
Side by side, a slum and gated community show South Africa's widening gulf
Upturned beer crates serve as stepping stones through a maze of muddy walkways in the foul-smelling slum where Irene Jubeju stands at the door of a tin shack. Inside, her three-year-old grandson, Lucobo, lies on a bed. A single lightbulb hangs from the ceiling.
'It's not nice to live here. I would go to America very happily if President Trump would take us,' Jubeju said, nodding sadly at her possessions: the bed, a single white plastic chair and a cupboard containing a bag of rice and two tins of pilchards.
Further along the alley, Patricia, a mother of six, waits to fill three large plastic bottles at a standpipe. 'At night there's shooting and screaming. You can't go out. We're not safe.' She added: 'You must call Mr Donald Trump and tell him to invite me and my family to America.'
Millions of South Africans watched on their phones last month as Trump harangued Cyril Ramaphosa, his South African counterpart, over claims that the white Afrikaner minority were facing 'genocide'.
The American president has granted refugee status to several dozen Afrikaners. To the slum-dwellers of Masiphumelele, they seem like the lucky ones.
'My daughter said to me the other day, 'Mum, maybe God has his favourites',' Patricia recalled. 'Those white farmers are probably right to be afraid of criminal attacks on their farms, but I think our case is just as deserving.'
Three decades after Nelson Mandela became South Africa's first black president, the country once reviled for its former apartheid system remains one of the most unequal in the world. Nothing better exemplifies the gulf than Masiphumelele.
The warren of ramshackle dwellings, where 65,000 people are crammed into an area of less than a quarter of a square mile, is bordered by a wall beyond which lies another world, a lakeside idyll of swimming pools and manicured lawns.
'People were separate before,' said Jeremy Mathers, a retired naval submarine engineer who has lived for years with his wife in this exclusive gated community guarded by security professionals. 'Thirty years later they still are,' he added, as a black maid swept his sitting room floor.
He has watched from this comfortable abode with a lakeside pontoon and a swimming pool as the township next door has expanded over the years, along with his own gated community. He does not need burglar alarms or bars on his windows: the estate is wired with cameras monitored by a team that conducts regular patrols.
'That fact that it's necessary is one of the tragedies of South Africa. There's massive unemployment, and people have to live,' Mathers said.
'The residents here know they live in a bubble isolated form the real world out there and probably feel a little guilty about this. But security of family and property trumps all other considerations.'
Down the road, slum-dwellers vie with baboons to rummage through rubbish from another well-off white enclave. Others hand out slips of paper asking for jobs as nannies or nursemaids. 'I am good with children and animal friendly,' said one note thrust through my car window at a traffic light. In a state hollowed out by flagrant corruption, the deepening crisis of crime and unemployment has made age-old warnings of national breakdown feel disturbingly plausible.
Wealthy white South Africans began leaving the country decades ago. 'There are 35 dollar billionaires born here who no longer live here, and I can name hundreds of South Africans worth $100 million to $900 million who are living overseas and not coming back to invest,' said Rob Hersov, 65, a billionaire who left in the 1980s but has returned.
He accuses Mandela's heirs in government of 'stealing the country to death' and promoting violence against whites. Claims of 'genocide' have been circulating for more than a decade, with vocal support from Trump's erstwhile ally, the South African-born billionaire Elon Musk.
• Fact check: Are white farmers being killed in South Africa?
Trump took up the matter last month when he hosted Ramaphosa and several officials in a live-streamed Oval Office meeting, playing a video that showed Julius Malema, leader of the far-left Economic Freedom Fighters party, and former president Jacob Zuma singing an apartheid-era struggle song called Kill the Boer. Trump claimed it was inciting 'white genocide'.
One of those in the meeting was John Steenhuisen, 49, South Africa's white agriculture minister and leader of the governing coalition Democratic Alliance party.
He said he had consulted Lord Mandelson, the British ambassador to Washington, the evening before the encounter with Trump. 'He gave me sound advice: 'Don't answer back, don't contradict him.' But nothing could have prepared us for the dimming of the lights and the TV screen coming on. My heart jumped into my throat. I thought, 'What's happening now?' '
Steenhuisen sprang to the defence of the coalition government, which had been formed specifically to keep the hate-filled militants depicted in the film out of power. The majority of white commercial farmers wanted to stay in South Africa and 'make it work', he said.
Speaking in his Cape Town office last week, he said claims of 'genocide' against whites were 'completely false'. South Africa suffers from appalling crime and murder rates: an average of 60 people are killed daily in this country of 63 million, about 7 per cent of whose inhabitants are white.
Down the road, Louis Botha, the Afrikaner war hero and South Africa's first prime minister, sits on horseback, cast in bronze outside parliament. 'We have a statue of Queen Victoria too,' Steenhuisen noted.
In the first quarter of this year, there were six murders on farms. One victim was a white farmer and the rest were black, according to police. Since 1990, 1,363 white farmers have been murdered — an average of 40 a year.
Grant Butler, a primary school headmaster in Port Elizabeth, recalled a tragic 2018 case when the home of a farming family with two boys in his school was targeted for robbery. 'The mother was raped, the father wasn't home at the time,' he said. 'I remember her telling me she couldn't sleep any more. The family needed a new start. They moved to Australia.'
The countryside the family once inhabited outside the city is cradled by gentle hills and distant ridgelines that shelter rows of trees from which oranges hang like golden lamps in a green night.
One of the region's biggest producers, Hannes de Waal, 58, who runs Sundays River Citrus Company, dismissed the 'white genocide' claim as 'the biggest nonsense under the sun', arguing that farm attacks are the result of common criminality, not an organised campaign. Sitting at the end of a long table in his headquarters, he called 'proper' Afrikaners 'tough and resilient', adding: 'Going to another country as a refugee is crazy.'
That did not mean farmers felt no anxiety, he added. The earth is moist and red in the orange groves, the air rich with the scent of sun-warmed rind. Yet beneath the postcard tranquillity, tension hums like an underground current.
'The only question — and it's always in the back of your mind — is when is it going to happen to you?' said Hennie Ehlers, 65, head of 2Rivers Citrus Company, further up the valley. 'You lock all the doors once you're inside at night. You don't leave anything open. You don't know what's going to happen. It's become a way of life.'
Rising unemployment and desperation have raised fears that crime will increase. 'People see the gold on the trees and want a share of that gold without realising how much effort, capital and sweat went into producing it,' Ehlers said.
The affable silver-haired figure is quick to acknowledge that farm murder victims are not only white. Sitting next to him was his black business partner, Khaya Katoo, and his wife, Crewelyn, who run a farm in the valley. 'These farm murders cut across race,' said Katoo, 50. 'We've got the same security cameras, alarms and smart tech systems at my house as they do here. Everyone is affected. Everyone is a potential victim.'
He blamed unemployment for the attacks. 'The government has failed to deal with it. There's a huge gap between the black elite and the poor. The rich got richer without pulling the poor up with them. There's not much of a black middle class.'
For the township dwellers of Masiphumelele, though, the daily struggle is not to thrive but to survive.
'Mandela wanted us to love each other,' said Patricia, the mother of six, of the freedom fighter turned president. 'He would be rotating in his grave. He'd cry if he could see what's happening to us.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Home discomforts send Trump rushing to project image of global patriarch
'Daddy's home.' So said a social media post from the White House, accompanied by a video featuring the song Hey Daddy (Daddy's Home) by Usher and images of Donald Trump at the Nato summit in The Hague. The US president's fundraising allies were quick to market $35 T-shirts with his image and the word after Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, referred to Trump's criticism of Israel and Iran over violations of a ceasefire by quipping: 'And then Daddy has to sometimes use strong language to get [them to] stop.' Yet even as Trump seeks to project an image of global patriarch, there are signs of trouble on the home front. His polling numbers are down. His party is struggling to pass his signature legislation. Millions of people have marched in the streets to protest against him. Critics say the president who claims to put America First is in fact putting America Last. Trump is not the first president to find the foreign policy domain, where as commander-in-chief he recently ordered strikes on nuclear sites in Iran, less restrictive than the domestic sphere, where a rambunctious Congress, robust judiciary and sceptical media are constant irritants. But rarely has the gap between symbolic posturing abroad and messy politicking at home been so pronounced. 'There's two presidencies,' said Larry Jacobs, director of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota. 'The one on the domestic front is gruesome and involves long-drawn-out and disappointing negotiations with Congress and that's exactly what Donald Trump is engaged in now. What emerges from Congress is not going to be as 'big' or 'beautiful' as he promised. 'Meanwhile you've got staggering photographs of bombs falling from the sky, Donald Trump's flamboyant description of what he's achieved in Iran and Europe. That's the kind of Hollywood performance that Donald Trump wants.' The president stunned the world last Saturday by announcing, on his Truth Social platform, that he had ordered more than 125 aircraft and 75 weapons – including 14 bunker-busting bombs – to hit three targets in Iran to prevent the country obtaining a nuclear weapon. He followed up with a White House speech, choreographed to project an image of power, in which he declared: 'Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' That narrative has since been cast into doubt by a leaked intelligence report suggesting that the operation set back Iran's nuclear programme by only a few months. Still, Trump pivoted to the role of peacemaker, again using Truth Social to announce a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, prompting Republicans to gush that he should win the Nobel peace prize. Trump's barrage of speeches, interactions with reporters and social media posts about the Middle East were likened by some to a daily soap opera, dominating Americans' attention and distracting them from his one big beautiful bill, a budget plan that threatens to slash the social safety net that many of his own supporters depend on. Jacobs observed: 'This is a classic deception. He's like the carnival barker who's waving his hands to keep the attention of the audience even as he's hiding the part for the next trick. 'What's coming out of Congress is going to absolutely harm many of his voters. Politicians like to cover their tracks; there's no covering the tracks here. There will be known cuts to widely used popular programmes like the healthcare for Medicaid and there will be no doubt as to who's responsible. These are traceable, highly visible consequences of Donald Trump.' Now in the sixth month of his second presidency, Trump's domestic honeymoon is over. A poll of 1,006 likely voters nationwide by John Zogby Strategies on 24 and 25 June found the president's approval rating down three points to 45%. About 49% of voters approve of his handling of immigration while 47% disapprove but on the economy 43% approve and 54% disapprove. Asked if they expect Trump's presidency will make them financially better off or worse off, 40% said better and 50% said worse. Zogby commented: 'There is a lot of anxiety domestically, first and foremost on the economy. People are confused and insecure. The numbers are plunging.' Consumer confidence unexpectedly deteriorated in June, a sign of economic uncertainty because of Trump's sweeping tariffs. The anxiety reported by the Conference Board was across the political spectrum, with the steepest decline among Republicans. And the share of consumers viewing jobs as plentiful was the smallest since March 2021. Elizabeth Warren, a Democratic senator, argued in a floor speech this week that Trump had broken him promise to lower costs 'on day one'. She said: 'American families don't need another war – they need good jobs and lower prices, and that is what we should be focused on.' Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Warren listed 10 ways in which the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would raise costs for families, from rent to groceries to prescription drug prices, and warned that it will take healthcare away from more than 16 million people. Republicans in the House of Representatives and Senate continue to haggle over the contents of the bill as a 4 July deadline looms. Neera Tanden, president and chief executive of the Center for American Progress and a former domestic policy adviser to President Joe Biden, told an audience on Thursday: 'This legislation is the greatest Robin Hood-in-reverse legislation that I have ever seen in my lifetime. It is cutting healthcare for working-class people and using those dollars to fund tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans.' Meanwhile discontent is simmering over Trump's signature issue of immigration, even among some of his own voters. Videos of people being snatched off the streets or beaten by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) agents have provoked widespread revulsion. There have also been cases such as that of Ming Li Hui, a popular member of staff at a restaurant in rural Missouri who was arrested and jailed to await deportation. Her friend Vanessa Cowart told the New York Times: 'I voted for Donald Trump, and so did practically everyone here. But no one voted to deport moms. We were all under the impression we were just getting rid of the gangs, the people who came here in droves.' Meanwhile aggressive workplace raids are hurting hotels, restaurants, farms, construction firms and meatpacking companies, including in conservative states. The alarm recently got through to Trump, who admitted that some undocumented immigrants were actually 'very good, longtime workers' and ordered a temporary pause, only to then yield back to hardliners in his administration. Wendy Schiller, a political science professor at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, said: 'In a restaurant, if you lose your cooks, you can't serve people and you lose money. If you are in a factory where people have been swooped up by Ice, you have to do more work. 'It puts more of the burden on the same people who might have voted for Donald Trump – lower-income or middle-income factory workers or meat-processing people. They're feeling the effects of this immigration sweep in ways that the administration did not anticipate.' Trump's second term has been further marred by the tech billionaire Elon Musk leading a 'department of government efficiency', or Doge, that fired thousands of federal workers but fell far short of its cost-saving target before Musk left amid acrimony. The president's authoritarian attacks on cultural institutions, law firms, media organisations and universities fuelled 'No Kings' protests involving more than 5 million people in more than 2,100 cities and towns across the country on 14 June. In that context, it is perhaps not surprising that Trump should relish the global stage, where any world leader is just a phone call away and where he is now being feted as statesman and father figure. It has proven easier to drop bombs on Iran or pressure Nato to agree to a big increase in military spending than to tame Thomas Massie, a rebellious Kentucky Republican defying him over both Iran and the spending bill. Schiller added: 'It is true for every president, Republican or Democrat, that when things are going south domestically they turn to foreign affairs. Trump feels in some ways more powerful on the global stage than he does trying to get Congress to do what he wants. The House Republicans are giving him a hard time. The Senate Republicans are giving him a hard time. He's annoyed by this so then he goes, well, we're a global military power.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE The leak that threatened to derail Trump's Iran strike... Susie Wiles's secret role... and a nail-biting final phone call, all now revealed
After exiting Marine One last Saturday evening, President Donald Trump – donning a red MAGA cap and signature blue suit and red tie – walked across the South Lawn glancing up briefly to acknowledge the assembled media but declining to answer their shouted questions. Then, the president suddenly stopped and looked skyward.


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump's plot to abolish major right as Supreme Court gives him more power
The US President wants to abolish a right enshrined in the US Constitution for 157 years - and now there's almost nobody who can stop him Donald Trump wants to abolish a major right people born in America have enjoyed for 157 years - and is enshrined in the US Constitution. He's taking his fight against 'birthright citizenship' all the way to the Supreme Court - and won a major victory last night. In a decision that hands him almost unlimited power to change American laws with a wave of his hand, Supreme Court justices ruled that individual federal judges would no longer be allowed to halt or block his executive orders - even if they're unconstitutional. It leaves just the Supremes themselves between him and whatever he wants to do. And the next thing on his list is birthright citizenship - an issue likely to come before the highest court in October. Here's what's at stake for Americans if that happens. What is birthright citizenship? Birthright citizenship is the rule that if you're born in the United States, you're a US citizen, regardless of your parents' immigration status. The practice goes back to soon after the Civil War, when Congress ratified the Constitution's 14th Amendment, in part to ensure that Black people, including former slaves, had citizenship. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States," the amendment states. Thirty years later, Wong Kim Ark, a man born in the US to Chinese parents, was refused re-entry into the U.S. after traveling overseas. His suit led to the Supreme Court explicitly ruling that the amendment gives citizenship to anyone born in the US, no matter their parents' legal status. It has been seen since then as an intrinsic part of US law, with only a handful of exceptions, such as for children born in the US to foreign diplomats. Because it's enshrined in the 14th amendment to the Constitution, it should require a congressional supermajority to change the rule - at least that's the theory. Why does Trump want to get rid of it? Republicans have long argued this leads to undocumented immigrants having "anchor babies" - a truly unpleasant term suggesting some people have children to make them harder to deport. And Trump himself has argued, baselessly, that the amendment was only ever intended to cover freed slaves, which ignores decades of caselaw and precedent. How is Trump trying to scrap it? Trump claims he can set it aside with an executive order - and he signed such an order almost immediately upon returning to the White House in January. Trump's executive order would deny citizenship to those born after February 19 whose parents are in the country illegally. It's part of the hardline immigration agenda of the president, who has called birthright citizenship a "magnet for illegal immigration." Trump and his supporters focus on one phrase in the amendment - "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" - saying it means the US can deny citizenship to babies born to women in the country illegally. What's the pushback been like? Some 22 states have brought lawsuits challenging the order, with one brought by Washington state, Arizona, Oregon and Illinois heard first in Seattle. "I've been on the bench for over four decades. I can't remember another case where the question presented was as clear as this one is," U.S. District Judge John Coughenour told a Justice Department attorney. "This is a blatantly unconstitutional order." In Greenbelt, Maryland, a Washington suburb, U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman wrote that "the Supreme Court has resoundingly rejected and no court in the country has ever endorsed" Trump's interpretation of birthright citizenship. So is it still blocked? Briefly. The Supreme Court did not address the merits of Trump's bid to enforce his birthright citizenship executive order - yet. Instead, they were asked to rule on the principle of state and district judges blocking orders for the whole country - which the Supremes decided wasn't on, despite being a right enjoyed by judges for decades. "The Trump administration made a strategic decision, which I think quite clearly paid off, that they were going to challenge not the judges' decisions on the merits, but on the scope of relief," said Jessica Levinson, a Loyola Law School professor. Attorney General Pam Bondi told reporters at the White House that the administration is "very confident" that the high court will ultimately side with the administration on the merits of the case. What happens next? The justices kicked the cases challenging the birthright citizenship policy back down to the lower courts, where judges will have to decide how to tailor their orders to comply with the new ruling. The executive order remains blocked for at least 30 days, giving lower courts and the parties time to sort out the next steps. The Supreme Court's ruling leaves open the possibility that groups challenging the policy could still get nationwide relief through class-action lawsuits and seek certification as a nationwide class. Within hours after the ruling, two class-action suits had been filed in Maryland and New Hampshire seeking to block Trump's order. But obtaining nationwide relief through a class action is difficult as courts have put up hurdles to doing so over the years, said Suzette Malveaux, a Washington and Lee University law school professor. Get Donald Trump updates straight to your WhatsApp! As tension between the White House and Iran grows, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. 'It's not the case that a class action is a sort of easy, breezy way of getting around this problem of not having nationwide relief,' said Malveaux, who had urged the high court not to eliminate the nationwide injunctions. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who penned the court's dissenting opinion, urged the lower courts to 'act swiftly on such requests for relief and to adjudicate the cases as quickly as they can so as to enable this Court's prompt review" in cases 'challenging policies as blatantly unlawful and harmful as the Citizenship Order.' Opponents of Trump's order warned there would be a patchwork of polices across the states, leading to chaos and confusion without nationwide relief. 'Birthright citizenship has been settled constitutional law for more than a century," said Krish O'Mara Vignarajah, president and CEO of Global Refuge, a nonprofit that supports refugees and migrants. 'By denying lower courts the ability to enforce that right uniformly, the Court has invited chaos, inequality, and fear.'