Teo Chee Hean resigns from GIC board
[SINGAPORE] Former senior minister Teo Chee Hean will resign from GIC's board of directors and his role as chairman of the GIC International Advisory Board, effective from Jun 30.
Teo, 70, has served on the board of Singapore's sovereign wealth fund for 14 years, GIC said on Tuesday (Jun 10).
He was first appointed as a director in December 2010, and took on the role of chairman of the International Advisory Board in April 2015.
The news comes days after it was announced that Teo would become chairman of Singapore's state investment company, Temasek Holdings.
On Jun 6, Temasek said that Teo would become take over the role from Lim Boon Heng. Teo will first join the company's board of directors as deputy chairman on Jul 1.
Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong, who is chairman of GIC, said in a letter of appreciation for Teo that 'there are good reasons why we have a strict policy not to allow directors to serve simultaneously on both the GIC and Temasek Holdings boards'.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'At a time when GIC's task is more consequential and also more difficult than ever, I shall miss (Teo's) calm presence and thoughtful interventions at GIC board deliberations,' SM Lee said.
During his tenure at GIC, Teo helped the sovereign wealth fund navigate significant developments including the aftermath of the global financial crisis, the Covid-19 pandemic, rapid technological and climate change, as well as rising geopolitical uncertainty, GIC said.
Lim Chow Kiat, chief executive of GIC, said: '(Teo's) geopolitical insights were particularly important, given the growing complexity and salience of these issues for GIC.'
Teo announced his retirement from politics on Apr 23. During his 33-year political career, he served as deputy prime minister from 2009 to 2019, and as senior minister from 2019 to 2025.
He was the coordinating minister for national security as well, and oversaw four units in the Prime Minister's Office: the Smart Nation and Digital Government Group, the National Security Coordination Secretariat, the National Population and Talent Division, and the National Climate Change Secretariat.
He was defence minister from 2003 to 2011, and home affairs minister from 2011 to 2015.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Paper
2 hours ago
- New Paper
Election spending in GE2025 outstrips that for GE2020
Some $10.7 million was spent on campaigning for the 2025 General Election, with about three-quarters of candidates having reported their expenses to the Elections Department (ELD). This figure already exceeds the total spending of $9 million by all candidates at the previous polls in 2020. As with previous elections, the bulk of the expenses this time, about $4.75 million, went towards non-online election advertising, such as the printing of posters, banners and fliers. Another $2.01 million was spent on online election advertising, which includes posts on social media and websites, and the boosting of such posts. With the return of physical rallies for the May 2025 election - after they were paused for the previous election due to the Covid-19 pandemic - candidates spent $1.33 million on holding these events. These amounts were calculated based on the expenses of 164 out of the 211 candidates, most of which were uploaded to ELD's website on June 13 after their submissions were announced in the Government Gazette. They comprised election returns of candidates from the ruling People's Action Party, the National Solidarity Party (NSP), People's Alliance for Reform (PAR), People's Power Party (PPP), Progress Singapore Party, Red Dot United (RDU), the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA), Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), Singapore People's Party (SPP), and the Singapore United Party (SUP) as well as two independent candidates. The remaining 47 candidates have until June 16 to submit their expenses. None of the WP candidates' expenses is available for inspection on the ELD's website so far. The return of physical rallies saw political parties divert some spending on print ads to rally-related expenses, while spending on online ads saw a smaller dip. Print advertising fell from about 60 per cent of election-related spending in 2020 to 44.4 per cent in 2025. Online advertising represented about 18.8 per cent of candidates' expenses at GE2025, compared with 22 per cent at the 2020 polls. On average, each candidate spent $64,959, with 19 candidates reporting no expenses, and NSP president Reno Fong reporting the highest expenses at $160,000. Based on expenses declared so far, the PAP had an average spending of $96,667 per candidate, or close to 30 per cent higher than at the last general election. Among the opposition parties, the SDP spent $50,009 per candidate, PSP spent $33,965, NSP spent $31,320, SPP spent $23,261, RDU spent $15,703, SUP spent $6,564, PAR spent $3,614, and PPP spent $2,017. Two SDA candidates have filed their expenses, declaring no spending. Among the PAP teams contesting group representation constituencies and which have submitted their expenses, the West Coast-Jurong West GRC team was the biggest spender. The team, led by Minister for Education Desmond Lee, spent $602,708 in all. The largest portion, or $290,290, went towards non-online election advertising. The PSP team it faced, led by party chairman Tan Cheng Bock, spent $180,560, with non-online election advertising accounting for the bulk of it at $98,540. The PAP took the constituency with 59.99 per cent of the vote, against the PSP's 40.01 per cent. The next biggest spender among the PAP's GRC teams was the Punggol GRC team, led by Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong, which spent $541,854 in all. However, unlike in West Coast-Jurong West GRC, more than half of the team's spending - $301,953 - went to online election advertising. The team won in the constituency with 55.17 per cent of the vote, against the WP's 44.83 per cent. The PAP's third-highest spending GRC team was the Aljunied GRC team, which spent $524,312. It lost in the constituency with 40.29 per cent of the vote against the WP team's 59.71 per cent.
Business Times
8 hours ago
- Business Times
Hong Kong – Canary in a goldmine
THE perception of Hong Kong's decline as a financial hub and desirable place to live is both understandable yet overstated. During a recent business trip to Europe, one consistent reaction stood out: Clients' faces flashed with concern and sympathy when I mentioned I was based in Hong Kong. I get it. For years, the narrative around Hong Kong has been relentlessly downbeat: falling property prices; the 2019 protests; Covid lockdowns; expat departures; strained US-China relations; and renewed worries about the stability of the HKD-USD peg. The concerns are valid but, as I argue below, also misplaced. Which major equity market has outperformed most others in 2025? Which market ranks fourth globally by capitalisation, trailing only the United States, mainland China, and Japan? Which market raised more in IPOs than Europe's exchanges combined this year? And which economy welcomed more tourists than Japan from January to May 2025? If you answered Hong Kong to all, you're absolutely correct. Surprised? Let me explain. Golden goose My optimism about Hong Kong's future hinges on its currency: the Hong Kong dollar (HKD). Within the Greater China region, no other city matches its currency's liquidity and convertibility (with apologies to Macau's pataca). Corporate China's unquenchable demand to recycle hard currency is well known, and until the renminbi becomes convertible – likely a distant prospect – Hong Kong's role as China's premier funding conduit remains secure. But what about the HKD-USD peg's vulnerabilities? Recent media reports have highlighted pressures on the peg, and these concerns are reasonable. Yet, the strain isn't from capital flight; it's the opposite. Inflows from IPOs, dividends, and investment opportunities are so robust that the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) had to sell some HK$47 billion (S$7.6 billion) in May 2025 to temper HKD appreciation. Of course, an appreciating currency is a nice problem to have, as are interest rates at – or close to – record lows. But, either way, both are still problems if allowed to endure, potentially distorting the allocation of capital. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up To be fair, the allure of a USD carry trade (selling HKD and investing in US money market funds for example) has seen the HKD's value normalise. But even two weeks on from the last mega-IPO, the monetary system remains awash with liquidity, allowing banks to reset mortgages rate lower and allowing refinancing opportunities for the beleaguered commercial real estate sector. Local hero With roughly comparable populations, land mass, and economic size, the friendly competition between Hong Kong and Singapore as rival business centres is as storied as it is long-running. Anyone who has recently visited Singapore will have been mightily impressed by the energy, opportunity, and confidence that the city state currently exudes; and might conclude – reasonably – that Hong Kong has (temporarily) lost its mojo to its ascendent challenger. Yet, Hong Kong's role as China's financial gateway also gives it both a role and an edge, certainly in the ability to offer local companies liquidity for financing purposes. For example, Hong Kong's stock market has a total market capitalisation of US$6.3 trillion, entirely dwarfing Singapore's at merely US$0.5 trillion, a 13-fold difference. As China corporates consider delisting from the US or dual list in Hong Kong, one can assume Hong Kong's market capitalisation may likely increase. Admittedly something of a stealth rally, the Hang Seng Index (HSI)'s year-to-date performance – largely complementing and reflecting renewed interest in China – may also have attracted international investors. At time of writing, the HSI was up 21 per cent on the year, outperforming the majority of competitor markets. My sense is as investors rotate thematically from US exceptionalism to – among other things – (China-centric) emerging market opportunities, local equities may further benefit in the months and quarters to come. Canary's fragility Yet for all Hong Kong's recent positives, as a financial entrepot it is both sensitive and vulnerable to the volatilities of global trade. And that is unlikely to change anytime soon. Thus, strained trade relations between the US and China – and the risk of high tariffs being imposed by the former on the latter – will negatively impact the city's fortunes. Inevitably, Hong Kong reliance on mainland inflows – with some 80 per cent of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's market cap tied to Chinese firms – exposes it to China's economic slowdown risks. Escalating geopolitical tensions or a faltering Chinese economy could trigger occasional liquidity shocks, potentially derailing Hong Kong's markets for a while. At Lombard Odier, we are overweight equities, including those in emerging markets. Our preferred way to access China risk is via Hong Kong's H Share market. Thus far, it has been a satisfactory trade. But Hong Kong's East-West history positions it – somewhat uniquely – in the crosshairs of tensions between the world's two great superpowers. Hong Kong's resilience is well known and well regarded; but shouldn't be taken for granted. The writer is chief investment officer, Asia, at Lombard Odier
Straits Times
16 hours ago
- Straits Times
Election spending in GE2025 outstrips that for GE2020
As with previous elections, the bulk of expenses this time, about $4.75 million, went towards non-online election advertising. PHOTO: ST FILE Election spending in GE2025 outstrips that for GE2020 SINGAPORE – Some $10.7 million was spent on campaigning for the 2025 General Election, with about three-quarters of candidates having reported their expenses to the Elections Department (ELD). This figure already exceeds the total spending of $9 million by all candidates at the 2020 polls. As with previous elections, the bulk of the expenses this time, about $4.75 million, went towards non-online election advertising, such as the printing of posters, banners and fliers. Another $2.01 million was spent on online election advertising, which includes posts on social media and websites and the boosting of such posts. With the return of physical rallies this time – after they were paused for the previous election due to the Covid-19 pandemic – candidates spent $1.33 million on holding these events. These amounts were calculated based on the expenses of 164 out of the 211 candidates, most of which were uploaded to ELD's website on June 13 after their submissions were announced on the Government Gazette. They comprised election returns of candidates from the ruling People's Action Party, the National Solidarity Party (NSP), People's Alliance for Reform (PAR), People's Power Party (PPP), Progress Singapore Party, Red Dot United (RDU), the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA), Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) and Singapore People's Party (SPP), as well as two independent candidates. The remaining 47 candidates have until June 16 to submit their expenses. None of the Workers' Party candidates' expenses are available for inspection on the ELD's website so far. The return of physical rallies saw political parties divert some spending on print ads to rally-related expenses, while spending on online ads saw a smaller dip. Print advertising fell from about 60 per cent of election-related spending in 2020 to 44.4 per cent in 2025. Online advertising represented about 18.8 per cent of candidates' expenses at GE2025, compared with 22 per cent at the 2020 polls. On average, each candidate spent $64,959, with 19 candidates reporting no expenses, and NSP president Reno Fong reporting the highest expenses at $160,000. Based on expenses declared so far, the PAP had an average spending of $96,667 per candidate, or close to 30 per cent higher than at the last general election. Among the opposition parties, the SDP spent $50,009, PSP spent $33,965, NSP spent $31,320, SPP spent $23,261, RDU spent $15,703, SUP spent $6,564, PAR spent $3,614, and PPP spent $2,017 per candidate. Among the PAP teams contesting group representation constituencies and which have submitted their expenses, the West Coast-Jurong West GRC team was the biggest spenders. The team, led by Minister for Education Desmond Lee, spent $602,708 in all. The largest portion, or $290,290, went towards non-online election advertising. The PSP team it faced, led by party chairman Tan Cheng Bock, spent $180,560, with non-online election advertising accounting for the bulk of it at $98,540. The PAP took the constituency with 59.99 per cent of vote, against its PSP opponent's 40.01 per cent. The next biggest spender among the PAP's GRC teams was the Punggol GRC team, led by Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong, which spent $541,854 in all. However, unlike in West Coast-Jurong West GRC, more than half of the team's spending – $301,953 – went to online election advertising. The team won in the constituency with 55.17 per cent of the vote, against the WP's 44.83 per cent. PAP's third highest spending GRC team was the Aljunied GRC team, which spent $524,312. It lost in the constituency with 40.29 per cent of the vote against the WP team's 59.71 per cent. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
