logo
Beard Stubble: Style Statement or Pathogen Paradise?

Beard Stubble: Style Statement or Pathogen Paradise?

Medscape22-07-2025
Human skin harbours billions of microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Facial hair represents a unique microbiological environment. Beards maintain ideal temperature, moisture, pH, and nutrient levels to support a dense and diverse microbial population. Sebum, food debris, and dirt can accumulate on hair, further promoting microbial growth.
Frequent touching of the beard, often with the hands, can spread germs from the environment.
Research over the past 50 years has shown that bacteria and toxins can persist in beards even after washing. This has led to concerns that beards may harbour bacteria, which could increase the risk for infection.
Healthcare Context
In healthcare, beards remain a topic of debate, particularly regarding the spread of hospital-acquired infections. Studies have shown mixed results; some have found higher overall bacterial counts on the faces of bearded healthcare workers than on those of their clean-shaven peers, while others have reported no significant difference.
One study comparing hygiene levels in human and dog MRI scans found that men's beards carried a higher microbiological load than canine fur, including potentially harmful bacteria. Interestingly, the same study also showed that bearded doctors were less likely to carry Staphylococcus aureus, a key cause of hospital-acquired infections, than clean-shaven doctors. In addition, patients treated by bearded surgeons did not have higher rates of postoperative infection.
Skin Infections
Beards can spread skin infections, such as impetigo, a contagious condition typically caused by S aureus, which can colonise facial hair. In rare cases, parasites such as pubic lice (Pthirus pubis) have been found in beards, eyelashes, or eyebrows, particularly in situations involving poor hygiene or close contact with an infected person.
Beard Care
Neglected or poorly maintained beards can cause skin irritation, inflammation, and infections. The underlying skin is sensitive, as it contains many blood vessels, nerves, and immune cells, and can be easily affected by oil, dead skin, and environmental factors. Experts recommend daily cleansing of the face and beard to effectively remove dirt, allergens, and microbes. Dermatologists also advise regular moisturisation, using a beard comb to clear out impurities, and trimming to manage stray hairs and support healthy growth.
The hygiene of a beard largely depends on how well it is cared for; when cleaned daily, it does not pose a significant risk.
This story was translated from Univadis Germany.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Social Media Reveals IBS Woes Missed by Clinics
Social Media Reveals IBS Woes Missed by Clinics

Medscape

time17 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Social Media Reveals IBS Woes Missed by Clinics

TOPLINE: An analysis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-related posts on X reveals discussions spanning symptoms, dietary triggers, peer support, and mental health — suggesting that traditional healthcare settings may not fully meet patients' needs and underscoring the value of integrating social media insights into IBS care models. METHODOLOGY: Social media platforms like X are frequentlly used to share health experiences and provide patient-generated insights. Researchers analyzed 12,345 IBS-related posts on X (April 2006-August 2024), using search terms capable of capturing user experiences and concerns. The dataset was processed to retain relevant information from texts and emojis. Posts with fewer than three words were removed. Sentiment analysis (score range, -1 to +1) was applied to 8864 posts, which were classified as positive, neutral, or negative. Topic modeling was applied to 2532 posts with ≥ 50 words to identify core subjects and themes. TAKEAWAY: Sentiment was primarily neutral (45.9%), followed by positive (35.4%) and negative (18.7%), suggesting that users often shared advice or information rather than strong emotions. Sentiment remained relatively consistent over time, with fluctuations linked to major IBS-related milestones (eg, new diagnostic criteria, high-profile publications, awareness campaigns). Main post themes included physical symptoms (15.6%), diet/triggers (15.1%), social support (14.2%), comorbidities (12.2%), research and treatment (12.2%), quality of life (12.0%), awareness (11.5%), and mental health (7.2%). Posts on physical symptoms had the highest proportion of negative sentiment (32.4%), whereas social support post were the most positive (53.7%). Mental health and research/treatment posts were mostly neutral due to their educational or informational nature. Post contributors included self-identified IBS patients (61.3%), healthcare professionals (12.8%), organizations/advocacy groups (10.5%), and general commenters (15.4%). IN PRACTICE: 'Patients turn to social media primarily because of unmet informational needs regarding day-to-day symptom management (evidenced by the prevalence of dietary and trigger discussions) and desires for experiential validation that clinical encounters may not provide (demonstrated by the high engagement with personal narrative content),' the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Ravi Shankar and Alexander Wenjun Yip, Alexandra Hospital in Singapore. It was published online in Scientific Reports. LIMITATIONS: Data were limited to X and may not reflect the entire spectrum of online IBS discussions. Users not active in online discussions — especially older adults or those with limited digital literacy/access — may have been underrepresented. DISCLOSURES: This study did not receive any specific grant funding. The authors declared having no competing interests. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Da Vinci Malfunctions: How Safe Is Robotic Surgery?
Da Vinci Malfunctions: How Safe Is Robotic Surgery?

Medscape

timean hour ago

  • Medscape

Da Vinci Malfunctions: How Safe Is Robotic Surgery?

The da Vinci robotic surgical system, developed by Intuitive Surgical, is the most widely used robot-assisted surgical platform worldwide. This enables surgeons to perform minimally invasive procedures with enhanced precision, flexibility, and control. For the first time, a systematic review and two real-world studies confirmed the safety and effectiveness of the system. These findings establish a new benchmark for the future of robotic surgery worldwide. Over the past two decades, robotic surgery has significantly reshaped surgical care, offering improved precision and less invasiveness than traditional approaches. The da Vinci system currently dominates the global market, with more than 2.6 million procedures performed in 2024. In Italy, da Vinci platforms have been in use for over 25 years and are now installed in more than 200 hospitals, where they have been used to treat hundreds of thousands of patients each year. Despite this widespread adoption, comprehensive safety analyses, particularly regarding the frequency and clinical impact of technical malfunctions, are lacking. This is a key gap, particularly as new robotic platforms are emerging and must be evaluated against current standards. Surgery Comparison The COMPARE study, published in the Annals of Surgery , is the largest comparative analysis to date of robotic, laparoscopic, and open oncologic surgeries. This study reviewed data on 3.9 million procedures from 230 publications across 22 countries. It included 34 randomised controlled trials, 74 prospective studies, and 122 database studies. The procedures examined included seven complex cancer surgeries performed using the da Vinci robotic surgical system between 2010 and 2022: lung lobectomy, total or radical hysterectomy, radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, right colectomy, low anterior resection, and total mesorectal excision and/or intersphincteric resection for rectal cancers. A total of 1,194,559 robotic procedures using the da Vinci system were compared with 1,095,936 laparoscopic and video-assisted thoracoscopic procedures and 1,625,320 open surgeries. The primary outcomes included conversion to open surgery, operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, 30-day postoperative complications, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality rates. Robotic surgery took longer than laparoscopy (mean difference [MD], 17.73 minutes) and open surgery (MD, 40.92 minutes), but this was offset by the key clinical benefits. Hospital stays were shorter than those with laparoscopy (MD, -0.51 days) and open surgery (MD, -1.85 days), and blood loss was significantly lower than that with open surgery (MD, -293.44 mL). Robotic surgery reduced the risk for conversion to open surgery by 56% compared with laparoscopy. The transfusion risk was 21% lower than that of laparoscopy and 75% lower than that of open surgeries. Thirty-day complication rates were 10% and 44% lower than those of laparoscopy and open surgery, respectively. Mortality was reduced by 14% and 46% compared with laparoscopy and open surgery, respectively. Overall, robotic surgery showed improved safety for patients. Few Malfunctions Complications related to technical malfunctions are rare; however, how rare are they? A systematic review published in the World Journal of Urology , led by Nicolò Maria Buffi, MD, and Andrea Piccolini, MD, from the Department of Urology at the IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital and Humanitas University in Milan, Italy, addressed this question. The review included 25 studies published over the past 20 years, covering 3,308,134 robotic procedures and 12,986 malfunctions of the da Vinci surgical system. Malfunction was defined as any unintended failure involving the robotic console, patient cart, instruments, or accessories that disrupted the workflow, required troubleshooting, caused delays, led to conversion, or resulted in patient injury. Malfunctions were classified as device-related (console or cart) or instrument-related (tools). A related study in European Urology , led by Marco Paciotti, MD, from the Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, and the Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, analysed Intuitive Surgical data from 1,835,192 da Vinci X and Xi procedures performed globally in 2022, focusing on system‑generated customer messages, which are alerts generated by the da Vinci system in response to technological problems or incorrect platform use. The meta-analysis reported a malfunction rate of 1%, with device malfunctions in 0.11%, instrument issues in 0.37%, and conversion due to malfunction in 0.09%. Among all the malfunctions, 12.9% led to conversion to open surgery and 7.7% to laparoscopy. Injuries linked to malfunctions were estimated at 0.01%-0.02%, typically minor and mostly due to electrical arcing (193 of 308 cases), causing limited tissue damage or burns. System Reliability Manufacturer data showed that 1,790,244 of the 1,835,192 planned procedures (97.55%) were completed without alerts. Alerts occurred in 44,948 procedures (2.45%), totalling 140,986 events. Of these, 81.18% (114,447 events) resolved without rebooting. Technical support was obtained for 14,231 procedures. Only 1202 procedures (0.07%) were interrupted due to alerts, and 945 cases (0.05%) required conversion. The specific causes of alerts and clinical outcomes were not analysed; therefore, a direct link between alerts and outcomes could not be determined. Setting Standards Buffi emphasised the need for clear benchmarks on the da Vinci system's reliability and malfunctions. 'Over the last 5-6 years, there has been a significant introduction of new robotic systems. Given that the da Vinci system (with which I specify that I have no conflict of interest) has a long history and is considered extremely reliable, I thought it was appropriate to establish benchmarks for the reliability of robotic surgery. This is important because we risk focusing on economics, that is, on the cost of one robotic system compared to another, without considering the advantages and reliability of the machine,' he said to Univadis Italy , a Medscape Network platform. Buffi also highlighted a major gap in the field: 'Currently, there is no true standard for assessing the reliability of robotic systems; only the CE approval process is required.' According to Buffi, the da Vinci platform, particularly the latest models, has proven to be extremely safe. He explained that most issues in robotic surgery are linked to human error rather than flaws in technology. This underscores the crucial need for thorough training and education of healthcare professionals. The key challenge is to effectively evaluate new platforms against current standards and ensure robust quality criteria for new entrants in the market.

U.S. News Announces 2025-2026 Best Hospitals
U.S. News Announces 2025-2026 Best Hospitals

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

U.S. News Announces 2025-2026 Best Hospitals

Latest edition features 504 Best Regional Hospitals across the U.S. WASHINGTON, July 29, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- U.S. News & World Report, the global authority in health care rankings and ratings, today released the 2025-2026 edition of Best Hospitals, the 36th year of this annual study. The 2025-2026 edition of Best Hospitals includes the regional evaluation of hospitals at both a state and metro level. This year, U.S. News recognizes 504 Best Regional Hospitals across 49 states and 95 metro areas that have demonstrated superior outcomes. "For most Americans, health care decisions are made close to home. The Best Regional Hospitals rankings underscore the difference high-performing local medical centers make," said Ben Harder, chief of health analysis and managing editor at U.S. News. Harder added, "These local hospital rankings, entirely performance-driven, equip individuals and their families, in consultation with their medical providers, to choose the highest quality care available in their own communities." 2025-2026 Best Regional Hospitals, Metro Highlights The Best Regional Hospitals for 25 of the most-populous U.S. metropolitan areas are shown below. These hospitals are recognized as No. 1 or tied for No. 1 and are listed alphabetically by metropolitan area. Atlanta: Emory University Hospital, No. 1 out of 10 Best Hospitals near Atlanta Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Hospital, No. 1 out of 4 Best Hospitals near Baltimore Boston: Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, No. 1 (tied) out of 10 Best Hospitals near Boston Chicago: Northwestern Medicine-Northwestern Memorial Hospital and Rush University Medical Center, No. 1 (tied) out of 21 Best Hospitals near Chicago Cleveland: Cleveland Clinic, No. 1 out of 6 Best Hospitals near Cleveland Dallas-Fort Worth: UT Southwestern Medical Center, No. 1 out of 9 Best Hospitals near Dallas-Fort Worth Denver: UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital, No. 1 out of 5 Best Hospitals near Denver Detroit: University of Michigan Health-Ann Arbor, No. 1 out of 11 Best Hospitals near Detroit Houston: Houston Methodist Hospital, No. 1 out of 12 Best Hospitals near Houston Los Angeles: Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and UCLA Medical Center, No. 1 (tied) out of 24 Best Hospitals near Los Angeles Miami-Fort Lauderdale: Cleveland Clinic Weston, No. 1 out of 10 Best Hospitals near Miami-Fort Lauderdale Minneapolis-St. Paul: M Health Fairview University of Minnesota Medical Center, No. 1 out of 9 Best Hospitals near Minneapolis-St. Paul New York: Hackensack University Medical Center at Hackensack Meridian Health, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia and Cornell and NYU Langone Hospitals, No. 1 (tied) out of 25 Best Hospitals near New York Orlando: AdventHealth Orlando, No. 1 out of 3 Best Hospitals near Orlando Philadelphia: Hospitals of the University of Pennsylvania-Penn Presbyterian, No. 1 out of 12 Best Hospitals near Philadelphia Phoenix: Mayo Clinic-Arizona, No. 1 out of 5 Best Hospitals near Phoenix Raleigh-Durham: Duke University Hospital, No. 1 out of 6 Best Hospitals near Raleigh-Durham Riverside-San Bernardino: Loma Linda University Medical Center, No. 1 out of 3 Best Hospitals near Riverside-San Bernardino Sacramento: UC Davis Medical Center, No. 1 out of 7 Best Hospitals near Sacramento San Antonio: Methodist Hospital-San Antonio, No. 1 out of 3 Best Hospitals near San Antonio San Diego: UC San Diego Health-La Jolla, Hillcrest, and East Campus Medical Centers, No. 1 out of 8 Best Hospitals near San Diego San Francisco: UCSF Health-UCSF Medical Center, No. 1 out of 9 Best Hospitals near San Francisco Seattle: Virginia Mason Medical Center, No. 1 out of 10 Best Hospitals near Seattle Tampa-St. Petersburg: Tampa General Hospital, No. 1 out of 7 Best Hospitals near Tampa-St. Petersburg Washington, D.C.: Inova Fairfax Hospital, No. 1 out of 9 Best Hospitals near Washington, D.C. The top-ranked hospitals in each state and major metropolitan area are listed at Twenty hospitals across 13 states are represented on this year's Honor Roll. To determine the Best Hospitals, U.S. News evaluated more than 4,400 hospitals' performance on objective measures such as risk-adjusted mortality rates, preventable complications and level of nursing care. The Best Hospitals Specialty rankings methodology and Procedures & Conditions ratings methodology measure patient outcomes using data from over 800 million records of patient care. This year, among other methodology refinements, U.S. News added ratings in two new cohorts, Heart Arrhythmia and Pacemaker Implantation, to the existing Procedures & Conditions ratings, for a new total of 22 ratings. For those seeking medical care, a hospital recognized by U.S. News with a "Best" designation may be worth considering in consultation with their medical provider. This year's rankings will be published in the U.S. News & World Report's "Best Hospitals 2026 Guidebook" (ISBN 979-8-9864591-5-8), available to order from the U.S. News Online Store. For more information, visit Best Hospitals and use #BestHospitals on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and X. About U.S. News & World ReportU.S. News & World Report is the global leader for journalism that empowers consumers, citizens, business leaders and policy officials to make confident decisions in all aspects of their lives and communities. A multifaceted media company, U.S. News provides unbiased rankings, independent reporting and analysis, and consumer advice to millions of people on each month. A pillar in Washington for more than 90 years, U.S. News is the trusted home for in-depth and exclusive insights on education, health, politics, the economy, personal finance, travel, automobiles, real estate, careers and consumer products and services. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE U.S. News & World Report, L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store