
‘Some don't agree to share power': DK Shivakumar's cryptic remark at Congress event
Though Shivakumar didn't name anyone, his remarks have reignited speculation about a rift with Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah over a rotational chief ministership – a deal the latter firmly denied.
Speaking at the AICC-organised event titled 'Constitutional Challenges' in Delhi on Sunday, Shivakumar lauded the Gandhi family's contributions to the party and praised Sonia Gandhi's decision to not assume the post of Prime Minister in 2004.
'When Sonia Gandhi was asked by the President to take oath as the Prime Minister, she said, 'For me, power is not important.' She decided that a Sikh, a minority, and an economist could save the country and should become the Prime Minister,' Shivakumar said, calling it an unparalleled act of political sacrifice.
In an apparent dig at leaders unwilling to step aside, he added: 'Has anyone in such a big democracy made such a sacrifice? Does anyone even sacrifice a small position today? Some MLAs and ministers share power, but some of us don't even agree to share power. Even at the panchayat level, many don't.'
Earlier last month, chief minister Siddaramaiah had dismissed speculation of a mid-term leadership change, asserting he would complete the full five-year term.
'Am I not sitting here as the Chief Minister? Where is the vacancy?' Siddaramaiah said in New Delhi. 'DK Shivakumar himself has clarified this, and I'm saying the same, there's no vacancy for the CM post,' he had said.
His statement was seen as a clear attempt to shut down persistent talk of Shivakumar being elevated to the top post in the latter half of the government's term.
'Congress's history is India's history'
In his concluding remarks at the Delhi event, the deputy CM further talked about the grand old party's legacy and the Gandhi family's role in maintaining unity within the organisation.
'Congress's history is the country's history. The Gandhi family has kept the Congress Party united, and the Congress Party has kept the country united,' he said, according to an official party release.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
21 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'Elections are choreographed': Rahul Gandhi's big claim against EC, BJP
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Thursday alleged that the Election Commission is working with the BJP to manipulate election results. Presenting data from the 2024 Lok Sabha elections in Karnataka, Gandhi claimed that "vote chori" (vote theft) had taken place on a large scale, calling it a "crime against the Constitution". During a media address at the AICC headquarters in New Delhi, Gandhi said the Congress had set up a team to investigate suspected irregularities and gathered 'concrete evidence of vote chori' over six months. He demanded access to machine-readable voter data from the past 10-15 years and CCTV footage from polling stations. "If the EC does not give us machine-readable data for the past 10-15 years and the CCTV footage, they are partaking in the crime," Rahul Gandhi said. Focus on Mahadevapura: Allegations of 100,000 fake votes Rahul Gandhi presented an analysis of voter data from the Bangalore Central Lok Sabha constituency, particularly the Mahadevapura Assembly segment. According to Gandhi, in the Lok Sabha constituency of Bangalore Central, the Congress polled 626,208 votes while BJP got 658,915 votes — a winning margin of 32,707 for the BJP. Despite Congress winning six out of seven Assembly segments in the constituency, Gandhi further pointed to a massive lead of over 114,000 votes for the BJP in Mahadevapura. This, he claimed, turned the seat in BJP's favour. 'Elections are being choreographed': Rahul Gandhi The Congress MP described the entire electoral process as being "staged". "Elections are choreographed... Our internal polling told us we would win 16 seats in Karnataka; we won nine," he said. The Congress focused on seven unexpected losses and zeroed in on Mahadevapura for a detailed analysis, he said. "We found 100,250 votes stolen. Stolen in five different ways. Duplicate voters, fake and invalid addresses, and bulk voters in a single address, on a building with 50-60 people living. But when we go there, there is no record of those people living there. One family living in that house," he added. Rahul Gandhi pointed to invalid photos and misuse of Form 6, which allows new voter registration, as methods used for vote tampering. He alleged that 100,250 votes were fraudulent, citing: • 11,965 duplicate voters • 40,009 voters with fake or invalid addresses • 10,452 bulk voters listed under single addresses • 4,132 voters with invalid photos • 33,692 voters registered using misused Form 6 for new voter applications Concerns over polling schedule and voter turnout Rahul Gandhi raised concerns about how elections are now held in multiple phases, unlike earlier when they were completed in a single day. "There was a time in India with no EVMs; people voted on one day. Now, UP has a different voting day, and Bihar has some other day. Voting goes on for a month. This made us suspicious," he said. He also flagged sudden changes in polling dates for Karnataka and Haryana as suspicious. Referring to the Maharashtra Assembly elections, Gandhi said the number of voters added to the rolls in five months exceeded those added in the last five years. "In Maharashtra and Haryana, we saw it right in front of our faces. We said publicly and told EC, more voters were added in five months than in five years in Maharashtra. More voters than the entire population of Maharashtra. Huge jump in voter turnout after 5 pm," he alleged. The Congress MP claimed there was a discrepancy between Lok Sabha and Assembly results, with 10 million new voters added at the state level, which altered the outcome. (With agency inputs)


Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Two FIRs filed after mob assault on YouTubers near Karnataka's Dharmasthala amid SIT probe
Tension flared near Dharmasthala in Karnataka's Dakshina Kannada district on Wednesday evening after a group of YouTubers was allegedly attacked by a mob. The incident, linked to the ongoing SIT investigation into a purported mass burial case, led to clashes between two groups, prompting police to step in and restore order. According to officials, two separate FIRs have been registered in connection with the events that unfolded in Dharmasthala. (PTI/File) Also Read - Siddaramaiah slams Trump's tariffs, accuses PM Modi of 'headline management' over national interest According to officials, two separate FIRs have been registered in connection with the events that unfolded. The first FIR pertains to the alleged physical assault on four individuals from three YouTube channels, including a cameraman, who were reportedly interviewing a local person when the mob targeted them. This complaint also includes the vandalism of two vehicles used by the content creators and an attack on a reporter from a private TV channel. The second FIR concerns incidents of unlawful assembly reported at three locations: Pangala near Dharmasthala (where police had to resort to a lathi charge), the Dharmasthala police station premises, and outside a local hospital. These disturbances took place as tensions escalated following the initial attack. Also Read - How Bengaluru prison inmates are using WhatsApp to run extortion racket Preliminary reports from doctors treating those injured suggest that none of the victims suffered serious injuries, police said. Medical staff have conveyed these findings verbally, pending full reports. Authorities confirmed that video evidence from the incident is being scrutinised, and appropriate legal action will be taken based on the findings. Police have stated that the situation has since been brought under control. (With PTI inputs)


Hans India
21 minutes ago
- Hans India
SCs internal quota report placed before K'taka cabinet; special meeting on Aug 16
Bengaluru: Justice H N Nagmohan Das Commission report aimed at providing internal reservation among Scheduled Castes (SCs), was on Thursday placed before the Karnataka cabinet, which decided to discuss and take a decision on it at a special meeting on August 16. The commission, headed by retired judge of the Karnataka High Court Nagmohan Das, submitted the 1,766-page report to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on August 4. "Justice H N Nagamohan Das Commission has submitted the report after a scientific survey in a short period of time. 92 per cent of the community's population has been covered in the survey. The report was placed before the cabinet and all the ministers have been given a copy of it," Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister H K Patil said. Briefing reporters about the cabinet decisions, he said, "The cabinet has received the report and after studying it, on August 16 (Saturday), a special cabinet meeting will be held to discuss and take a decision." Asked about the classifications and reservations to various SC communities in the survey, the minister said the report has just been given to the ministers and he has not gone through it. "Though I have seen reports in the media, I have not compared it with the survey report," he said. The internal reservation is aimed at slicing up the 17 per cent reservation matrix given to 101 Scheduled Castes. According to reports, of the 17 per cent reservation that SCs have in the state -- SC (Left)/Madiga community will get 6 per cent, SC (Right)/Holeya- 5 per cent, 'touchable' communities- 4 per cent, 'most backward' communities- 1 per cent, and Adi Karnataka, Adi Dravida and Adi Andhra communities- 1 per cent. The government, in November last year, had appointed the commission to recommend internal reservation among SCs by gathering empirical data, after the Supreme Court last year allowed the states to provide internal reservation, and the State Cabinet agreed to implement internal reservation. In a landmark verdict delivered by the Supreme Court on August 1 last year, it held that states are constitutionally empowered to make sub-classifications within the SCs, which form a socially heterogeneous class, for granting reservation for the uplift of castes that are socially and educationally more backward. A section of SCs, like 'SC Left', have been demanding internal reservation, alleging that only a few influential sub-castes were taking away a majority of the benefits, while many communities were still marginalised.