logo
Is today's AI boom bigger than the dotcom bubble?

Is today's AI boom bigger than the dotcom bubble?

Business Times12 hours ago
WALL Street's concentration in the red-hot tech sector is, by some measures, greater than it has ever been, eclipsing levels hit during the 1990s dotcom bubble. But does this mean history is bound to repeat itself? The growing concentration in US equities instantly brings to mind the Internet and communications frenzy of the late 1990s. The tech-heavy Nasdaq peaked in March 2000 before cratering 65 per cent over the following 12 months. And it didn't revisit its previous high for 14 years.
It seems unlikely that we'll see a repeat of this today, right? Maybe. The market's reaction function appears to be different from what it was during the dotcom boom and bust. Just look at the current rebound from its post-'Liberation Day' tariff slump in early April – one of the fastest on record – or its rally during the pandemic.
But despite all of these differences, there are also some worrying parallels. Investors would do well to keep both in mind.
Top 10 club
The most obvious similarity between these two periods is the concentration of tech and related industries in US equity markets. The broad tech sector now accounts for 34 per cent of the S&P 500's market cap, according to some data, exceeding the previous record of 33 per cent set in March 2000.
Of the top 10 companies by market capitalisation today, eight are tech or communications behemoths. They include the so-called 'Magnificent 7' – Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla – as well as Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan.
By contrast, only five of the 10 biggest companies in 1999 were tech firms. The other five were General Electric, Citi, Exxon, Walmart and Home Depot.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
On top of that, the top 10 companies' footprint in the S&P 500 today is much larger than it was back then. The combined market cap of the top 10 today is almost US$22 trillion (S$28.1 trillion), or 40 per cent of the index's total, significantly higher than the 25 per cent in 1999.
This all reflects the fact that technology plays a much bigger role in the US economy today than it did around the turn of the millennium.
AI bubble?
By some measures, the current tech boom, driven in part by enthusiasm for artificial intelligence, is more extreme than the IT bubble of the late 1990s.
As Torsten Slok, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, points out, the 12-month forward earnings valuation of today's top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 is higher than it was 25 years ago.
However, it's worth remembering that the dotcom bubble was characterised by a frenzy of public offerings and a raft of companies with shares valued at triple-digit multiples of future earnings. That's not the case today.
While the S&P tech sector is trading at 29.5 times forward earnings today, which is high by historical standards, this is nowhere near the peak of almost 50 times recorded in 2000. Similarly, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are currently trading around 22 and 28.5 times forward earnings, compared with the dotcom peaks of 24.5 and over 70 times, respectively.
US$3 trillion investment hurdle
With all that being said, a meaningful, prolonged market correction cannot be ruled out, especially if AI-driven growth isn't delivered as quickly as investors expect.
AI, the new driver of technological development, will require vast capital outlays, especially on data centres, which may mean that earnings and share price growth in tech could slow in the short run.
According to Morgan Stanley, the transformative potential of generative AI will require roughly US$2.9 trillion of global data centre spending through 2028, comprising US$1.6 trillion on hardware such as chips and servers and US$1.3 trillion on infrastructure.
That means investment needs of over US$900 billion in 2028, the group reckons. For context, combined capital expenditure by all S&P 500 companies last year was around US$950 billion. Wall Street analysts are well aware of these figures, which suggests that at least some percentage of these huge sums should be factored into current share prices and expected earnings, but what if the benefits of AI take longer to deliver? Or what if an upstart (remember China's DeepSeek) dramatically shifts growth expectations for a major component of the index, such as US$4 trillion chipmaker Nvidia?
Of course, technology is so fundamental to today's society and economy that it's difficult to imagine its market footprint shrinking too much, for too long, as this raises the inevitable question of where investor capital would go. It's therefore reasonable to question whether a tech crash today would take well over a decade to recover from.
But, on the other hand, it's that type of thinking that has gotten investors into trouble before. REUTERS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US: Dow advances, S&P 500 logs new record with boost from tariff pacts
US: Dow advances, S&P 500 logs new record with boost from tariff pacts

Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Business Times

US: Dow advances, S&P 500 logs new record with boost from tariff pacts

[NEW YORK] Wall Street stocks advanced on Wednesday with the Dow logging strong gains and the S&P 500 closing at a record for the third time in a row after the United States unveiled more tariff deals. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 1.1 per cent to 45,010.29 while the broad-based S&P 500 Index bounced 0.8 per cent to 6,358.91. The tech-focused Nasdaq Composite Index climbed 0.6 per cent to 21,020.02. The gains came after President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that Washington had reached tariff agreements with Japan and the Philippines, and as officials signaled optimism in trade talks with the European Union. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz voiced optimism that EU and United States negotiators are making progress in talks to resolve a transatlantic trade row. Several EU diplomats also said the bloc was examining a US proposal involving a baseline tariff of 15 per cent and sectoral carve-outs still to be decided. An ongoing wave of company earnings reports also helped buoy major US indexes. For the most part, 'companies are saying that they can deal with tariffs at the levels they're at,' shift supply chains or cope with modest price increases, said Pat Donlon of Fiduciary Trust Company. 'It will be interesting to see, though, some of the consumer discretionary companies that are more exposed to production in China, Vietnam, Malaysia, South Asia that report later in earnings season,' he said. AFP

Dow advances, S&P 500 logs new record with boost from tariff pacts
Dow advances, S&P 500 logs new record with boost from tariff pacts

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Dow advances, S&P 500 logs new record with boost from tariff pacts

Find out what's new on ST website and app. Traders working on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on July 23, in New York City. NEW YORK - Wall Street stocks advanced on July 23 with the Dow logging strong gains and the S&P 500 closing at a record for the third time in a row after the United States unveiled more tariff deals. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 1.1 per cent to 45,010.29, while the broad-based S&P 500 Index bounced 0.8 per cent to 6,358.91. The tech-focused Nasdaq Composite Index climbed 0.6 per cent to 21,020.02. The gains came after President Donald Trump announced on July 22 that Washington had reached tariff agreements with Japan and the Philippines, and as officials signalled optimism in trade talks with the European Union. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz voiced optimism that EU and United States negotiators are making progress in talks to resolve a transatlantic trade row. Several EU diplomats also said the bloc was examining a US proposal involving a baseline tariff of 15 per cent and sectoral carve-outs still to be decided. An ongoing wave of company earnings reports also helped buoy major US indexes. For the most part, 'companies are saying that they can deal with tariffs at the levels they're at,' shift supply chains or cope with modest price increases, said Mr Pat Donlon, of Fiduciary Trust Company. 'It will be interesting to see, though, some of the consumer discretionary companies that are more exposed to production in China, Vietnam, Malaysia, South Asia that report later in earnings season,' he said. AFP

Apple beats US appeal claiming it shortchanged customers on iCloud storage
Apple beats US appeal claiming it shortchanged customers on iCloud storage

CNA

time3 hours ago

  • CNA

Apple beats US appeal claiming it shortchanged customers on iCloud storage

A U.S. federal appeals court on Wednesday rejected claims by Apple customers that the iPhone maker gave them less iCloud data storage than they paid for when upgrading. In a 3-0 decision, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said reasonable consumers in the proposed class action would not have been misled by Apple's promises about storage capacity in its iCloud+ plans. The plaintiff Lisa Bodenburg said she paid $2.99 a month for 200 GB of storage, believing Apple would add it to the 5 GB that all iCloud customers receive, and was shortchanged because Apple gave her only 200 GB of total storage, not 205 GB. Circuit Judge Milan Smith, however said Bodenburg "received exactly what Apple promised her" when the Cupertino, California-based company offered "incremental" or "supplemental" storage, on top of the 5 GB she got for free. He cited dismissals of other cases based on "unreasonable assumptions," including that Diet Dr. Pepper would aid in weight loss, and the net weight on a lip balm label failed to reveal that the dispenser's design left some balm inaccessible. "Apple's statements are not false and deceptive merely because [they] may be unreasonably misunderstood by an insignificant and unrepresentative segment of consumers," Smith wrote. Lawyers for Bodenburg did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The decision upheld a May 2024 dismissal by U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson in San Francisco. The case is Bodenburg v Apple Inc, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-3335.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store