logo
My father threw away my childhood possessions – then took his own life

My father threw away my childhood possessions – then took his own life

Yahoo5 days ago
Sometimes it's not something you've seen tangibly in front of you that stays with you for the rest of your days, be that a disturbing horror movie or real-life car crash. It's suddenly seeing nothing where something important should be.
And nothing is exactly how I saw it when I stepped into my father's garage one day seven years ago, to find it starkly bare, voided of the classic dad-junk that had cluttered the space for years. Gone were the half-used paint cans and rusty garden tools, the grandchildren's obsolete toys and pieces of old furniture waiting to be fixed or upcycled.
I should have felt admiration and approval, for his 'getting things done' and having a clear-out after a year of listlessness since Mum had died. Instead I felt a heart-sinking horror at the prospect the worst had happened.
Buried beneath all that worthless flotsam had lived something of incalculable importance to me, which I'd entombed there for 'safekeeping' as I moved from house to house.
It was a large cardboard box, emblazoned with the words 'DON'T THROW AWAY' in black marker pen on each side. It contained the entirety of my life mementoes: a distillation chiefly of my childhood, teenage and university years.
Inside was the priceless time-capsule items one looks forward to revisiting one day: years' worth of personal journals; Polaroids and photos with no negatives; love letters; reams of teenage poetry; all my degree essays and education certificates; all the local newspaper and student-mag articles of my early journalism years.
Essentially it held the most important artefacts, documents and keepsakes from the first 30 years of my life – I was 39 at the time.
I knew there and then that it was all gone, and irretrievable: the 'clear-out' had taken place months prior, spontaneously, with Dad quick to exonerate himself by blaming the 'builder' he had hired to clear his garage and dispose of the contents, not realising or 'forgetting' my life-box was among it all.
If there was one thing I knew about my father, it's that he was a terrible liar. He expected me to believe this workman had not checked with him despite the large letters daubed on the side of the box.
He knew full well that box was there, why it was there and what it meant, and for reasons I'll never understand, he'd callously binned it himself with his own hands.
This was established instantly: a swift phone call to the builder confirmed what I already knew: he hadn't cleared any garage or outbuildings as it wasn't part of his service remit, for anyone.
But it didn't matter that Dad was 'busted'. He simply flapped about it being an easy mistake to make – and please don't go on about it as he had enough already on his plate and it was only old junk.
It was in that bleak moment that the irony sledge-hammered me: I, someone who placed so much importance on physical memories, had left mine in the protection of someone who absolutely didn't.
The bitterest pill for me, however, was that he had not even set it aside just in case, or made a quick call to check if I still wanted it. He didn't even need the space in his now-empty garage or the three-bed house he was rattling around in.
It was the utter needlessness of the act that I couldn't fathom. But I simply had no choice but to chalk it up to 'experience'. I couldn't 'go on about it' as implored because Dad was a broken man, and had been since Mum's passing. He didn't know what to do with his life except wanting to end it, which he had not just threatened but attempted, hospitalising himself with a botched effort. I had to bury my acrimony.
And the worst then happened only weeks later. He was gone for good after succeeding this time in taking his own life, and so the previous calamity was simply supplanted and snuffed out by the next.
Both the throwing away of the box and then the throwing away of himself had been destructive acts over which I'd had no control, so I would just have to learn to accept and live with it.
Covid arrived not long after, and a pandemic and lockdowns and everything else in those crazy couple of years kept me distracted and diverted from all that had happened before.
And once the country was back to normality again, and I'd landed a long-term copywriting contract, I truly felt like I'd emerged from all the earlier heartache like a butterfly from a chrysalis. How wrong I would be.
Five years on, in 2023, out of nowhere the grief returned with a vengeance, but this time transmuted into something closer to consuming anger and rancour – emotions I'd kept in check at the time because of the situation with Dad. They had lain dormant all those years until finally finding an opening to vent, the trigger being my deciding to clear out my own junk-filled spare room, and deciding what needed to be chucked. Suddenly the dam burst and it all flooded back.
The Kübler-Ross grief stages – denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance – had basically been upended: I'd had to leapfrog straight to 'acceptance'.
Turns out your mind doesn't let you off that lightly: there are no shortcuts. Those early stages are simply deferred, held 'in the bank', and I'd now experience the disbelief and ire years after the fact, long after thinking I was in the clear.
Triggers arose everywhere: anything to do with history, personal possessions, memories, from someone mentioning something in conversation to a scene in a movie, would lead back to the feeling that part of me had died when that box went into landfill.
Why on earth had I not liberated it when I had the chance, I'd continually curse myself, as if I'd had any way of knowing what was going to happen. Another grievance was that without any of my old ticket stubs or diary entries, I could no longer pinpoint the dates or times of anything I'd seen or visited – my curated life chronology now just a vague swirl of guesswork.
Maybe that's a good thing, someone suggested to me: 'Without objects to steer your memory, you're free to remember anything in any order.'
And that's what I've learnt to do now: to see things differently, or at least try to, or I'd just afflict my remaining life with futile recriminations over a deceased father who I can never otherwise properly mourn.
Finding new meaning after loss is a powerful thing, someone else said to me. That helped clarify the importance of talking about it, whether to friends or a therapist, and not 'being a man' and just suppressing it all, as if that would help.
Researching similar stories showed me I'm far from alone, from the theft of a removals truck containing an entire home's contents to storage-unit conflagrations, or the hapless man who couldn't afford to keep up with his storage arrears while seconded abroad and returned to find the company had subsequently destroyed his life possessions (was in the Ts-and-Cs, apparently).
Writing about it helps, even if just as a warning to anyone likewise storing precious personal items with parents/relatives for 'safekeeping'. While the lesson is too late for me to learn, it should at least underscore the importance of keeping those things within your own control, their destiny in your own hands.
Other recently emerging silver linings include my mind now compensating in other ways. Music has always been a potent transporter, but certain songs from my youth suddenly hold more evocative power than ever.
I've also become given to organising large-scale social events, like an annual indoor mini-festival in a rural stately home for friends, or a high-school reunion attended by 120 people in my hometown – it's all about making the most of time left now, forging new life experiences I probably wouldn't otherwise have bothered with.
On a practical note, as that box was the only thing I'd have rescued from a house fire, I no longer bother with contents insurance. Once the irreplaceable stuff is gone, everything else just becomes the opposite.
Nowadays I can see more of the funny side, if you could call it that, of any of the triggers that not long ago plagued me. A recent Telegraph article on 'Döstädning' (decluttering) raised a smile at the irony of Dad's own little declutter session where he certainly was as 'ruthless' as the practice recommends.
Earlier this year, during my latest fast-tracked bucket-list experience – a Beatles location pilgrimage in Liverpool, after a lifetime of Fab Four fandom – I was struck by a Paul McCartney quote reflecting on his unsteady relationship with John Lennon not long before his murder: 'His bluff was all on the surface. He used to take his glasses down, those granny glasses, and say, 'It's only me'…Those are the moments I treasure.'
The truth of that line really chimed, that life is all about those moments that stay with you, so even if someone or something removes your physical reminders, they can't extinguish your actual memories of cherished lived moments, and it's those, once all is said and done, that sustain until the end. They can never be thrown away.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hearing loss can put a strain on relationships
Hearing loss can put a strain on relationships

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hearing loss can put a strain on relationships

'WHAT did he say?' 'What was that?' Just about every TV programme I watch with my husband is peppered with questions from me about who said what and what's going on. He finds it irritating to say the least but, even though the volume is set high, I find it difficult to hear. I'd like to turn it up to full but he says it's already at 'pensioner level', it makes him uncomfortable and would be unbearable not to mention unfair to the neighbours, were it any higher. My hearing has been deteriorating for decades. Having virtually no hearing in my left ear due to Meniere's disease, I rely completely on my right, which is good but is blighted by constant tinnitus in my left. So, all in all, it's not great. There's many a conversation in my house that goes something like this: Husband: 'Have you moved the beans I left outside?' Me: 'No, but you don't need to put the bins out, they're not collected until Thursday.' At the weekend he sent me to the garage for a hammer. I came back with a spanner. Those are the occasions when I reply to him: there are many when I don't hear him at all, so don't answer, leaving him exasperated. I often ask: 'Can you come into the room and face me when you ask something, then I can answer you?' We are far from alone in experiencing this sort of exchange. Nearly half of all couples have argued because of hearing loss, according to a poll of 2,000 adults. The problem leaves two fifths feeling frustrated, a third feeling ignored, and a fifth feeling disconnected from their partner. The poll by market research company OnePoll also found couples ask each other to repeat themselves an average of four times a week. And just under half reported having to shout to be heard. With more than a third of adults admitting getting the gist of a conversation wrong and 17 per cent to offending their partner, it can easily lead to disagreements. Living with hearing loss presents challenges in the home.. Picture: Pixabay The survey followed a series of public stunts by Hilary and Michael Whitehall, the parents of UK comedian Jack Whitehall, who leaked CCTV footage of themselves arguing due to problems with Michael's hearing, before revealing it was part of a campaign to raise awareness. The short film could easily have been made in my home and made me realise how frustrating my condition is for my husband. He accepts it and is very accommodating, but sometimes finds it difficult. Michael Whitehall has since been fitted with hearing devices, which have been transformative. He said: 'I've realised how much I was missing before - and the issues my hearing was causing.' My local NHS hearing department is excellent and after undergoing tests I was fitted with a hearing aid, but sadly it makes no difference. Of course, we could use subtitles when watching TV, but it's not as enjoyable. I will persevere with it for foreign language films, but I'm not a fan, especially when they text is not in synch with the dialogue. It's not fair on my husband either, although he would readily accept it. I have to turn my phone alarm up high in case I'm asleep on my right ear when it goes off. But even then I sometimes fail to hear it. There is one advantage though - I simply turn over if I want to block out the dawn chorus. It's ten times harder to hear if I'm in a group and more than one person is speaking. It takes every scrap of concentration, and feeble attempts at lip reading, to be able to join in the conversation. I am glad that my husband's auditory system is functioning well, but living with hearing loss isn't easy for either of us.

Lancaster sends emergency alert after engine issue
Lancaster sends emergency alert after engine issue

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Lancaster sends emergency alert after engine issue

An investigation has been launched after a Battle of Britain Memorial Flight (BBMF) Lancaster bomber suffered an engine problem earlier, the RAF has confirmed. The Avro Lancaster PA474, which had been taking part in the RAF Waddington Families Day in Lincolnshire, sent a general emergency alert as black smoke was seen coming from one of its four engines. According to the RAF, the crew of the iconic World War Two aircraft "diagnosed unusual engine behaviour" and returned to its base at RAF Coningsby "as a precautionary measure". An RAF spokesperson added: "Crew are well trained to handle such events, and an investigation of the aircraft has been launched." None of the aircrew were injured and it's not known if the investigation will impact upcoming scheduled appearances. The BBMF also operates five Spitfires, two Hurricanes and a C47 Dakota. The Lancaster is the most famous and successful RAF bomber of World War Two. Out of 7,377 that were built, the PA474 is one of only two airworthy Lancasters left in the world. Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices Lancaster bomber takes to sky following restoration Primary History KS2: WW2 Clips. A Lancaster bomber takes off Battle of Britain planes grounded after fatal crash Battle of Britain Memorial Flight

Britons say ‘sorry' in 15 different ways – but which one really means genuine regret?
Britons say ‘sorry' in 15 different ways – but which one really means genuine regret?

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Britons say ‘sorry' in 15 different ways – but which one really means genuine regret?

We all say it - and most of the time, let's face it, we don't even mean it. Well, now researchers have backed up the theory, after finding Britons say 'sorry' in as many as 15 different ways, with only one actually expressing true regret. After examining different scenarios we use the apologetic term, they say the multitude of meanings even creates confusion for foreigners, who assume a literal apology is being made, rather than accounting for the other uses of the word. And they say only one of them means true regret - when someone is genuinely sorry to hear someone else's bad news. Karen Grainger, a lecturer in linguistics at Sheffield Hallam University commissioned by Babbel to analyse apologies, explained that 'sorry' is frequently used in attempts to be polite, and to take the edge of disagreements or awkwardness as well as to work around social norms. Britons say 'sorry' as many as nine times a day on average, a previous survey suggested, according to The Times. Mattias Pettersson, who is from Sweden but lives in the UK, told the newspaper: 'When I first started spending time with my British partner, I was struck by how often she said 'sorry'. At first, I thought I'd done something wrong. She'd say sorry when we passed each other in the hallway, when she handed me something, even mid-sneeze. 'Now, even with our two-year-old daughter and other Brits I met, I realised 'sorry' can mean anything from 'excuse me' to 'after you' to 'I exist, and I hope that's OK.' 'At first, I didn't know how to respond — should I apologise back? Say thank you? It was confusing but also fascinating: a tiny word carrying a thousand meanings. It felt like there were secret rules I hadn't learnt yet. Over time, I've learnt to love it. It feels less like an odd habit and more like a quiet sign of thoughtfulness and consideration.' Sofia Zambelli, who is a cultural and language expert at Babbel, added: 'In British English, 'sorry' is as much a social lubricant, an exclamation or a response to mild discomfort as it is a genuine apology. This unique multifunctionality makes it one of the most fascinating and simultaneously misunderstood words in the English language.' Here are the 15 ways Britons use the word 'sorry': A genuine apology is used when someone wants to show that they care about what another person is going through when they share bad news. Then there is the passive aggressive use, such as 'I'm sorry if I offended you.' If two people bump into each other, it is expected that both apologise, regardless of whose fault it is. When someone is blocking your way, often 'sorry' is used to politely ask them to move. 'Sorry' can be used before a polite challenge, such as: 'Sorry, but I disagree.' To enforce rules, 'sorry' is frequently used before the rule is stated, for example, 'Sorry but you can't sit there.' Then there are the times 'sorry' takes the place of 'pardon?' in conversations when someone misses what another person says. An apology can be used to express outrage, such as: 'I'm sorry but they were totally out of line.' People often apologise when turning down offers or plans. A 'sorry' can come before someone interrupts another. Before asking, someone to do something, a 'sorry' is often said. If you want to turn down someone who is trying to engage with you, if you are busy, for example, then usually you would apologise first. 'Sorry' is often said before speaking in an unfiltered manner. Minor rule-breaking might be prefaced with an apology, such as: 'Sorry, I just couldn't resist.' If suggesting a correction, but attempting to be polite about it, someone might say 'sorry'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store