Teachers protest at Dublin's Synge Street school over plans to switch to Gaelcholáiste
TEACHERS IN DUBLIN who were unexpectedly told that their secondary school would be transitioned into a Gaelcholáiste have expressed anger over the lack of consultation over the decision.
Proposals to turn Synge Street CBS in Dublin 8 into a gaelscoil were
first announced in September last year
. The plan was later
overturned in February
but greenlit
again in March
.
Today, President of the teaching union ASTI Donal Cremin and General Secretary Kieran Christie and members of the association staged a lunch-time protest outside the building over the lack of communication with staff over the proposal.
Staff and members of the ASTI outside the school in Dublin 8 during the protest today.
The Journal
The Journal
The ASTI said the decision will affect the staff's working lives 'in a fundamental way' and that there is an urgent need to discuss upskilling, transition and timeline plans with the teachers.
Many teachers spoke of feeling caught off guard by the announcement. The Journal previously reported that the school
was only told of the plan the day before then-education minister Norma Foley publicly announced it.
Speaking at the event, Cremin told The Journal that staff, the department, the union and the Edmund Rice Schools Trust – which oversees the school and owns the property – need to 'get around the table to discuss' the plan.
Communication between the union and the department has continued, Cremin said, but he claimed that there is a split between the school's management over the decision. He said that the issue needs to be addressed to staff properly for the transition to be a success.
The ASTI believes the issue needs to be discussed with staff properly for the transition to be a success.
The Journal
The Journal
First-year students entering Synge Street C.B.S. in September 2026 will be the only class that is taught completely as Gaeilge. All other students who enrolled before will continue their education through English.
By September 2032 the school will be lán-Gaeilge. It follows a long-running campaign from residents and parents in the Dublin 2, 4, 6 and 8 areas who want a dedicated Gaelcholáiste option for when their children leave local Irish-speaking primary schools.
Advertisement
Students from Bunscoil Synge, Gaelscoil Eoin, Gaelscoil Inse Chór, Gaelscoil Lios na nÓg and Scoil Bhríde located in the Dublin 2, 4, 6, and 8 have
frequently taken part in the protest to demand that a Irish-speaking secondary school be created locally.
The Department of Education has previously said that it remains committed to the establishment of a Gaelcholáiste in the Dublin South City area.
ASTI, however, has said that 91% of staff at Synge Street CBS are not in favour of the transition to a Gaelcholáiste.
Despite the school's concerns, the Edmund Rice Schools Trust – which oversees the school and owns the property – told staff in March that the plans to enroll and teach students through Irish in September 2026 will proceed.
Labour councillor Fiona Connelly, Labour party leader and local TD Ivana Bacik and Fine Gael councillor Danny Byrne attended the protest alongside the teachers and the ASTI leadership this afternoon.
Bacik told The Journal that she has long-supported plans to introduce a gaelscoil in the area but urged that there needed to be better communication, cooperation and consultation with the staff at the school for it to be done properly.
Signs made by school staff read: 'RTÉ knew before we knew', 'No Consent, No Consultation' and 'Respect our Community'.
Signs made by school staff read: "RTÉ knew before we knew".
The Journal
The Journal
An assistant principal, who speaks Irish, will be appointed at the school and the Department and the Trust will provide upskilling resources to the staff. Teachers today said they are concerned over the efficiency of the upskilling programmes.
One teacher said he would not have the level of proficiency required to teach through Irish within two years' time.
The ASTI standing committee has highlighted how a number of gaelscoileanna around Dublin have constant staff shortages and are sometimes required to temporarily hire English-speaking teachers to teach Irish-speaking classes.
Other teachers have recognised the need for a Gaelcholáiste in the Dublin 8 area, but that the speed of change is too fast, the lack of communication has increased concern for the future of their employment and the risk it poses to the school's community and diversity seen in its population.
While most staff have recognised the need for a Gaelcholáiste in the Dublin 8 area, the speed of change and the lack of communication, they say, puts the future of their school and employment there at risk.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
Ireland to take soundings over EU joining UK-led sanctions against far-right Israeli ministers
Taoiseach Micheál Martin has already criticised one of the two men – the Israeli finance minister Bezalel Smotrich, leader of the National Religious Party-Religious Zionism. He and the Israeli security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir are to be sanctioned by the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway. The move has angered Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court in connection with alleged war crimes. Norway was previously involved with Ireland in a co-ordinated move to recognise a Palestinian state, which included diplomatic contact with Spain, Belgium, Malta and Slovenia last year. Ireland will explore possible sanctions from as early as next week, when Mr Martin attends a conference on a two-state solution, convened in New York by co-hosts France and Saudi Arabia. Sources said the contacts in New York could then potentially feed into discussion at an EU summit in Brussels the following week. EU high representative for foreign affairs Kaja Kallas has been monitoring the move of the UK-led bloc, none of which are EU members. An Irish government source said: 'We have pushed for such sanctions at EU level, including at the recent meeting of the Foreign Affairs Council on May 20, but it requires unanimity and that isn't there for sanctioning these individuals at this point.' Mr Martin is also pursuing the suspension of the EU-Israel trade agreement, which would have a paralysing effect on Israeli exports. He told the Dáil earlier this month: 'I believe the agreement should now be suspended, pending a review,' adding that Ireland and Spain had first called for scrutiny of the deal under its human rights provisions. Mr Martin said he was aware of 'reprehensible' comments from Mr Smotrich. He said Mr Smotrich had been 'speaking openly about conquering Gaza, and, with God's help, pushing the population south and into third countries'. 'So this is a senior minister of the Israeli government articulating in no uncertain terms what the agenda is – and it is absolutely reprehensible,' the Taoiseach added. 'It is also absolutely unacceptable that innocent people were abducted and remain hostages so long after October 7, 2023.' He said it was 'wholly unacceptable' to contemplate the mass displacement of people in Gaza, or to talk of permanent occupation. 'Not only is it an affront to decency and to international law, but history tells us that it offers no solution.'


Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Cianan Brennan: Why didn't government admit its error with biometric public services cards?
Six years ago, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) went mano-a-mano with the government of the day over the infamous public services card, and ended up in a long legal war of attrition. That battle involved a simple question: Could the card be used as a catch-all portal for citizens accessing the State's services, regardless of their wishes? That particular spat was more than a little unedifying, ending up in a wholesale climbdown on the part of the Department of Social Protection in December 2021. However, yesterday's decision by the commission to fine the department €550,000 and order it to suspend the biometric processing of the public's data via the card should be even more seismic. €550,000 is five times the amount of the next-largest fine for breach of GDPR by a public body, and more than half of the maximum allowable. Puzzling defence of the indefensible Six years is a long time, however, and the world is a different place now. This time round, the State may be more willing to take its punishment from its own regulator. That in itself would be borderline farcical. The government — former social protection minister Regina Doherty being probably the most noteworthy culprit — argued for years that the card did not carry biometric data, despite it being plainly obvious to anyone with common sense that it did — in this case, a photo used for facial matching. Why did the State spend hundreds of thousands of euro in taxpayers' money defending the indefensible? The answer may be because it couldn't afford not to. Why did it do so? Because it couldn't afford not to. Having stated until it was blue in the face that black was indeed white, to change tack in any way would have been legally disastrous. Why the government of the day couldn't just hold its hands up and admit fault in the first place, rather than spending hundreds of thousands of euro in taxpayers' money defending the indefensible, we may never definitively know. However, we can speculate. The card is deeply ingrained in Irish society now, but that wasn't the case to quite the same extent in 2019. Furthermore, back then GDPR was brand new. It was so new that the initial investigation into the public service card was carried out under Ireland's previous Data Protection Act. Under that act, the commission had far fewer teeth to impose fines. GDPR is now a firmly embedded, if not universally beloved, EU policy. Maybe in 2019 it was felt the time wasn't right for the government to eat crow on its ambitious biometric card venture. Range of views in data protection community Those we polled yesterday across Ireland's niche data protection community had different views as to whether or not the Government, in the guise of the Department of Social Protection, will go the legal route once more. One said: The circumstances have changed. The data protection and GDPR landscape is much clearer now than it was under the old act. 'It seems more likely than not that this is one that won't be challenged, at least not in court.' However, there was little consensus. 'For years, they [the department] have been shouting that there is no biometric data on the card. Now this decision from the regulator is unequivocal that there is. Can they really back down from that? Would that be in character?' a second expert asked. DPC will defend its decision 'very robustly' Should the Government press the nuclear button once more and appeal the decision to the courts, deciding commissioner Dale Sutherland has made it clear that 'we will very robustly defend our decision'. He said: We are well used to this. It is a feature of our system. There are other puzzling aspects to yesterday's decision, not least the sheer length of time it took. The biometrics investigation had been set in train even before the 2019 decision, which dealt specifically with whether or not the government had the right to make the card mandatory for public services such as passport applications, yet it was only officially commenced in July of 2021. It then took four more years to complete, during which time the card has become ever more embedded in Irish society. That is surely an inordinate amount of time to take over a key investigation concerning personal data. 'This was a complex inquiry with complex issues,' Mr Sutherland said. 'The resources these inquiries take are just extraordinary. This one took a bit of time,' he added, while allowing 'it's probably a bit longer than we would have liked'. Digital Rights Ireland, whose initial complaint spurred the investigations back in 2017, professed itself 'concerned' at the length of time it had taken to finalise the probe. A spokesperson added that the decision 'leaves the Government in a very serious situation', given it has spent 'hundreds of millions of euro on an illegal public service card project'. Mr Sutherland stressed, however, that 'the important thing is that it [the investigation] is done now'. Asked whether the world had moved on in the last six years, he said: 'The principles haven't.'


RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Martin and Harris to attend British-Irish Council summit
Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Tánaiste Simon Harris will attend the 43rd summit meeting of the British-Irish Council (BIC), which is being hosted by the Northern Ireland Executive. The summit will be attended by political leaders from the BIC's eight member administrations and will focus on the theme of 'The role of AI in Reform and Transformation'. Last night, Mr Harris held substantial discussions with the Northern Secretary Hilary Benn on the issue of legacy as part of ongoing intensive efforts to find an agreement between the Irish and UK governments. Mr Harris will hold bilateral meetings with the North's First and deputy First Ministers and the Scottish First Minister, as well as taking part in the summit plenary meeting. The BIC was established in December 1999, following the Good Friday Agreement of 1998, to "promote the harmonious and mutually beneficial development of the totality of relationships among the peoples of these islands".