
Entry-level job numbers have 'dropped by a third since ChatGPT was launched'
The number of new entry-level jobs has fallen by nearly a third since ChatGPT was launched in November 2022, it was reported last night.
Openings for apprenticeships, graduate roles, internships and junior roles with no requirement for a degree fell by 31.9 per cent, according to The Times.
Research by jobs search website Adzuna found that entry-level vacancies only make up a quarter of the overall jobs market, which is down by nearly 4 per cent since 2022.
It comes as more companies outline their plans to use AI to reduce their headcount.
BT said in May 2023 that 10,000 jobs would be replaced by artificial intelligence by the end of the decade. The roles impacted include call handling and network diagnostics.
Its chief executive Allison Kirkby has claimed that advances in AI could result in even more job cuts at the company.
Dario Amodei, head of $61billion AI start-up Anthropic, last month warned that the technology could cut half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within five years.
He said this could increase unemployment by between up to 20 per cent.
James Neave, the head of data science at Adzuna, said AI was a major factor in the reduction of entry-level jobs.
'If you can reduce your hiring at the entry level, that's just going to increase your efficiency and improve cost savings,' he said.
Businesses are facing increasing costs including rises in national insurance contributions and the national minimum wage. The number of entry-level roles fell again by 4.2 per cent in May.
Experts predict a 50-50 chance machines could take over all our jobs within a century.
But a poll of 16,000 workers last year found many employees believe AI could do it already.
Nearly half admitted the technology can outperform them in 'routine tasks' – while also paying better attention to detail.
The 'jobs apocalypse' is expected to see admin and entry-level roles first – but will increasingly affect those higher paid as it becomes more sophisticated.
The Future of Work Report by jobs website Indeed found just one in three respondents were confident AI would have a positive impact on their role.
The majority however – nine in ten – felt confident they would be able to adapt to the changes over the next five years.
Workers told how much of their day-to-day responsibilities were already ripe for automation – with three in five saying that AI can carry out data analysis better than humans.
Routine tasks (48%) and attention to detail (45%) were other tasks where workers felt AI had the upper hand.
While repetitive jobs are well-suited to AI, workers said they still felt confident they were better in critical thinking, creativity and emotional intelligence.
Asked which jobs are most likely to be untouched by AI in a decade's time, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Chief Economist, Barret Kupelian said people should look to traditional trades - with roles plumbers, electricians and decorators
He explained: 'It appears to me that jobs that require a quite a lot of manual labour...I don't think the technology is skilled there, in terms of augmenting those skills.'
The PwC spokesman said that roles that require 'a high degree of judgement and creativity' are also unlikely to be able to be automated any time soon because they require 'bespoke skills that are quite difficult to replicate on a digital basis.'
The IMF warned that, even where AI's effects are positive, computer automation is likely to drive wealth inequality.
Highly paid professions will see AI boost their wages while lower paid roles are at a significant risk of pay cuts and lay-offs.
A study by the IMF found that clerical workers such as secretaries and clerks are very likely to be replaced by AI because most of their could be done by machines.
However, it is clerical support workers and technical service roles that are most likely to be replaced by AI.
Professionals and managers, although they are very likely to be impacted by AI, are more likely to be impacted positively.
These findings echo a previous study from the Department for Education which found that white-collar professionals were most likely to be replaced by AI.
The study found that accountants, consultants, and psychologists were among the professions most likely to be pushed aside by computers.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Savers won't benefit from Reeves's pension reforms, Labour's own research suggests
Rachel Reeves's radical pensions overhaul will only 'slightly' benefit savers, Labour's own research suggests. Unearthed government documents show that changes brought in by Pension Schemes Bill will provide just 'slightly greater expected returns', despite the Chancellor's promises to deliver 'bigger pots for savers.' The Bill, which is set to become law next year, proposes giving regulators the ability to force defined contribution schemes to invest in private markets. But in a best case scenario, this will only add £5,000 to an average pension pot after 30 years, Government forecasts show. Experts have repeatedly warned that the Chancellor risks 'sacrificing' people's long-term retirement goals in pursuit of economic growth. Meanwhile, Ms Reeves has claimed that the Bill is a 'game changer' that would deliver bigger returns. Currently, the majority of defined contribution schemes are invested in public markets, such as government and corporate bonds or stocks and shares. The private market, such as start-ups and infrastructure projects, only makes up a small portion of pension fund portfolios. But under Ms Reeves's changes, regulators could be given a reserve power to force schemes to invest in UK private markets. Mike Ambery, of Standard Life, said he did not expect the reserve power to be used, but he questioned why it was added to the Bill in the first place when already positively being actioned. Under the voluntary Mansion House Accord, 17 of the UK's largest defined contribution scheme providers pledged to invest at least 5pc of their assets in UK private markets by 2030. Defined contribution pensions are schemes that savers pay in to to build up a pot of money over time. Tom Selby, of AJ Bell, said: 'Pension schemes should fundamentally be investing to deliver the best possible returns for savers, regardless of where those assets are held.' 'There is a real danger in conflating the Government's increasingly desperate efforts to deliver economic growth with people's long-term retirement goals that the latter will be sacrificed in pursuit of the former. 'Ministers need to be straight with people about the risks inherent in this approach, rather than denying the uncertainty that exists and claiming this is somehow a guaranteed win-win for savers and the UK economy.' The Chancellor has already faced criticism over other parts of the Bill, namely allowing defined benefit pension schemes to transfer surplus funds back into businesses. Firms will be allowed to raid £160bn in defined benefit pension surpluses, loosening existing safeguards that protect pensions from riskier investments. Around 8.8 million savers are members of a defined benefit pension scheme. They provide a guaranteed income for life, typically based on someone's final salary. The majority of defined benefit schemes are now running at a surplus thanks to increased investment returns and higher interest rates. Steve Webb, partner at pension consultants LCP, said: 'The Government's primary objective in changing the way pension funds are invested is to boost the UK economy rather than to boost individual pensions. 'The Government's own projections suggest that even after several decades of the new approach, the impact on individual pension pots is likely to be slight. 'Given that we clearly have an under-saving crisis in the UK, with millions set for a disappointing retirement, there needs to be much greater urgency around measures to get more money flowing into pension savings'. The Department for Work and Pensions was contacted for comment.


The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
How plug-in solar panels could help Britons save 30% on energy bills
Your support helps us to tell the story Read more Support Now From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference. Read more Britons could soon buy cheap solar panels which can be put on balconies, sheds and terraces to cut their energy bills. The plan, using so-called plug-in solar modules which typically cut bills by 30 per cent in countries where they are already used, has been announced by the government as part of a broader plan to step up solar power access. Using balconies for solar panels is already common in Germany, where 1.5 million homes use the technology. Locals have named it Balkonkraftwerk, or balcony power plant. Using solar panels this way is a lot cheaper than installing them on a roof, where scaffolding and hiring specialist workers means that even a modest eight-panel array will cost about £5,000. It will also unlock solar power for many of Britian's 5.4m households which rent. Presently, only homeowners can opt to fit solar panels unless they agree a deal with their landlord. Even then, if they moved, they would lose their panels. The proposed system is portable. This so-called plug-in power plant also means no expensive fitting is required. Instead, the panels are attached to an inverter, which steps up the voltage to the 240v used by your home's mains supply. It is then attached by a regular plug. To avoid electric shock, the inverters detect when they are unplugged and isolate the plug and its exposed electrical pins. open image in gallery Rooftop panels still produce the most ebergy but they are expensive to fit ( Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. ) The government is investigating whether a similar safe system can be deployed in the UK. Unlike a full rooftop solar system, no power can be sold back to the grid with plug-in panels. Instead, the aim is to cut electricity bills during the day from appliances like fridges, freezers and computers used by home workers. The panels also probably won't face upwards for the best power generation, since roofs are still the best for that. But plummeting solar panel prices and climbing prices for having them fitted to a roof mean that balcony panels are now a more attractive option than in previous years. Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero Ed Miliband said solar 'is one of the cheapest and quickest to build power sources we have.' He added: 'We will push ahead on a solar rooftop revolution, while tackling the barriers of planning, grid, supply chains and skills.' In Germany, a pair of 400-watt panels could save €120 to €240 a year in electricity costs, according to consumer website Finanztip, which could be 30 per cent off a smaller flat's usage, according to manufacturer estimates. Panels can last 30 years if looked after well, and the €540 they can cost can be recouped in a few years, depending on usage.


BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
'Very frustrating for Newcastle and Howe so far'
Our chief football writer Phil McNulty has been taking your asked: Why do we (Newcastle United) seem to be struggling to get deals done? Eddie Howe said he wanted business done early but we haven't been able to attract our top targets. It's a little bit of a replied: It has been frustrating as I was at Newcastle on the last day of the season when Eddie Howe said it was imperative business was done quickly. But this has not is not as if they have not been trying, but they have been unable to agree deals and now it looks like Joao Pedro, a prime target, is off to Chelsea.I think this was always a fear behind the scenes at Newcastle, with the attraction of London and extending the ex-Brighton clan of Marc Cucurella, Moises Caicedo and Robert plenty of time to bring in new faces – but there is no escaping the fact it has all been very frustrating for Newcastle and Howe so far.