IDF's Gaza Invasion Begins; Officially Announces Last Phase Of War On Hamas: ‘Israel Is Not Waiting'
Union Home Minister Amit Shah introduced three controversial bills in the Lok Sabha, triggering sharp protests from the opposition. The bills seek removal of the prime minister, chief ministers, or ministers held in custody for 30 days on serious criminal charges. Opposition MPs, including KC Venugopal and Asaduddin Owaisi, called the bills 'anti-constitutional.' Venugopal questioned Shah's moral authority, referring to his past arrest as Gujarat's home minister. Shah said he had resigned then and did not hold any post until cleared by court. The bills, including the 130th Constitution Amendment, have been sent to the Joint Parliamentary Committee for scrutiny.
125.3K views | 9 hours ago
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
12 minutes ago
- India Today
Parliament Monsoon session ends: Who won the battle of narratives? Experts debate
The month-long Monsoon session of Parliament ended on Thursday after it witnessed almost daily disruptions and noisy protests by the Opposition in both Houses over the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar. The session that started on July 21 had 21 sittings with 37 hours and 7 minutes of effective business, according to the Lok Sabha secretariat. The debate on Operation Sindoor was the high point of the session, which saw heated exchanges between the opposition and Treasury benches. The opposition also sought a discussion on the special intensive revision of the voter list by the election commission in Bihar, but this was rejected by the government. So, who won the battle of narratives in the monsoon session? Watch as experts discuss this and more on the show,
India Today
12 minutes ago
- India Today
Parliament paralysis: Should no work, no pay be implemented for MPs? Experts debate
In this episode of India First, the programme examines the Monsoon Session of Parliament, which ran from July 21st to August 21st. The session experienced significant disruptions, with the Lok Sabha operating for only 37 of 120 scheduled hours, resulting in productivity falling below 40%. Independent MP Umesh Patel staged a protest, advocating for a 'no work, no pay' policy for lawmakers and demanding that the entire salary and allowances of MPs for this session be withheld, with House running expenses recovered from them. The discussion explores the growing bitterness in Indian politics, parliamentary dysfunction, and the estimated ₹121 crore of taxpayer money lost due to disruptions.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
1996 dhoti-pulling case against one of BJP's 1st 2 LS MPs dropped
representative image AHMEDABAD: Twenty-nine years after then Gujarat minister Atmaram Patel's dhoti was pulled during a BJP function at Sardar Patel Stadium, a city sessions court on Thursday dropped the criminal case against former Union minister A K Patel, one of the two first BJP Lok Sabha members. Another BJP politician, Mangaldas Patel, was also an accused in the case, registered at Naranpura police station under IPC Section 307 (attempt to murder) for allegedly assaulting and pulling off the minister's dhoti in 1996. The accused had backed Shankersinh Vaghela at the time of his rift with then chief minister Keshubhai Patel. The incident occurred immediately after BJP's Atal Bihari Vajpayee had finished addressing the party gathering. Public prosecutor Sudhir Brahmbhatt filed an application under CrPC Section 321 seeking withdrawal of the case against the 95-year-old former MP. The co-accused in the case, Mangaldas Patel, and witness (victim) Atmaram Patel, had passed away during the pendency of the trial. After hearing the submissions, additional sessions judge H G Pandya observed: "The case involves an internal political party dispute that occurred 28 years ago, and the victim, Atmarambhai Maganbhai Patel, has passed away... The public prosecutor's request to withdraw the case appears to be made with bona fide intentions, and sufficient consideration has been given to withdrawing the prosecution. Therefore, considering the records and the nature of the offence, it is appropriate to grant permission to withdraw the prosecution under Section 321 of CrPC in the interest of justice. " Earlier, on Jan 30, 2018, a metropolitan court had dropped a related criminal case against 41 BJP workers and politicians, including VHP leader Pravin Togadia and BJP MLA from Daskroi Babu Jamna Patel.
