PM Modi pays tributes to Jawaharlal Nehru on his 61st death anniversary
PM Modi pays tributes to former PM Jawaharlal Nehru on his 61st death anniversary.
In a post on X, PM Modi said, 'Tributes to our former PM, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru on his death anniversary.'
Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, also paid tribute to India's first Prime Minister.
In a post on X, Gandhi remembered Nehru's "visionary leadership" in laying a strong foundation for independent India.
"Respectful tribute to the first Prime Minister of India, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru ji on his death anniversary. With the dream of a strong and inclusive India, Nehruji laid a strong foundation for independent India with his visionary leadership. His contribution in the establishment of social justice, modernity, education, constitution and democracy is invaluable. The legacy of Jawahar of India and his ideals will always guide us," Rahul Gandhi said.
Earlier today, Congress Parliamentary Party Chairperson Sonia Gandhi paid floral tribute to Jawaharlal Nehru at his memorial, Shanti Van, in Delhi.
His contribution in the establishment of social justice, modernity, education, constitution and democracy is invaluable.
Jawaharlal Nehru was a prominent freedom fighter who played a crucial role in India's struggle for independence. After the country gained freedom in 1947, he became India's first Prime Minister, a position he held for over 16 years until his death from a heart attack on May 27, 1964. Following his passing, Lal Bahadur Shastri succeeded him as the second Prime Minister.
Nehru was instrumental in shaping India's foreign policy and is regarded as a founding figure of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), which aimed to keep newly independent nations out of the Cold War blocs.
Key Takeaways Nehru was a pivotal figure in India's independence and the first Prime Minister for over 16 years.
His legacy includes significant contributions to education, social justice, and foreign policy.
Nehru's birthday is celebrated as Children's Day in India, reflecting his affection for youth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran's Khamenei calls US nuclear proposal against national interest
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Wednesday a US proposal for a nuclear agreement was against the national interest, amid sharp differences over whether Tehran can continue to enrich uranium. The longtime foes have held five rounds of talks since April to thrash out a new accord to replace the deal with major powers that US President Donald Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. On Saturday, Iran said it had received "elements" of the US proposal through Omani mediators, the details of which have not been publicly disclosed. "The proposal presented by the Americans is 100 percent against" notions of independence and self-reliance, Khamenei said in a televised speech, invoking ideals of the 1979 Islamic revolution. "Independence means not waiting for the green light from America and the likes of America." Iran's enrichment of uranium has emerged as a major point of contention. Trump said on Monday his administration would not allow "any" enrichment, despite Tehran's insistence it is its right under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Khamenei said enrichment is "key" to Iran's nuclear programme and that the United States "cannot have a say" on the issue. "If we have 100 nuclear power plants but don't have enrichment, they will be of no use to us," because "nuclear power plants need fuel" to operate, he said. "If we cannot produce this fuel domestically, we have to reach out to the United States, which may have dozens of conditions." The New York Times reported Tuesday that the US proposal includes "an arrangement that would allow Iran to continue enriching uranium at low levels" as the US and other countries "work out a more detailed plan intended to block Iran's path to a nuclear weapon". It said the proposal would see the United States facilitating "the building of nuclear power plants for Iran and negotiate the construction of enrichment facilities managed by a consortium of regional countries". Iran has previously said it is open to temporary limits on its enrichment of uranium, and is willing to consider the establishment of a regional nuclear fuel consortium. But it has stressed that such a consortium is "in no way intended to replace Iran's own uranium enrichment programme". Iran's chief negotiator, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, said in a Wednesday post on X: No enrichment, no deal. No nuclear weapons, we have a deal." On Monday, Araghchi held talks in Cairo with Rafael Grossi, head of the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. In its latest quarterly report last week, the IAEA said Iran had further stepped up its production of highly enriched uranium. In a separate report, it also criticised "less than satisfactory" cooperation from Tehran, particularly in explaining past cases of nuclear material found at undeclared sites. Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 percent, far above the 3.67-percent limit set in the 2015 deal but still short of the 90 percent threshold needed for a nuclear warhead. The reports came ahead of a planned IAEA Board of Governors meeting in Vienna later this month which will review Iran's nuclear activities. Washington and other Western governments have continued to accuse Iran of seeking a nuclear weapons capability. Iran insists its programme is for peaceful purposes only. The 2015 deal provided Iran with relief from international sanctions in return for UN-monitored restrictions on its nuclear activities. Trump reimposed US sanctions when he quit the agreement in 2018 and has since tightened them with secondary sanctions against third parties who violate them. Britain, France and Germany, the three European countries who were party to the 2015 deal, are currently weighing whether to trigger the sanctions "snapback" mechanism in the accord. The mechanism would reinstate UN sanctions in response to Iranian non-compliance -- an option that expires in October. Iran has criticised the IAEA report as unbalanced, saying it relied on "forged documents" provided by its arch foe Israel.
Hans India
32 minutes ago
- Hans India
Ukraine's drone strike should alarm the U.S.—Here's why
Ukraine's recent drone attack that damaged up to 40 Russian military aircraft has sent a powerful message—not just to Moscow, but also to Washington. The success of this low-cost, high-impact strike should prompt urgent reflection on America's own vulnerabilities. Details remain scarce, but Kyiv reportedly launched dozens of inexpensive drones that penetrated Russian airspace, striking strategic bombers parked openly on military runways. The operation demonstrated not only Ukraine's ingenuity but also a frightening truth: advanced and costly military assets can be crippled by cheap, commercially modified drones. Military expert Fred Kagan posed a chilling question this week: 'What if those had been B-2 bombers targeted by Iranian drones launched from hidden containers—or worse, Chinese drones?' The U.S. bomber fleet today is much smaller than during the Cold War and concentrated at just a few bases. Publicly available satellite imagery shows B-52s lined up vulnerably at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana, a tempting target for adversaries. Meanwhile, China is rapidly widening its edge in the drone market. According to Rep. Pat Harrigan of North Carolina, China's drone output reached $29.4 billion in 2024—four times that of the U.S.—with significantly lower unit costs. The lesson from Ukraine's daring strike is stark: The U.S. must rethink its defense posture. In an age of asymmetric warfare, the most dangerous threats may come not from billion-dollar missiles, but from drones that cost a fraction of the price—and still devastate critical assets.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
No question of review of satcom spectrum recommendation based COAI's reax: TRAI sources
New Delhi, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India ( TRAI ) on Wednesday categorically ruled out any review of recommendations on satcom spectrum at this stage, based on industry body COAI 's claims. Sources in TRAI told PTI that the regulator has already given its recommendations to the government "after following the due consultation process exhaustively and transparently". All stakeholders were given adequate opportunity to represent their viewpoint during the consultation process, they said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo There is no question of review of the recommendations at this stage based on reactions of the Cellular Operators' Association of India (COAI), TRAI sources said. The comments assume significance as COAI - whose members include Reliance Jio and Airtel - has approached the telecom department to raise concerns over TRAI recommendations on the satcom spectrum, claiming that "incorrect assumptions" have led to unjustifiably low spectrum charges for satellite services relative to terrestrial networks . Live Events In a letter dated May 29, COAI claimed that TRAI's recommendations are based on incorrect assumptions and that their implementation will hit the sustainability of terrestrial services, which form the foundation of India's digital infrastructure. COAI has urged the Department of Telecom (DoT) to form a committee to "undertake a comprehensive review of the recommendations in their entirety, ensuring the process is guided by principles of fairness, transparency, and equity and also give an opportunity to TSPs (telcos) to share their views regarding the same". The industry body argued that the recommendations provide a regulatory advantage to commercial Non-Geostationary Orbit (NGSO) satellites against terrestrial broadband service providers and, if accepted by the DoT in their present form, will undermine competition and create a non-level playing field. COAI said that TRAI's recommendations do not appear to address the most fundamental and contentious issue -- the lack of a level-playing field between terrestrial service providers and satellite operators serving the same market. "The said recommendations are based on incorrect assumptions and implementation of these recommendations will impact the sustainability of terrestrial services that form the foundation of India's digital infrastructure," the association had said. The telecom regulator last month suggested that satellite communication companies like Starlink pay four per cent of their adjusted gross revenue (AGR) as spectrum charges to the government. Operators offering satellite-based broadband internet services in urban areas would have to shell out an additional Rs 500 per subscriber annually. No additional levy would be applicable for services in rural areas. COAI also argued that the recommendation of a spectrum charge at four per cent of AGR is without justification. "It is well known and TRAI would surely be fully aware that with the advent of next-generation NGSO broadband services -- including low Earth orbit (LEO) and medium Earth orbit (MEO) constellations -- satellite services are now capable of directly substituting and competing with terrestrial fixed and mobile broadband networks," COAI said. PTI
