This state is likely to roll back 5-day work week in government offices
A move to scrap the five-day work week in government offices has ignited a political row and triggered sharp reactions from employees, with the ruling BJP-led government in Chhattisgarh indicating that a policy reversal may be imminent.The five-day week - implemented in February 2022 by the previous Congress government under then-Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel - was aimed at promoting work-life balance and improving administrative efficiency. Under the policy, government staff worked longer hours across five days, with Saturdays and Sundays off.advertisementHowever, current Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai has now signalled a rollback of the system. Speaking to the media, Sai said the government was reviewing feedback from senior officers, many of whom believe the two-day weekend is hindering productivity and slowing down the pace of governance.
"Even officials have said that two-day holidays are not helping them. They feel time is wasted and work is piling up, especially due to TL (time-limit) meetings on Tuesdays. Many employees also leave early by Friday afternoon, which slows down government functioning," the Chief Minister said.The statement has drawn a sharp political response from the Congress party, which accused the BJP of dismantling progressive reform. "The CM's statement will create friction among employees. If he's so against the five-day week, let him write to the central government to revoke their similar policy too. Why reverse a decision that has improved work culture?" said Congress spokesperson and media cell chief Sushil Anand Shukla.advertisementEmployee unions have also strongly objected to the proposal. Union leaders described the potential rollback as regressive, warning of protests if the decision is implemented without proper dialogue."Those advising the Chief Minister must be frustrated individuals. The five-day work week gave us time to rest and recharge, and improved our efficiency," one union leader said.The government, however, maintains that essential public services are being affected by the current setup. Officials claim that early Friday departures, paired with weekend closures, are leading to delays in administrative work and bottlenecks in service delivery.The debate comes at a sensitive time, as Chhattisgarh has crossed 100 active COVID-19 cases once again, prompting renewed health alerts. With questions being raised about the readiness and efficiency of the state's administrative machinery, the timing of this policy reconsideration has further intensified scrutiny.Tune InTrending Reel
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Sonowal calls on panchayat leaders to uphold Modi's vision for 2047
Dibrugarh: Union minister of ports, shipping & waterways Sarbananda Sonowal on Wednesday urged newly elected panchayat representatives in Tinsukia district to work toward Prime Minister Narendra Modi's vision of a developed India by 2047, stating that true democratic strength lies in grassroots participation. Addressing candidates from the newly formed Makum legislative assembly constituency who contested the recent three-tier panchayat polls, Sonowal congratulated all participants and underlined the importance of value-driven, transparent governance through the Panchayati Raj system. "Every candidate deserves heartfelt congratulations. Your involvement — win or lose — has strengthened the BJP's organisational base across panchayats. Let us continue working toward the vision of Viksit Bharat 2047," he said. Drawing a parallel between sports and politics, the Dibrugarh MP likened political credibility to Olympic success, saying both demand sustained commitment.
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.S. top court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday (June 18, 2025) upheld a state law banning gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors – an issue at the heart of the American culture wars. The court voted 6-3 to uphold a Tennessee law barring hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery for those under the age of 18. The six conservative justices on the top court rejected a challenge to the law while the three liberals dissented. Two dozen Republican-led states have enacted laws restricting medical care for transgender youth, and the case will have repercussions for the prohibitions across the country. 'This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy, and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field,' wrote Chief Justice John Roberts, author of the majority opinion. 'The Court's role is not 'to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic' (of the law) but only to ensure that the law does not violate equal protection guarantees,' Mr. Roberts said. 'It does not. Questions regarding the law's policy are thus appropriately left to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process,' he added. The Supreme Court heard the case in December, and the Justice Department of then-president Joe Biden joined opponents of the law, arguing that it violated the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause since it denies transgender minors access to medical treatments permitted to others. Republican President Donald Trump has since taken office, and he signed an executive order in January restricting gender transition procedures for people under the age of 19. While there is no U.S.-wide law against gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender youth, the Mr. Trump order ended any federal backing for such procedures. Reacting to the ruling, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) said it 'sets a dangerous precedent for legislative interference in the practice of medicine.' 'Gender-affirming care is medically necessary for treating gender dysphoria and is backed by decades of peer-reviewed research, clinical experience, and scientific consensus,' the AAP said. 'Denying patients access to this care not only undermines their health and safety, but it also robs them of basic human dignity.' 'Must end' The Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal group, welcomed the ruling as a 'huge win for children' and a 'step toward ending dangerous experiments on kids.' During oral arguments in December, Tennessee Solicitor General Matthew Rice told the court the law was designed to 'protect minors from risky, unproven medical interventions' with 'often irreversible and life-altering consequences.' Chase Strangio, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney representing three transgender adolescents, their parents, and a Memphis-based doctor, countered that the law has 'taken away the only treatment that relieved years of suffering.' 'What they've done is impose a blunderbuss ban, overriding the very careful judgment of parents who love and care for their children and the doctors who have recommended the treatment,' said Mr. Strangio, the first openly transgender lawyer to argue before the court. Mr. Trump, in his inauguration speech, said his government would henceforth only recognise two genders – male and female – and he issued his executive order a week later restricting gender transition procedures for minors. 'Across the country today, medical professionals are maiming and sterilising a growing number of impressionable children,' the executive order said. 'This dangerous trend will be a stain on our Nation's history, and it must end.' Mr. Trump's order said it would now be U.S. policy that it would 'not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called 'transition' of a child from one sex to another.' The order bars funding for gender transition under the Medicaid health insurance program for poor families, the Medicare scheme used by retirees, and Defense Department health insurance that covers some two million children. According to a study by UCLA's Williams Institute, an estimated 1.6 million people aged 13 and older in the United States identify as transgender.
India Today
27 minutes ago
- India Today
High Court orders Centre to resume MGNREGA in West Bengal from August 1
The Calcutta High Court has ordered the Central Government to resume implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in West Bengal from August project had been stalled for nearly three years in the state, as allegations of corruption led to a political blame game between the Trinamool Congress (TMC) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).advertisementA division bench comprising Chief Justice T S Sivagnanam and Justice Chaitali Chatterjee Das has now ordered the implementation of the scheme. The bench noted that neither the Centre nor the State had taken any action against those involved in the alleged corruption, which had delayed the scheme's implementation in Bengal."The Centre has sufficient power. The Centre will start this scheme not only in four districts but across the entire state from August 1. The Centre may impose any conditions or restrictions it deems necessary, so that the corruption which occurred previously is not repeated," the court High Court's order followed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that claimed the poor were being denied their legitimate entitlement under the Act, which guarantees 100 days of employment per year to rural households. BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari had also filed a case in this regard, which was subsequently merged with the to the order, Trinamool leader Kunal Ghosh said, "The state government will respond to this development in detail... But we want to say that today's order vindicated our stance and our fight for the central funds. The central government was blocking Bengal's funds illegally and in a discriminatory manner.""Such discrimination should not happen in the country. They pointed fingers at Bengal, but the Gujarat minister's son was involved in the MGNREGA scam, and fake job cards were found in Uttar Pradesh..." Ghosh Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was enacted in 2005 and came into force on February 2, 2006, initially covering 200 districts. It was later expanded to include all rural districts across scheme guarantees 100 days of wage employment per year to rural households, aiming to enhance livelihood security, reduce poverty, and create durable rural assets, while promoting inclusive development through unskilled manual work on public Watch
