How can CBFC deny censor certificate to Manushi without specifying objectionable scenes, asks Madras High Court
The Madras High Court on Wednesday (June 4, 2025) wondered how the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) could deny certification to the Vetri Maaran-produced film Manushi without specifying the objectionable scenes, visuals, dialogues, music, or other content that would need to be edited before public screening.
Justice N. Anand Venkatesh said, unless the objectionable portions of the movie were spelt out by the CBFC, the producer would be groping in the dark without knowing which parts of the film required editing and end up suffering huge monetary loss, as the entire movie had already been shot.
The judge directed Central government senior panel counsel A. Kumaraguru to take instructions from the CBFC by June 16 with respect to the portions that required editing. In the alternative, the officials could watch the movie along with the producer and point out the objectionable portions to him, the judge said.
'Making a movie is a part of the right to speech and expression. As such, the filmmakers are already suffering from a lot of difficulties. You cannot deny certification for an entire movie without specifying the objectionable portions and expect a filmmaker to shoot the entire movie afresh,' the judge told the counsel.
When he was told that the examining committee as well as the screening committee (an appellate body) of the CBFC had recommended against certifying the movie, the judge perused the orders passed by the board and found that it had given five reasons for denying certification to Manushi.
The reasons cited by the CBFC in the rejection order were that the movie went against the integrity of the State; it had scenes that were contemptuous; it defames government policies; it portrays stereotypes leading to north/south divide; and that it had many scenes that were against the interests of the country.
'These conclusions are not subjective but based on objective facts, which are discernable from various scenes in the movie. Therefore, if at all the petitioner is required to edit those portions, he must be informed about the specific portions that required such editing,' the judge said, and sought the CBFC's response by June 11, 2025.
Manushi is produced by Vetri Maaran's Grassroot Film Company and directed by Aramm fame Gopi Nainar. The film stars Andrea Jeremiah in the lead role, with key supporting roles played by actors Nasser, Tamizh, Hakkim Shah, and Balaji Sakthivel.
Acclaimed musician Ilaiyaraaja had composed the music for the film, and its trailer released by actor Vijay Sethupathi in April 2024 had received critical acclaim as it showed moving scenes pertaining to the custodial torture of a woman suspected to be a terrorist.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
'Refund Excess Ticket Charges Or Face Action': Madras High Court Warns Cinema Halls
Last Updated: The theatre owners cannot fleece the movie goers by collecting excess amount from them, court said. Against cinema theatre owners flouting government-fixed ticket rates, the Madras High Court has directed Tamil Nadu authorities to take prompt action against such violators and ensure refund of excess amounts charged from moviegoers. The order came in a writ petition filed by G Devarajan, who alleged that several cinema theatres across Tamil Nadu were collecting more than the permitted price for tickets, especially during the first four days after a new movie's release. He pointed out that films like 'Vivegam" had seen inflated pricing, in clear violation of government norms. The petitioner had urged the court to issue a writ of mandamus directing state officials—including Tahsildars, Collectors, and officials from the Commercial Tax and Home Departments—to crack down on this 'cheating practice" and ensure that the overcharged amounts were returned to the public. During the hearing, the state's Additional Government Pleader informed the bench that a dedicated monitoring committee was already in place. This committee regularly inspects theatres, monitors compliance, and recommends action wherever overcharging is detected. Justice N Anand Venkatesh, however, emphasised that merely forming a committee was not enough. Observing that such violations often occur during the high-demand phase immediately after a film's release, he directed that the committee take active steps whenever complaints are received. The court said that if a theatre is found collecting more than the approved rates, it must not only face appropriate action but also refund the excess collected. 'When the Government has fixed a rate which is revised from time to time, the theatre owners cannot fleece the moviegoers by collecting excess amount," the court stated, while adding that the committee must respond promptly to complaints and enforce the rules strictly. Justice Venkatesh concluded the proceedings by disposing of the petition but with clear directions for future monitoring. He stated that no costs were being awarded in the case and closed the connected miscellaneous petition as well. First Published:
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'Thug Life' Karnataka ban row: Supreme Court seeks KA govt's reply over screening of Kamal Haasan starrer
The Supreme Court on Friday issued a notice to the Karnataka government in response to a plea challenging the alleged unofficial ban on the screening of Kamal Haasan 's 'Thug Life' in the state. The petition, filed by M Mahesh Reddy , claimed that threats and police interference have prevented the Tamil film's theatrical release in Karnataka, despite it being certified by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). The bench, comprising Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan, scheduled the next hearing for Tuesday (June 17). Petitioner alleges verbal instructions Filed through the advocate A Velan, the petition argued that the ban was not implemented through any formal government order or legal process, but through oral instructions and indirect pressure. According to News 18, it alleged that the officials failed to work against the groups threatening violence, which led to a cold impact on expression and freedom of cinema exhibition. The petition stated that such intervention violates constitutional rights, including the right to free speech and practicing a profession under Article 19 (1) (A) and 19 (1) (G). State accused of yielding to threats and violence The petition also accused the state government of becoming a silent spectator amid threats of arson and communal violence targeting linguistic minorities. "This surrender to violent, non-state actors is not only a lapse in governance but a breakdown of constitutional machinery,' the plea stated. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 월 2만원으로 아이들의 한끼 선물하기 굿네이버스 더 알아보기 Undo It called for urgent intervention to ensure law and order and protect citizens' rights. Call for legal action and safe screenings M Mahesh Reddy urged the court to declare the de facto ban on 'Thug Life' illegal and to direct authorities to ensure safe, uninterrupted screenings in willing theatres. It also demanded legal action against those inciting threats or communal hatred. Notably, the film was released in other states on June 5 in Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, and Hindi, but faced resistance in Karnataka following controversial remarks made by Kamal Haasan regarding the Kannada language.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
SC seeks Karnataka govt reply on plea seeking release of 'Thug life' film in state
New Delhi, The Supreme Court on Friday sought the Karnataka government's response on a plea seeking protection against alleged threats over the screening of Kamal Haasan's film "Thug Life" in Karnataka theatres. A bench of justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan issued notice on M Mahesh Reddy's plea challenging the ban on the screening of the Tamil feature film, starring Haasan and directed by Mani Ratnam, in Karnataka. It listed the matter for hearing next Tuesday. Reddy in his plea filed through advocate A Velan contended that despite the movie being granted certification by the Central Board of Film Certification , the Karnataka government has allegedly prevented its theatrical release through oral instructions and police interference, without issuing any official prohibitory order or any registration of an FIR qua the same. Velan argued that such actions by the state amount to an unconstitutional restriction on free speech and expression under Article 19 of the Constitution. The bench recorded his argument that the so-called ban under threat of violence stems not from any lawful process but from a deliberate campaign of terror, including explicit threat of arson against cinema halls, incitement of large-scale violence targeting linguistic minorities. The plea said, "This reign of intimidation is a direct, flagrant violation of the Fundamental Rights to Freedom of Speech and Expression ) and to Practice any Profession ). More seriously, it is a calculated attack on the secular fabric and public order of the State." It added that the Karnataka government through its authorities concerned has become a silent party to this undermining of the Constitution and its failure to use the full force of the law against those openly issuing threats of death, arson, and communal warfare is not just negligence; it is a surrender that effectively hands control to violent non-state actors. "This constitutes a profound and flagrant failure of the law and order machinery in the state, signifying a dangerous weakening of the constitutional machinery's ability to function and protect its citizens," it said. The plea sought direction declaring that the de facto ban on the screening of "Thug Life" in Karnataka, is illegal, unconstitutional, and void ab initio, being violative of Articles 14, 19, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. It also sought directions to the authorities including police to ensure the safe, secure, and unimpeded exhibition of the film in all cinema theatres and multiplexes across Karnataka , that are willing to screen it, and to take all necessary steps to prevent any recurrence of such intimidation for this or any other lawfully certified film. The plea further sought direction to initiate and pursue with utmost diligence, accountability, and transparency, appropriate legal proceedings, including criminal prosecution, against all individuals and office bearers of organizations who have issued threats of violence, arson, or incited communal hatred/violence in connection with the release of the film. On June 9, the top court refused to grant an urgent hearing on a plea filed by a theatre association seeking protection against alleged threats over the screening of the film in Karnataka theatres. It had asked the theatre association from Karnataka to approach the Karnataka High Court instead. "Thug Life" released in cinema halls across the country on June 5. The Tamil movie, which reunites Haasan with filmmaker Mani Ratnam after 1987's "Nayakan", could not be released in Karnataka after the 70-year-old's comments about Kannada language sparked a major controversy. It was also released in Telugu, Hindi and Malayalam.
