logo
Is it time to lock in a longer home loan fix?

Is it time to lock in a longer home loan fix?

RNZ News29-05-2025

Photo:
RNZ
Timing the market to lock in interest rates at the very bottom of the cycle is likely to be difficult, ANZ's economists say - but there could merit in taking one more short-term fix before locking in a longer term.
They have released their latest Property Focus report, in which they say they expect the housing market to pick up over the latter half of this year, and for prices to end the year 4.5 percent higher.
But they say the big question on many borrowers' minds is when is the right time to lock in home loan rates.
The Reserve Bank
cut the OCR
again on Wednesday, and banks are offering a range of terms just below 5 percent.
ANZ's economists said the Reserve Bank's own forecasts implied more cuts were coming but there was debate about how quickly and how much.
The Reserve Bank has pencilled in 40bps of cuts, indicating that two 25bp cuts is more likely than one.
ANZ economists expect the OCR to fall to a trough of 2.5 percent in October.
They said wholesale rates were likely to keep falling until the end of the year and mortgage rates were likely to follow suit.
But when markets decided the turn was happening, the opportunity to take cheaper rates could start to disappear.
"History has taught us that when interest rates bottom out, financial markets tend to be quick to conclude that if they aren't falling they will eventually start rising. Given that, we think the proverbial $64,0000 question for most people will be when should I lock in for longer? Loosely speaking the short answer is soon."
Wholesale rates would have a little further to fall, but not as much as the OCR, which could bring one, two and three-year mortgage rates down by another 10bps or 20bps, they said. "At face value that suggests there is merit in fixing for six months with a view to refixing for a longer term when that fixed term ends. The only problem with that strategy is that the future is always uncertain and of course rates may not fall, or if they do they may not fall as much as expected."
They said the US tariff impacts would mean it took longer for the economy to recover than it otherwise would, which would keep inflation at bay and mean rates could fall further.
"We have broadly been of the view that borrowers have had the luxury of waiting a little longer for the past few months and, while it has paid off, and we think that remains the case, time is marching on.
"With one- and two-year rates already at 4.99 percent, they are worthy of consideration too, as is spreading one's risk over several terms or strategies.
"For many borrowers the choice will come down to how convinced you are that interest rates will keep falling and how much you stand to gain if they do."
They said they expected the housing market was likely to stay fairly steady with rising demand being matched by supply.
"The sales-to-listings ratio is a useful indicator of heat in the housing market and tends to give a three to six month lead on house price momentum. It's tracked sideways as rising sales have been matched by growing inventories, and points to modest growth in house prices in the near term."
They said days to sell had dropped a bit but was still above the long-term average.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Carrington Resort trial: Former manager defends actions in court
Carrington Resort trial: Former manager defends actions in court

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Carrington Resort trial: Former manager defends actions in court

By Shannon Pitman, Open Justice reporter of Belle Mumby (inset) defended forgery charges related to her time working at Carrington Resort. Photo: Supplied / NZME / Open Justice A judge-alone trial against a former manager of a luxury resort accused of fraudulent behaviour has wrapped up but not before she had her say, painting a picture of mounting workloads and rightful entitlements. "I could foresee it would get worse," Belle Mumby said, defending the long hours she claims were justified, despite the resort's insistence otherwise. The former Carrington Resort operations manager has spent the past two weeks facing charges of theft, deception, and forgery in a judge-alone trial in the Whangārei District Court. The Crown alleges Mumby photocopied CEO Jing Ma's signature on an overtime form and claimed payments she wasn't entitled to. She is also accused of using the company account for personal purchases and selling resort-owned equipment - a trailer and post rammer - for $3000 and keeping the proceeds. Mumby maintains Ma approved the photocopied overtime document because she was often unavailable to sign off. She also claims the purchases were for the resort and argues the equipment was unusable, with Ma allegedly pocketing some of the funds. The prosecution's key witness, Ma, faced five days of cross-examination by defence lawyer Wayne McKean. She repeatedly asserted Mumby had stolen from the resort and that none of the overtime claims, purchases, or equipment sales were authorised. Before Mumby took the stand on Tuesday, the resort's payroll clerk, Wendy Weng, said all the overtime forms needed approval with a higher authority signature. Weng was presented an email from Mumby which stated Ma was happy for her to sign off her leave forms from now on. Weng also assumed this included overtime as well. "I saw Jing was included in this email so I assumed Jing was in agreement and she didn't reply otherwise," Weng said. Mumby, taking the stand on Tuesday, said she foresaw her overtime hours increasing as summer approached and waiting for the CEO to sign off was impossible as she was never there. Belle Mumby said she was authorised to do the overtime and purchase items. Photo: Supplied / NZME / Open Justice She claimed Ma suggested signing blank forms that she could later photocopy and complete based on hours worked. "She indicated to me she would come less and less in the future so I [asked] her 'So what happens to my overtime?' I need the verification'," Mumby said. "She suggest[ed] no need to worry about that, she would sign on the blank form and I would go to photocopy it and fill out whatever hours I did, then I can claim it." Mumby said she followed the procedure she was told to do. Regarding the alleged unlawful purchases such as AirPods, iPads, a phone, security cameras and Oral B electric toothbrushes, Mumby insisted they were for the resort or for her job productivity. Ma had previously given evidence that the post rammer and trailer that Mumby allegedly sold were valued at $100,000. But Mumby said both the items were sitting with a pile of rusted machinery, were of no use and sold for $3000. During cross-examination by Crown lawyer Danica Soich, it was suggested to her that clients would never use Oral B electric toothbrushes that may have been previously used by others. Soich pointed out that several items purchased on the resort's account were found at Mumby's house or in her car, including an unopened security system. "There was never a plan to return those items, was there?" Soich asked. "No, I was going to bring them back after sorting myself out from Hong Kong," Mumby replied. "You felt entitled to more than what you were receiving from Carrington?" Soich pressed. "No, I'm happy," Mumby responded. "You bought those items for yourself," Soich alleged. "No, that is wrong," Mumby countered. Mumby said that upon her return from her trip to Hong Kong, she was brought into Ma's office, fired and promised a discussion that never happened. The trial closed on Thursday and Judge Taryn Bayley has reserved her decision. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald.

Māori, Pacific removed from extra education funding priorities
Māori, Pacific removed from extra education funding priorities

RNZ News

time5 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Māori, Pacific removed from extra education funding priorities

The Tertiary Education Commission warns it doesn't have enough money to cover enrolment growth next year. Photo: AFP The government will remove extra funding for Māori and Pacific enrolments in vocational courses, and trim funding for workplace training. The Tertiary Education Commission told institutions this week it was "reprioritising a small amount - approximately 8 percent - of learner component funding towards provider-based delivery rates, through the removal of Māori and Pacific learners as an eligible category". The weightings for Māori and Pacific enrolments were worth $152 for each student enrolling in work-based level 1-2 certificates and courses at levels 3-6, and $364 per student in non-degree level 7 courses. However, the $1327 weighting for disabled students and students with low prior educational achievement would continue. The payments were added to subsidies for courses offered by polytechnics and private providers, ranging from $6584 for humanities and business courses to nearly $11,786 for health, science, engineering and agriculture, and $19,753 for special agriculture. The commission said funding for work-based training and education would drop 10 percent, while also repeating warnings from earlier in the year that it would not have enough money to cover enrolment growth next year . "Current forecasts indicate the demand for funding will be greater than what we have available to allocate," it said. "Given the multi-year nature of much education and training, we will need to prioritise our future investment." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Should I contribute to KiwiSaver or pay mortgage faster?  Ask Susan
Should I contribute to KiwiSaver or pay mortgage faster?  Ask Susan

RNZ News

time11 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Should I contribute to KiwiSaver or pay mortgage faster? Ask Susan

The short answer is it depends. Photo: RNZ I was wondering, is it better to invest more in your KiwiSaver or into your mortgage? We are lucky and have a little bit of extra cash every pay, so we have been making additional mortgage repayments. With the upcoming changes to KiwiSaver, we won't be able to continue to do this if we don't opt out. What is the better option? My thinking is the lower the mortgage, the less interest we pay, which would see us better off in the long term. Fisher Funds Kiwisaver general manager David Boyle says he has received questions like this over the years and the answer is: "it depends". "It's hard to know, without knowing the total financial position and how long they've got until they retire," he said. "Paying more off your mortgage and contributing to KiwiSaver are both smart choices, if you find yourself with a bit of money leftover before payday. "To help with this here are some things they should consider if they keep paying a bit more off the mortgage." It's probably worth talking to a financial adviser about this. If you opt to focus on paying your mortgage faster, you might need a plan to get you on track for retirement, once that loan is gone. The increase to contributions of 4 percent is stepped over the next couple of years. Are you likely to receive a pay rise over that period that will help you continue paying a bit off your mortgage, as well as contribute a bit more? You also have the option to temporarily lower your contribution rate back to 3 percent if you want. I am the epitome of being a victim of the government's totally unfair direct deduction policy. I should have started receiving my richly deserved superannuation when I qualified for it 9.5 years ago and the Winter Energy Payments seven years ago when they began. Consequently, over $300,000 has been stolen from me and I live in abject poverty as a result. I am a dual citizen from America. I have lived here 19.5 years, so on what legal basis has the government for denying the WEPs? Its written explanation is that it would be difficult to administer to NZ seniors not currently receiving a government benefit such as superannuation. That is mind boggling and I hope you see fit to write about this outrageous treatment of nearly 100,000 Kiwi seniors. Sorry, yes, I've checked with the ministry and it confirms that people who are not getting NZ Super because of an overseas pension cannot get the Winter Energy Payment. Generally, if your NZ Super entitlement has been eliminated by your overseas pension, it's because what you receive from overseas is more than the NZ Super payment. Send your questions to Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store