
Tariff showdown shatters once robust populist alliance between Trump and Modi
In India, the bonhomie between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump was seen as a relationship like no other. That is, until a series of events gummed up the works.
From Trump's tariffs and India's purchase of oil from Russia to a US tilt towards Pakistan, friction between New Delhi and Washington has been hard to miss. And much of it has happened far from the corridors of power and, unsurprisingly, through Trump's posts on social media.
It has left policy experts wondering whether the camaraderie the two leaders shared may be a thing of the past, even though Trump has stopped short of referring to Modi directly on social media. The dip in rapport, some say, puts a strategic bilateral relationship built over decades at risk.
'This is a testing time for the relationship,' said Ashok Malik, a former policy adviser in India's Foreign Ministry.
The White House did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment.
The latest hiccup between India and the US emerged last week when Trump announced that he was slapping 25% tariffs on India as well as an unspecified penalty because of India's purchase of Russian oil.
For New Delhi, such a move from its largest trading partner is expected to be felt across sectors, but it also led to a sense of unease in India — even more so when Trump, on social media, called India's economy 'dead'.
Trump's recent statements reflect his frustration with the pace of trade talks with India, according to a White House official who was not authorised to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal administration thinking. The Republican president has not been pursuing any strategic realignment with Pakistan, according to the official, but is instead trying to play hardball in negotiations.
Trump doubled down on the pressure Monday with a fresh post on Truth Social, in which he accused India of buying 'massive amounts' of oil from Russia and then 'selling it on the Open Market for big profits".
'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the tariff paid by India to the USA,' he said.
The messaging appears to have stung Modi's administration, which has been hard-selling negotiations with Trump's team over a trade deal by balancing between India's protectionist system while also opening up the country's market to more American goods.
'Strenuous, uninterrupted and bipartisan efforts in both capitals over the past 25 years are being put at risk by not just the tariffs but by fast and loose statements and social media posts,' said Malik, who heads the India chapter of The Asia Group, a US advisory firm.
Malik also said the trade deal the Indian side has offered to the US is the 'most expansive in this country's history,' referring to reports that India was willing to open up to some American agricultural products. That is a politically sensitive issue for Modi, who faced a yearlong farmers' protest a few years ago.
The unravelling may have gained momentum over tariffs, but the tensions have been palpable for a while. Much of it has to do with Trump growing closer to Pakistan, India's nuclear rival in the neighbourhood.
In May, India and Pakistan traded a series of military strikes over a gun massacre in the disputed Kashmir region that New Delhi blamed on Islamabad. Pakistan denied the accusations. The four-day conflict made the possibility of a nuclear conflagration between the two sides seem real and the fighting only stopped when global powers intervened.
But it was Trump's claims of mediation and an offer to work to provide a 'solution' regarding the dispute over Kashmir that made Modi's administration uneasy. Since then, Trump has repeated nearly two dozen times that he brokered peace between India and Pakistan.
For Modi, that is a risky — even nervy — territory. Domestically, he has positioned himself as a leader who is tough on Pakistan. Internationally, he has made huge diplomatic efforts to isolate the country. So Trump's claims cut a deep wound, prompting a sense in India that the US may no longer be its strategic partner.
India insists that Kashmir is India's internal issue and had opposed any third-party intervention. Last week Modi appeared to dismiss Trump's claims after India's opposition began demanding answers from him. Modi said that 'no country in the world stopped' the fighting between India and Pakistan, but he did not name Trump.
Trump has also appeared to be warming up to Pakistan, even praising its counterterrorism efforts. Hours after levying tariffs on India, Trump announced a 'massive' oil exploration deal with Pakistan, saying that one day, India might have to buy oil from Islamabad. Earlier, he also hosted one of Pakistan's top military officials at a private lunch.
Sreeram Sundar Chaulia, an expert at New Delhi's Jindal School of International Affairs, said Trump's sudden admiration for Pakistan as a great partner in counterterrorism has 'definitely soured' the mood in India.
Chaulia said 'the best-case scenario is that this is just a passing Trump whim', but he also warned that 'if financial and energy deals are indeed being struck between the US and Pakistan, it will dent the US-India strategic partnership and lead to loss of confidence in the US in Indian eyes".
India had faced strong pressure from the Biden administration to cut back its oil purchases from Moscow during the early months of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Instead, India bought more, making it the second-biggest buyer of Russian oil after China. That pressure sputtered over time and the US focused more on building strategic ties with India, which is seen as a bulwark against a rising China.
Trump's threat to penalise India over oil, however, brought back those issues.
On Sunday, the Trump administration made its frustrations over ties between India and Russia ever more public. Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House, accused India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine by purchasing oil from Moscow, saying it was "not acceptable".
Miller's remarks were followed by another Trump social media post on Monday in which he again threatened to raise tariffs on goods from India over its Russian oil purchases.
'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian oil, they are then, for much of the oil purchased, selling it on the open market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine," Trump wrote.
Some experts, though, suspect Trump's remarks are mere pressure tactics.
'Given the wild fluctuations in Trump's policies,' Chaulia said, 'it may return to high fives and hugs again.'
Many expected India to react strongly over Trump's tariff threats considering Modi's carefully crafted reputation of strength. Instead, the announcement prompted a rather careful response from India's commerce minister, Piyush Goyal, who said the two countries are working toward a "fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement".
Initially, India's Foreign Ministry also played down suggestions of any strain. But in a statement late Monday, it called Trump's criticism 'unjustified and unreasonable' and said it will take 'all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security".
It said India began importing oil from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the Ukraine conflict, calling it a 'necessity compelled by global market situation".
The statement also noted US trade with Russia.
'It is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia,' the statement said. — Euronews
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Leaders
an hour ago
- Leaders
Trump Doubles Tariffs on India to 50% for Buying Russian Oil
The US President, Donald Trump, has signed an executive order doubling tariffs on India from 25% to 50% for purchasing oil from Russia. On Wednesday, Trump signed an executive order imposing tariffs on India 'in response to its continued purchase of Russian Federation oil,' the White House said. This makes India's tariffs among the highest imposed by the US so far. 'India's importation of Russian Federation oil undermines US efforts to counter Russia's harmful activities,' the White House noted. The tariffs will come into effect on August 27, 2025, according to the White House fact sheet, which warned that other countries that directly or indirectly import Russian oil could be subject to similar tariffs. India and China are two of the largest Russian oil buyers. Trump has imposed 30% tariffs on imports from China. In response to Trump's announcement, the Indian Foreign Ministry reiterated in a statement that 'these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable.' It said that New Delhi had made clear its position that its imports from Russia 'are based on market factors' and aim to ensure energy security for its people. 'It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest,' it noted, adding that New Delhi will 'take all actions necessary to protect its national interests.' The tariff hike announcement followed a meeting between the US Special Envoy, Steve Witkoff, and the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, in Moscow, two days before Trump's deadline for Russia to end its war in Ukraine or face new economic sanctions. Short link : Post Views: 7


Leaders
an hour ago
- Leaders
Putin, US Envoy Witkoff Meet in Moscow ahead of Ukraine Ceasefire Deadline
The Russian President, Vladimir Putin, hosted the US Special Envoy, Steve Witkoff, in the Kremlin on Wednesday as the deadline set by US President, Donald Trump, for Moscow to agree a ceasefire in Ukraine looms. Putin-Witkoff Meeting According to Russian news agency TASS, the meeting lasted for around 3 hours, with the presence of Russian Presidential Aide, Yury Ushakov, who described the meeting as 'useful and constructive.' Earlier on Wednesday, Witkoff arrived in Moscow, where he was received by the Russian Direct Investment Fund CEO and special presidential envoy for economic cooperation, Kirill Dmitriev. The two officials also had a walk in Zaryadye Park in downtown Moscow. Deadline Looming Witkoff's visit to Russia marks the fifth since the start of the year. It came two days ahead of the deadline set by the US President, Donald Trump, for Russia to end the war in Ukraine. Trump threatened Moscow with new economic sanctions if it did not reach a ceasefire Ukraine by August 8. He also threatened heavy tariffs on countries that buy Russian exports, particularly India and China – two of the largest Russian oil buyers. Putin's Options Putin seemed to be unmoved by Trump's threats, insisting that his demands to end the war in Ukraine remained unchanged and signaling that the war's momentum was in Russia's favor. It was not clear what he might propose to Witkoff to avert Trump's threats. One of the options could be proposing a moratorium on air strikes by Russia and Ukraine, Reuters reported citing Bloomberg and independent Russian news outlet The Bell. Although this would not meet the US' demand of a full and immediate ceasefire, it might offer some relief to both sides. Anti-Submarine Drill In a separate development, Russia and China conducted an anti-submarine exercise in the Sea of Japan – days after Trump said he had moved nuclear submarines closer to Russia. The exercise was part of a broader series of joint naval drills. On Wednesday, Russia's Defense Ministry said that the Russian and Chinese navies have practiced hunting and destroying an enemy submarine. 'As a result of effective joint actions, the 'enemy' submarine was promptly detected and mock-destroyed,' it said in a statement. Trump's decision to reposition nuclear submarines followed an online row with Russia's former president and the deputy chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, Dmitry Medvedev. Short link : Post Views: 12


Leaders
an hour ago
- Leaders
Rwanda Takes US Migrants for Cash: Human Rights Concerns Mount
Rwanda has officially agreed to accept up to 250 migrants from the United States as part of a new agreement that includes a cash grant. This decision aligns with the Trump administration's broader strategy to deport migrants to third countries. However, it raises significant concerns regarding human rights, legality, and the troubling trend of wealthier nations paying other countries to accept deportees. Rwandan government spokesperson Yolande Makolo announced the agreement on Tuesday. She emphasized that nearly every Rwandan family has faced displacement hardships, stating, 'Our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation.' The agreement was signed by officials from both countries in Kigali in June. A Rwandan official, speaking anonymously to Reuters, revealed that the US had already sent an initial list of 10 migrants for vetting. The White House, along with the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department, did not provide immediate comments on the deal. Financial Implications Under this agreement, Rwanda will receive funding from the US in the form of a cash grant. Although the Rwandan official confirmed that the grant letter was signed in July, they did not disclose the specific amount involved. Phil Clark, a professor at SOAS University in the UK, remarked, 'This is the real surprise in this deal.' He noted that the previous announcement indicated the US was trading this policy for a peace deal with the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Now, it appears Rwanda will also benefit financially from hosting these migrants. The two countries may expand the scheme beyond the initial 250 migrants. Those sent to Rwanda will have the option to leave the country if they choose. Resettlement Conditions Rwandan authorities will have the final say on who can be resettled. They have made it clear that they will not accept individuals who have served part of a prison sentence or who face criminal charges. Additionally, there are no plans to allow deportees to complete US prison terms in Rwanda, and child sex offenders will not be accepted. Makolo stated that approved migrants would receive job training, healthcare, and housing support. She emphasized the opportunity for these individuals to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade. In June, the US Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration could deport migrants to third countries. However, the legal battle continues. A federal lawsuit challenging this policy is currently underway in Boston and may reach the Supreme Court again. The US has also pressured other countries to accept deportees. In March, more than 200 Venezuelans accused of gang involvement were sent to El Salvador, where they were held until a later prisoner swap. A Broader Context Talks between the US and Rwanda began earlier this year, according to Rwanda's foreign minister. While Western leaders often commend Rwandan President Paul Kagame for rebuilding the country after the 1994 genocide, rights groups accuse his government of human rights abuses and supporting rebel groups in eastern DR Congo Kagame has denied these allegations. The UN refugee agency (UNHCR) has warned that some migrants deported to Rwanda could face forced returns to the countries they fled. Rwanda, with a population of around 13 million, has faced criticism from international watchdogs for its restrictions on free speech and political opposition. Nevertheless, the Rwandan government has positioned itself as a willing partner for Western nations seeking to offload asylum seekers and migrants. Previously, Rwanda signed a deal with the UK under then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. However, no deportations occurred under that plan due to years of legal challenges, and it was officially dropped in July 2024 by the incoming Labour government. A Shift in Policy Clark noted that this issue extends beyond Rwanda, reflecting a broader shift in policy across the West. 'These countries have now decided that it is acceptable to spend more money sending migrants away than they used to spend hosting them,' he said. The Trump administration has defended third-country deportations as a means to quickly remove individuals, especially those with criminal records. Supporters argue that this approach helps prevent threats to public safety. In contrast, critics label the policy as dangerous and inhumane, as it sends individuals to unfamiliar countries where they may face harm or lack support networks. Short link : Post Views: 11