Latest news with #FreeMarketFoundation
IOL News
05-08-2025
- Business
- IOL News
Black Sash urges government to tackle corruption for better social grants
Free Market Foundation President Eustace Davie fears that social grants might discourage young people from making efforts to be self-reliant. Image: Supplied The government can still afford to pay social grants for the unemployed despite the US's 30% tariffs on local exports, which could result in the country shedding 300,000 jobs and losing billions of rand in tax revenue. Black Sash, a human rights advocacy group, said the government should stop corruption to afford social grants that are above the poverty line. The group commented after the Free Market Foundation lashed out at the government for what it described as making the grants a permanent income generation for the unemployed instead of providing skills and creating job opportunities for young people. Black Sash said the country does have a lot of money, which has been spent irresponsibly. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'We just need to tighten where we think we are losing money, such as corruption, so that we can redirect the money to the basic services rather than to say there is no money because of the tariffs,' said Black Sash's communications and media manager, Oliver Meth. Meth said the government should focus on creating job opportunities for young people. He said it was unjustifiable to say the country would run into bankruptcy if there was no money coming from another country. 'There is a lot of money in this country, but it's just that it's not directed to the right responsibility,' said Meth. He said every year, the country was facing an increase in unemployment. The Black Sash welcomed the government's move on June 1 to replace the Social Relief Grant (SRG), which paid each unemployed recipient R350 per month, with the Universal Basic Income Grant (UBIG), which increased the payment to R720. Black Sash had, in its May statement, described the introduction of UBIG as the reaffirmation of the Government of National Unity's commitment to ensuring long-term income support for those living in poverty and unemployed. The group had felt that R370 was far below the food poverty line and was insufficient to restore dignity or break the cycle of poverty. 'Black Sash stands ready to engage with policymakers and civil society to ensure that the Basic Income Grant becomes a transformative tool for building a more just, equitable society — one where everyone has the means to live in dignity,' read its May statement. However, Free Market Foundation President Eustace Davies released a statement on Thursday expressing fear that the grant would subject the unemployed to permanent dependency on government handouts. It was estimated in 2024 that there would be 9.24 million grant recipients in 2024/25, and the government had set aside R33.7 billion for this. Davies said the grant was defeating the government's purpose of making young people self-sustainable. He said that unemployed persons who attempt to earn even a modest income through part-time work, informal trading, or entry-level employment risk being immediately disqualified from the grant. 'The reward for productive effort becomes the loss of support,' said Davies. He said grants do not help recipients to progress in their lives, but instead, they remain idle. 'When the state creates a condition in which individuals are penalised for trying to lift themselves out of poverty, it arrests their development and saps their self-respect. A population so becomes compliant but not empowered,' he said. He said the state where grants were in a permanent arrangement could be an indication of economic failure. 'Unemployment remains structurally high, especially among the youth, and entrepreneurship continues to be stifled under layers of bureaucracy,' he said. Davies said South Africa should look at the model of Singapore and Switzerland, which he said were economically successful. 'In Singapore, the emphasis is on education, skills, and enterprise, not permanent grants. 'Switzerland keeps welfare limited and locally administered, with strong expectations of personal responsibility. 'For decades, Hong Kong allowed markets to allocate labour and capital with minimal interference. The result in each case was widespread prosperity,' he said. To keep financing the grants, Davies said, the Treasury will have to introduce taxes, which would mean punishing those who are already carrying the burden of employment creation, capital formation, and tax compliance. 'A policy that extracts more from the productive to fund inactivity cannot produce long-term stability or growth,' he said.
Eyewitness News
14-06-2025
- Business
- Eyewitness News
Systemic govt failures, not BEE to blame rising unemployment in SA, says economist
JOHANNESBURG - The debate over the effects of broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) continues, as some push back against claims that affirmative action is to blame for rising unemployment. This follows a report by the Free Market Foundation and trade union Solidarity, which links the country's high unemployment rate to B-BBEE policies. However, numbers from Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) tell a different story, showing that employment has grown from 8.9 million in 1994 to 16.7 million in the first quarter of 2025. Of these, more than 12 million jobs are held by black South Africans. According to Stats SA, the number of employed black people has increased from 5 million in 1994 to 12 million in the first quarter of 2025. While more black people are employed now than three decades ago, they still experience the highest rate of unemployment compared to other racial groups. Solidarity argued that B-BBEE had contributed to rising unemployment among black South Africans. However, political economist Dale McKinley disputed the claim that B-BBEE was responsible, instead attributing the issue to systemic government failures. "What I don't agree with is that you can blame BEE [black economic empowerment] for the lack of growth in the economy as a whole. Those are structural problems in our economy that go way beyond a particular BEE policy, that go through apartheid legacy and racial and class divisions that are very deep." In his presidential newsletter, President Cyril Ramaphosa also refuted claims that B-BBEE had failed to address unemployment.
IOL News
13-06-2025
- Business
- IOL News
Cosatu defends B-BBEE policy amid criticism from Solidarity and FMF
The Free Market Foundation and Solidarity held a media briefing on Thursday to discuss the impact of Black Economic Empowerment legislation on the economy. Image: Supplied Banele Ginidza The battle for the scrapping of "race laws" in South Africa went a notch up on Thursday as the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) shot down a call to review and drop South Africa's Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) policy. This comes as trade union Solidarity and the Free Market Foundation (FMF) on Thursday released a report claiming that B-BBEE has caused serious damage to the country's economy and to its population while only enriching a small, politically-connected elite. The report draws on data from the B-BBEE Commission, Stats SA, the JSE, and international comparisons to assess the real costs of compliance across the key BEE scorecard elements: ownership, skills development, enterprise and supplier development, management control, and socio-economic development. According to the report, the annual cost of BEE compliance is between R145 billion and R290bn per year. It claimed that this has resulted in an annual reduction of 1.5% to 3% in economic growth, and to an annual loss of between 96 000 and 192 000 jobs. 'Our findings show that BEE, as currently designed, is enriching a small elite while throttling economic dynamism and deepening unemployment,' said Dr Morné Malan, FMF senior associate and co-author of the report, speaking at the joint press conference. The study compares South Africa's model with global 'affirmative action' policies in Malaysia, India, Brazil, the US, and Namibia, showing that South Africa's version is the most intrusive and economically damaging. At the media briefing, the organisations claimed that B-BBEE benefits largely captured by politically-connected elites as South Africa now ranks 139th in GDP per capita, down from 87th in 1994. Executives of both organisations said the people most affected by the current economic programme are people that work poor people and those that are beneficiaries are the elite. "That is why we will engage with Cosatu trade unions Numsa and others to find alternatives to the current racial legislation," said Theuns du Buisson, economic researcher at the Solidarity Research Institute, and co-author of the report. "In the second place we will continue to litigate and in the third place we will also put pressure on SA via the international world and continue to put pressure on South Africa with the outside world especially the G20 that comes." However, Cosatu's Parliamentary spokesperson Matthew Parks said the report provided no breakdown backed up by actual research as to any financial burden to the state nor how B-BBEE has been an obstacle to growing the economy and reducing unemployment. Parks said the report strangely cited statistics related to real and potential growth overall, but no evidence of the relationship between those and B-BBEE. He said it may as well have blamed constitutional democracy for South Africa's economic challenges. "No reference is made to the need to overcome our still prevalent racial divides as evidenced by countless employment equity studies confirming that most senior positions in the private sector are held by White males or that economic ownership, including shares on the JSE remain largely White-held," Parks said. Johann Rossouw, an economist at Altitude Wealth, said a more sensible empowerment model as an alternative to B-BBEE policies was Black Economic Skills Transfer (BEST), which would help with job creation and carry the economy into the future. "At the moment all the arguments are about how many ways to cut the existing pie instead of growing the pie that we have for the future. Black empowerment is not a policy of the government of national unity," Rossouw said, commending that the study was evidence based and drew comparison with other countries. "It is important that the GNU makes its own policies that will benefit the average poor." However, independent economist Duma Gqubule said the study and the report was fake news on steroids, which lacked the fundamental understanding of the objectives of transformation. Gqubule said the report lacked empirical evidence and was premised on companies counting upskilling workers for an example as a transformation contribution when both the worker and the company benefited from the exercise. "I would call on black business to come up with a coherent response to this. It is a dangerous agenda. We need another citizen dialogue on black empowerment for the new circumstances as the situation in the 1990s when the policies were crafted were critical," Gqubule said. BUSINESS REPORT
Eyewitness News
12-06-2025
- Business
- Eyewitness News
Job creation has been minimal in SA since democracy, claims Solidarity
JOHANNESBURG - Minority lobby group, Solidarity, claims that job creation since 1994 has been minimal, largely due to Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) policies. Solidarity, in collaboration with the Free Market Foundation (FMF), has released a new study outlining the costs associated with BBBEE compliance. Their findings indicate that these policies have contributed to rising unemployment and have hindered significant economic growth since 1994. Solidarity CEO Dirk Hermann argues that a complete overhaul of the BBBEE policy would be more beneficial for the country. 'Black Economic Empowerment does not address inequality. It increases as a result of the policy. The paradox is that inequality increases particularly in the black community as a result of a small group of elites, who are being radically enriched.' Speaking to 702 , prominent businessman Saki Macozoma said BBBEE remains necessary for transformation. 'Empowering people who are previously disadvantaged is the right kind of thing. It may be that the terminology of Black Economic Empowerment is the one that creates the emotion. The fact of the matter is that we need to have the redress, and we have not done it to the extent that we should have.' ALSO READ:
The Citizen
12-06-2025
- Business
- The Citizen
BEE is bringing South Africa's economy to its knees
BEE is bringing South Africa's economy to its knees – new report A report released on June 12 by the Solidarity Research Institute (SRI) and the Free Market Foundation (FMF) has sent shockwaves through South Africa's political and economic landscape. The report delivers a scathing critique of the country's Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) policy, asserting that it is causing substantial damage to the South African economy while enriching only a small, politically connected elite. BEE was initially introduced as a transformative policy aimed at redressing the economic imbalances of apartheid by promoting greater inclusion of black South Africans in the economy. However, the latest findings paint a different picture, highlighting a policy that is now burdening economic growth, exacerbating inequality, and stalling job creation. According to the report, the annual compliance costs for BEE range from R145-billion to R290-billion, which represents between 2% and 4% of South Africa's Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This enormous economic burden has resulted in an annual reduction of GDP growth by between 1.5% and 3%, with a concomitant loss of between 96 000 and 192 000 jobs each year. Over the years, this has accumulated to about 3.8 million lost job opportunities for South Africans. 'This huge economic cost is not simply the result of negligence or the mere poor implementation of a plan. It is a deliberate government policy that causes it,' said Theuns du Buisson, economic researcher at the SRI and co-author of the report. 'It is irrelevant when someone then says the policy was introduced with good intentions. Today it serves as a mechanism to enrich the elite at the expense of our country's economy and especially at the expense of its poorest citizens.' The report further outlines that while there has been some progress in terms of black ownership and skills development, these gains are heavily overshadowed by the adverse effects of BEE. Among these are increased inequality, elite capture of policy benefits, and widespread economic stagnation. 'The policy places a particularly heavy burden on critical sectors such as mining and finance,' the report reads, 'and it deters foreign investment, encourages capital flight, and stifles technological progress.' South Africa's economic position on the global stage has deteriorated markedly, falling behind other middle-income countries with which it was once comparable. The report critiques the lack of focus and effectiveness in the implementation of BEE policies, which contrasts with more successful affirmative action or empowerment programmes abroad. Du Buisson pointed to countries such as Brazil and the United States, which have begun to phase out similar race-based economic policies. 'Moreover, in other countries, affirmative action policies are precisely there to prevent discrimination, while in South Africa, they in fact make discrimination compulsory,' he noted. 'South Africa must now follow the path of other countries and get rid of it. BEE has become an instrument that benefits a small, politically connected elite and has long ago stopped being a policy that could empower a disadvantaged society.' Connie Mulder, head of the SRI, emphasised the urgency of the situation: 'South Africa cannot afford to continue down this path. The data is clear. BEE, in its current form, is damaging the economy and hurting those it was meant to help. We need policies that promote real economic participation and growth without racial quotas that cripple progress.' The call to action from the writers of the report is for policymakers to immediately abolish the current BEE framework and replace it with a policy that fosters inclusive growth without impeding the economy. 'We need an economic environment where all South Africans, regardless of race, have the opportunity to contribute and prosper,' Du Buisson said. – Access the full report here: Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to bennittb@ or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading! Stay in the know. Download the Caxton Local News Network App Stay in the know. Download the Caxton Local News Network App here
