Inflation data delivers ‘green light' for rate cut, but food prices cause concern
'The last time annual building cost inflation was this low was in the depths of the GFC and, before that, the 1998/1999 recession.'
Weak building costs also flowed through to property maintenance which experienced 1.4% annual inflation, he said.
There was annual deflation for furniture, furnishings and floor coverings, household textiles and household appliances.
But the really worrying thing was that the cost of essentials was rising far faster than the remainder of the CPI, he said.
'There are a lot of ways that you can cut this but we reckon the things that are most essential are food, accommodation and energy (electricity, gas and petrol).'
'Our very back-of-the-envelope 'essentials index' shows the cost of essentials rising at around twice the pace of the remainder of the CPI.'
The biggest concern was that food price inflation had accelerated to an annual 4.2% following a 1.6% quarterly increase, he said.
As well as being a significant hardship for a large portion of the population, this was adding to the headwinds for the economic recovery.
'If GDP is to pick up meaningfully then household consumption has to rise. With effective real disposable incomes under so much pressure there is very little chance of an increase in real spending.'
BNZ's early forecast for the current quarter was for prices to rise 0.8% in the quarter, taking the annual rate to 2.9%.
Other economists have forecast the third quarter rate to rise above the upper limit of the RBNZ's 1-3% target range.
'We also acknowledge that there is some upside risk to this,' Toplis said.
'But the good news is that we believe that will be the peak with annual inflation back near the midpoint of the RBNZ's target band by this time next year.'
A key assumption was that food price inflation would soon abate, he said.
'New Zealand commodity price inflation is already past its peak and this is normally a forerunner to domestic prices, particularly for food. There is even a chance that food prices outright fall.'
BNZ also assumes further falls for petrol prices drift lower.
With the economy continuing to perform below capacity, there would be continued downward pressure on non-tradeable inflation, he said.
KiwiBank senior economist Mary Jo Vergara noted that tradeable inflation was on the rise.
Mary Jo Vergara, Kiwibank economist. Photo / Supplied
'We're no longer importing deflation,' she said.
Annual tradeables inflation lifted from 0.3% to 1.2%.
'The 4.2% increase in food prices accounted for 28.5% of the lift in headline inflation,' she said.
'Domestic inflation, in contrast, continues its (slow) move south.'
Annual non-tradeables inflation fell below 4% for the first time in four years to 3.7%.
'Domestic inflation had fallen some way from its 6.8% peak in 2023, but it was still sitting high above the long-term average (around 3%).
'And that's despite such a weak domestic economy.'
The persistence was due to lingering strength in 'administered prices' such as rates, insurance costs and power.
Annual council rates and insurance costs were running well above historic averages, up 12.2% and 6%, respectively, she said.
Households were also contending with high electricity charges, climbing to 9.1% annually.
'Given excess capacity still sloshing in the economy, domestic inflation should continue to head lower. But the pace of easing is being dictated by factors largely outside of the RBNZ's control,' Vergara said. 'That's a frustration.'
Overall, the data added to the case for another OCR cut in August and suggested risks were tilting towards further easing being delivered sooner than previously expected, ANZ senior economist Miles Workman said.
'We have long been expecting the RBNZ will need to cut the OCR more than they have recently been signalling,' he said.
'With [this] data not the roadblock we thought it was going to be, the risk of a follow-up cut in October is now looking higher.'
Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
9 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
No plan A or B: Danyl McLauchlan on PM Chris Luxon's economic tinkering
Walking a fine line between self congratulations and bold policy: PM Christopher Luxon and finance minister Nicola Willis. Photo / Getty Images / composite The government lacks a roadmap for a sustained economic recovery beyond tinkering with childcare rebates and payment surcharges. In the satirical war novel Catch 22, a burnt-out World War II pilot covertly moved the red string on the battle map demarcating the front line, reasoning that this would somehow cause the army to have advanced in real life so he wouldn't have to fly more missions. It's a joke about confusing the map for the territory: our simplified models of reality are not the real world. For most of 2024, US voters told pollsters they were angry about inflation and they'd kick out Joe Biden's government if he didn't do something about it. The Biden administration would exasperatedly reply, 'We did do something! Look at the CPI. The rate of inflation was 9%, it's now 2.9%.' Voters were not persuaded. They felt the government was pointing to a line on the map, not the world. So they voted for Donald Trump, who vowed he would beat inflation. Core CPI is now lower than it was under Biden, though this might change as the effects of Liberation Day's tariffs kick in. But Americans are angry at Trump anyway, because their food prices are up, and expensive groceries and petrol are what most people mean by inflation. US discourse is focused on eggs. In New Zealand, we're upset about butter. Both might seem trivial, but these are things we can point to in the world and shout, 'Forget the CPI. Your map is wrong. Prices are still high!' Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Finance Minister Nicola Willis are trying to walk a fine line between congratulating themselves on their incredible work in defeating inflation and introducing bolder policies to tackle inflation because the public is clearly not convinced by the first claim. Rebate boost The flagship policies include the tax cuts passed last year – stealthily being clawed back as wages rise alongside prices via the infamous fiscal-drag mechanism – and FamilyBoost, a rebate scheme for early childhood education. This has simultaneously been a triumph and a failure, depending on your perspective. The policy has significantly lowered the cost of childcare, because the government is subsidising 25% of weekly ECE fees. But it has simultaneously lifted the price of childcare – because the government is subsidising 25% of weekly ECE fees, providers have every incentive to charge more. We've recently learned the scheme has fully benefited only 249 households instead of the 21,000 predicted by IRD's model. Willis's solution is to extend the rebate to 40% and make this available to households earning up to $229,000 a year. This makes political sense – National can hardly abandon a key campaign promise in the middle of a cost-of-living crisis. But it means the state will give up to $250 a fortnight to households earning more than twice the median income, while lecturing both central and local government agencies about the need for prudence and fiscal discipline. Council rap After a spate of dire polls and yet another round of rapacious rates rises contributing to an increase in the CPI last quarter there's talk of a rates cap on councils. Local Government Minister Simon Watts claims to want the policy in place 'as fast as possible' and has introduced legislation along those lines; but neither Act nor New Zealand First appear convinced. There's also a plan to ban payment surcharges for in-store electronic transactions 'by May 2026 at the latest'. If they're voted out of office in late 2026, National will look back in astonishment at how little they did to address the key issue that won them the 2023 election ‒ the cost of living. In the US, there were two popular theories to explain the disconnect between voter perceptions and the economic data, and both feel true for New Zealand. The first came from The Atlantic journalist Annie Lowrey, who explained that most of us anchor cost expectations to the price tags we got used to during the pre-pandemic era of low inflation. Washing powder was $20, now it's $30. Even if the price hasn't changed in the past year, we still register it as an increase every time we pay the higher amount. The 'vibecession' The second theory is from economic commentator Kyla Scanlon, who coined the term 'vibecession'. She argues years of instability caused by Covid, inflation, layoffs and the housing crisis have created a profoundly negative mood about the state of the US economy. This was amplified by social and mainstream media, reinforcing pessimism even during the recovery. Prices here might be more stable than they were three years ago, but the overall vibes are terrible. New Zealand feels broken in a way that banning credit card surcharges will probably not resolve. Both theories are grounded in psychology rather than microeconomics. Both will need a broad, sustained economic recovery to solve them – something National has promised but not yet delivered, a failure the Prime Minister loudly blames on Labour, although local government and the media also seem to be complicit. When Luxon was opposition leader, he assured voters our problems were caused by former prime minister Chris Hipkins and former finance minister Grant Robertson, and they'd be solved when he was running things. They all say that. But incoming governments usually have some kind of plan to address the more serious challenges they're confronted with – such as a sustained economic downturn. Luxon seems to have assumed his mere presence in the Beehive would sort this out. Two years in, it's still hard to see any kind of plan. He doesn't seem to occupy the same bleak territory the rest of us live in, nor does he have a map to guide him or us anywhere. John Maynard Keynes used to mock economists who 'can only tell us that when the storm is long past the ocean is flat again', but even that is preferable to political leaders who squander their time in power whining that the storm is everyone else's fault.
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
How Bad Is The Tariff News For NZ, Really?
, Money Correspondent New Zealand has been hit with a higher tariff rate than Australia on exports to the US - but economists say the situation could have been worse. It was revealed on Friday that New Zealand exports would have a 15 percent tariff applied, up from 10 percent announced earlier. Australia remains at 10 percent. Brad Olsen, chief executive at Infometrics, said that was a clear challenge for New Zealand. "There is now a wedge between us and Australia." There were other parts of the world that previously had a higher tariff rate that were now on the same level as New Zealand, such as Europe. "Wine, for example, under the original tariffs, we might have had a slight advantage. Now we don't." But he said it was not necessarily true that the country would have been better off had it negotiated a deal. He said New Zealand did not have a lot to "give up" in those negotiations, and it could have ended up being costly. "I'm a little bit surprised by comments, including from the opposition's trade spokesperson, that the government failed to achieve a lower tariff rate. "The comments seem to make the implication that New Zealand could have found a way to come up with a trade agreement that might have given us a lower tariff rate. "That might be true, but we have no idea what we would have had to give up to achieve that… some of what had to be given up by other countries to get a 15 percent tariffs rate is consequential - Japan and other countries had to give up to half a trillion dollars of further investment into the US." He said the impact on New Zealand's trading partners might not be as bad as had been expected, which should prove positive for the economy. "It will be slightly more challenging to export to the US from a New Zealand point of view, but our trading partner activity might not be hit as bad as was feared in April. That's probably a net benefit for us." Mike Jones, chief economist at BNZ, said the increase was not unexpected given indications of the past few weeks. "It's obviously unhelpful for NZ exports into the US, particularly how we line up with those coming from Australia and the UK, given the lower 10 percent baseline tariff rate for those countries. "Beef and wine exports could be affected. It's interesting in this context that we've seen the NZD/AUD exchange rate fall a little today in the wake of the announcements." Kelly Eckhold, chief economist at Westpac, said he thought New Zealand was in roughly the same position as in April. "On one hand, the tariff is higher, so there is a bigger direct cost, but it's a bit lower for a lot of our trading partners, so it's better for the economy than would otherwise be the case." He said how the lingering elements of uncertainty played out over the coming weeks would be important. "The legal basis of these tariffs, whether they're going to be able to continue or need to be replaced with a different type of tariff, is an issue. And the sectoral tariffs have not yet really been negotiated. "While I don't think these things affect the sort of goods New Zealand trades with the US, there may be some impact on our trading partners." He said it seemed strange that the US was calculating tariffs based on which countries exported more than they imported. "The concept that US authorities have had of countries ripping them off by selling more stuff to America than they're been buying is quite myopic. "We're only talking about goods trade here, we buy a lot of services from the US. "In large part, the trade imbalance is a cyclical rather than a structural story. "In the last few years, the economy has been relatively weak compared to the US. We're not sucking in as many imports, and the exchange rate has been lower than would normally be the case, which has encouraged export revenues. "I would have thought trade policy metrics like tariffs would be determined on the basis of structural, not cyclical factors. "All those things could easily be the other way around in a few years' time."
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
Love For Labour Is Lacking
Press Release – Kiwi Economics Domestic inflation is heading in the right direction. Next weeks labour market is the second test for an August rate cut. Stats NZ's suite of labour market data is out on Wednesday. The Kiwi labour market likely loosened further over the June quarter. We expect the unemployment rate to increase to 5.3% from 5.1% – the highest in over eight years. The moderation in wage inflation likely continued. Annual wage growth likely slowed to 2.3%, down from 2.5% – the weakest in four years. Weaker wage inflation is helping to drive further easing in domestic inflation. It's that famous Phillips curve. Next week's data should reinforce the need for further monetary policy easing. Downside risks to medium-term inflation are growing given the soft labour market and dimming global outlook. We expect the RBNZ to cut the cash rate by 25bps at the August meeting. And they'll need to go to 2.5% eventually. Last week's inflation data was the first test for the RBNZ given its data-dependent approach. And we believe it opened the door to a rate cut in August. Headline rose, but thankfully, the drivers appear temporary. Domestic inflation is heading in the right direction. Next week's labour market is the second test for an August rate cut. And should the data print the way we expect, the door to a rate cut remains firmly open. We expect the labour market to loosen further. The economy may have started to turn, with output expanding over the summer months. But the labour market lags the broader economic cycle, and the appetite for labour remains soft. Jobs growth looks to have weakened over the quarter. Stats NZ's monthly jobs data notched a 0.3% decline over the June quarter. Filled jobs are sitting 2% below the March 2024 peak. There is a conceptual difference between Stats NZ's filled jobs data and the Household Labour Force Survey (released on Wednesday). The former is drawn from tax data, and the latter is subject to sampling errors. Despite this, the monthly data does a good job in providing a steer on employment. Accordingly, we have pencilled in a 0.2% fall in employment over the quarter. Annually, employment growth likely weakened further to -1%. By our calculations, the unemployment rate is set to hit the highest level since December 2016, rising from 5.1% to 5.3%. The jobs data is a key statistic before the May MPS. Our forecasts are softer than the RBNZ's latest projections. The RBNZ sees employment growing 0.2% over the quarter, with the unemployment rate rising to 5.2% – which they forecast to be the peak in the current cycle. However, given the weakening global growth outlook, there's risk the recovery in labour demand is delayed.
