logo
#

Latest news with #LisaMirzaGrotts

Fury at What Waitress Does To Cost Her a Tip on $300 Tab: 'It's Messed Up'
Fury at What Waitress Does To Cost Her a Tip on $300 Tab: 'It's Messed Up'

Newsweek

time5 days ago

  • Newsweek

Fury at What Waitress Does To Cost Her a Tip on $300 Tab: 'It's Messed Up'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. The internet has weighed in after a waitress lost a tip on a $300+ tab for repeatedly failing to bring one thing. As the man, who chose not to give his name but who posts to Reddit under the username u/Nerd_Rat, told Newsweek: "It's one thing to get bad service, but that was pretty blatant. The initial event really got under my skin. I don't think anybody likes being treated like that." He explained, in a post to the r/AITA_WIBTA_PUBLIC sub on May 19, that he met a group of friends at a club and sat at their table, where they had already been ordering alcohol and food. As he wasn't drinking due to being on medication, he asked the waitress for a Sprite—and says "she gave me an awkward smile and said okay." She then returned 10 minutes later, without his Sprite, and asked his friends if they wanted another round. They ordered a round of shots and reminded her about the Sprite—but she returned with the alcohol, and again without the Sprite. When the same thing happened again, and he noticed the waitress didn't go to the bar to get his drink even after he asked a third time, he took matters into his own hands. He went to the bar, ordered his Sprite, paid and tipped the bartender, and returned to his seat. And later, when the waitress came with the bill that he estimated to be around $300 for the entire party, she tried to charge the man for the Sprite she never brought, claiming the bar had transferred the order to her. He wrote: "I don't know why I was so upset about the Sprite; it's just a Sprite. But my friends were also upset that I was being treated that way, so they all paid their tabs, left no tip, and wrote on the checks, 'You should have brought my friend a Sprite.'" The man was torn by what happened, as he usually thinks it's "messed up not to leave tips," and he only learned afterwards what his friends had done. But at the same time, he added, "I also don't like being discriminated against because I can't drink alcohol due to my medications." Reddit users responded in a big way, awarding the post more than 23,000 upvotes, as commenters weighed in. One took the party's side, writing: "I've worked as a bartender, waitress, and a barista. That kind of behavior doesn't just deserve a no tip, it also deserves a call to the bar owner to let them know WHY the waitress didn't get a tip." Another assured the man he shouldn't feel bad, as "it was up to your friends to leave a tip and they chose not to. She was not catering to the whole party, just the drinkers. I wouldn't have tipped her either," as another pointed out: "This service deserves no tip. Soft drinks and waters take less than 10 seconds to make." And as one put it: "She didn't provide a service to get tipped for. Your friends saw that she was blatantly ignoring you. That equals no tip." But etiquette consultant Lisa Mirza Grotts suggested the party could have taken a different approach, as while gratuity is optional, in the United States "it's customary and often expected." Pictured: Stock image of a woman holding a bill receipt at a restaurant. Pictured: Stock image of a woman holding a bill receipt at a restaurant. frantic00/Getty Images "When service is completely absent or disrespectful, diners may feel justified in withholding a tip," she told Newsweek, but urged: "Don't walk away in silence. Speak to a manager even when annoyed. This leaves the door open for resolution." A reduced tip "sends a clear message without cutting off the server's income entirely," and while the man did everything right in waiting, reminding the server and going to the bar himself, "the stronger move would have been to politely flag down a manager when it became clear the Sprite wasn't coming. A calm explanation allows for a real-time fix." The man told Newsweek he was "surprised" by the response to his post. "It felt good that the majority of people [agreed] with me, but there were quite a few who didn't, and I understand why," he said. "I do think it's important to tip people who aren't going to be getting a living wage otherwise, but that doesn't mean you can treat people poorly just because you think they won't tip." Do you have funny and adorable videos or pictures you want to share? Send them to life@ with some extra details, and they could appear on our website.

An Etiquette Expert Is Begging You to Never, Ever Show Up to a Party at This Time
An Etiquette Expert Is Begging You to Never, Ever Show Up to a Party at This Time

Yahoo

time15-05-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Yahoo

An Etiquette Expert Is Begging You to Never, Ever Show Up to a Party at This Time

We've all heard the term 'fashionably late' when it comes to social functions. No one wants to arrive at a gathering too early and hover anxiously around the host, or interrupt them as they put the final touches on the decor. But when it comes to arriving late to a party, it can be difficult to discern what an acceptable arrival time is. Should you follow the start time listed on your invitation as closely as possible, or hold off until more people have arrived?Although every party host's expectations are bound to be different, etiquette expert Lisa Mirza Grotts of Golden Rules Gal warns that it's often better to be safe than sorry when it comes to planning your arrival time. As she puts it, being too 'fashionably late' isn't an indicator of your busy social life. Instead, it's often plain disruptive.'Arriving late to a party isn't a grand entrance,' Grotts says. 'It's a gamble, impolite and poor timing.'Still, you might find yourself wondering what a good rule of thumb is for event timing. At what point should you notify the host that you'll be late? If you insist on being fashionably late, exactly how late can you be without being rude? And what's the ideal arrival time to aim for in the first place?Below, an etiquette expert answers all the questions you might have about party arrival As a rule of thumb, it's better to arrive early and wait for the party's official start time than to show up long after your fellow guests have already made themselves comfortable. That being said, it's best to avoid showing up before the host has said the party will start unless you've been specifically invited to do so.'A good guest honors the host's rhythm, not their own watch,' Grotts says. 'If you must, drive around the block until the set time.' If you're aiming to be on your best behavior, being as punctual as possible is key.'There's a fine line between fashionably late and rudely disruptive,' Grotts notes. 'Respect the invitation as much as you'd want your own time to be respected.'Related: Your 'fashionably late' window depends on the exact event you're going to. For instance, Evite professionals note that guests at gatherings like dinner parties should arrive within 15 minutes of the stated start time, while the arrival time for larger parties or New Year's gatherings is more flexible. However, when in doubt, Grotts recommends showing up slightly earlier than you think just to be safe.'Remember it this way: Behave a little better than what is asked of you,' she says. 'To be fashionably late should be stylishly timed, not selfishly timed.' Grotts recommends letting your host know if you'll be more than 30 minutes late to the party, since 'anything beyond that is inconsiderate.'When in doubt, she says, 'reply early, arrive graciously.''One of my favorite memes [is]: An invite is a gift,' Grotts adds .'Responding on time is how you unwrap it!' Up Next:Lisa Mirza Grotts, of Golden Rules Gal

Why Woman Sat on Train Passenger's Purse Applauded: 'Inconsiderate'
Why Woman Sat on Train Passenger's Purse Applauded: 'Inconsiderate'

Newsweek

time25-04-2025

  • Newsweek

Why Woman Sat on Train Passenger's Purse Applauded: 'Inconsiderate'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A post about a passenger sitting on a fellow commuter's purse on a crowded train when the woman refused to move the bag to allow her to sit has gone viral on Reddit. The post by u/CyclingSkater, shared on April 24 in the r/AmItheA****** subreddit, received over 6,700 upvotes and hundreds of comments debating train etiquette and public courtesy. The poster, who identified herself as a woman, recounted her daily commute in a "metropolitan city" where trains are often packed during rush hour. On this particular day, the poster said she walked through multiple train cars in search of a seat and came across a seat taken by a woman's bag. "I asked this woman if I could sit there and she pretended to not hear me," the poster wrote. "I didn't want to tap her shoulder because you never know how people would react so I waved a bit to get her attention and she said she didn't want to hold her bag (which was a no)." Despite saying that there were no other empty seats and the train was about to depart, the woman continued to ignore her. With no alternative, the poster said she sat down on the purse. "She began yelling at me telling me I'm a b**** and told me to move because she never said I could sit there. I told her that there was no other seat and the train was departing," the poster added. Stock image: A woman grabs a bag placed on a middle seat next to her. Stock image: A woman grabs a bag placed on a middle seat next to her. iStock / Getty Images Plus Etiquette expert Lisa Mirza Grotts, author of A Traveler's Passport to Etiquette in a Post-Pandemic World, told Newsweek: "In travel, as in life, grace is the best carry-on." She added: "Your seat is not a throne. Share and share alike." The American Community Survey (ACS) found that public transportation commuters accounted for around 5 percent of all workers in the United States in 2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Census Bureau reported in April 2021. Though public transportation was a "relatively uncommon method" of traveling to work in the country as a whole in 2019, "it played a prominent role in certain places, like the cities of New York, where over 2 million people commuted by public transportation, and San Francisco, where over one-third of workers did so," the bureau said. The confrontation in the Reddit post escalated until a conductor intervened. According to the poster, the conductor asked the seated woman if her purse was occupying a seat. She did not respond. The conductor reportedly advised her to "be considerate" and continued checking tickets. At the next stop, the woman threatened to report the poster to the police for "touching her belongings" and demanded compensation for the purse, claiming it was dented. She also said that, since she had a rough day, she needed personal space and that others should have arrived earlier to claim a seat. 'Be Considerate of Space' Etiquette experts weighed in, agreeing with the poster's frustration and emphasizing the importance of courtesy in shared public spaces. Grotts said: "Be considerate of space. Don't sprawl; during busy times, less is more; and keep your luggage tucked away—not center stage." Etiquette expert Jules Hirst, co-author of Power of Civility, told Newsweek that, while stressful situations can test patience, they are precisely when good manners matter most. "Seats on public transportation are for passengers and not for your belongings," Hirst said. "This train was almost full due to the afterwork rush commute. The seated passenger should have shown some civility and moved their belongings so a fellow passenger could sit down." Addressing the poster's decision to sit on the purse, Hirst said that it may not have been ideal but understandable. "The seatless passenger waved to get the attention of the seated passenger, explained the situation and was ignored. The seated passenger prioritized her purse over the needs of a fellow human being," she added. "Public transportation is a shared space, so the seated passenger needed to share and did not," Hirst said. 'Her Purse Doesn't Get a Seat' The Reddit community overwhelmingly supported the poster. In a top comment with more than 8,000 upvotes, u/uncommonbreeddogmom wrote: "It's public transit. Her purse doesn't get a seat because she had a bad day." Other users echoed the sentiment. "She really thought that seat came with a bag reservation tag or sum," u/Sablefernglow commented. "You asked nice multiple times and she ignored u … ppl [people] love acting like victims when they were inconsiderate first …" Many Reddit users used humor to underline the absurdity of the situation. "Seats are for butts, not bags," wrote u/awkwardlypragmatic. Another, u/Ellend821, added: "NTA [not the a******] and this is hilarious, I'm using this tactic next time." "NTA. Public transit seats are for people, not purses," wrote u/Arorua_Mendes. "What were you supposed to do, levitate? Her rough day doesn't trump basic transit etiquette … Her bag doesn't pay fare, and your actions were justified." Newsweek has contacted the original poster for comment via the Reddit messaging system. Do you have a travel-related video or story to share? Let us know via life@ and your story could be featured on Newsweek.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store