logo
Why Owens & Minor (OMI) Shares Are Sliding Today

Why Owens & Minor (OMI) Shares Are Sliding Today

Yahoo4 days ago
Shares of medical supply and logistics company Owens & Minor (NYSE:OMI) fell 3% in the afternoon session after the U.S. administration announced a sharp escalation in trade tensions by threatening new tariffs on Canada. The wider market sentiment turned negative after the White House announced plans to impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, sparking renewed fears of a trade war. This news prompted a sell-off across major U.S. indexes, including the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average, as investors grew concerned about the potential economic impact of escalating protectionist policies. The healthcare sector is especially vulnerable to such tensions due to its deeply integrated supply chains with Canada for pharmaceuticals and medical devices, meaning increased costs and potential disruptions.
Additionally, ongoing U.S. policy headwinds aimed at lowering drug prices and specific corporate challenges, like those faced by UnitedHealth Group, further compounded the sector's decline. As a result, the Health Care SPDR ETF (XLV) fell 1.0%, underperforming even as major indices pared some losses.
The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Is now the time to buy Owens & Minor? Access our full analysis report here, it's free.
Owens & Minor's shares are extremely volatile and have had 44 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business.
Owens & Minor is down 37.3% since the beginning of the year, and at $8.06 per share, it is trading 51.1% below its 52-week high of $16.48 from July 2024. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Owens & Minor's shares 5 years ago would now be looking at an investment worth $1,095.
Here at StockStory, we certainly understand the potential of thematic investing. Diverse winners from Microsoft (MSFT) to Alphabet (GOOG), Coca-Cola (KO) to Monster Beverage (MNST) could all have been identified as promising growth stories with a megatrend driving the growth. So, in that spirit, we've identified a relatively under-the-radar profitable growth stock benefiting from the rise of AI, available to you FREE via this link.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

McDonald's AI Breach Reveals The Dark Side Of Automated Recruitment
McDonald's AI Breach Reveals The Dark Side Of Automated Recruitment

Forbes

time25 minutes ago

  • Forbes

McDonald's AI Breach Reveals The Dark Side Of Automated Recruitment

Millions of McDonald's job applicants had their personal data exposed after basic security failures ... More left the company's AI hiring system wide open. If you've ever wondered what could go wrong with an AI-powered hiring system, McDonald's just served up a cautionary tale. This week, security researchers revealed that the company's McHire website—a recruitment platform used by over 90% of McDonald's franchisees—left the personal information of millions of job applicants exposed to anyone with a browser and a little curiosity. The culprit: Olivia, an AI chatbot from designed to handle job applications, collect personal information, and even conduct personality tests. On paper, it's a vision of modern efficiency. In reality, the system was wide open due to security flaws so basic they'd be comical if the consequences weren't so serious. What Went Wrong? It didn't take a sophisticated hacker to find the holes. Researchers Ian Carroll and Sam Curry started investigating after Reddit users complained that Olivia gave nonsensical responses during the application process. After failing to find more complex vulnerabilities, the pair simply tried logging into the site's backend using '123456' for both the username and password. In less than half an hour, they had access to nearly every applicant's personal data—names, email addresses, phone numbers, and complete chat histories—with no multifactor authentication required. Worse still, the researchers discovered that anyone could access records just by tweaking the ID numbers in the URL, exposing over 64 million unique applicant profiles. One compromised account had not even been used since 2019, yet remained active and linked to live data. As Carroll told Wired, 'I just thought it was pretty uniquely dystopian compared to a normal hiring process, right? And that's what made me want to look into it more.' Why Security Fundamentals Still Matter Experts agree that the real shock isn't the technology itself—it's the lack of security basics that made the breach possible. As Aditi Gupta of Black Duck noted, the McDonald's incident was less a case of advanced hacking and more a 'series of critical failures,' ranging from unchanged default credentials and inactive accounts left open for years, to missing access controls and weak monitoring. The result: an old admin account that hadn't been touched since 2019 was all it took to unlock a massive trove of personal data. For many in the industry, this raises bigger questions. Randolph Barr, CISO at Cequence Security, points out that the use of weak, guessable credentials like '123456' in a live production system is not just a technical slip—it signals deeper problems with security culture and governance. When basic measures like credential management, access controls, and even multi-factor authentication are missing, the entire security posture comes into question. If a security professional can spot these flaws in minutes, Barr says, 'bad actors absolutely will—and they'll be encouraged to dig deeper for other easy wins.' And this isn't just about AI or McDonald's. Security missteps of this kind tend to follow each new 'game-changing' technology. As PointGuard AI's William Leichter observes, organizations often rush to deploy the latest tools, driven by hype and immediate gains, while seasoned security professionals get sidelined. It happened with cloud, and now, he says, 'it's AI's turn: tools are being rolled out hastily, with immature controls and sloppy practices.' Automation and the Illusion of Security McDonald's isn't alone in betting big on AI to speed up hiring and make life easier for franchisees and HR teams. Automated chatbots like Olivia are supposed to streamline applications, assess candidates, and remove human bottlenecks. But as this incident shows, convenience can't come at the expense of basic digital hygiene. Simple safeguards—unique credentials, robust authentication, and proper access controls—were missing entirely. The rush to digitize and automate HR brings with it a false sense of security. When sensitive data is managed by machines, it's easy to assume the system is secure. But technology is only as strong as the practices behind it. Lessons for the Future If there's a lesson here, it's that technology should never substitute for common sense. Automated hiring systems, especially those powered by AI, are only as secure as the most basic controls. The ease with which researchers accessed the McHire backend shows that old problems—default passwords, missing MFA—are still some of the biggest threats, even in the age of chatbots. Companies embracing automation need to build security into the foundations, not as an afterthought. And applicants should remember that behind every 'friendly' AI bot is a company making choices about how to protect—or neglect—their privacy. The Price of Convenience The McDonald's McHire data leak is a warning to every company automating hiring, and to every job seeker trusting a bot with their future. Technology can streamline the process, but it should never circumvent or subvert security. The real world isn't as neat as a chatbot's conversation tree. If we aren't careful, the push for convenience will keep putting real people at risk.

Defense Department to spend $1 billion on ‘offensive' hacking: What that means—and the major risk involved
Defense Department to spend $1 billion on ‘offensive' hacking: What that means—and the major risk involved

Fast Company

time29 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Defense Department to spend $1 billion on ‘offensive' hacking: What that means—and the major risk involved

The Department of Defense plans to spend $1 billion on 'offensive cyber operations' over the next four years, Tech Crunch reported. The funding comes from a provision tucked into President Donald Trump's massive 940-page One Big Beautiful Bill, which was recently passed and signed into law on July 4. The mega bill also increases overall defense spending from lasy year's fiscal 2024 levels of $873 billion, or 12.9% of the federal budget, per USAFacts a nonprofit initiative to make government data more understandable. According to the report, the bill does not specify what the 'offensive cyber operations' are, or what software would qualify for funding; however, it does stipulate the funding will go to enhancing and improving the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM), based in Hawaii, which is the responsible for defending and promting U.S. interests in the Pacific and Asia, including China. International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), senior cyber advisor Marcus Willet has described offensive cyber operations as those which 'most often entail influencing, misleading or otherwise cognitively affecting a competitor or adversary by, for example, planting false information. But they can also be used for disablement.' Adding,'Offensive cyber operations are of increasing significance in international affairs and bring with them a range of strategic risks.' Democrat Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, who sits on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence said that the funding comes as the same time the Trump administration has cut other defensive cybersecurity programs—including slashing the staff and budget for the the U.S. cybersecurity agency CISA—which Wyden said has 'left our country wide open to attack by foreign hackers,' according to the report. 'Vastly expanding U.S. government hacking is going to invite retaliation — not just against federal agencies, but also rural hospitals, local governments and private companies who don't stand a chance against nation-state hackers,' Wyden told TechCrunch.

Prices are rising again. Here's what just got more expensive
Prices are rising again. Here's what just got more expensive

Fast Company

time30 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Prices are rising again. Here's what just got more expensive

American's weekly grocery haul and monthly electric bill may get more expensive thanks to last month's rising inflation rates, as Trump's tariffs and a volatile consumer market comes to a head. The end of June marked an additional .3% rise in the consumer price index (CPI) from May alone, adding to the 2.4% uptick in inflation that has occurred since May 2024. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data, the rise is reflective of all consumer items, but the areas that saw the biggest rises over the past year were shelter at an increase of 3.8% and utility gas services at 14.2% from the past year. Food and energy, which includes gas and fuel oil, saw rates rising .3% and .9% respectively over the past month. Whereas over the past year, food saw a 3% increase alone in inflated cost, and energy saw a slight .8% decrease (the sharpest uptick in four months). Energy services, which would reflect electric and utility bills, saw a 7.5% increase over the same period. Tariff ignited inflation The rising rates come as Trump's 90-day tariff pause was supposed to end this week, with notable tariffs being placed on major import countries including 25% on Japan and Korea, with Laos and Myanmar being given the highest rate at 40%. Most of which were introduced by Trump's 'tariff letters' and were given an August 1, 2025 deadline. The ban notably did not pause tariffs placed on America's biggest importer, China. The country has a current minimum 30% rate on most imported goods including technology and clothes, that seems to change by the day per the two countries' ongoing negotiations. Another slew of high-tariffs were introduced over the past week for other high import countries for the U.S. including a 50% tariff on Brazil, 35% on Canada, and 35% on the European Union. There is currently a 10% base-line tariff on any and all goods entering the U.S. market. What 'taking back economic sovereignty' may cost consumers Economists expect rising prices to continue into the summer and the rest of the year, due to the quick and staggered nature of the tariffs. What they call a 'price creep' won't be sudden, but will steadily show in consumer goods and costs during these next few months. However, what the White House's fact sheet calls a 'commitment to take back America's economic sovereignty by addressing many nonreciprocal trade relationships that threaten our economic and national security,' others worry about basic goods and necessities. Items that notably saw a rise in CPI over the past month include: Fruits and vegetables (.9% increase) Coffee (2.2% increase) Apparel (.4% increase) Rent (.2% increase) Prescription drugs (.4% increase) Items that notably saw a rise in CPI over the past year include: Eggs (27.3% increase) Shelter (3.8% increase) Electricity (5.8% increase) Natural gas (14.2% increase) Household furnishings (3.3% increase) With the Federal Reserve's target inflation rate being 2%, investors suggest that they won't likely be cutting their 'higher than usual' federal rates (currently around 4.5%), anytime this month.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store