
Their info leaked online, Dehradun interfaith couple say marriage application on hold amid threats and pressure
However, on Saturday, their application was put on hold after two witnesses pulled out, citing threats from right-wing groups and objections from the woman's father, who was threatened with a boycott by his community.
According to the couple, their wedding plans unravelled because the man is a Muslim and the woman a Hindu. The details of the couple — both 28 years old — along with their photographs, were uploaded online by a Facebook user, leading to a flurry of threats, abuses, and visits to the family of the woman.
The woman, who works at a clinic, said her relatives and others turned up at their door on Saturday, disparaging the family for 'letting her marry' the Muslim man.
'My parents are neither happy nor upset about my decision. They respect my choice. However, after the entire system came against us, my father was forced to raise objections with the SDM (Sub-Divisional Magistrate). The page that has gone viral on social media is not the notice put up on the board of the office of the SDM, but from our file with the officer,' she said.
She alleges that some lawyers who work with the man she is set to marry, as well as some government officials, 'are facilitating this hounding and delaying our second motion'. The SDM has denied allegations that the documents were leaked from his office.
The man who sought to marry her works as an advocate in Dehradun, but has not gone to work since their details went up online. Threats, allegedly from the Hindu Raksha Dal, Bajrang Dal, and other outfits, have been pouring in ever since, he claimed.
'We have known each other since class 6 and attended the same college. We are exercising our fundamental rights and getting married under the Special Marriage Act. How can their law prevail over the Constitution?' he said.
The woman said she fears her job is on the line after her employer came across the social media posts. 'Though I have not been terminated, the doctor called to tell me to stay put until things blow over. I'm not sure if they will lay me off if this persists,' she said.
The couple had sought protection from the High Court on Friday. The division bench of Chief Justice G Narender and Justice Alok Mahra had directed the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) to comply with the Supreme Court verdict in the Lata Singh vs State of UP and Another (2006) case.
The apex court had directed the administration and police across the country to ensure that when any man or woman, who is a major, undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is also a major, the couple is not harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence.
They were also directed to ensure that anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence, either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons, and further stern action is taken against such persons as provided by law.
The woman claimed that police did not lodge an FIR on her complaint and told her they can only protect her in case of a 'real threat'. The couple's lawyer said that she has been ostracised for helping them get married.
Meanwhile, SDM, Sadar, Har Giri, said that he was looking into the objections raised by the woman's family. Asked about the delay, he said, 'We have to look into the cause for the withdrawal by the witnesses. My responsibility is to enquire about the matter; threats to the couple do not figure in my responsibilities.' He denied allegations that the documents with details of the couple were leaked from his office.
Earlier this year, another couple from Udham Singh Nagar faced a similar ordeal after their details were made public by right-wing outfits despite a High Court order directing protection from threats.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
13 minutes ago
- India Today
Criticise state, face action: Maharashtra's social media rule for government staff
The General Administration Department of the Maharashtra government on Tuesday issued a Government Resolution (GR) outlining new social media usage guidelines for all state government employees. The move aims to ensure responsible digital conduct amid the rising influence of platforms like Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, WhatsApp, and GR states that while social media serve as an effective communication tool, it is increasingly being misused for leaking confidential information, spreading misinformation, and posting political commentary -- violations of existing government service to the new guidelines, misusing social media in ways such as violating government service rules and giving negative feedback about government policies or any political event/person will not be tolerated. Breach guidelines will attract disciplinary action under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979. The guidelines are applicable to all government employees, including those on deputation, contractual workers, staff of local governing bodies, public sector undertakings, and government-affiliated the key provisions are:Separation of personal and official accounts: Employees must maintain separate personal and official social media access: Use of banned websites or applications is strictly communication only: Only designated personnel, with prior approval, are allowed to share information about government schemes and initiatives via official self-promotion: Posts highlighting the success of schemes may be shared, but self-glorification is of official symbols prohibited: Employees should avoid using government logos, names, addresses, or assets such as vehicles and buildings in social media posts, except in personal profile defamatory content: Sharing of offensive, hateful, defamatory, or discriminatory content is required: Government documents must not be shared or uploaded without prior transfers: Upon transfer, official social media accounts must be formally handed resolution concludes with a stern warning: any breach of these guidelines will lead to disciplinary action under the relevant service rules.- EndsMust Watch


India Today
13 minutes ago
- India Today
Kerala opposes presidential reference on Governors' assent deadlines
The Kerala Government has opposed the Presidential reference filed before the Supreme Court regarding deadlines for Governors in granting assent to state its application submitted to the Court, the state contended that the reference is 'not maintainable' and suffers from 'serious legal lacunae.'Kerala argued that 11 out of the 14 questions raised in the reference have already been addressed by the Supreme Court in its judgment in the Tamil Nadu Government vs Governor case. Since the Union Government has not filed any review or curative petition against that verdict, Kerala maintained that the Centre has effectively accepted the Stating that the judgment has neither been assailed nor set aside in any validly constituted proceeding, Kerala submitted that it has attained finality and is binding under Article 141 of the Constitution. Therefore, it cannot be challenged indirectly through the current state alleged that the Union Government is using the reference as a device to reopen and contest settled constitutional issues, without disclosing that the apex court has already ruled on Article 144, Kerala asserted that the President and the Council of Ministers are constitutionally bound to act in aid of the Supreme Court, not seek to overturn its judgments by indirect also objected to the claim made in the reference that Article 200 does not prescribe a timeline for Governors to act on bills. The state said the Supreme Court has already interpreted the provision clearly, and the reference attempts to mislead the Court into reconsidering its settled suppression of judicial precedent, misinterpretation of constitutional provisions, and lack of transparency in the reference, Kerala urged the Court to return the reference unanswered.'This Court cannot sit in appeal over its own judgments—nor can that power be vested in it by the President under Article 143,' the state further contended that if the foundation of the reference is flawed and the majority of questions aim to overturn existing judgments, the presence of two or three additional questions does not obligate the Court to address any of them.- EndsMust Watch


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Churches condemn arrest of nuns, demand immediate release
Kottayam: Churches in Kerala on Monday came out in protest against the arrest of two nuns in Chhattisgarh. Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church raised concerns over the incident. Malankara Association secretary Biju Oommen said a trial by the mob, led by organisations with an extremist nature, was cruel. "Our democratic society will differentiate between the approaches of persecuting in north India and appeasement bid in Kerala. The situation where minorities are not given the freedoms enshrined in the Constitution is worrying. The misuse of anti-conversion laws is becoming a recurring theme," he said. He demanded the immediate release of the two nuns. Head of Malankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church Theodosius Mar Thoma metropolitan condemned the arrests, saying such incidents against nuns are a violation of fundamental rights and will weaken Indian democracy. He urged for ensuring legal protection to the nuns and wanted them free at the earliest. Bishop of Madhya Kerala diocese of Church of South India (CSI) Sabu Koshy Cherian strongly condemned the arrests and urged Centre to intervene in the matter. "CSI Church firmly believes that the central govt has the responsibility to allay fears of minorities here and the entire Christian community," he said. Cherian indicated that the issue came up in discussions between various churches and bishops in Kerala. Kerala Council of Churches stated that the arrest of Malayali nuns in Chhattisgarh on charges of religious conversion and human trafficking is condemnable and a challenge to Indian secularism. In a joint statement, president Alexios Mar Eusebius metropolitan and general secretary Prakash P Thomas demanded Centre's urgent intervention. "Making the general public communal and narrow-minded and denying them freedom of movement without fear is an insult to a secular and democratic nation. Subjecting individuals, who are selflessly working in social service and nation-building, to mob trials in the name of religion, arresting them on false charges and imprisoning them is evidence of the legal system becoming biased," . Meanwhile, Kerala Congress (Mani) on Monday organised marches across the state in protest against the arrests. At the state-level inauguration of the dharna in front of the post office in Kottayam, Job Michael, MLA, a member of the party's high-power committee, urged Prime Minister's immediate intervention to release both the nuns. Kottayam MP Francis George submitted a memorandum to PM Narendra Modi and Chhattisgarh chief minister protesting the incident and demanding the nuns' release.