
TfL passengers lose out on Oyster railcard discounts after union order
The RMT union said the move was because 'errors' by members had led to 'disciplinary action'.
The move by the RMT – seen as one of the more militant unions – will see passengers forced to pay higher off-peak fares unless they travel to stations not on the London Overground.
It comes after warnings that the UK faces a 'summer of discontent' from unions following the long-running bin strike in Birmingham that has left rubbish piled high on the city's streets.
Labour offered billions of pounds worth of pay rises to unionised public sector workers last year, forcing Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, to raise taxes in the Autumn Budget.
A copy of the RMT London Overground branch members' magazine, called Orange Is The New Black, revealed how the ban on loading discounts came about.
'We are aware that some members, including agency colleagues, have been performing this task in isolation. Unfortunately, some have faced disciplinary action for errors made while carrying out a duty strongly advised against by the union,' it said. 'Our stance remains clear: this is not part of the roles we do.'
It went on to claim that Arriva Rail London, the Overground operator, had told staff to 'apologise and inform [passengers] that you are unable to do that activity' if asked to add discounts to Oyster cards.
This, the newsletter said, only came about following pressure from RMT shop stewards who said it was not part of unionised staff's jobs to help passengers obtain discounts, although a company spokesman denied that such an instruction had been given.
Rail union militancy has soared
Adding Railcard discounts to an Oyster card is only possible if a staff member does it for you, according to the Transport for London (TfL) website. Railcards, such as Two Together or the Network Railcard, typically offer a one-third discount that applies to off-peak train travel.
They can be loaded onto an Oyster card so the discount is applied to pay-as-you-go daily fare caps as well as Oyster Travelcard fares.
A spokesman for Arriva Rail London said: 'London Overground employees have not been instructed to avoid applying discounts to Oyster cards. It has been acknowledged that this is not part of their job description, therefore we do not expect or request that colleagues undertake this task.
'We know that several colleagues are willing to perform this task for the benefit of our customers. We are therefore making training available for colleagues who wish to undertake this task at certain locations.'
Rail union militancy has soared in the past few years, with the Government handing train workers 15 per cent pay rises last summer in an effort to quell ongoing strikes.
That move backfired after train drivers, typically the highest paid staff in the industry, banked the backdated pay increases and stopped accepting overtime shifts, triggering cancellations over the winter.
Hull Trains has been beset by strikes organised by Aslef, the drivers' union, after one of its members was sacked for falling asleep while driving 125mph long distance services. Internal letters seen by The Telegraph revealed that the individual had a history of doing so, and had been supported by bosses previously.
Although a 56-day strike was called by Aslef over the sacking, the effect has been confined to minor disruption to the company's timetables.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Kingsmill and Hovis agree £70m merger in competition test for Reeves
Kingsmill and Hovis have agreed to a £70m merger to create Britain's biggest bakery, testing the competition watchdog's resolve after pressure from Rachel Reeves to approve more deals. Associated British Foods (ABF), which owns Kingsmill through its Allied Bakeries division, on Friday said it planned to purchase rival baker Hovis from its private equity owner, Endless. The deal will create the UK's biggest bread company, overtaking the current market leader, Warburton's. It comes as both Hovis and Kingsmill have struggled with profitability amid falling demand for sliced loaves in recent years. ABF's tie-up must be approved by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), which is under pressure from the Government to wave through more mergers. Clive Black, of Shore Capital, said: 'If [Ms Reeves] is interested in protecting jobs, then absolutely this is going to be a very good test case, because I severely question the viability of these two businesses in the long run if they don't merge. 'I think it could be quite dangerous, from a practical perspective in terms of jobs and supply chains, if the CMA took a very simplistic view of things, because both businesses are loss-making.' In an unprecedented intervention this year, Marcus Bokkerink, the CMA chairman, was ousted by ministers following warnings from the Chancellor that it needed to rip up red tape to boost growth. He was replaced on an interim basis by Doug Gurr, the former Amazon UK boss, with the intervention widely interpreted as signalling that Britain would be open to approving more takeovers. ABF owns Kingsmill through Allied Bakeries, which was founded in 1935. Hovis has been owned by the private equity firm Endless since 2020. It was formerly owned by Premier Foods, the owner of Mr Kipling. Demand for sliced loaves and traditional bakery products has fallen amid rising worries over excess carbohydrate consumption and concerns around so-called ultra-processed foods (UPF). Soaring costs in the wake of the pandemic have heaped further pressure on bakeries. The price of wheat, which surged due to the Ukraine war, has proved particularly burdensome. Kingsmill and Hovis have faced steep competition from Warburtons in recent years, which has pivoted away from traditional loaves towards other baked goods like crumpets, bagels and flatbreads. George Weston, the chief executive of ABF, said: 'This transaction will create a UK bakeries business that is both profitable and sustainable over the long term.'


Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Thousands could be due car insurance compensation over ‘unfair' claims as Admiral sets aside £50m
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THOUSANDS of drivers could be owed compensation after being underpaid by their car insurer, as Admiral has set aside £50m to cover claims. A review of the 12 biggest car insurers by the City watchdog last March found some customers were being offered settlements worth less than their car's value when making a claim on stolen or written-off vehicles. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Admiral has set aside £50million to compensate customers who may have been affected by the overpayments Credit: Alamy Admiral has now become the first insurer to set aside cash to compensate customers who may have been impacted. In its half-year results on Thursday, the company admitted to failing to respond quickly enough to rising used car prices when settling claims. Admiral customers who made a claim on a stolen or written-off vehicle between 2019 and 2025 will be contacted by the company if they're owed compensation, the FCA said. It's expected that other insurance firms will follow suit in announcing their redress plans. When drivers claim on their car insurance where their vehicle is written off or stolen, they should be offered a payout equivalent to the fair market value of their car. This is the amount their car should have been worth at the time it was stolen or damaged. The FCA looked at the 12 biggest car insurers, which it said make up around 70% of the total market. The watchdog said it had since set clearer expectations for how these sorts of claims should be handled in the future. An FCA spokesperson said: 'We're pleased that Admiral is acting on our findings to put things right for its customers. 'Customers should wait to be contacted by Admiral and we're working with the firm to make sure that those affected get compensation if they're due it.' Supreme Court blow for finance compensation Admiral boss Milena Mondini de Focatiis said just 3% of motor loss claimants had been affected, adding that it was of "paramount importance" for the claims to be handled fairly. The company said it would begin contacting impacted customers during H2 2025. Admiral, which has 9.3million customers in the UK, reported strong first-half results this week. This was led by growth in its motor insurance business, where profits leapt 56 per cent year-on-year. The FTSE 100-listing said pre-tax profit rose 67% to £516.1 million in the six months to June 30 from £309.8 million the year prior. It comes after the Supreme Court ruled last month that millions fewer drivers will be entitled to compensation over "hidden commission" payments in a landmark case. The decision avoided a major headache for chancellor Rachel Reeves, as a major financial redress scheme for victims is no longer needed. However, millions of drivers are still in line to get up to £950 in compensation for car finance loans. The City watchdog is set to launch a refund scheme for motorists stung by 'hidden' commission payments, with up to £18billion expected to be paid out as early as next year. In 2023, Direct Line was forced to pay out £30million in compensation to customers after they were overcharged. The redress involved home and car policyholders who were charged more than new customers after renewing their policies, which broke rules introduced by the FCA in 2022. Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@ Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories


Times
7 hours ago
- Times
‘Fewer nom-doms left than feared' after Rachel Reeves's budget
An exodus of millionaires from Britain after Rachel Reeves's crackdown on non-doms may not be as drastic as feared, it has been claimed. In April, the government abolished the centuries-old non-dom tax regime, which allowed wealthy foreigners living in the UK to shelter their worldwide assets from British taxes for an annual fee starting at £30,000. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the government's fiscal watchdog, had said that up to a quarter of non-doms would leave Britain in response to the changes. Knightsbridge in London is a hotspot for non-doms — a UK resident whose permanent home, or domicile, is for tax purposes outside the country DARKO MLINAREVIC/GETTY IMAGES There have been fears of a broader exodus. One survey suggested that Britain lost more millionaires to migration last year than any other country except China. But initial payroll data reported by the Financial Times suggested that the reaction from the wealthy to the tax changes has been in line with, or even below, the OBR's forecast. One Reeves ally told the newspaper: 'We've seen no evidence that there's been a change in the non-dom profile beyond what the OBR forecast.' However, it is thought that HMRC will not have a full understanding of exactly how many have fled the reforms until January 2027, when individuals submit tax returns for the 2025-26 year. An analysis of company filings in June showed that more than 4,400 directors had left over the past year and numbers had jumped in the past few months, according to Companies House records. • A ham-fisted inheritance tax grab on the middle class would end in tears Departures in April were 75 per cent higher than the same month last year. The pace of exits was highest in finance, insurance and property. Figures compiled by New World Wealth, the global analytics firm, and investment migration advisers Henley & Partners, suggested Britain lost a net 10,800 millionaires to migration last year, a 157 per cent increase on 2023. The research said that high net-worth individuals with liquid assets of more than $1 million (£821,500) had left Britain every 45 minutes since the general election was called last year. Labour included the non-dom pledge in their manifesto, arguing that it would pay for 40,000 more NHS appointments each week. The OBR had estimated that the abolition of the non-dom regime would raise £33 billion in extra tax over the next five years, although it admitted that this prediction was 'highly uncertain' because it depended on the decisions of a relatively small number of wealthy people. A softer than expected wealth exodus, alongside higher than expected GDP growth, will ease pressure on the chancellor. However, Reeves is still expected to face a hole of at least £20 billion in the autumn budget that must be filled by a combination of tax rises and spending cuts. Officials are said to be considering changes to capital gains tax and adjusting how much can be given as a gift, and when, to avoid inheritance tax. The Treasury said: 'The UK remains a highly attractive place to live and invest. Our main capital gains tax rate is lower than any other G7 European country and our new residence-based regime is simpler and more attractive than the previous one.'