logo
Dirty politics, dirtier ideology

Dirty politics, dirtier ideology

Time of India7 days ago
If politics is the art of the possible, ideology is the blueprint for the impossible. When ideology trumps politics, the consequences vary from deplorable to catastrophic. This is exactly what we are witnessing in the world's biggest democracies, India and the United States. While the various problematic elements of Hindutva are adversely affecting the functioning and performance of the Narendra Modi government, the Democrats' Leftward drift is making their party's struggle to crawl back to relevance tougher by the day.
It will be helpful to examine the essence of ideology. It is the toolkit of a philosophical school, which brings us to the nature of philosophy. Philosophy is the rational investigation into and general understanding of the world in general. When a group of people start believing in the functioning of the world (natural as well as human) in a specific manner, they become a school, identified with the suffix 'ism.'
Often, this entails two consequences. First, the 'understanding' part eclipses the 'rational investigation' element, usually leading to beliefs becoming dogmas—impervious to reason and empirical evidence. Second, adherents develop a toolkit to transform the world in accordance with their beliefs, or rather, dogmas. Philosophers recede; ideologues march on. As Karl Marx famously said, 'The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it.'
Unsurprisingly, Marxists have tried to change the world without understanding it, leading to the death of over 100 million people.
Ideologues and visionaries fantasize about a utopia, a never-never land; they invest their ideas, ideals, emotions, and not infrequently their phobias and pathologies into this dreamworld. Their followers (both on the Left and the Right) strive to rearrange the real world in consonance with the vision of their prophet(s)—invariably resulting in destruction and disaster.
Galvanized by the seemingly unstoppable march of the Hindutva ideology in the last 11 years under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and somewhat smug in the face of feeble and confused responses of the Opposition, the saffron brigade seems convinced that it will rule the country for a very long time. This conviction encourages them to peddle their most outlandish ideas and execute a few of them.
A case in point is the opposition to GM foods by some right wing organisations. Their opposition is not because of any adverse remarks by any scientist or expert body; their opposition is doctrinaire, not evidence-based. GM foods are bad: this is an article of faith, a dogma for them. Typically, in their scheme of things, dogmas matter, not facts or reason.
Decency is also seen as an overrated virtue—if it can be called a virtue in the first place. So, saffron cowboys feel free to harass any Muslim with cattle and want to examine every mosque to find if it was built over a temple. Some of them even forced a Muslim servant at an eatery on the Kanwar to take off his pants.
Worse, the high priests of Hindutva—who greatly emphasize social graces, good behavior, values, piety, sacrifice, (sanskars, shuchita, mulya, tyaag, et al) etc.—and other educated and well-placed defenders of the Bharatiya Janata Party tend to ignore the abominations unleashed by the saffron hotheads. The rowdiness of Kanwariyas and the preposterous decisions like shutting down schools and roads for them don't arouse any indignation among the sophisticated and cultured supporters of the Modi regime. Nor are the top pontiffs outraged by any excesses; indeed some of them join in the fun.
The reason? The ideology-fueled cadres like the abominations.
The ideology-fueled cadres on the Left also like excesses, though of a different kind. Unfortunately, they increasingly control liberal parties all over the world—from the Congress in India, to the Democratic Party in the US, and Labour in the UK. Rahul Gandhi, the top leader of the grand old party, has surrounded himself with pinkish intellectuals, which is evident from his growing faith in dangerous Leftist doctrines like social justice and wealth redistribution.
But even in the US, the bastion of capitalism, a communist like Zohran Mamdani can rise in the Democratic Party because the ideologically motivated radical Leftist cadres love him. 'If there was any system that could guarantee each person housing, whether you call it the abolition of private property or you call it, you know, just a statewide housing guarantee, it is preferable to what is going on right now,' Mamdani, who won the party's nomination for mayor of New York City, said in a resurfaced video.
This is despite one reason for the party's presidential candidate Kamala Harris' loss last year being her suggestion of price controls, a socialist measure.
Yet, the party leadership is helpless in the face of loud and assertive Left within, even though it knows that the ideological agenda of radicals is hurting them politically. Ideology has trumped politics.
In our country too, the politically motivated decisions (like abuse of Central agencies) and the outrageous actions of Hindutva hotheads often diminish the good work that the Modi government has done in the last 11 years—from maintaining a high growth rate, checking the fiscal and revenue deficits, and building infrastructure to enhancing military preparedness. Politics may be dirty, but ideology is dirtier.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Their info leaked online, Dehradun interfaith couple say marriage application on hold amid threats and pressure
Their info leaked online, Dehradun interfaith couple say marriage application on hold amid threats and pressure

Indian Express

time17 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Their info leaked online, Dehradun interfaith couple say marriage application on hold amid threats and pressure

After being in a relationship for over a decade, a couple from Dehradun decided to get married under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. However, on Saturday, their application was put on hold after two witnesses pulled out, citing threats from right-wing groups and objections from the woman's father, who was threatened with a boycott by his community. According to the couple, their wedding plans unravelled because the man is a Muslim and the woman a Hindu. The details of the couple — both 28 years old — along with their photographs, were uploaded online by a Facebook user, leading to a flurry of threats, abuses, and visits to the family of the woman. The woman, who works at a clinic, said her relatives and others turned up at their door on Saturday, disparaging the family for 'letting her marry' the Muslim man. 'My parents are neither happy nor upset about my decision. They respect my choice. However, after the entire system came against us, my father was forced to raise objections with the SDM (Sub-Divisional Magistrate). The page that has gone viral on social media is not the notice put up on the board of the office of the SDM, but from our file with the officer,' she said. She alleges that some lawyers who work with the man she is set to marry, as well as some government officials, 'are facilitating this hounding and delaying our second motion'. The SDM has denied allegations that the documents were leaked from his office. The man who sought to marry her works as an advocate in Dehradun, but has not gone to work since their details went up online. Threats, allegedly from the Hindu Raksha Dal, Bajrang Dal, and other outfits, have been pouring in ever since, he claimed. 'We have known each other since class 6 and attended the same college. We are exercising our fundamental rights and getting married under the Special Marriage Act. How can their law prevail over the Constitution?' he said. The woman said she fears her job is on the line after her employer came across the social media posts. 'Though I have not been terminated, the doctor called to tell me to stay put until things blow over. I'm not sure if they will lay me off if this persists,' she said. The couple had sought protection from the High Court on Friday. The division bench of Chief Justice G Narender and Justice Alok Mahra had directed the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) to comply with the Supreme Court verdict in the Lata Singh vs State of UP and Another (2006) case. The apex court had directed the administration and police across the country to ensure that when any man or woman, who is a major, undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is also a major, the couple is not harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence. They were also directed to ensure that anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence, either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons, and further stern action is taken against such persons as provided by law. The woman claimed that police did not lodge an FIR on her complaint and told her they can only protect her in case of a 'real threat'. The couple's lawyer said that she has been ostracised for helping them get married. Meanwhile, SDM, Sadar, Har Giri, said that he was looking into the objections raised by the woman's family. Asked about the delay, he said, 'We have to look into the cause for the withdrawal by the witnesses. My responsibility is to enquire about the matter; threats to the couple do not figure in my responsibilities.' He denied allegations that the documents with details of the couple were leaked from his office. Earlier this year, another couple from Udham Singh Nagar faced a similar ordeal after their details were made public by right-wing outfits despite a High Court order directing protection from threats.

Muslim cleric booked for 'objectionable' remarks on SP MP Dimple Yadav
Muslim cleric booked for 'objectionable' remarks on SP MP Dimple Yadav

Hindustan Times

time44 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Muslim cleric booked for 'objectionable' remarks on SP MP Dimple Yadav

Lucknow, A Muslim cleric has been booked for allegedly making objectionable and inflammatory remarks against Samajwadi Party MP Dimple Yadav during a televised debate, an official said on Monday. Muslim cleric booked for 'objectionable' remarks on SP MP Dimple Yadav The FIR against cleric Maulana Sajid Rashidi was lodged at the Vibhuti Khand police station on Sunday evening on a complaint by local resident Pravesh Yadav. The remarks in question were allegedly made in response to Dimple Yadav's recent visit to a mosque, where the cleric reportedly commented inappropriately on her attire. The complaint accused Rashidi of making statements that were not only derogatory and misogynistic, but also "highly provocative and aimed at inciting religious disharmony and communal tension," according to the FIR. Pravesh Yadav alleged that Rashidi's comments, made publicly on social media and national television, were "an affront to a woman's personal dignity" and appeared to be a deliberate attempt to provoke unrest, it showed. "He made extremely offensive, inflammatory, and anti-women remarks against honourable MP Mrs Dimple Yadav, wife of former Uttar Pradesh chief minister Akhilesh Yadav, following her presence at a mosque on July 26," Pravesh Yadav said in his written complaint. "Such statements hurt not only women's dignity but also threaten the unity, integrity, and peace of the nation," he said. The FIR has been registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , including Section 79 , 196 , and 197 , among others. Provisions under the Information Technology Act have also been invoked for the circulation of the content on digital platforms. In his complaint, Pravesh Yadav further alleged that Rashidi's language and tone indicated an "anti-national mindset" and linked him to a group "working to disturb social harmony in India." "Such elements are a direct threat to the secular, democratic, and inclusive fabric of the country," the complaint added. A police official said the matter is under investigation and appropriate action will be taken based on the findings. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Muslim cleric booked for ‘objectionable' remarks on Samajwadi Party MP Dimple Yadav
Muslim cleric booked for ‘objectionable' remarks on Samajwadi Party MP Dimple Yadav

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

Muslim cleric booked for ‘objectionable' remarks on Samajwadi Party MP Dimple Yadav

A Muslim cleric has been booked for allegedly making objectionable and inflammatory remarks against Samajwadi Party MP Dimple Yadav during a televised debate, an official said on Monday (July 28, 2025). The FIR against cleric Maulana Sajid Rashidi was lodged at the Vibhuti Khand police station on Sunday (July 27, 2025) evening on a complaint by local resident Pravesh Yadav. The remarks in question were allegedly made in response to Dimple Yadav's recent visit to a mosque, where the cleric reportedly commented inappropriately on her attire. The complaint accused Rashidi of making statements that were not only derogatory and misogynistic, but also "highly provocative and aimed at inciting religious disharmony and communal tension," according to the FIR. Pravesh Yadav alleged that Rashidi's comments, made publicly on social media and national television, were "an affront to a woman's personal dignity" and appeared to be a deliberate attempt to provoke unrest, it showed. "He made extremely offensive, inflammatory, and anti-women remarks against honourable MP Mrs Dimple Yadav, wife of former Uttar Pradesh chief minister Akhilesh Yadav, following her presence at a mosque on July 26," Pravesh Yadav said in his written complaint. "Such statements hurt not only women's dignity but also threaten the unity, integrity, and peace of the nation," he said. The FIR has been registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including Section 79 (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman), 196 (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, etc), and 197 (imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration), among others. Provisions under the Information Technology Act have also been invoked for the circulation of the content on digital platforms. In his complaint, Pravesh Yadav further alleged that Rashidi's language and tone indicated an "anti-national mindset" and linked him to a group "working to disturb social harmony in India." "Such elements are a direct threat to the secular, democratic, and inclusive fabric of the country," the complaint added. A police official said the matter is under investigation and appropriate action will be taken based on the findings.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store