logo
Trump's pivot on Ukraine still leaves the onus on Europe

Trump's pivot on Ukraine still leaves the onus on Europe

AllAfrica5 days ago
Everything that President Donald Trump says is unreliable, simply because he says so much and because he has succeeded in politics by making image and sensation his priority, rather than substance.
So if we want to decide how seriously to take his sudden reversal of position on helping Ukraine, the right people to listen to are the Ukrainians themselves and their opponents, the Russians. Neither has shown signs that they consider this American reversal to be truly game-changing.
President Volodymr Zelensky, of course, welcomed Trump's new promises to supply more weapons and missile-defense systems, contradicting a decision by the US Department of Defense just a week earlier, but Zelensky also promptly got on the phone to European leaders asking them to supply more weapons too, and urgently.
If you are fighting a war for national survival, the only weapons that truly count are the ones that actually arrive in the hands of your soldiers.
Until that happens, and with still no clear information about when American weapons will arrive, Trump's promise has some value in terms of the message it sends to Ukraine's invader, Vladimir Putin, but that value is strictly temporary until new things are said in the White House, and it saves no lives directly.
On his side, Putin has continued his army's 'summer offensive' to try to seize more Ukrainian territory, has continued to bombard Ukrainian cities, and has stuck to the uncompromising list of conditions he says he requires before any serious ceasefire talks can occur.
In fact, in one important sense, Trump's announcement may have even relaxed the pressure on Putin to stop the fighting. While the decision to resume weapons deliveries was obviously important, an equally important decision may have been the one to set a 50-day deadline before any new economic sanctions will be imposed on Russia by the United States.
This gives Putin an incentive to try to achieve as much as he can on the battlefield between now and mid-September, at which point he will most likely try to resume talks with the United States so as to persuade Trump to delay the sanctions deadline even further.
This really is as perfect a situation as Putin could have hoped for, short of a complete alignment by America with his war aims. The summer offensive is not going well for Russia, but there is still time for progress to be made.
Unless nearby European countries choose to send weapons and missile-defense systems immediately, Ukraine's military will remain at a disadvantage, valiant and innovative though it certainly is.
Under the scenario now laid out for him by Trump, Putin does not really need to think hard about the future of his war until after the summer. By that time, Putin will be thinking, Trump may have changed his mind and his message multiple times.
And Putin may well have seen recent political arguments taking place inside Ukraine about President Zelensky's cabinet reshuffle and claims about corruption as being encouraging signs that the Ukrainian government is itself becoming vulnerable to political pressure and criticism.
For these reasons, Trump's latest change of mind still leaves the true initiative in the hands of European governments. His decision to resume weapons deliveries is predicated on those weapons being paid for by European countries, so if weapons are to arrive soon those payments had better be agreed upon and made soon.
Moreover, all talks about those purchases will take place against the background of the European Union's negotiations with the United States over trade tariffs, which risks handing more bargaining power to the Americans for as long as those talks continue.
This may mean until the recently announced deadline of August 1, or it may mean the date hinted at by the US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent of September 1.
That highly contentious background could complicate the process of getting purchases agreed and weapons delivered. After all, the EU trade negotiators have this week been briefing the media about how they are preparing retaliatory tariffs and controls on US services exports to the EU, which mainly means by the big technology platforms, if the Americans stick to Trump's latest threat of a 30% tariff on EU goods.
A transatlantic trade war would not be a happy or helpful scenario against which to carry out the urgent task of helping Ukraine withstand the real war inflicted on it by Russia.
Above all, the four European countries leading Europe's defense efforts —Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Poland —must maintain a strict focus on Ukraine's daily needs and not become complacent by Trump's apparent reversal on US weapons deliveries. The countries with the weapons stocks and production lines that are best able to help Ukraine emerge from the summer feeling strong are these European ones.
In the long term, Europe wants to buy defense equipment and materials mainly from European producers rather than from the United States. That need not preclude purchases from America in the short term, if supplies are available, but it does mean that the sooner that long-term orders can be placed with European suppliers to allow them to invest and plan ahead, the better.
It also means that Ukraine's now large, innovative and highly cost-competitive defense industry promises to become a big future asset for Europe, making the protection of it from Russian attacks even more important.
In the tense atmosphere of this fourth summer of Russia's war in Ukraine, risks are going to have to be taken by those leading European governments in order to prevent a worsening of the security situation for the whole of Europe.
Trump's reversal could offer some reassurance that weapons will be available from America in future months and in 2026, making it easier for Europeans to hand over their own critical missile-defense systems to Ukraine in the coming weeks and, ideally, the long-range missiles that the Ukrainians need to hurt and deter Russia.
The time for worrying about escalating the conflict with Russia has long passed. President Putin is the one who has been doing the escalation. If Ukraine and the rest of Europe are to deter him and even push him back, the Europeans will have to send some clear messages of their own, not in words but in actions.
Formerly editor-in-chief of The Economist, Bill Emmott is currently chairman of the Japan Society of the UK, the International Institute for Strategic Studies and the International Trade Institute.
This is the English original of an article published in Italian by La Stampa and in English on the Substack Bill Emmott's Global View. It is republished here with kind permission.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US-India trade talks seen unlikely to produce deal by August 1 deadline
US-India trade talks seen unlikely to produce deal by August 1 deadline

South China Morning Post

time2 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

US-India trade talks seen unlikely to produce deal by August 1 deadline

Months of intense negotiations appear unlikely to produce a trade deal between the US and India before the August 1 deadline, despite US President Donald Trump having teased one for months as 'coming soon', according to three people familiar with the situation. One person described the current state of discussions as a 'total mess' behind the scenes as Trump and his trade representative, Jameison Greer, continue to push for a pact that would secure greater market access for American produce, dairy, and poultry in India. 'Despite bullish comments by India's trade minister, securing a deal by August 1 seems nearly impossible', said Rick Rossow, chair in US-India Policy Studies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank. He said that while 'negotiations seemed to move pretty fast in the early days', the closing stages are 'always the most difficult'. Indian Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh on Thursday told the Indian Parliament that negotiations with the US were 'active' and revolved around 'enhanced mutual market access, reduction of tariffs and non-tariff barriers and closer integration of supply chains'. Rajesh Agarwal, India's chief negotiator and Commerce Department special secretary, was in Washington last week for trade talks but the July 14-17 negotiation ended without any announcement.

Trump's Arctic strategy stirs debate over China's polar shipping ambitions
Trump's Arctic strategy stirs debate over China's polar shipping ambitions

South China Morning Post

time7 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Trump's Arctic strategy stirs debate over China's polar shipping ambitions

, particularly by developing shipping routes. As US President Donald Trump reiterates his desire to acquire Greenland – part of a broader push to assert influence in the Arctic – Chinese scholars are debating whether the world's second-largest economy should become more involved in the regionparticularly by developing shipping routes. The Northern Sea Route (NSR) – the shortest passage between the Asia-Pacific region and western Eurasia – has drawn growing attention as global warming makes its icy waters navigable for longer periods each year. Trump, who has pledged to buy or annex Greenland, views the Arctic as vital to advancing US commercial and strategic interests – from securing natural resources to countering Chinese and Russian influence. His ambition, outlined in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed into law on July 4, allocates nearly US$9 billion for icebreakers – a 'historic investment in US Arctic security' aimed at putting 'America back in charge of the frozen frontier', according to the White House. As Washington increases its focus on the region, China – a 'Near-Arctic State' and observer of the Arctic Council – must seize new shipping opportunities, according to Zhang Cheng and Su Anqi, scholars at Wuhan University. 'Arctic shipping routes offer advantages in terms of cost and efficiency over traditional routes, making them a potential new pathway to counter US geopolitical containment,' they wrote in the June issue of China Review.

Weak hands at the helm, from Tokyo to Kiev
Weak hands at the helm, from Tokyo to Kiev

AllAfrica

time10 hours ago

  • AllAfrica

Weak hands at the helm, from Tokyo to Kiev

Subscribe now with a one-month trial for only $1, then enjoy the first year at an exclusive rate of just $99. Japanese politics enters uncharted territory Scott Foster reports on the crushing electoral defeat for Japan's ruling LDP-led coalition in recent Upper House elections. Voter dissatisfaction with inflation, taxes, and immigration fueled a sharp rise for populist challengers, signaling a shift in Japan's political landscape. From Brussels to Berlin, Trump sees an EU ripe to squeeze Diego Faßnacht argues that Germany's much-publicized €631 billion corporate investment pledge is more political theater than economic transformation. Washington, meanwhile, plans sweeping tariffs on European imports, confident that Germany will bear the brunt. Low expectations in Istanbul as Ukraine war grinds on James Davis observes that talks between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul yielded little optimism, while Zelensky's controversial move to bring Ukraine's anti-corruption agency under presidential control has sparked protests and speculation about his political future.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store