Public servant flight perks slashed in major travel policy shake-up
The Whole of Australian Government review of public service travel policy was flagged by the aviation white paper amid claims Qantas was getting the lion's share of flight bookings — despite existing policy requiring departments to select the cheapest and most practical fare.
The review was completed in late 2024, but kept under wraps by Finance Minister Katy Gallagher during a consultation phase.
Published without fanfare on the finance department website, the review found the current travel procurement policy had delivered $260m in savings from January 2022 to December 2023.
However, it found further savings were possible 'through a reduction of business class use on flights under 3 hours, encouraging simple international bookings to be made online, and applying changes to the air travel booking system that aim to positively increase compliance with the government travel policy. Economy class must be set as the standard class of travel for all travellers, including SES (senior executive service) officers, on flights less than 3 hours in duration on domestic and international flights.'
Business class bookings found they accounted for just 4 per cent of domestic travel, but 8 per cent of domestic travel spend.
'For international bookings, business class accounts for 25 per cent of bookings but 45 per cent of spend,' the review said.
Public servants will have to justify their choice if they choose a flight with a more expensive ticket price than that available on the day, and the travel policy will be reviewed every two years.
The condition that government travellers did not select flights on the basis of airline loyalty programs remained, with public servants allowed to collect status credits but not points.
But that privilege could be removed in future, with the review noting 'the suppression of status credits' was an issue to be canvassed with the market.
On the topic of upgrades, the review found being upgraded should not be accepted 'unless required for operational reasons'.
'For example — failure to accept the upgrade may impact on business needs — that is being bumped from a flight,' the report said. 'When accepted, upgrades should be declared (and) officials must not accept any upgrade to first class.'
Government membership of Qantas's exclusive Chairman's Lounge and Virgin Australia's Beyond Lounge will be more transparent — with the review promising to publish such details for 'key management personnel'.
'This will include information on sectors flown, split by airline, for both domestic and international travel, updated every 6 months,' the report said.
Government travellers accounted for 3.3 per cent of Qantas passengers, 1.4 per cent of Virgin Australia customers and 0.2 per cent of Jetstar's passengers.
On the high-traffic golden triangle routes between Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, Qantas carried the lion's share of public servants and government officials ahead of Virgin Australia.
Airlines are considering the report.
Virgin Australia's submission to the review claimed there was considerable preference for Qantas and the government was paying too much for fares. Read related topics: Qantas Robyn Ironside Aviation Writer
Robyn Ironside is The Australian's aviation writer, and has twice been recognised by the Australasian Aviation Press Club (in 2020 and 2023) as the best aviation journalist. She has been with The Australian since 2018, and covered aviation for News Corp since 2014 after previously reporting on Queensland state politics and crime with The Courier-Mail. Aviation
Robert Irwin spearheads a star-studded, five-pronged $130m campaign to lure more visitors to Australia | WATCH Aviation
Lobbying inside Qantas is trying to get the new A321XLRs assigned on Perth-Brisbane or Bali routes. Meanwhile, electric aircraft are about 20 years away from joining the Qantas fleet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Australian
20 minutes ago
- The Australian
Koonenberry Gold outlines emerging bulk tonnage gold play with high-grade potential at Sunnyside
Koonenberry drilling at Sunnyside prospect in NSW delivers 60m at 0.7g/t gold intersection Results from completed Phase 1 drill program indicate Sunnyside as an emerging bulk tonnage gold play Sunnyside Shear Zone shows potential for growth with ~2km prospective zone identified Special Report: Final assays from diamond drilling at Koonenberry Gold's Enmore project in New South Wales highlight the Sunnyside prospect as an emerging bulk tonnage play with high-grade potential. Latest results extend the mineralised zone to more than 260m with hole 25ENDD007, which was drilled 40m along strike from hole 006, returning a 60m intersection grading 0.7g/t gold from a down-hole depth of 105m including 9m at 2.74g/t from 112m. Adding further interest for Koonenberry Gold (ASX:KNB), holes 008 to 010 were potentially drilled beneath the up-plunge projection of mineralisation intersected to the east. This is highlighted in a long section, where the mineralisation has an apparent ~easterly plunge with gold mineralisation open up-plunge, along strike and at depth. There are indications of higher grades such as a 1m zone at 11.9g/t gold from 244m within the broader intersection of 6m at 2.58g/t gold from 243m in hole 25ENDD010. Managing director Dan Power said the 'extremely successful' phase 1 drill campaign at Enmore had delivered exceptional results that pointed to an emerging gold discovery story at Sunnyside, which had standalone bulk tonnage as well as high-grade gold potential. 'The final four holes all intersected altered granite host rock, however the reported intercepts have become narrower and lower grade to the SW,' he added. 'These holes are within the mineralised system but may have drilled 'underneath' or peripheral to the better grades and widths intersected in holes to the east and at depth. 'When plotted in long section, results indicate a potential plunge of the mineralisation along the shear zone towards the east with a high-grade zone of ~130m clearly open at depth.' He added that drilling had intersected mineralisation from surface to a vertical depth of 300m, strike of ~260m and true width of ~75m, with the system remaining open at depth and along strike to the southwest and northeast along the Sunnyside Shear Zone, and providing clear potential for growth. 'To the east of Sunnyside, we see the potential for extensions and/or repetitions with gold and arsenic in soils and high-grade rock chips highlighting a ~2km long prospective zone along the shear at the contact between the granite and sediments,' Power noted. 'Limited, wide-spaced and relatively shallow historical drilling in this location also highlights the potential for additional discoveries, with most of these holes intersecting anomalous gold but rarely testing broad intervals of the preferred granite host rock.' Enmore project The 302km2 Enmore project sits within the underexplored New England Gold Belt, which hosts the 1.7Moz gold-antimony Hillgrove mine, the 8Moz Ravenswood gold mine, the 7.7Moz gold and 0.36Mt copper Mt Morgan mine and the 2.5Moz Cracow gold mine. While results from Sunnyside have really underscored its potential, it is far from being the only prospect of interest, with the Borah fault hosting historical high-grade intersections, while historical workings are present at Sherwood, Queen of Sheba and Lone Hand. Small wonder then that the company is using today's results to plan more than 10,000m of further drilling that will be funded from its existing cash position of $8.6m. This follow-up drilling is anticipated to start in late August and will test the continuity and extensions to mineralisation at Sunnyside as well as discovery and growth drilling along the Sunnyside Shear Zone. Growth drilling will focus on the east of the Shear Zone where KNB has identified a ~2km strike length of highly prospective granite associated with gold and arsenic soil anomalies, high-grade rock chips and wide-spaced, relatively shallow historical drilling containing anomalous gold. Induced polarisation surveys are being conducted at Sunnyside as a tool to help rank district targets and assist with drill targeting. This article was developed in collaboration with Koonenberry Gold, a Stockhead advertiser at the time of publishing. This article does not constitute financial product advice. You should consider obtaining independent advice before making any financial decisions. Sponsored Nova Minerals has released a conceptual processing flowsheet for its 1.24Moz RPM deposit in Alaska. Sponsored Rhythm Biosciences has announced that its second-generation ColoSTAT blood test detects colorectal cancer consistently across all stages of the disease.
ABC News
43 minutes ago
- ABC News
Why police couldn't stop the Harbour Bridge protest
Sam Hawley: It was a protest the New South Wales government and police tried to stop but couldn't. In the end, more than 100,000 protesters were permitted to walk across the Sydney Harbour Bridge, demanding an end to the war in Gaza. But should we be concerned that organisers had to fight for the right to hold the rally in the first place? Today, Associate Professor in Law at the University of South Australia, Sarah Moulds, on why it's becoming harder to protest. I'm Sam Hawley on Gadigal land in Sydney. This is ABC News Daily. News report: It was the protest that brought Sydney to a standstill. Thousands marching across the Harbour Bridge. Despite the rain that come from all over the city and beyond. Protester: The starving children of Gaza cannot wait another day. End the violence. Protester: There's too many deaths of young children, too much starvation. Protester: It's a sign of the turning tide of the of the opinion in this country. And it's a sign that people aren't going to put up with it anymore. Sam Hawley: Sarah, when a pro-Palestinian group first proposed this march across the Harbour Bridge in Sydney about a week before it was to take place, the government and police were not happy, were they? Sarah Moulds: No, they were looking for a way to stop the protest or to see whether the protest could happen in a different place. Sam Hawley: Yeah. So the New South Wales Police Acting Deputy Commissioner, Peter McKenna, he was saying that he was concerned about public safety and the disruption to motorists. Assistant Commissioner Peter McKenna, NSW Police: We understand there is some angst at the moment about what's happening overseas. We understand and are sympathetic to that. But the New South Wales Police decision around this has to be first and foremost about public and police safety. We will not be facilitating that protest. Sam Hawley: Chris Minns, the New South Wales Premier, he opposed the protest, saying he could not allow Sydney to descend into chaos. Chris Minns, NSW Premier: To close down the Harbour Bridge, which has happened maybe two or three times in a decade, is a logistical and communications Everest. It's incredibly difficult to do. And I understand that some people say, look, it's easy to shut down the bridge. It's not easy. Sam Hawley: Were they reasonable arguments at that time? Sarah Moulds: I think they were reasonable arguments. But one of the things that's important to hold in mind is this concept that we have a common law right to communicate about political matters in Australia that comes from our constitution. And the concept of the right of peaceful assembly is something we've signed up to at the international level. So while I think the arguments around safety, inconvenience and disruption are really powerful, particularly with something of this scale in this place, on the other side of the ledger, if you like, are these important principles that Australians also consider to be fundamental in our democracy? Sam Hawley: All right. Well, around this time, the protesters were predicting that around 50,000 people would turn up. So that's about a week before it actually happened. And the matter then went before the New South Wales Supreme Court and Judge Belinda Rigg, who would make the ultimate decision about whether or not this protest could happen on the Harbour Bridge. And she did that on Saturday morning. What did she say? Sarah Moulds: In the reasons that were shared from the justice of the New South Wales Supreme Court, it's clear that that common law concept of peaceful assembly was an important consideration. So was the principle that just because something might be inconvenient or disruptive might not be enough to say it should be prohibited under the law. And also there was information to suggest that people were going to do this anyway. And so that was something that needed to be considered alongside the safety information that the police were putting before the court. Sam Hawley: And Justice Rigg, she noted that the march at this location on the Harbour Bridge was motivated by the belief that the horror and urgency of the situation in Gaza demands an urgent and extraordinary response from the people of the world. She also noted that it is in the nature of peaceful protests to cause disruption to others. Sarah Moulds: That's right. That was clear from the ruling that that concept of inconvenience and disruption is inherently connected to the idea of protest and communicating on a matter of political importance to the people of Australia. Sam Hawley: All right. So the judgment meant, of course, that the protest could go ahead and that the protesters would have immunity from being charged with what offences? Sarah Moulds: Yes. So the immunity is quite limited. So the ruling meant that somebody was not going to be charged with an offence relating to unlawful assembly, of obstructing a person, vehicle or public place. But it was conditional on the fact that the protesters stayed within the boundaries of the assembly that was described in this form one that was before the court. So the protest organisers had to put all that information together, share that with the police and the court. And if the communities involved stayed within the scope of that plan, they would be immune from those minor offences that I just described. However, it would not extend to somebody being prosecuted or charged with a violent offence. And the police retain powers to make orders with respect to individuals and ask them to do things or ask them to change what they're doing. And a failure to comply with those kind of orders made by police could also potentially result in liability. So important immunity, but also limited. Sam Hawley: Well, Sarah, as we said before, initially, the protest organisers thought that it attracted around 50,000 people. In the end, more than 100,000 people showed up despite the terrible weather. It was pouring with rain. That's huge, isn't it? Just put that into perspective. Have we seen such a large protest like this before? Sarah Moulds: I'm sure we have back in history, but in recent years, particularly in the years since these legal processes for handling process have been involved in this way. This is a very, very significant number of people. And I think that speaks to the significance of the issue that people were protesting about on the bridge, as well as the challenge faced by police and other authorities in facilitating this type of event to happen safely. So, yeah, throughout history, we've had really big protests before in Australia. But definitely in recent years, the numbers of this one are really significant. Sam Hawley: The acting assistant commissioner, Adam Johnson, he described the situation on the bridge as intense and one of the most perilous he's ever been involved in. Acting Assistant Commissioner Adam Johnson, NSW Police: I can honestly say in my 35 years of policing, that was a perilous situation. I've never seen a more perilous situation. I was honestly worried that we were going to have a a major incident with a potential loss of life. Sam Hawley: But it was peaceful, wasn't it? Sarah Moulds: I think one thing to keep in mind on the legal side of it is that the reason we have this process of being able to put forward an application detailing a public assembly and then have the opportunity for the police to respond and ultimately the courts is to try and make sure that this can happen safely, that we get the right balance between freedom of speech and association and our right to communicate on political matters and safety. And so I think that it is really important to continue to encourage organisers of community events and public assemblies to put that information in the application and give the authorities time to respond. It was clear from the ruling in this case that this was important to get right. If there was a prohibition, there was a risk that people would protest anyway and then you would lose that opportunity to create safety or have control over what might happen in and around the protest. With the oversight of the court, you can do this in a safe way. And it appears that it did have a safe result in this particular case, which is pretty extraordinary. Not many places around the world could have a protest of 90,000 people and result in safety for everybody. So that's something pretty significant as well. Sam Hawley: So, Sarah, we know protesting is a democratic right, but as you've mentioned, it has become harder to protest in Australia. There are more barriers now than ever before, right? Sarah Moulds: Yeah, that's correct. So we've made a commitment at the international level to protect everybody's right to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. But what we don't have is anything clear in our constitution or in any other piece of legislation saying we have a right to protest in Australia. Instead, we have this implied constitutional freedom to communicate on political matters in our representative democracy. But what you definitely can have and what we see in a number of states in Australia are laws that prohibit any disruptive action on the streets, any disruptive action on the roads or around businesses or workplaces. So in South Australia, for example, we've got offences for obstructing public place. In Queensland and New South Wales, they've got offences for attaching yourself to roads or major thoroughfares. In Tasmania, we had laws around logging areas, prohibiting people from protesting there. One of the things that's obvious is that these laws are different in different places, and it's quite complex and confusing for people to know what they are. And that's why we see people having to get legal advice and barristers to help them work this out. So if we were able to get together and streamline these processes across Australia so it was clear about how important it is to value peaceful assembly, but also how important it is to put people on notice about what things are going to look like so we can do this safely. I think that would be great. Sam Hawley: All right. Well, police have said they can't allow a protest like this to happen again. Assistant Commissioner Peter McKenna, NSW Police: So this operation, from our point of view, was a success in that no one was hurt. No people were hurt. No police were hurt. But gee whiz, I wouldn't like to try and do this every Sunday at that short notice. There's a reason we need time to plan these things out. And I think going forward into the future, that has to be taken into consideration. Sam Hawley: And the Premier, Chris Minns, says the government will look at whether that Supreme Court judgment actually sets a precedent. Chris Minns, NSW Premier: I have to examine all of this. I'm not ruling anything out. And I think most reasonable people would expect that, yes, you do have from time to time massive demonstrations, even if it's on the bridge. But knocking it out every week is just it's not something that we can consider forever. Sarah Moulds: Well, I think that at the moment, the summary offences process that was followed in this case, it gives discretion for police commissioners to make decisions, and it gives discretion for the courts to make decisions. If the New South Wales Parliament attempted to pass a different law about protest, they've done this in other areas or use different powers, then ultimately it might go to the High Court to see whether the Parliament has unduly infringed that constitutional freedom. So I think there are tweaks that the Parliament could make to the process of applying for authorisation for protests. But they'd have to be careful because there's a tipping point where the High Court would say you are now prohibiting that implied freedom of political communication. And that's such an important concept of a representative democracy that we can communicate about things that we feel passionately about as voters and citizens in the country. Sam Hawley: The point, of course, of a protest, Sarah, is to bring about change. Do you think this will do that in any way, given the magnitude of it? Sarah Moulds: Well, I think Australia's ability to influence what's happening on the ground in the Middle East is limited. However, we have a powerful voice in international forums and in forums with our allies. And so I think that action like this empowers and emboldens our political leaders to do things like look to international forums, international law, humanitarian law, and say Australian people support those concepts of dignity and human rights and that they can then go and express that position on the world stage. So I think the protesters would feel that they've done something historic in organising this event, sent a message across the world about what the people of Australia think, supported the elected representatives who are articulating their perspective on the world stage. And I think we should also be proud of our police and authorities, as I said, that have been able to organise a protest like this is probably an excellent sign of a healthy democracy that we can facilitate this kind of democratic expression in this way. Sam Hawley: Sarah Moulds is an associate professor in law at the University of South Australia. This episode was produced by Sydney Pead and Cinnamon Nippard. Audio production by Sam Dunn. Our supervising producer is David Coady. I'm Sam Hawley. Thanks for listening.
The Australian
an hour ago
- The Australian
ASX200: Gold the bright spot on flat day for local markets
Shaky US jobs data and the subsequent sacking of the labour statistics chief has seen investors flocking to Australian gold stocks on Monday. While the ASX200 closed up by the barest of margins on Monday, the gold index benchmark grew 3.5 per cent to start the week. At the close of trade, strong consumer staples and materials sectors had dragged the S&P/ASX200 to a 0.02 per cent gain, closing up 1.7 points to 8663.7. The All Ords rose 0.06 per cent. Gold shares were the shimmering highlight on the day, with the S&P/ASX All Ordinaries Gold benchmark gaining 3.57 per cent. Western Australian, Northern Territory and Alaskan operator Northern Star Resources – up 13 per cent on the year – tacked on another 5.6 per cent gain ($16.16) following the presentation of details from a site visit in Kalgoorlie. The inland city is hosting the Diggers and Dealers mining forum this week, and the historic town will be heaving following Monday's sterling gold results. Bellevue Gold shot up 6.4 per cent ($0.82), Mineral Resources' price lifted 3 per cent ($30.76), and Evolution Mining rose 2.5 per cent ($7.23). Evolution Mining boss Lawrie Conway warned the Kalgoorlie conference that boom cycles had been squandered before. 'As an industry, we have been poor allocators of capital through these periods of record margins,' he said on Monday. The gold price has risen $1000 in the space of four months. 'It's imperative for us … when the cycle turns, our shareholders aren't left looking and saying, 'Where is the cash?',' Mr Conway said. Across the border, the Whyalla steelworks and its associated iron ore mines are the target of a potential offer from Bluescope Steel and an international consortium. That news pushed Bluescope's share price down 1.2 per cent, closing at $23.10. The surge in gold has been ignited and sustained by rumblings in the US. Underwhelming jobs data at the end of their week prompted Donald Trump to sack the Bureau of Labor Statistics chief, sowing doubt in US economic data. 'The dire US jobs report raised expectations of a Fed rate cut in September and prompted risk aversion flows, including buying of gold,' said IG market analyst Tony Sycamore. 'The rebound from the $US3265 support zone suggests gold is consolidating gains from the first half of this year in a range between $US3450 and $US3250.' After an eight-month high a couple of weeks ago, the Aussie dollar has settled at 64.8 US cents. Trailing the materials sector at the top of the heap, consumer staples also had a bountiful day. This charge was led by gains for Coles (1.7 per cent) and Woolworths (1.3 per cent). In lock-step, health and wellness food company OMG Group shot to a 7 per cent gain ($0.008), while Farm Pride Foods, Pure Foods Tasmania, Synlait Milk and Ricegrowers Ltd all rose more than 3.6 per cent. From the farmgate to the bar stool, pub and hospitality giant Endeavour Group surged to a 2.9 per cent gain on the news its dual chairman-chief executive was quitting over board disagreements. Endeavour owns Dan Murphy's and BWS. The company already lined up former Virgin Australia chief executive, Jayne Hrdlicka, to take charge in the new year. Despite Monday's bump, Endeavour shares are down 23 per cent on this time last year. With an essentially flat day in local trading, six of 11 sectors finished in the red, with financials, energy and industrials being the dead weight. Blair's journalism career has taken him from Perth, to New Zealand, Queensland and now Melbourne. Business Breaking News One of the country's key water agencies is axing nearly a quarter of its workforce, blindsiding employees and drawing union backlash. Business Breaking News Australia's biggest food retailers say they are not interested in buying beef from the US and will stick to their homegrown approach.
