continue to generate political speculation. The comments suggest underlying tensions about power distribution within the state government and highlight the complex dynamics between the two senior Congress leaders in Karnataka. Shivakumar's emphasis on organizational loyalty and his implicit contrast with Siddaramaiah's political history appears to be a strategic positioning move. By highlighting his continuous association with Congress since his political inception, he distinguishes himself from colleagues who have changed party affiliations, potentially strengthening his claim to leadership positions within the state hierarchy. The Deputy Chief Minister's statements reflect broader themes of political loyalty, organizational commitment, and the significance of maintaining consistent party allegiance throughout one's career. His comments also underscore the ongoing internal dynamics within the Karnataka Congress unit, where questions of leadership succession and power-sharing arrangements continue to influence political discourse. As speculation about potential changes in Karnataka's leadership structure persists, Shivakumar's public assertions of loyalty and dedication serve to reinforce his position as a committed party member who has consistently supported Congress interests throughout his extensive political career. His subtle critique of party-switching behavior appears designed to highlight the value of unwavering organizational commitment in contemporary Indian politics.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
12 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Lok Sabha MP Sudha R's gold chain snatched in Delhi's Chanakyapuri
Congress MP Sudha Ramakrishnan lodged a police complaint on Monday, claiming that her gold chain was snatched during a morning walk in the diplomatic enclave of Delhi's Chanakyapuri area. Ramakrishnan also wrote a letter to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, providing details of the complaint. She told Shah that the blatant attack on a woman, who is a Member of Parliament, in a high-security zone like Chanakyapuri—an area filled with embassies and protected institutions—was "highly shocking". According to the MP, the incident occurred between 6:15 am and 6:20 am on August 4 while she was walking near Gates 3 and 4 of the Polish Embassy with Rajya Sabha MP Rajathi. She said, "A man wearing a full helmet, riding a two-wheeler, approached from the opposite direction and snatched my gold chain before fleeing the spot." "If a woman cannot walk safely in this high-priority zone in the national capital of India, where else can we feel safe and do our routine without fearing for our lives and valuables," she added. In her complaint, Ramakrishnan stated she had sustained injuries on her neck and that her churidhar (tightly fitting trousers) was torn due to the impact. She added that both of them shouted for help. Later, they saw a Delhi Police mobile patrol vehicle and filed the complaint. Ensure prompt justice: Sudha Ramakrishnan Ramakrishnan urged the home minister to instruct the authorities to trace the accused using CCTV footage from the area and to ensure prompt justice and recovery of the stolen chain. A senior police officer stated that a case had been registered and an investigation was underway. He said multiple police teams had been deployed to trace the accused and examine CCTV footage from the area. Police officers are also interviewing witnesses and reviewing reports of any unusual activity in the area at the time of the incident.
Hans India
12 minutes ago
- Hans India
Supreme Court Questions Rahul Gandhi's Patriotism Over China Territory Claims, Stays Defamation Case
The Supreme Court delivered sharp criticism to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Monday regarding his assertions that China had seized over 2,000 square kilometers of Indian territory. The justices questioned whether a genuine patriot would make such statements, though they simultaneously halted defamation legal proceedings against the Leader of Opposition. The controversy stems from Gandhi's statements during his 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra, where he alleged that Chinese forces had occupied significant portions of Indian land and were physically attacking Indian military personnel in Arunachal Pradesh. The Supreme Court bench, comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih, expressed skepticism about the source of Gandhi's information regarding the territorial claims. The justices questioned Gandhi's approach as the Leader of Opposition, suggesting that such concerns should be raised within Parliament rather than through public statements. They emphasized that his position carries significant responsibility and questioned why he would make such assertions publicly instead of utilizing proper parliamentary channels. Gandhi had approached the Supreme Court after the Allahabad High Court rejected his petition in May, which challenged both the summoning order and the criminal complaint filed against him. The High Court had previously ruled that freedom of speech does not provide protection for statements that defame the military forces. The original complaint was filed by Udai Shanker Srivastava, who accused Gandhi of making disparaging comments about the Indian Army during his political campaign. The complainant alleged that Gandhi's remarks were made in the context of ongoing border tensions with China and were detrimental to the armed forces' reputation. During a 2022 press conference in Rajasthan, Gandhi had criticized the ruling party for allegedly ignoring China's territorial advances and military aggression. He claimed that while media attention focused on internal political matters, insufficient attention was given to what he described as China's capture of Indian territory and violence against Indian soldiers. Gandhi reiterated similar claims in January 2023 while in Jammu and Kashmir, stating that former military officials had corroborated his assertions about territorial loss. He mentioned meeting with retired army personnel and a delegation from Ladakh who allegedly confirmed that Chinese forces had taken control of significant Indian territory. The Congress leader also claimed that former military personnel informed him that numerous patrolling points previously under Indian control had been permanently occupied by Chinese forces. These statements formed the basis of the defamation case filed in Uttar Pradesh, which led to a trial court issuing summons against Gandhi. After receiving the summons, Gandhi approached the Allahabad High Court seeking to have both the proceedings and the summons dismissed. However, the High Court rejected his petition, leading to his appeal to the Supreme Court. The case highlights the delicate balance between political criticism and statements that may be perceived as harmful to national interests or military morale. While the Supreme Court has stayed the defamation proceedings, the justices' comments reflect concerns about the appropriateness of Gandhi's public statements regarding sensitive border issues. The matter underscores ongoing political tensions regarding India's border management and the role of opposition leaders in addressing national security concerns. The Supreme Court's intervention suggests that while legal proceedings have been paused, questions remain about the proper channels for raising such sensitive issues in India's democratic framework.
