HC asks Centre to respond to AAP's plea seeking relief from rent
The notice was issued in response to a fresh petition in an ongoing case based on the party's challenge to the Centre's decision cancelling the allotment of a suite in the residential-cum-office complex to AAP. The court directed the authorities to file their response within two weeks and posted the matter for July 22.
AAP told the court that the Directorate of Estates, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, cancelled the allotment of a suite on September 14, 2024 and that the party was informed about the decision on January 17 this year. AAP has contended that the decision was made without prior notice, and even after it vacated the office on April 30 this year, it was illegally charged ₹8 lakh as rent.
After AAP's counsel urged the court to stay a reminder notice on June 20 demanding the rent, the Centre's lawyer said the matter was not urgent as only a notice had been issued. The Centre assured the court that it would proceed in line with the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Delhi HC expunges adverse remarks against judge for summoning senior police officials
The Delhi High Court last week expunged the adverse remarks it made in an order against a judicial officer for summoning senior Delhi Police officials in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act case. Justice Amit Bansal, on July 8, expunged parts of a judgment he had passed in December 2023 after the judicial officer informed the court that the observations made would affect his annual confidential report and cause prejudice to him. Justice Bansal also took into account that the Supreme Court had earlier observed that courts should show restraint in making adverse comments on the conduct and calibre of judicial officers in a judgment, as such comments prejudice their careers. On December 22, 2023, Justice Bansal had set aside an order of a special NDPS judge who had issued a warrant against a deputy commissioner of police and sought his presence 'for not making sincere efforts' in expeditiously receiving a Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report in a case. The NDPS judge had also ordered the presence of the investigating officer, the station house officer (SHO), the assistant commissioner of police (ACP), and the DCP. While quashing the NDPS judge's order, Justice Bansal had observed, 'It is unfathomable that despite a detailed judgment having been passed, similar orders are continued to being passed by the same judge. In my considered view, this appears to be a complete breach of judicial discipline that a sessions judge continues to pass orders in the teeth of a detailed judgment passed by this court, expunging/deleting adverse remarks made by him against senior police officials.' This observation now stands expunged from the order. Justice Bansal had also observed, 'As noted above, the same judge has been repeatedly passing orders that are in teeth of a detailed judgment by a Coordinate Bench. Hence, it is deemed appropriate that a copy of this judgment be sent to the Inspection Committee of this Court in respect of the said Judge .' This too stands expunged.
Mint
44 minutes ago
- Mint
Delhi scraps police clearance mandate for hotels, pools and gaming zones — Here's why it matters
The Delhi government has scrapped the mandate to obtain police permission for seven commercial activities, a notification said. In the notification released on June 30, the Delhi government said swimming pools, eating houses, hotels, discotheques, video game parlours, amusement parks and auditoriums will no longer require police permission to run their businesses. According to the notification issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs, the move follows an order dated June 19, 2025 by Delhi Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena. 'The lieutenant governor, exercising powers under Section 28(2) read with Section 4 of the Delhi Police Act, 1978, has withdrawn the earlier sanction granted to the Commissioner of Police, for regulating these business activities under Section 28(1) of the same Act,' it said. The order will affect regulations that had been in place for decades, including those established as early as 1980 for swimming pools and more recent ones from 2023 governing hotels, eating houses and other entertainment establishments. Delhi Police Commissioner Sanjay Arora has issued a formal notification repealing the seven sets of regulations. 'Whereas vide the above said Order, the Commissioner of Police, Delhi has been directed to issue a notification repealing the said regulations with immediate effect,' the notification read. The notification was implemented with immediate effect. Hailing the move, India's former G20 Sherpa Amitabh Kant called it a 'landmark reform'. 'A landmark reform. After 45 years, the Delhi Police will no longer issue licenses for restaurants, hotels, guesthouses, swimming pools, discotheques, amusement parks, video game parlours, and auditoriums,' he said. The powers have been 'rightly withdrawn', Kant said in a post on X. 'These powers, first conferred in 1980, have now rightly been withdrawn. This is a vital step in ease of doing business and promoting trust in enterprise,' he noted. Kant said, 'Less regulation means more growth, more jobs, and a more vibrant city economy.' The former G20 Sherpa urged more such reforms to fully realise the vision of ease of living. 'India must now build on this momentum. We need many more such reforms in States to realise the full promise of PM @narendramodi vision of ease of living. Congrats @LtGovDelhi for driving this reform,' Kant wrote.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Court grants time to arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari to avail legal remedy against order declaring him fugitive
ANI Court grants time to arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari to avail legal remedy against order declaring him fugitive Delhi's Rouse Avenue court on Saturday granted time to Arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari to exhaust statutory legal remedy against the order declaring him a fugitive economic was declared a fugitive economic offender on July 5. The second step is the confiscation of his properties. Special judge Sanjay Jindal granted time to Bhandari's counsel till August 2. Meanwhile, the court adjourned the hearing on the Enforcement Directorate (ED)'s plea seeking confiscation of Sanjay Bhandari's properties. Bhandari's counsel sought time to challenge the order declaring Bhandari a fugitive economic offender. Special Counsel Zoheb Hossain, along with Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Naveen Kumar Matta and Mohd Faizan, appeared for the was submitted that notices have already been served on the application. Three noticees have already filed their Hosain mentioned before the court that there is a list which includes properties to be included in India, Dubai, and the UK, benami property in Noida and Gurugram, a series of bank accounts in his and his wife's name, jewellery and cash, immovable property in India in Vasant Vihar, Panchsheel shopping complex, and property in Shahpur the other hand, counsel for Bhandari sought time on the ground that there is a 30-day time limit to challenge the order before the high court. He prayed to adjourn the time he exhausted his legal remedy against the was also submitted by the counsel that others have an opportunity to make their submissions on the application. "I have a statutory remedy. Let me exhaust my statutory remedy. The properties mentioned are already attached by the ED," the counsel Hossain opposed the submissions by submitting that no adjournment can be sought on the ground of filing an appeal. He said that Bandari's Counsel cannot make submissions on behalf of other notices. On July 5, a Delhi special court declared UK-based arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari a fugitive Economic Offender under the Fugitive Economic Offenders (FEO) Act, in connection with an income tax case involving undisclosed foreign assets. Additional Sessions Judge Sanjeev Aggarwal passed the order following a plea by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), which has alleged that Bhandari had deliberately evaded Indian legal proceedings and possessed foreign assets exceeding Rs 100 crore. The agency emphasised that the UK court's refusal to extradite Bhandari had no bearing on the current proceedings, which are independent and governed by Indian however, contested the ED's plea, arguing that his residence in the UK is lawful and backed by a ruling from the London High Court, which denied his extradition, citing concerns over his safety in Tihar jail. His counsel, senior advocate Maninder Singh, claimed the ED's application was vague, lacked jurisdiction, and failed to meet the legal threshold under the FEO Act. Singh had further argued that the monetary value of the alleged offence did not exceed Rs 100 crore, referencing a 2020 submission by the Income Tax Department. He also pointed out that the UK High Court had discharged Bhandari, and no fresh warrants were pending against him. The UK High Court had earlier blocked Bhandari's extradition on human rights grounds, citing risks of extortion and violence in Indian custody. The Indian government's subsequent attempt to challenge the decision in Britain's Supreme Court was also rejected.
