
NHL trade grades: Ducks cut bait on Trevor Zegras, selling low to the Flyers
Philadelphia Flyers get: F Trevor Zegras
Anaheim Ducks get: F Ryan Poehling, 2025 second-round pick (No. 45), 2026 fourth-round pick
Corey Pronman: Zegras' time in Anaheim was tumultuous. After a sterling rookie year where he dazzled, he hit some bumps and had frustrated his coaching staff over the past few years. He's a player with elite skill and hockey sense. NHL scouts have wondered if he can be a consistent 70- to 80-point player with how ridiculously skilled and creative he is. He can be a legit top-six forward and benefit a power play. But he also has noticeable warts in his game. He's a below-average NHL skater who takes too many shifts and games off and rubs people the wrong way. Philadelphia has been searching for a center, and while Zegras has played center before, it's questionable if he can pivot in a major role on a good NHL team.
Advertisement
It's a dramatic decline in value as well for a player Anaheim was hoping to get a high first-round pick or major young asset in return for when it first put him on the market. Zegras supporters will argue it's a potential buy-low scenario for the Flyers, given his massive potential, NHL track record and reasonable contract. His critics will say he's not a 'winner' and it's addition by subtraction for the Philadelphia while opening up opportunities for the Ducks' plethora of talented young forwards. I understand the latter argument, but the caliber of player plus the low price paid for him seems a little off. This is a nice gamble by the Flyers, who gave up very little, and if it doesn't work out they could simply move him again in a rising cap environment. Owen Tippett had similar issues in Florida, and the Flyers did good work turning him into a useful NHL forward.
Ryan Poehling is a 2026 free agent. He's a hard-working center with good skill, but he's not dynamic in terms of his pace or creativity. He's a bottom-six forward.
Flyers grade: A-
Ducks grade: C+
Sean Gentille: In the summer of 2023, Zegras was 22 years old and coming off his second straight season with at least 20 goals and 60 points — one in which he shared the cover of EA's NHL 23. Not bad.
Around that same time, Ryan Poehling was non-qualified by the Pittsburgh Penguins, the equivalent of a team saying 'thanks, but no thanks.' Not good.
Now, somehow, three years later, Poehling was the primary player the Ducks brought back in a trade that, on their end, was more about dumping Zegras' salary than anything else.
The fact that Anaheim moved on from Zegras — Michigan goals and all — shouldn't surprise anyone. He's been too frequently injured and too frequently ineffective for most of the past two seasons, killing his momentum on and off the ice. Playing for Dallas Eakins and Greg Cronin probably didn't help; Zegras is an imperfectly electric player, and ditching too much of that on the road to two-way responsibility feels like it was a Pyrrhic victory. Zegras' name has been part of trade rumors for years. If this is what he's worth, one line of logic goes, this is what he's worth.
Advertisement
Still, if you assume that to be true, the question for Anaheim should be, 'why bother?' Why bother moving a 24-year-old with high-end offensive upside and (dampened) star power if the return is a decent fourth-line center, the 45th pick in one draft and a fourth-rounder from another?
The best argument is that Zegras counts $5.75 million against the cap for one more season and future contract talks, given his career arc, could get bizarre. The Ducks also have extensions for other young forwards — namely Leo Carlsson and Mason McTavish — to consider down the line. On the other hand, they're still more than $36 million under the salary cap, according to PuckPedia. With only Pittsburgh starting the summer in traditional 'seller' mode, why not wait and see how the market looks in a week or two? It's hard to imagine it being worse. That fact alone makes it impossible to give Anaheim anything other than a mediocre mark here. It's not just about the underwhelming return; it's about the road that brought them to it.
The Flyers, meanwhile, got themselves a lottery ticket with solid odds. If Zegras' health holds up, his worst-case scenario probably lands him as an offense-only middle-six winger with power-play utility. His upside: the exact sort of high-end, top-six center that they've been unable to add during their rebuild. The Athletic, pre-trade, put their center depth chart at second from the bottom in the NHL. No matter what, Philadelphia desperately needed another potential offensive star to pair with Matvei Michkov, maybe on the same line, maybe not, and Zegras has a shot at filling the bill.
Those sorts of players are best added through the draft. If that's not an option — and for the Flyers, it doesn't seem to be — then it's time to seek a different route. There's plenty to like about the one they've chosen. It's not just about the player; it's about the fit.
Flyers grade: A
Ducks grade: D+
Shayna Goldman: The big question around Zegras over the past few years is whether he has the chops to be a true franchise cornerstone to build around. At this point, it doesn't seem to be the case. But that doesn't mean the Ducks should have shipped him off in an imbalanced deal.
Zegras has his flaws — he isn't a perfect play-driver and has some real defensive gaps in his game. After making some improvements in his own zone in a condensed 2023-24, he took a step back this past season with the Ducks, allowing 0.26 more expected goals against per 60 relative to the rest of the team. And unlike years past, the offense wasn't enough to make up for it. Defense is a team-wide problem in Anaheim, and it seems to be overwhelming Zegras at this point. Pair that with some of the comps for Zegras at 25 years old — from Robby Fabbri and Chris Tierney to Sam Gagner — and there is reason to worry about his trajectory from here.
Advertisement
But even if Zegras isn't worth the same hype that he once was, it doesn't make enough sense to sell this low. Even if management wanted a deal done sooner than later, to go into next season with a clean slate, there is still an entire offseason ahead. Ryan Poehling addresses the Ducks' bottom-six need for more defensive upside, but him plus a second-rounder doesn't thread the needle enough. Because even if Zegras isn't meant to be the No. 1 center of a contender, his offensive strengths can be worth betting on in a different top-six capacity. Playoff teams still need complementary talent around their big guns, and there are signs that Zegras can be that. His creativity and puck-moving ability, which still tracks well according to AllThreeZones, are worth investing in.
Even though Zegras' value has declined, it makes sense for a rebuilding team like the Flyers. Philadelphia has defensive structure and strong two-way forwards, like Noah Cates and Sean Couturier. What they need is more high-octane offensive skill around Michkov and more depth down the middle, so he checks both of those boxes. No matter what, this is still a gamble for the Flyers. But it's a low-risk, high-return bet worth investing in.
Flyers grade: B+
Ducks grade: C-
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pistons' NBA Cup schedule 2025: Celtics on ESPN highlights 4 games
The Detroit Pistons' 2025 NBA Cup schedule was released Wednesday, Aug. 13. The Pistons, one of five teams in East Group B, will visit the Brooklyn Nets on Nov. 7 to start their in-season tournament schedule, host the Philadelphia 76ers on Nov. 14, play in Boston for a nationally-televised game against the Celtics on ESPN on Nov. 26, and then conclude group play with a home game against the Orlando Magic on Nov. 28. The Nets are rebuilding, the Sixers have exciting young guards surrounding injury-riddled veterans Joel Embiid and Paul George, the Celtics won't have Jayson Tatum (Achilles) and traded starters Jrue Holiday (Portland) and Kristaps Porzingis (Atlanta) and the Magic acquired Desmond Bane to form a dynamic top four. Orlando is the betting favorite to win the group, with the Pistons and Sixers with the second-best odds according to BetMGM. The Pistons have three known national games ahead of the full NBA schedule release Thursday. Both are home games, against the Cleveland Cavaliers on Oct. 27 (Peacock) and against the Celtics on Martin Luther King Jr. Day on Jan. 19 at 8 p.m. (Peacock, NBC). TRENDING: NBA experts are high on Pistons win total for 2025-26 They will also face the Dallas Mavericks in Mexico City, Nov. 1. It will be the Pistons' third time playing in Mexico, with the two teams last facing each other in the city in 2019. The Pistons tip off their four-game preseason slate Oct. 6 on the road against the Memphis Grizzlies. Detroit Pistons NBA Cup schedule 2025 The Pistons have a four-game schedule comprised from East Group B for the third year of the NBA Cup, an in-season tournament. All group games are among each team's 82-game regular season. Nov. 7: at Brooklyn Nets, 7:30 p.m. Nov. 14: vs Philadelphia 76ers, 7:30 p.m. Nov. 26: at Boston Celtics, 5 p.m., ESPN. Nov. 28: vs Orlando Magic, 7:30 p.m. There are six groups split evenly across both conferences, and the best team in each group plus two wild-card teams will advance to the single-elimination quarterfinals, scheduled for Dec. 9, followed by the semifinals and then the championship game in Las Vegas on Dec. 16. The championship game does not count in the regular season standings. [ MUST WATCH: Make "The Pistons Pulse" your go-to Detroit Pistons podcast, listen available anywhere you listen to podcasts (Apple, Spotify) ] Follow the Pistons all year long with the best coverage at Follow the Detroit Free Press on Instagram (@detroitfreepress), TikTok (@detroitfreepress), YouTube (@DetroitFreePress), X (@freep), and LinkedIn, and like us on Facebook (@detroitfreepress). Submit a letter to the editor at and we may publish it online or in print. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Pistons NBA Cup schedule 2025: Celtics on ESPN highlights 4 games
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What's the next 'arms race' in college sports? Finding ways to legally exceed new rev-share cap
Tennessee athletic director Danny White faced a decision this year: Remain with apparel partner Nike or move to a new brand, adidas. He considered plenty of factors in the decision, such as quality of the gear and overall financial terms. But one, perhaps, stood above the rest: How much name, image and likeness (NIL) support would an apparel company give to Tennessee's athletes? 'NIL was right up there,' White told Yahoo Sports in a recent interview. 'We are in a very competitive space. It was at the forefront of my mind.' Tennessee announced on Wednesday a return to adidas, a brand the university used during a 20-year run that ended in 2014. The brand and school struck a 10-year contract that is 'one of the biggest apparel deals in the history of college sports,' according to White, likely putting its value at at least $10 million annually in product and cash. At the heart of the deal is expected to also be one of the most lucrative NIL components in the history of collegiate apparel deals, described by one of the company's vice presidents as 'establishing a new standard for investment in NIL.' In short, the players will get a piece of the $100 million-plus pie — in a significant way, too, and, for some of them, immediately. Adidas says it is already working to strike individual deals with Tennessee athletes during this school year — months before the new apparel contract starts next July. Once the partnership begins, the company will offer what it calls 'unprecedented NIL opportunities' for UT athletes across all 20 sports. 'The arms race was originally about facilities,' said Chris McGuire, adidas vice president of sports marketing, North America. 'Now it's gone to rev-share and NIL. We want to make sure we provide opportunities to our partners that are competitive in the marketplace so they'll have competitive teams on the field.' Tennessee's apparel partnership is the latest weapon in the new recruiting battlefield: Finding creative ways to legally exceed the revenue-share cap by providing athletes with legitimate third-party endorsement and commercial deals. 'This is the first one' The adidas deal won't be the last apparel contract structured in this way, experts believe. Several power programs remain in negotiations with apparel partners as their current contracts come to an end, including LSU, Penn State and USC. In fact, more than 20 power conference programs have apparel deals set to expire in 2026 and 2027. McGuire acknowledges that this 'model,' if it works as intended, will be used elsewhere. 'This is the first one,' he said. There are plenty more weapons, so to speak, that schools are using to increase the value of their rosters, including multimedia rights partners, various corporate sponsors and even reinvented booster collectives — all supplying some level of above-the-cap athlete compensation. The revenue-share cap this year (July 2025-June 2026) is $20.5 million, the max each school can distribute to their athletes. But schools are able to facilitate for their athletes individual third-party endorsement and commercial deals that, if approved through the new College Sports Commission enforcement process, are not included in the cap number. This has created a new recruiting landscape where many schools, at first reliant on their collectives to drive athlete compensation, are now shifting to what they believe are more legitimate entities whose athlete deals can more easily gain the approval of the College Sports Commission. There's a brewing bidding war unfolding among multimedia rights and apparel companies jockeying to offer the best NIL-centric contracts to gain university partnerships. Many schools are employing multimedia rights (MMR) partners and marketing agencies — perhaps those that once operated as collectives — to use corporate sponsors to direct their distribution to athletes instead of to the school, says Tommy Gray, CEO of Altius, a company that provides dozens of schools with consultation and strategic planning. "For example, some are going to their corporate sponsors and saying 20% of your spend must be deployed in an athlete marketing fund so we can distribute it to our athletes," Gray told Yahoo Sports in the spring. "It may be impermissible to commit that money to athletes in writing, but that doesn't mean you can't tell athletes that if they do these things, you are confident they will get X amount of dollars. There are a lot of ways to do it if you want to push the envelope." Apparel companies fill a similar void in a similar way, except they would directly strike deals with athletes. There's no middle man necessary. Despite being deemed an 'affiliated entity' of a school — this designation heightens the enforcement arm's standard — would adidas, Nike or Under Armour, all longtime legitimate national brands, really see their athlete deals rejected? What about Learfield, JMI and Playfly Sports? They are longtime school multimedia rights partners with the capability to facilitate deals with athletes among any of their thousands of corporate businesses and brands. "There are a lot of places where the MMR partner, directly or indirectly, is supplying millions to athletes," Gray says. 'Who gets to tell Learfield it's not OK to give $5 million a year to athletes? Who gets to go in and say, 'That's not permissible.'' Paia LaPalombara, a former Ohio State athletic administrator who joined last year the Indiana law firm Church Church Hittle + Antrim, says partnering with an MMR or apparel brand is likely the best way for schools to 'exceed the cap without falling under that fair market value' standard. Will new deals pass muster? Multimedia rights partners are already paying schools millions in licensing agreements to sell their intellectual property, such as marks, logos, etc. Corporate sponsors want both — the marks plus the athletes — for the most lucrative NIL deals, says Craig Sloan, the CEO of Playfly Sports. 'The one that's going to be tested the most is a student-athlete appearing in uniform in a campaign. What is that value?' Sloan said. 'We do have evidence that shows the use of IP will enhance a brand's perception with consumers. The data supports the idea that if you're going to come in and sponsor our Auburn program, it makes sense to do it with a student-athlete.' Sloan says Playfly doesn't guarantee schools a certain amount of NIL for their athletes, but, moreso, 'shares a vision' with schools on a 'need number' for NIL. Learfield is approaching it in a similar fashion. CEO Cole Gahagan says the company struck athlete brand deals of more than $135 million last fiscal year. 'Now that salary caps have been in place, there is increased pressure to find more opportunities to create more events for athletes,' Gahagan said. 'When we have dedicated resources on the ground on campus — sales people dedicated to NIL, NIL activation coordinator and NIL content producer — we see the greatest and most NIL deal-making output at our properties.' Learfield has recently announced new NIL-related partnerships with several power programs, including Texas, Georgia and Oklahoma — all deals billed as a way to 'unlock new revenue-generating opportunities' for athletes. These collaborations will operate independently from the university as marketing and NIL agencies to connect athletes with corporate sponsors to 'earn income beyond traditional revenue-sharing models,' according to one of the releases. Playfly, meanwhile, struck a 15-year, $515 million deal with Texas A&M earlier this summer, believed to be one of the most lucrative multimedia rights contracts in the history of college athletics and one that offers NIL components. Kentucky announced a similar move just this week, resigning with multimedia partner JMI in a deal where the company will create an "in-house NIL collective" to help facilitate athlete brand deals and ensure each passes through the new enforcement process. 'How quickly will collectives start to fade away or become less important? Because the sustainable model is athletes inking opportunities for producing content, activations, likeness in campaigns,' Sloan said. 'It's pretty clear it's not going to be a collective and booster giving someone a bunch of money.' But collectives received a sort-of lifeline last month, when a legal threat from attorneys forced the College Sports Commission to re-evaluate guidance that would have prohibited most booster-collective deals with athletes. The enforcement arm is determining the legitimacy of third-party deals based mostly on two standards. NIL deals have to meet the standard of (1) having a 'valid business purpose' and (2) falling within a compensation range created by Deloitte. The first of those — involving the prohibition of many collective deals — fell victim to the legal challenge, opening a path for collectives to continue to operate in a similar way, but not exactly the same, as they previously did. The second standard — range of compensation — serves as the CSC's backstop, at least until it is challenged legally as well. Deloitte created 'the range of compensation' through an algorithm using fair-market value analysis, comparing similar types of NIL deals struck between an athlete and the third party. It factors in a player's social media following, athletic performance, the school's marketplace and location, etc. Will the CSC really deny athlete deals from big brands and apparel companies? 'At the end of the day,' said Sloan, 'a person not on campus, not in our communities is going to have a difficult time setting our market rate.'
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
McIlroy 'shot down' suggestion of Ryder Cup playing captain role
Masters champion Rory McIlroy said Wednesday he rejected the suggestion he could serve as playing captain at a Ryder Cup "sometime soon," saying he thinks combining roles is too onerous. "I've ben asked to do that, and I've turned it down," the Northern Ireland star said as he spoke to reporters prior to the US PGA Tour BMW Championship in Maryland. McIlroy will spearhead the European challenge against the United States when the match play showdown is held at Bethpage Black in New York September 26-28. Luke Donald will captain the Europeans and the US captain is Keegan Bradley, whose strong form in 2025 has the 39-year-old in 10th place in the qualification standings. After he won the Travelers Championship Bradley acknowledged he would consider casting himself as the first playing captain since Arnold Palmer in 1963. But McIlroy says the demands on the captain are too great to mesh with a playing role. "The idea of me being a playing captain sometime soon coming up has come up, and I've shot it down straight away," McIlroy said. "Because I don't think you can do it. "I just think the commitments that a captain has -- you think about the extra media that a captain has to do, you think about the extra meetings that the captains have to do with the vice captains, with the PGA of America, in Keegan's case, preparing your speech for the opening ceremony. "Just there's a lot of things that people don't see that the captain does the week of the Ryder Cup, especially now that the Ryder Cup has become so big." McIlroy said the captain would also have less flexibility to play every session over the three days, which could rob a team of an in-form player for some sessions. "Would you rather not have a player that has the flexibility to go twice if he's playing well?" McIlroy said. "It's just my opinion, but I think it would just be very difficult to do." But McIlroy said he is as intrigued as anyone to see whether Bradley will take on the dual role. "I definitely think he's one of the best 12 American players right now," McIlroy said. "That's why everyone is so interested and it's such a compelling case. "I'm just as interested as everyone else to see how it all plays out." bb/nr