‘It's very much relevant today': the one-woman show on Charlottesville
She had moved from India to live the American dream. Priyanka Shetty came to study acting at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, a liberal place of clipped lawns and classical architecture rated in one survey as the happiest city in America.
But what she found was isolation and discomfort because of her race and, as the era of Donald Trump dawned, a nation on the cusp of hostility towards immigrants like her. Then came a white supremacist march through Charlottesville and an explosion of racist violence that left one woman dead.
Shetty combines the personal and political in a one-woman show, #Charlottesville, currently receiving its premiere at the Keegan Theatre in Washington. Based on verbatim interviews with more than a hundred local residents, court transcripts and political speeches, it argues that Charlottesville was a warning from history that went unheeded.
'I don't know why there's this denial about the state of affairs right now in the country,' the 35-year-old said by phone this week. 'I don't know how many more wake-up calls we need. I'm not saying this play will be that wake-up call but at least I hope to remind people of something that may seem like old news, which is not really old news. It's very much relevant today.'
When Shetty, from Bangalore in southern India, auditioned for a master of fine arts degree in acting at the University of Virginia in 2015, Barack Obama was still president. 'For me America was the place of full of opportunities because to pursue a field like this in India the odds of success are so low,' she said.
'To be in the place where there's Broadway and Hollywood and all of these things to aspire to was a big deal. It was and is still full of promise but at that point I don't think I sensed the danger of being an immigrant or person of colour as much as I do today.'
Charlottesville is a liberal city in a conservative region but Shetty did not always feel welcome. 'It's something as simple as, when I'm walking down the streets of Charlottesville, it felt like I wasn't supposed to be there. I had been to other cities in the US and never felt that way.
'But walking down the streets of Charlottesville always felt like the eyes on me, even among mostly undergraduates, with this look of, 'What are you doing here?' It was liberal in in many ways but I always was hyper aware that I was an outsider or there was this weird feeling under my skin that I shouldn't be there.'
Shetty was out of town when hundreds of white nationalists descended on Charlottesville for a 'Unite the Right' rally on 11 and 12 August 2017, ostensibly protesting the planned removal of a statue of the Confederate general Robert E Lee. They carried torches and marched through the University of Virginia campus chanting 'Jews will not replace us!'
Clashes with anti-racism demonstrators broke out both days, prompting authorities to declare the gathering on 12 August an 'unlawful assembly' and order crowds to disperse. A man then rammed his car into a peaceful group of counter-protesters, killing Heather Heyer and injuring 35.
Shetty recalls: 'My immediate impulse was that it was reminiscent of Nazi Germany, especially the kind of slogans that were being chanted and the drama of the open flames. It was scary and my response was to go and read about this movement and who these people were and that led me to the Daily Stormer [a neo-nazi website] and 'A Normie's Guide to the Alt-Right' [an article on the site setting out the far right's extremist agenda].
'There was a curiosity about it and my mind went to the place that this is a possibility in the United States of America, like it was in Germany back then. It didn't seem that far fetched to me then and it doesn't seem that far fetched to me now.'
Shetty believes the atrocity represented an urgent lesson about a growing faction of far right extremists who believe the white race is superior, women should be sent back home to produce and raise children, immigrants should be deported, Black people should be allocated a different territory or sent back to Africa and homosexuality should be banned.
'America was the place where you could be an immigrant, you could be a woman, you could be a member of the LGBTQ+ community and you could be equal and well respected and successful. But there are a significant number of people who hold an idea of superiority and think certain other people who don't fall into that need to be eliminated.'
The horror of Charlottesville inspired Joe Biden to come out of political retirement and run for president in 2020. On her return to the city, Shetty expected the community to be on high alert and the university in particular to be grappling with the implications.
'What I instead saw was people were ashamed for Charlottesville to be associated with something like this and, for some reason, also didn't want to acknowledge the antisemitic nature of it. As an immigrant, it confused me.
'Charlottesville was that warning which many people think they didn't ignore but we absolutely did because what were the real action items that came out of it? Zero. Then January 6 was another warning that we ignored and here we are in 2025 and we are terrified, with not just the US many other places in the world leaning in these scary directions.'
Shetty felt that American theatre was also failing to respond but, as an outsider, doubted whether she was the right person to confront it. Then she hit upon the idea of interviewing community members to make a verbatim piece in the style of Anna Deavere Smith, renowned for combining journalistic techniques with individual characterisations performance.
Shetty did not have permission from the drama department to do the interviews, so she met the subjects at weekends and quickly ushered them in a lift and then into a basement classroom. She did the interviews on a camera set up for actors to self-tape auditions then transcribed them hand which, though painstaking, helped her capture the cadences and mannerisms of the subjects on stage.
Among all the interviewees, two distinct groups emerged. Shetty said: 'There were a bunch of people who were completely flabbergasted that something like this had happened in their town and did not see it coming. There were other people who were like, well, this is how it's been all along.'
With Trump now back in the White House and waging a crackdown against immigrants, civil rights in America are under attack. That includes a series of arrests of international students who are not accused of any crime but have been involved in pro-Palestinian activism on student campuses. Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish national and a doctoral student at Tufts University, was sent to detention this week after being snatched off the street outside her home.
Shetty, who now lives in Philadelphia, reflected: 'I echo a lot of what the interviewees in #Charlottesville said, that America wasn't great to begin with. But it is sad to see it regress further and further when significant efforts were being made to go in the other direction. Now it feels like we've taken 20, 30, 50 steps back and it's going to take a long time to recover from all of this, if at all.'
Directed by Russian-born Yury Urnov, Shetty plays multiple roles in #Charlottesville including Trump – complete with oversized red tie – and Indian prime minister Narendra Modi. Performing at small venue just a mile from the White House, Shetty is aware that she too could become a target but regards art as an essential act of resistance.
'Of course we worry because right now given how people who are green card holders and permanent residents are being targeted it's very easy to pinpoint someone. As an immigrant, I know what it takes to even get here, especially in the arts. I had to prove that I'm an artist of 'extraordinary ability', which is insanely difficult to do.
'To know that it could be taken away at any moment is scary but at the same time now is not the time to stand down. Sometimes it feels foolish because I feel like, 'They don't care about their their country, why should I?' But there's something in me that just can't sit idle and do nothing.'
She added: 'It may be super foolish to take this on at this time, given how much is at stake for me personally too but I can't help it. I would still like to believe that America is a place where we can question things and criticise something and still be OK. I would still like to believe that.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
9 minutes ago
- BBC News
'There was a real gutsiness about them': How the heiresses dubbed the 'dollar princesses' brought US flair to the UK
The rich, glamorous women of the gilded age who married into the English aristocracy faced some challenges – but they were resilient, formidable characters. As TV's The Buccaneers season two begins, and an exhibition in London is devoted to them, we explore the lives of the women who inspired writers and artists. Can the new Duchess of Tintagel steer clear of scandal? Will her fugitive sister, Jinny, keep her baby from the clutches of her husband, the monstrous Lord Seadown? Can Mabel and Honoria's forbidden love flourish? The Buccaneers, Apple TV+'s hit period drama, is back for a second season, and its legions of fans expect answers to all of the above. The show charts the romantic adventures of a group of young American women – two pairs of sisters and their friend – who, looked down upon as nouveau riche by older, grander New York families, come to England in the 1870s and cut a swathe through high society. Fast-moving, fun and visually sumptuous, it looks as though the costume budget alone could dwarf the entire expenditure of lesser shows. It is lavish, colourful escapism – yet the unfinished Edith Wharton novel of 1938 upon which it is based was inspired by a real phenomenon. Between 1870 and 1914, 102 American women – 50 of them from New York – married British peers or the younger sons of peers, and many more married into the upper classes. They were dubbed "dollar princesses" and the popular view was that these were purely transactional marriages – cash for class. The women gained a title and status; the often cash-strapped aristocrats got a welcome injection of money to help them fix the leaking roof of the crumbling family seat. "The decline in landed income during the Great Agricultural Depression, beginning in the 1870s, necessitated numerous male aristocrats to seek marital alliances outside the inner social network of the British aristocracy," explains Maureen Montgomery, a historian and Wharton scholar who is currently editing The Buccaneers for the Oxford University Press's The Complete Works of Edith Wharton. "Another factor was the openness of the Prince of Wales, later King Edward VII, to wealthy businessmen being part of his inner social circle and his penchant for the beautiful and entertaining daughters of the American bourgeois elite who were travelling in ever larger numbers, after the Civil War, to Europe." The first inklings of a novel to be called The Buccaneers appear in Wharton's notebook for 1924-1928. There she set out the plot, revolving around the "conquest of England by American adventurers & adventuresses/families". "In the summer of 1928, during one of her many annual trips to England in her later years, she visited Tintagel in Cornwall and stayed with her close friend Lady Wemyss at her Cotswold estate, Stanway," Montgomery tells the BBC. "Both of these places became significant settings for the novel." However, Montgomery doesn't believe that there is any one particular story or person that the writer drew upon. "Wharton had close friends among the British aristocracy, and went to weekend country house parties. She personally knew a number of titled Americans. She would have been familiar with various scenarios for these marriages, how they were received, the different motives for marrying," she says. Some historians have suggested Consuelo Vanderbilt as one of the possible models for The Buccaneers' Conchita Closson. Considered a great beauty, Consuelo was a "dollar princess" whose father made a fortune in railroads. Her dowry was worth tens of millions in today's money. She was more or less bullied by her mother into marrying Charles Spencer-Churchill, 9th Duke of Marlborough, and was said to have wept behind her veil at the altar on her wedding day in 1895 (one of nine US heiresses to marry English aristocrats that year). More like this:• The true story of the first ever 'rock star' chef• Age of Innocence: How a US classic defined its era• How history's brutal witch trials resonate now The marriage was deeply unhappy. "Sunny", as the Duke was known, wasted little time in telling her he'd only married her for her money and in order to save Blenheim Palace, the ducal seat. In her memoir, The Glitter and the Gold, Conseulo wrote of a Blenheim Palace butler who had drowned himself: "As one gloomy day succeeded another I began to feel a deep sympathy for him." Her marriage produced two children but both Consuelo and her husband had lovers. Consuelo had been preceded into the aristocracy by the godmother after whom she was named. The Cuban-American heiress Consuelo Yznaga Montagu, another model for Conchita, married George Montagu, Viscount Mandeville, in 1876 and became the Duchess of Manchester when he inherited the title. The profligate duke burned through his wife's money and had numerous affairs. Consuelo, who is mentioned in Wharton's notebook, was reportedly very close to the Prince of Wales. 'Swashbuckling beauties' Both Consuelos feature in Heiress: Sargent's American Portraits, an exhibition of 18 works by John Singer Sargent at Kenwood House on London's Hampstead Heath. The show has been curated by Wendy Monkhouse, English Heritage Senior Curator (South), and is the result of two years' work. "There was a real gutsiness about these heiresses," Monkhouse tells the BBC. "They were brave. They had a hard time entering British society as foreigners, and foreigners of whom everybody was envious and resentful and wanted to take down a peg or two because of this 'buccaneer' trope." They were, supposedly, swashbuckling beauties who leapt aboard the good ship Britannia and, with piratical ruthlessness, bagged themselves a baron or an earl or maybe even a duke. The English newspaper editor WT Stead used the expression "gilded prostitution" when writing about these transatlantic marriages. There was opposition from the US too, at the highest level. President Theodore Roosevelt wrote to his ambassador to the UK Whitelaw Reid in 1906, "I thoroly [sic]… dislike these international marriages… which are based upon the sale of the girl for her money and the purchase of the man for his title." And plenty of ordinary Americans hated the idea of all that wealth leaving the country and being squandered on wastrel British aristocrats. This wasn't what they'd fought a war of independence for. But Monkhouse argues that the moniker "dollar princesses" does the women a disservice. "I think it's a term that has been tossed around for a hundred years without very much thought, apart from in academic circles," she says. "The more that you delve into it, the more it falls apart. I think Consuelo Vanderbilt, though she doesn't call herself a dollar princess, sort of defined the genre in that she was a very rich American who was, not by her own choice, married for a title and then was unhappy." However, other women whose images are featured in the exhibition had very different stories. Daisy Leiter, glamorous and independent-minded daughter of a Chicago real estate magnate, was considered quite the catch and not just for her money, as Sargent's magnificent portrait shows. She was bombarded with proposals but married Henry Howard, the 19th Earl of Suffolk. It seems to have been a very happy love match and produced three sons. In later life, Daisy further exemplified the adventurous spirit of many of these women by becoming a helicopter pilot. Another of Sargent's subjects was Cora, Countess of Strafford. Her name is echoed by that of a famous fictional "dollar princess", Cora, Countess of Grantham, in Downton Abbey. Julian Fellowes has said that one of the inspirations for the series was a book about American heiresses called To Marry an English Lord. The real Cora was a Southern belle who married the 4th Earl of Strafford after the death of her first husband, toothpaste baron Samuel Colgate. The Earl died just five months after the wedding when he fell on to railway tracks at Potter's Bar. The incident prompted much gossip, as did the fact that Cora wore her coronet sideways at Edward VII's coronation. One of the best known of the women in the Heiress exhibition, represented in both an oil portrait and a charcoal drawing, is Nancy Astor, Viscountess Astor, the daughter of a Virginian railway tycoon and the first woman to take her seat as an MP in the House of Commons. She had regular clashes with Winston Churchill, whose own mother, Jennie Jerome, was the daughter of a wealthy New York speculator and financier. There's a splash of politics in the new season of The Buccaneers that sees Nan realising that her elevated social status gives her power and influence, and beginning to wield it. Buccaneers showrunner Katherine Jakeways read extensively on the "dollar princesses" before writing began on the series, and she draws on their stories, as well as the Wharton text. "You imagine that the girls who came over were interesting to the men because (a) they were beautiful, (b) they were American and (c) they were rich, but actually what's really interesting is that (d) they were much better educated and much more encouraged to be confidently involved in society [than their English counterparts]," she tells the BBC. "In New York their opinions were sought whereas girls in England, as we show with Honoria in Season one, were asked not to speak or have an opinion." Like their real-life counterparts, the women in the show don't conform to reductive stereotypes. "Our characters are complicated and have depth, and we try to make all the relationships have some kind of resonance for a contemporary audience," says Jakeways. "And hopefully it's just really good fun." Season two is another rollercoaster ride that remixes all the successful ingredients from the first series. Will there be a season three? I'd bet an heiress's dowry on it. The Buccaneers Season Two premieres on Apple TV+ on 18 June. Heiress: Sargent's American Portraits is at Kenwood House, London, until 5 October. -- For more Culture stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram.
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Army veteran joins anti-ICE protest in Dallas and ‘calls on conscience' of fellow service members
A uniformed U.S. Army veteran has provoked anger among MAGA conservatives by joining a protest against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Dallas, Texas, on Monday. In a viral video recorded at the event, the soldier does not hold back in her criticism of President Donald Trump for activating 4,000 members of the National Guard and 700 Marines to help police the anti-ICE demonstrations that have raged in Los Angeles for five days and have since spread to other major American cities. 'We are not pawns for Donald Trump's agenda,' the woman, wearing a camouflage uniform bearing the name tag 'Colado,' says in the video shared by left-leaning X account BreakThrough News. 'Why now?' she continues. 'It's because the military was called upon against the protesters. In our oath to serve, we serve the people of the United States, the Constitution. These constitutional rights are being stripped and just denied. 'And the military will not be pawns to that. That's why I'm calling on the conscience of military members who served previously and now. We have a conscience, we have a mind and we have a duty, a moral obligation to say no and resist.' The Independent has contacted the Pentagon for its response to her comments. Online, conservatives wasted no time in calling for the woman, subsequently identified as Carmen Colado, a former U.S. Army intelligence analyst, to be dishonorably discharged or court-martialled for publicly criticizing the commander-in-chief's orders. Some argued that her actions constituted a violation of the U.S. military's Uniform Code of Military Justice and called for Article 15 to be invoked against her, which empowers a commanding officer to order nonjudicial punishments less severe than a court-martial. These might include restrictions on duty, extra duty, forfeiture of pay, and, in some cases, confinement; however, since Colado appears to have left the service, it is unlikely to apply. She describes herself on Instagram as the 'proud daughter of an illegal immigrant hero who saved my life' and posts photos of friends and family, poetry, pencil drawings, and even a short film she has directed. Her posts also include an inspirational quote from Texas Democratic Rep. Al Green, who was censured for interrupting President Trump's address to a joint session of Congress earlier this year, on the occasion of a Dallas protest march calling for immigration reform. 'To protect liberty and justice for all – to protect government of the people, by the people, for the people – to protect what this country has in its great and noble ideals, we have to do what is necessary,' Green's quote reads.
Daily Mirror
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
9 unhinged Donald Trump moments as Elon Musk posts oddly-worded message
Tanks rolled through the streets of Washington DC last night, as Donald Trump goaded troops into booing elected politicians and journalists. And Elon Musk says he might have gone "too far". Here's everything you need to know Tanks rolled through the streets of Washington DC last night, as Donald Trump goaded troops into booing elected politicians and journalists. The President branded fellow Americans who protested against his policies "animals." He warned there would be a harsh response to anyone who took part in protests during a military parade on his birthday. And that all happened within the space of about two hours. Here's everything you need to know about that - plus Elon Musk walking back some of his tweets. 1. He called protesters "animals" and "paid insurrectionists" During a Q&A in the Oval Office, Trump branded people protesting against his programme of mass deportations "animals." And he claimed - without providing any evidence - that protesters in LA are "paid". "It would have been total control if we didn't have the military in there, the National Guard, and we also sent in some Marines," he said. "We had some bad people. We had people they look in your face and they spit right in your face. They're animals. 2. He lied about talking to California's governor Asked at the Tuesday press conference when he last spoke to California Governor Gavin Newsom, Trump said: "A day ago." Mr Newsom pointed out that wasn't true, saying there had been no phone call - not even a voicemail. Then the White House did something very weird - they released a call log, apparently intended to disprove Newsom's denial. But the call log said Trump's last call to Newsom was a 16 minute call - four days earlier, before troops were deployed to LA. So we're not sure why they did that. 3. Tanks started rolling into Washington As we've mentioned before, Trump is gearing up for a massive display of America's military might - with a huge tank parade set for the streets of Washington on Saturday. Trump is said to have been inspired by seeing the Bastille Day parade in Paris, and has been trying to get this done since his first term. Saturday is Flag Day, which marks the 250th anniversary of the US Army. It also happens to be Donald Trump's 79th birthday. 4. He gave a stern warning to anyone planning to protest at his birthday parade Woe betide anyone who decides to exercise their first amendment right to protest during the military parade. "We're going to celebrate big on Saturday," he said. "If any protesters want to come out, they will be met with very big force." It's been pointed out that he didn't say anything about the "big force" being reserved for violent protesters. "People that want to protest will be met with big force," he said - acknowledging he'd not heard of any plans for a protest in DC. 5. He goaded soldiers into booing two elected American politicians Later Trump gave a speech to troops at Fort Bragg, during which he repeated several baseless conspiracy theories about the protests in LA. But his most searing attacks were aimed at California Governor Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass - whom the President encouraged the troops to boo. 'In Los Angeles, the governor of California, the mayor of Los Angeles, they're incompetent and they paid troublemakers, agitators and insurrectionists," he said. "They're engaged in this willful attempt to nullify federal law, and aid the occupation of the city by criminal invaders." None of the above is true. But the troops, sworn to defend and protect America from enemies foreign and domestic, booed California's elected politicians loudly. 6. And journalists. He got them to boo journalists too Oh and obviously he goaded them into booing journalists doing their job. Of course he did. 7. He issued a vague threat to Europe There was a weird moment where he compared the protests in LA to a vague attack on Europe. "We will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean, and safe again," he said. "It's happening very quickly." He went on: "They have it in Europe too. It's happening in many of the countries in Europe. They don't like it when I say it, I'll say it loudly and clearly, they'd better do something before it's too late." It's unclear what he meant by any of this. 8. He vowed to rename army bases after a string of enemies of the united states Trump declared he plans to rename seven Army Bases after Confederate traitors, who opposed the United States in the Civil War - taking the side of the southern states in the conflict over slavery. Among them is Robert E Lee, who was commander of the Confederate States Army. 9. Aaaaand Elon Musk is walking back "some" of his tweets The biggest beef in modern political history may have cooled somewhat. Last week the bromance between Donald Trump and Elon Musk imploded in operatic fashion - with Trump threatening to pull Musk's government contracts and Musk making a wild and unsubstantiated claim that Trump appeared in FBI files about dead paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Well, towards the end of last week Musk quietly deleted some of the more inflammatory posts - specifically the ones about Epstein. And this morning, he issued an oddly worded statement on X, saying: "I regret some of my posts about President Trump last week. They went too far." He doesn't say they were wrong, or jokes, or exaggerated or explain why they went too far. Only that he regrets them. Like I say, odd.
