
Trump boxes in Fed with extreme rate cut calls
Presidential tirades aside, there is a strong case to be made that the fed funds rate should be lower than its current 4.25-4.50% target range. The labor market is beginning to show signs of cracking, 'hard' economic data is softening, and a tariff-led slowdown may be in the offing.
On the other hand, economic growth is clocking in at an annualized pace of around 2.5% and not expected to dip much below 2% next year, unemployment is still historically low, the stock market is at a record peak, and other financial assets like bitcoin have also never been higher. And, crucially, core inflation is still almost a percentage point above the Fed's 2% target, suggesting that we may be starting to see the inflationary impact of tariffs.
By those measures, policy may be too loose, not too tight.
Indeed, Jason Thomas, head of global research and investment strategy at Carlyle, reckons financial conditions are "unusually accommodative", and argues that had the Fed not said in December that policy was 'restrictive', there would be no need to explain why it hadn't cut rates six months later.
The president clearly does not agree. Trump is clamoring for borrowing costs to be slashed by 300 basis points. That would take the policy rate closer to 1%, a level usually associated with severe financial market stress, strong disinflationary pressures or a deep economic funk. Or all three.
One would be hard-pressed to find many experts who would agree with Trump's call, even those who fall on the dovish side.
But then where should rates be?
Policymakers typically use forward-looking models and frameworks to inform their decisions. The most famous of these, so-called 'R-Star', comes in for a lot of criticism, as it is theoretical, referring to the inflation-adjusted long-term neutral interest rate that neither accelerates nor slows growth when inflation is at target. This may be a fuzzy concept, but officials look at it, so investors cannot dismiss it completely.
There are two benchmark 'R-Star' models, both partly created by New York Fed President John Williams. One currently puts this rate at around 0.80% and the other around 1.35%. If inflation were at the Fed's target 2%, then these models would put the nominal fed funds rate at around 2.80% or 3.35%, respectively. Fed policymakers split the difference in their latest median projections, putting the long-term nominal Fed funds rate right at 3.00%.
If these estimates are anywhere close to accurate, the nominal policy target range of 4.25-4.50% now appears to be restrictive, so the path ahead is lower.
Rates traders and investors seem to agree. While the latest CPI report has caused jitters at the long end of the yield curve, rates markets are still pricing in more than 100 basis points of easing over the next 18 months.
But this has helped fuel the asset price rally, which, ironically, strengthens the argument that policy may be closer to neutral than models suggest.
Powell may have backed the Fed into a corner by maintaining that policy is still restrictive, albeit "modestly" so.
These claims signal the Fed will lower rates, but it has not done so, as it is waiting to see if Trump's protectionist trade agenda unleashes inflation. Moreover, it also does not want to appear to be responding to political pressure to cut rates.
"Some will say this collision was unavoidable. But the Fed would find itself in a far more defensible position had it embraced a posture of neutrality, pledging to cut or hike as warranted by future developments (including policy shifts)," Carlyle's Thomas wrote on Tuesday.
In short, the Fed is in a bit of a bind, and Trump's attacks will only make it worse. His call for 300 basis points of rate cuts may end up being similar to his 'reciprocal tariff' gambit: aim extremely high, settle for something less, and claim victory.
The problem, of course, is that monetary policy is not supposed to be a negotiation.
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
13 minutes ago
- Reuters
Barclays profit up 23% as Trump tariff turmoil lifts trading
LONDON, July 29 (Reuters) - Barclays (BARC.L), opens new tab first-half profit rose by a better-than-expected 23%, the British bank said on Tuesday, with its markets business reaping bumper returns from the frenzied trading activity sparked by U.S. President Donald Trump's trade tariffs. Pretax profit for the January-June period totalled 5.2 billion pounds ($6.94 billion), above analysts' average forecast of 4.96 billion pounds. The bank also announced a share buyback of 1 billion pounds and a half year dividend of 3 pence per share, equating to 1.4 billion pounds of total capital distributions to shareholders, up 21% from the year before. The earnings update from the Britain and U.S.-focused lender showed continued progress in its strategy to cut costs and prioritise spending on its domestic, retail and corporate focused unit above its investment bank. "We remain on track to achieve the objectives of our three-year plan, delivering structurally higher and more stable returns for our investors," CEO C. S. Venkatakrishnan said in the statement. The lender's investment bank nonetheless followed Wall Street peers in reporting a robust second quarter, as market turmoil led to increased trading activity in fixed income products and stocks in particular. Second-quarter income in the investment bank was 3.3 billion pounds, better than the 3 billion pounds forecast by analysts, thanks to strong gains in those trading businesses that offset a decline in fees from advising on deals. ($1 = 0.7492 pounds)


Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
In a generation, we went from begging for immigrants to begging our leaders to keep them out. Here's the TRUTH about why the Left and Right are finally saying enough is enough - and it has nothing to do with race: PVO
There was a time, not all that long ago, when Australia couldn't open the gates wide enough to let more migrants in. Skilled migrants were needed and international students were welcomed with open arms. Why? Birth rates were down, economic growth was flat, and politicians of all stripes embraced immigration as an economic necessity.


Reuters
13 minutes ago
- Reuters
Sika first half results hit by dollar weakness
ZURICH July 29 (Reuters) - Sika (SIKA.S), opens new tab gave a more cautious full-year sales guidance on Tuesday after a weaker dollar weighed on the Swiss construction chemical maker's first-half sales and profit. The company, which makes products used to strengthen and waterproof walls and floors, became the latest firm to flag the dollar's impact on results, following Nordic industrial companies earlier this month. The dollar lost value during the first half of the year on concerns about U.S. debt and President Donald Trump's unpredictable trade policies, creating problems for companies such as Sika, which counts the United States as its biggest market. "The weaker U.S. dollar, which lost 10% against the Swiss franc in the second quarter, as well as ongoing uncertainties in global markets, had an impact on the results," Sika said. The company, whose additives were used in projects including the Gordie Howe International Bridge between the United States and Canada, now expects only a "modest" sales increase in local currencies. Previously, Sika had guided for an increase of 3-6%. During the first six months of 2025, Sika suffered a foreign currency effect of minus 4.3%, which turned local currency growth of 1.6% into a 2.7% decline when converted back into Swiss francs, the company's reporting currency. Total sales of 5.68 billion Swiss francs ($7.1 billion) in the six months to June 30 fell short of analyst forecasts of 5.72 billion francs, according to a consensus compiled by Vara. The company's core operating profit (EBITDA) fell to 1.07 billion Swiss francs, missing analysts' forecast of 1.09 billion francs. Its shares were indicated 3.4% lower in premarket activity in Zurich. Sika's results offer insight into the health of the broader construction industry, with its chemical additives being used in infrastructure projects such as the Daimer Basha dam in Pakistan. Its local currency growth of 1.6% was better than the 1.5% decline in the market overall, with Sika saying it expects to continue to grow faster than the market in 2025. "In a challenging market environment, we once again outpaced the industry trend and continued to gain market share," Chief Executive Thomas Hasler said. The company also kept its full-year profit guidance to increase core operating profit faster than local sales growth and achieve a profit margin of 19.5% to 19.8%. ($1 = 0.8026 Swiss francs)