Daily subject-wise quiz: Polity and Governance MCQs on NITI Aayog, Secretariat of Parliament and more (Week 122)
🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for July 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at manas.srivastava@indianexpress.com🚨
With reference to the Secretariat of Parliament, consider the following statements:
1. Parliament may by law regulate the recruitment and the conditions of service of persons appointed.
2. It is not mentioned in the Constitution of India.
3. There is one combined Secretariat for the Parliament (Both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha).
How many of the statements given above are correct?
(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) All three
(d) None
Explanation
— Article 98 of the Constitution of India provides for the Secretariat of Parliament. Hence, statement 2 is not correct.
— Each House of Parliament shall have a separate secretarial staff. Hence, statement 3 is not correct.
— Provided that nothing in this clause shall be construed as preventing the creation of posts common to both Houses of Parliament.
— Parliament may by law regulate the recruitment and terms of employment of individuals appointed to the secretarial staff of either House of Parliament. Hence, statement 1 is correct.
— Until Parliament makes provision, the President may, after consultation with the Speaker of the House of the People or the Chairman of the Council of States, as the case may be, make rules governing the recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to the secretarial staff of the House of the People or the Council of States, and any such rules shall have effect subject to the provisions of any law enacted under the said clause.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
(Source: Constitution of India)
Which of the following statements about the Lok Sabha are correct?
1. The Lok Sabha is the upper House of the parliament.
2. Lok Sabha is composed of representatives of the people chosen by direct election on the basis of adult suffrage.
3. The first General Elections to the Lok Sabha were held in 1951-1952.
4. The term of the Lok Sabha, unless dissolved, is five years from the date of election.
Select the correct answer using the codes given below:
(a) 1, 2 and 4
(b) 2 and 4 only
(c) 1 and 3 only
(d) 2 and 3 only
Explanation
— As per the provision of Article 79 of Indian Constitution, the House of the People, the Lok Sabha is the lower House of the parliament. Hence, statement 1 is not correct.
— Lok Sabha is composed of representatives of the people chosen by direct election on the basis of the adult suffrage. The maximum strength of the House envisaged by the Constitution is 552. As Per Article 81 of the Constitution, Subject to the provisions of article 331 ,the House of the People shall consist of— Hence, statement 2 is correct.
(a) not more than five hundred and thirty members chosen by direct election from territorial constituencies in the States, and
(b) not more than [twenty members] to represent the Union territories, chosen in such manner as Parliament may by law provide.
— The Lok Sabha (Lower House of the People) was elected for the first time on April 17, 1952, following the first General Elections, which were held from October 25, 1951 to February 21, 1952. The House is currently composed of 543 members. Hence, statement 3 is correct.
— The Lok Sabha's term, unless dissolved, is five years from the date set for its first meeting. However, while a proclamation of emergency is in effect, Parliament may prolong it by legislation for a period of no more than one year at a time, and no more than six months after the proclamation has expired. Hence, statement 4 is not correct.
Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.
(Source: sansad.in)
With reference to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), consider the following statements:
1. It was launched in 200 most backwards rural districts of the country in 2001-02.
2. It was extended to the entire country from the financial year 2008-09.
3. The number of families that worked under the MGNREGS has increased year by year from 2021-22 to 2024-25.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) All three
(d) None
Explanation
— The NITI Aayog is conducting an 'evaluation study' of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), the Government informed Lok Sabha on Tuesday, even as the Ministry of Rural Development has circulated a proposal seeking approval for the scheme's continuation and an outlay for Rs 5.23 lakh crore till 2029-30, a period that coincides with the next Finance Commission (16th) cycle.
About MGNREGS
— The MGNREGS was inaugurated in 200 of the country's most backward rural districts in 2006-07, expanded to a further 130 districts in 2007-08, and will be available throughout the country beginning in 2008-09. Hence, statement 1 is not correct and statement 2 is correct.
— The initiative experienced an increase in demand for work in 2020-21, when a record 7.55 crore rural families took advantage of it following the Covid epidemic. The project served as a safety net for migrants who returned to their villages during the Covid lockdown in 2020.
— However, since then the number of families that worked under the MGNREGS has gradually come down – 7.25 crore in 2021-22, 6.18 crore in 2022-23, 5.99 crore in 2023-24, and 5.79 crore in 2024-25. The scheme has been suspended in West Bengal since March 2022. Hence, statement 3 is not correct.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
With reference to the Adjournment of the House, consider the following statements:
1. An adjournment of the House suspends proceedings for the full day.
2. In Lok Sabha, the leader of the House determines when sitting of House is to adjourn sine die or to a particular day or to an hour or part of same day.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Explanation
— 'Adjournment of the House' implies to suspend (proceedings) for the day; to postpone till a later day. The term 'adjourn' refers to the conduct of a deliberative body, for example, in adjourning a meeting with the aim of reconvening on the next working day or at a later period. Hence, statement 1 is correct.
— In Lok Sabha, the Speaker decides when the House will adjourn sine die or to a specific day, hour, or part of the same day. Hence, statement 2 is not correct.
— When a house adjourns, the session ends and the proceedings are postponed until the next sitting, which is usually the next day or at a later date.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
(Source: sansad.in)
Which of the following articles of the Constitution of India provides for the Vacation of seats in the Parliament?
(a) Article 99
(b) Article 100
(c) Article 101
(d) Article 102
Explanation
— Article 101 of the Constitution of India provides for the Vacation of seats.
— No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.
Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.
(Source: Constitution of India)
Which of the following are NOT objectives/features of NITI Aayog?
1. To evolve a shared vision of national development priorities, sectors, and strategies with the active involvement of States.
2. To foster cooperative federalism through structured support mechanisms with the States on a continuous basis.
3. To develop mechanisms for credible village level planning and incremental aggregation of plans to higher levels of government.
4. To ensure that national security interests are incorporated into economic strategy and policy in areas specifically referred to NITI Aayog.
5. To allocate financial resources directly to the States for programmes and developmental schemes.
Select the correct code:
(a) 3 and 5 only
(b) 3 only
(c) 5 only
(d) 1, 2 and 4 only
Explanation
— NITI Aayog as a Think Tank is developing itself as a state-of-the-art resource centre with the necessary knowledge and skills that will enable it to act with speed, promote research and innovation, provide strategic policy vision for the government, and deal with contingent issues.
Features of NITI Aayog
— To evolve a shared vision of national development priorities, sectors and strategies with the active involvement of States.
— To foster cooperative federalism through structured support initiatives and mechanisms with the States on a continuous basis, recognizing that strong States make a strong nation.
— To develop mechanisms to formulate credible plans at the village level and aggregate these progressively at higher levels of government.
— To ensure, on areas that are specifically referred to it, that the interests of national security are incorporated in economic strategy and policy.
— To pay special attention to the sections of our society that may be at risk of not benefiting adequately from economic progress.
— To design strategic and long-term policy and programme frameworks and initiatives, and monitor their progress and their efficacy.
— To provide advice and encourage partnerships between key stakeholders and national and international like-minded think tanks, as well as educational and policy research institutions.
— To create a knowledge, innovation and entrepreneurial support system through a collaborative community of national and international experts, practitioners and other partners.
— To offer a platform for the resolution of inter-sectoral and inter departmental issues in order to accelerate the implementation of the development agenda.
— To maintain a state-of-the-art resource centre, be a repository of research on good governance and best practices in sustainable and equitable development as well as help their dissemination to stake-holders.
— To actively monitor and evaluate the implementation of programmes and initiatives, including the identification of the needed resources so as to strengthen the probability of success and scope of delivery.
— To focus on technology upgradation and capacity building for implementation of programmes and initiatives.
Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.
(Other Source: niti.gov.in)
Which of the following was not a criterion for being listed as a voter in the electoral rolls prepared for the 1952 general election?
1. Voters had to be Indian citizens residing in their respective newly drawn constituencies, as per the post-independence delimitation exercise.
2. Voters had to be at least 18 years old as of January 1, 1949
3. Voters had to be residents of a village or electoral unit for at least 180 days in the year ending March 31, 1948
Select the correct code:
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 1and 3 only
(c) 2 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3
Explanation
— The confusion on the ground that has marked the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar brings to mind the mammoth task involved in preparing the electoral rolls for the 1952 election.
— In July 1947 itself, the Constituent Assembly had decided to grant voting rights to every citizen aged 21 or older, a bold commitment to universal adult suffrage for a young nation. By March 1948, the Assembly Secretariat issued detailed directions to states for preparing draft electoral rolls. These directions specified eligibility criteria: voters had to be Indian citizens, at least 21 years old as of January 1, 1949, and residents of a village or electoral unit for at least 180 days in the year ending March 31, 1948.
— Since delimitation was yet to be initiated, the rolls were organised village-wise to facilitate later segregation into constituencies once boundaries were defined. Enumerators conducted house-to-house inquiries, using house numbers listed in the 1941 Census and assigned supplementary numbers to new premises.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
With reference to the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, consider the following statements:
1. His appointment by the President of India
2. Special procedure for removal (like a Supreme Court Judge)
3. Salary and expenses Charged (not Voted) to the Consolidated Fund of India
4. Disallowing his holding any other Government office after his term expires
Which of the above given statements ensure the independent and unbiased nature of audit by the CAG?
(a) 1, 2 and 3 only
(b) 2, 3 and 4 only
(c) 1, 2 and 4 only
(d) 1, 2, 3 and 4
Explanation
According to cag.gov.in,
— The Constitution (Articles 148-151) enables the independent and unbiased nature of audit by the CAG by providing for: His appointment by the President of India Special procedure for removal (like a Supreme Court Judge) Salary and expenses Charged (not Voted) to the Consolidated Fund of India Disallowing his holding any other Government office after his term expires.
Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.
Daily Subject-wise quiz — History, Culture, and Social Issues (Week 120)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Polity and Governance (Week 121)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Science and Technology (Week 121)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Economy (Week 121)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Environment and Geography (Week 121)
Daily subject-wise quiz – International Relations (Week 121)
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week.
Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
Manas Srivastava leads the UPSC Essentials section of The Indian Express (digital). He majorly writes on UPSC, other competitive exams and education-related projects. In the past, Manas has represented India at the G-20 Youth Summit in Mexico. He is a former member of the Youth Council, GOI. A two-time topper/gold medallist in History (both in graduation and post-graduation) from Delhi University, he has mentored and taught UPSC aspirants for more than five years. His diverse role in The Indian Express consists of writing, editing, anchoring/ hosting, interviewing experts, and curating and simplifying news for the benefit of students. He hosts the YouTube talk show called 'Art and Culture with Devdutt Pattanaik' and a LIVE series on Instagram and YouTube called 'LIVE with Manas'.His talks on 'How to read a newspaper' focus on newspaper reading as an essential habit for students. His articles and videos aim at finding solutions to the general queries of students and hence he believes in being students' editor, preparing them not just for any exam but helping them to become informed citizens. This is where he makes his teaching profession meet journalism. He is also the editor of UPSC Essentials' monthly magazine for the aspirants. He is a recipient of the Dip Chand Memorial Award, the Lala Ram Mohan Prize and Prof. Papiya Ghosh Memorial Prize for academic excellence. He was also awarded the University's Post-Graduate Scholarship for pursuing M.A. in History where he chose to specialise in Ancient India due to his keen interest in Archaeology. He has also successfully completed a Certificate course on Women's Studies by the Women's Studies Development Centre, DU. As a part of N.S.S in the past, Manas has worked with national and international organisations and has shown keen interest and active participation in Social Service. He has led and been a part of projects involving areas such as gender sensitisation, persons with disability, helping slum dwellers, environment, adopting our heritage programme. He has also presented a case study on 'Psychological stress among students' at ICSQCC- Sri Lanka. As a compere for seminars and other events he likes to keep his orating hobby alive. His interests also lie in International Relations, Governance, Social issues, Essays and poetry. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
6 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
HC gives Delhi govt 10 weeks to act on EWS fee violations
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed the Directorate of Education (DoE) to decide within 10 weeks on a plea seeking action against several private schools for allegedly charging fees from students admitted under the economically weaker section (EWS) and disadvantaged group (DG) quotas. The HC instructed DoE to take appropriate action within 10 weeks of receiving the new representation. (HT Archive) A bench of chief justice DK Upadhyay and justice Tushar Rao Gedela noted that although the petitioner -- the Wazirpur JJ Colony Association -- had earlier submitted a representation to DoE on the issue, the department had not yet acted on it. The court disposed of the petition with a direction for the association to file a fresh, comprehensive representation within four weeks. It also instructed DoE to examine the matter and take appropriate action within 10 weeks of receiving the new representation. 'Having regard to the issue raised, we permit the petitioner to take up the cause of all such students by way of a representation before DoE. The said representation shall be made within a period of four weeks… and a decision shall be taken within 10 weeks from the date of receipt, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the schools concerned,' the court said in its order. The association had alleged in its plea that several private schools in Delhi were violating the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009, by demanding fees from students admitted under the EWS/DG quotas and, in some cases, expelling those unable to pay. Under the RTE Act and Article 21A of the Constitution, children aged 6 to 14 from these categories are entitled to free education up to Class 8. The order comes just two days after Delhi education minister Ashish Sood introduced the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025, in the Assembly. The bill, which aims to regulate fee structures in 1,677 unaided private schools, proposes a three-tier grievance redressal mechanism, parental representation in fee decisions, and penalties of up to ₹10 lakh for violations.
Indian Express
6 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Logjam over SIR: Rijiju says House can't discuss EC's functioning, Congress counters
Parliament saw little legislative business Wednesday as the Opposition attempted to bring up the SIR in Bihar and the government said rules and precedent do not allow for a debate on the Election Commission, which is conducting the exercise. Lok Sabha was adjourned within minutes of its proceedings getting underway. Rajya Sabha proceedings were adjourned until 2 pm soon after it commenced. The RS was later adjourned for the day after the passing of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill by voice vote. Opposition parties have repeatedly sought a discussion during this Parliament session on the SIR exercise. Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, during the second half of LS, told the Opposition that the government is 'very open to take up for discussion any matter'. 'On the issue of SIR which they are disturbing the House (on) from day one, we all know the matter is under the consideration of the Supreme Court and is sub-judice. Under Rule 186 (8), any matter can be discussed in the House only if it does not relate to a matter which is under adjudication by a court of law…' he said. In the past, he said, it had been clearly established in LS that matters 'falling under the domain of the Election Commission cannot be discussed'. 'The House cannot have a discussion on the working of an autonomous body like the Election Commission. Do you want to break the rules established by this House? Do you want to throw out the provisions of the Constitution of India?' he said. Deputy Leader of Congress in LS Gaurav Gogoi said: 'Just to jog the memory of the BJP-led NDA government — Parliament has a long history of discussing electoral reforms and functioning of the EC… There is ample precedent,' he said, citing debates in 1961, 1981 and 1991, among others. Congress MP Manish Tewari said the Rijiju was 'absolutely wrong' and that the House had 'discussed many times' in the past the 'conduct of the Election Commission'. In RS, after ministers laid papers on the table of the House, and an obituary was read out for former J&K governor Satya Pal Malik, Deputy Chairman Harivansh said he would not admit 35 notices received under Rule 267. MPs can seek discussions on urgent matters under Rule 267. '…none of these notices are in adherence to the rules as enunciated in the past…' Harivansh said, sparking protests. Harivansh appealed to members to let the House function during Zero Hour. With the MPs not relenting, the Deputy Chairman adjourned the proceedings till 2 pm. After the House reconvened, members of the Opposition tried to raise a point of order. Bhubaneswar Kalita, who was then chairing Rajya Sabha, said he would allow a point of order only when there was order in the House. He asked all the members to return to their seats. Leader of Opposition in RS Mallikarjun Kharge said: 'When members from this side raise a point of order then you say that the House is not in order. There, they are giving speeches. And, you are allowing them. This is unfair, untenable…' To this, the leader of House J P Nadda said: 'Sir, those who create disorder in the House have no right to raise point of order. If you are so interested, obey the rules accordingly, otherwise the Chair's direction is final.' When Opposition MPs were called to speak on the Bill, they either did not go back to their seats and forfeited their chance, or tried to raise SIR issue. Kalita said nothing would go on record and moved to the next speaker.
Indian Express
6 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Retd SC judge Oka: Did Justice Murlidhar face consequences for decisions during Delhi riots
Noting that dissent by judges while adhering to Constitutional morality comes at a price, retired Supreme Court judge Justice Abhay Oka on Wednesday publicly asked if Justice (retired) S Muralidhar had to 'face consequences' for his 'bold decisions' during the 2020 Delhi riots. At the same event in the capital, themed on morality in judiciary, retired Delhi HC judge Justice Kailash Gambhir drew a contrast between former CJIs D Y Chandrachud and M N Venkatachaliah. He said that while one 'violated' the Constitutional scheme of separation of powers by inviting Prime Minister Narendra Modi for a Ganesh Puja at his residence, the other had refused to meet the then PM, Rajiv Gandhi, when his elevation from the Karnataka HC to SC was underway. Justice Chandrachud had defended himself over the visit last year, saying there was 'absolutely nothing wrong for the simple reason that these are continuing meetings between the judiciary and the executive, even at a social level'. Justice Oka, delivering the keynote address at the event in New Delhi, said: 'Judges are not bound by traditional concepts of morality, they are bound by the oath of the constitution. We talk about dissenting judgements… We talk of Justice HR Khanna… he gave dissenting judgments because he was bound by his oath, not bound by what politicians feel or people in power feel or what the common man feels… One example I can't resist, it pertains to Delhi… a midnight bench was constituted (of Justices S Muralidhar and Anup Bhambhani), some victims of riots were stranded and the bench gave audience at midnight or a little past midnight and not only ensured that they were given safe passage, but also ensured that compliance is reported. We often talk about sacrifices made by the three judges in Kesavananda Bharati, but some day we also have to consider whether the judges who were in the midnight bench during the 2020 Delhi riots) met with consequences of their bold decisions given in the four corners of the Constitution. So when we discuss morality, we have to discuss this also… these judgements were delivered because the judges were not influenced by the opinion of the ruling party.' Justice Muralidhar, who retired in 2023 and is now practising as an advocate, was transferred from the Delhi High Court to the Punjab & Haryana High Court in February 2020 after questioning the Delhi Police's conduct in the riots and directing it to register FIRs against those who made hate speeches. Meanwhile, Justice Gambhir noted recent instances of 'judicial impropriety'. He spoke about Justice Yashwant Varma, at whose residence cash was found, and Justice Shekhar Yadav, who had made communal statements in a public address. He said apart from financial corruption, the judiciary has also been under attack owing to judges' 'temptation for post-retirement jobs'.
