Are COEs broken? How to fix Singapore's car quota system
In this episode of TransportBT by The Business Times, host Derryn Wong is joined by associate professor Walter Theseira of the Singapore University of Social Sciences. Together, they take a hard look at the logic, politics and pain points behind the COE) system.
If you've ever questioned whether the system still works and who it really works for—this one's worth your time.
Why listen?
Because we need more than hot takes Prof Theseira doesn't just comment on COE headlines. He advised the Land Transport Authority, contributed to international transport studies, and spent years researching Singapore's car ownership model. If anyone can make sense of this, it's him.
Because the Acting Transport Minister's comments stirred real debate From private hire cars to system efficiency, Mr Jeffrey Siow's remarks raised eyebrows. Wong and Prof Theseira dig into what was said, what was really meant, and what the public response tells us.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Because the public isn't just reacting to prices—it's reacting to fairness This episode doesn't shy away from the emotional undertow. The duo examines how public sentiment is shaped by perceived inequality and whether the system can regain trust.
Because big ideas deserve airtime Prof Theseira floats bold suggestions, including phasing out COEs altogether and replacing upfront costs with pay-as-you-drive models. They won't all land, but they're designed to provoke smarter conversations.
Because transport policy affects everyone Whether you drive, ride, rent or wait endlessly for a Grab, this episode helps you understand the trade-offs shaping your daily journey.
TransportBT is a podcast of BT Correspondents by The Business Times. Join Derryn Wong every month as he breaks down the headlines and the policy moves behind them for you. Listen now at bt.sg/podcasts . Got feedback or an idea for a future episode? Drop us a line at btpodcasts@sph.com.sg.
---
Written and hosted by: Derryn Wong (derrynwong@sph.com.sg)
With Walter Theseira, Associate Professor of Economics, Singapore University of Social Sciences
Edited by: Emily Liu & Claressa Monteiro
Produced by: Derryn Wong, Emily Liu & Howie Lim
A podcast by BT Podcasts, The Business Times, SPH Media
Share your thoughts with us at btpodcasts@sph.com.sg .
---
Follow BT Correspondents:
Channel: bt.sg/btcobt
Amazon: bt.sg/btcoam
Apple Podcasts: bt.sg/btcoap
Spotify: bt.sg/btcosp
YouTube Music: bt.sg/btcoyt
Do note: This podcast is meant to provide general information only. SPH Media accepts no liability for loss arising from any reliance on the podcast or use of third party's products and services. Please consult professional advisors for independent advice.
Discover more BT podcast series:
BT Money Hacks at: bt.sg/btmoneyhacks
BT Mark To Market at: bt.sg/btmark2mkt
WealthBT at: bt.sg/btwealthbt
PropertyBT at: bt.sg/btpropertybt
BT Podcasts at: bt.sg/podcasts
BT Market Focus at: bt.sg/btmktfocus
BT Branded Podcasts at: bt.sg/brpod
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Hongkong Land back in the black with H1 underlying profit of US$297 million
[SINGAPORE] Hongkong Land posted an underlying profit of US$297 million for the six months ended Jun 30, reversing from a net loss of US$7 million in the corresponding year-ago period. Excluding the impact of non-cash provisions for its build-to-sell segment in China, H1 underlying profit stood at US$320 million, 11 per cent higher than the US$288 million recorded the year before. In an interview with The Business Times on Tuesday (Jul 29), Hongkong Land's chief financial officer Craig Beattie said market sentiment in Hong Kong has improved significantly in the first six months of this year, led by the huge jump in capital markets activity. Rents in Hong Kong have been on the decline for five years, and that is unlikely to continue, he added. 'The uptick in capital markets activity combined with rents being at a level that many occupiers feel this is a good point to really jump (in)... has meant that we've seen an improvement in inquiries. 'When you start to see some very savvy (and) large financial firms securing their presence in Hong Kong for the long term, I think people sit up and start to realise that maybe this could be the bottom of the market.' A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up Vacancies on a committed basis for the group's portfolio declined to 6.9 per cent as at end-June, compared to 7.1 per cent at the end of 2024. This was also lower than the 11.8 per cent vacancy in Hong Kong's wider Central Grade A office market. In Singapore, the group's office portfolio 'continued to perform well and was effectively fully let', Hongkong Land said. Rental reversions were positive, with average rents increasing to S$11.40 per square foot (psf), compared to S$11.10 psf for the same period in 2024. The group uses underlying profit in its internal financial reporting to distinguish between ongoing business performance and non-trading items, as its management considers this to be a key measure that provides additional information on the group's underlying business performance. Revenue for the first half of 2025 fell to US$751.2 million, down 23 per cent from US$972.4 million year on year as the group winds down its build-to-sell business . Including net non-cash valuation movements, the group recorded US$221 million in profit attributable to shareholders, compared to a loss of US$833 million in H1 2024. Underlying earnings per share for H1 2025 stood at US$0.1351, from an underlying loss per share of US$0.0031 in H1 2024. The board is proposing an interim dividend of US$0.06 per share, unchanged from a year ago. Giving an update on its capital recycling efforts, Hongkong Land said that, as at Jun 30, it has secured 33 per cent of its US$4 billion target. This includes the sale of office floors and retail space in One Exchange Square to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange for US$810 million. 'Capital recycling continues to be prioritised to reduce net debt and increase investment capacity, with a number of significant initiatives currently under way.' On the build-to-sell segment, the group said the outlook is 'expected to remain challenging with weak sales levels across most cities on the Chinese mainland'. 'Stimulus measures have had a limited impact on improving broader market sentiment outside of Tier 1 cities. Profit contribution is likely to be substantially lower in the second half of 2025 due to lower profit margins on completed projects.' The group's Landmark retail space in its Hong Kong Central portfolio will continue to be impacted by renovations in the second half of 2025, although this is expected to be 'partially offset' by scheduled re-openings in the fourth quarter. Asked about the impact of tariff uncertainty on the group, Beattie said that in terms of capital recycling, for strategic transactions where buyers see long-term value, those deals will continue to move forward. 'Given the fact that Hong Kong has been in a difficult place but hopefully (is) now coming out of that… I think a lot of investors are perhaps thinking this could be a time to pivot back into this part of the world.' Speaking on whether Hongkong Land still plans to divest MCL Land, Beattie said the group's Singapore property development arm is 'a very strong business overall'. 'Most of our projects are almost effectively fully sold. Whether there (are) opportunities for a buyer to take over the custodianship of our business... we'll just have to see. There's a number of options that we're looking at (in) the moment.' Shares of Hongkong Land closed 2.1 per cent or US$0.13 higher at US$6.39 on Tuesday, before the H1 results were announced.
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
How to maximise investment returns
[SINGAPORE] The Straits Times Index has been on a winning streak over the past month. As at Jul 24, the benchmark blue-chip index has enjoyed a 14-day streak of unbroken increases, sending the index past its all-time high. For those who invested early, this rally has likely translated into solid capital gains. But the extent of your profits will depend on how your investments are allocated. If a significant portion of your portfolio is parked in stocks and other growth-oriented assets, you're likely to have seen strong returns. On the other hand, having too much cash on the sidelines could have meant missed opportunities. Here's why your asset allocation matters – and how you can make the most of future rallies. Asset allocation determines returns Your portfolio's returns are closely tied to how much of it is invested, versus how much you keep as cash. Let's break this down with a simple comparison. Imagine three investors, each starting with S$100,000. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Investor A invests S$90,000 into an exchange-traded fund (ETF) tracking the STI, and keeps S$10,000 in cash. Investor B invests half (S$50,000) in the ETF, and the other half in cash. Investor C is more conservative, allocating just S$20,000 to the ETF and S$80,000 in cash. Between Apr 9 and Jul 24, the STI surged 25.9 per cent, rebounding strongly from earlier declines due to Trump's tariff announcements. Now, let's assume all three investors stayed invested during this entire period. Despite holding the same ETF, their results would differ significantly due to their asset allocation. Since cash typically earns a negligible 0.05 per cent in annual interest, we'll assume it contributes almost nothing to returns. Here's how the numbers play out: Investor A (90 per cent invested) earns a 23.3 per cent return. Investor B (50 per cent invested) sees a 13 per cent return. Investor C (20 per cent invested) ends up with just 5.2 per cent. This simple example clearly shows how being more fully invested during a market rally can significantly boost your capital gains. Even modestly allocating idle cash can improve outcomes. For instance, if Investor B had placed S$40,000 of his cash into corporate bonds yielding 3 per cent, his overall return would rise to 14.2 per cent, instead of 13 per cent. The bottom line is that being 90 per cent invested can deliver dramatically better returns than staying mostly in cash. Your asset allocation matters – and staying invested is key to capturing upside when markets rally. Pick the right stocks to improve returns Of course, the previous example assumes the investors only held the STI ETF in their portfolios. But how about individual stocks? Take Singapore Technologies Engineering (STE), for example. From Apr 9 to Jul 24 this year, STE's share price surged 40.6 per cent, far outpacing the STI's 25.9 per cent gain over the same period. Good returns are not restricted to blue-chip stocks. Smaller companies can sometimes deliver even more impressive results. One standout is Food Empire, a maker of three-in-one coffee. Its shares nearly doubled during the same timeframe, jumping from S$1.12 to S$2.41. So, if your portfolio included high-performing stocks like STE or Food Empire, your overall returns could have been significantly higher than if you had only invested in the STI ETF. Waiting for the crash Meanwhile, some investors may feel the urge to cash out during a rally, hoping to lock in profits before a potential crash. They plan to sell high now and buy back later when the market drops. It sounds like a smart move on paper – but in practice, it's much harder to pull off. The truth is, you could be waiting a long time for that crash. Bull markets tend to last much longer than bear markets. In fact, according to data from Bespoke Investment Group, the average S&P 500 bull market lasts 1,011 days, while the average bear market lasts only 286 days. That means bull markets typically run about three times longer than bear markets. So, if you're sitting on the sidelines in cash, waiting for the next downturn, you could end up missing out on years of strong gains. That's why it often makes more sense to stay invested, especially if the companies you own continue to deliver healthy growth. While there will be periods when there will be downturns, in the long run, time in the market beats trying to time the market. Don't forget dividends Staying out of the market doesn't just mean missing potential capital gains as share prices climb. It also means forgoing valuable dividend income while you wait on the sidelines. STE is a great example of why that matters. Over the past decade, STE's share price rose 166.1 per cent, climbing from S$3.32 to S$8.86. But that's only part of the story. During the same period, STE also paid out S$1.48 in dividends per share. When you include those dividends, your total return jumps to 210.5 per cent, a significant boost. In terms of annualised performance, STE delivered a 10.3 per cent compound annual growth rate (CAGR) based on share price alone. Add in dividends, and the CAGR rises to 12 per cent. This clearly illustrates how dividends play a powerful role in enhancing your long-term investment returns – not just as a bonus, but also as a meaningful contributor to wealth growth. The importance of keeping some cash Some investors believe it's best to be 100 per cent invested at all times to maximise returns, rather than letting any cash sit idle. But that approach has its drawbacks. First, a fully invested portfolio can experience sharp swings during periods of market volatility. Watching your entire portfolio fluctuate wildly isn't easy; it can lead to emotional, knee-jerk decisions. Second, having some cash on hand gives you the flexibility to act quickly when unexpected opportunities arise, especially during a sudden market downturn. If you're already fully invested when markets crash, you'll be forced to sell other stocks, likely at a loss, just to free up cash. That means selling at exactly the wrong time, when prices are falling. For these reasons, it's wise to keep a portion of your portfolio in cash. This gives you the stability to ride out market volatility and the firepower to seize opportunities when they appear. Get smart: Smart portfolio management is key The secret to building attractive long-term returns may sound simple, but it's incredibly effective. Invest the bulk of your portfolio in strong, growing companies, and hold them for the long haul. Not only will you benefit from capital appreciation over time, you'll also enjoy rising dividends that enhance your total returns. At the same time, it's wise to keep some cash on hand. This gives you the flexibility to scoop up great bargains if the market suddenly takes a dip. In short, smart portfolio management – balancing long-term investments with cash for opportunity – is the foundation for lasting success. Stick to these timeless principles, and you'll be well on your way to achieving investment results you can truly be proud of. The writer does not own shares in any of the companies mentioned. He is portfolio manager of The Smart Investor, a website that aims to help people invest smartly by providing investor education, stock commentary and market coverage
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
Are investors overlooking the upside risk in markets?
[SINGAPORE] Equity markets seem to have taken recent tariff headlines in their stride. So far, investors appear to be treating tariffs as a one-off impact, with little evidence that it will evolve into a broader trade war. Remarkably, the 'Trump trade' – higher equities, a softer US dollar and lower yields – seems to be holding. Perhaps it's time to pause before it fades. Investors used to say: 'Don't fight the Federal Reserve.' In today's environment, it might be more apt to say: 'Don't fight President Donald Trump.' This is not to suggest that risks have disappeared – far from it. Recession fears, geopolitical tensions, and higher-for-longer interest rates still dominate the narrative. As investors, we are conditioned to focus on what could go wrong. Prospect theory explains why: We feel the pain of losses much more acutely than the satisfaction of gains. However, markets often work in the opposite way. They climb walls of worry and recover faster – and further – than most expect. After a strong start to 2025, with the Nasdaq-100 index up 9 per cent in the year to date and the S&P 500 not far behind, the debate now turns to whether this rally has legs. What's often overlooked is the potential for upside surprises – factors that could keep markets advancing despite widespread caution. 1. Earnings and growth momentum could surprise: Corporate earnings are the ultimate driver of equity markets. Two weeks into the second-quarter earnings season, early results have been encouraging. A large majority of companies are beating expectations by a healthy margin, well above historical averages. This suggests that analysts may have been too cautious in their forecasts, thus leaving room for the positive earnings momentum to continue. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Although the S&P 500 index earnings growth was estimated to slow to around 5.8 per cent year on year in Q2 at the start of the earnings season (based on LSEG IBES Estimates), this deceleration was well-telegraphed and is likely already in the price. From here, the consensus anticipates a notable acceleration in earnings, with third-quarter earnings growth estimated at 8.4 per cent. Combined with modest US economic growth forecasts that set a low bar for upside surprises, this creates precisely the kind of set-up that markets tend to reward. 2. Liquidity and positioning leave room for risk-taking: Global liquidity continues to expand. Rising money supply is helping to offset the drag from trade tensions and geopolitical shocks, providing a supportive backdrop for risk assets. Investor positioning also points to caution rather than exuberance. Many institutional investors remain underweight on equities, which suggests that there is room for re-risking if confidence improves. Hedge funds, in particular, have scope to re-leverage, with exposures far from extreme. This 'dry powder' could become an additional catalyst should momentum build. 3. Momentum is self-reinforcing: Momentum remains a powerful and often underappreciated force in markets. As momentum builds, it can attract further inflows from investors wary of missing out, creating a self-reinforcing cycle. This behavioural dynamic can extend rallies beyond what fundamentals alone might suggest. Portfolio implications for investors For investors, the key takeaway is to recognise that risks are not only on the downside. There is scope for upside risks as well, such as stronger earnings, improving market breadth, and modest investor positioning. Given this, we would adopt the following strategies: * Staying invested in the growth theme: This remains critical, as missing even a handful of strong days in the market can significantly reduce long-term returns. * Diversifying thoughtfully: While US equities have driven the recent performance, a weak US dollar environment could create opportunities in ex-US equities, particularly Asia ex-Japan, where we are overweight in our global equities allocation. * Balancing discipline with flexibility: Avoid chasing returns indiscriminately, but ensure one's portfolio isn't overly defensive in an environment where the returns on the path of least resistance may be still higher. * Reassessing allocations: For those underweight equities, incremental re-risking may be worth considering, particularly as macroeconomic and earnings momentum improve. The bottom line Markets are designed to recover. Investors, however, are conditioned to doubt them. This persistent scepticism – whether about valuations, leadership concentration, or macroeconomic headwinds – is precisely what allows rallies to extend. While risks to the downside remain, the case for potential upside is also strong and should not be overlooked. The critical question is whether investors are focusing too much on what could go wrong and missing what is quietly going right. The writer is head of asset allocation at Standard Chartered Bank's wealth solutions chief investment office