logo
Yes, more and more celebrities are entering the phone business. Here's why

Yes, more and more celebrities are entering the phone business. Here's why

Time of India19-06-2025
By Wyatte Grantham-Philips
NEW YORK: More and more celebrities are looking to attach their names to your phone. Or rather, wireless services that could power it.
From cosmetics to snacks and signature spirits, brands launched or co-owned by high-profile figures are just about everywhere you look today. But several big names are also venturing into the market for
mobile virtual network operators
- or MVNOs, an industry term for businesses that provide cell coverage by leasing infrastructure from bigger, more established carriers.
U.S. President Donald Trump's family was the most recent to join the list with the launch of
Trump Mobile
this week. Here's what to know.
Which big names have entered the phone business?
On Monday, The Trump Organization (currently run by the president's sons Eric and Donald Jr.) unveiled Trump Mobile. The company says this new business will offer cell service, through an apparent licensing deal with "all three major cellular carriers" in the U.S., and sell gold phones by August.
Trump Mobile marks the latest in a string of new Trump-branded offerings - which already span from golden sneakers to "God Bless the USA" bibles - despite mounting ethical concerns that the president is profiting off his position and could distort public policy for personal gain.
"This raises a real question about a conflict of interest," said Ben Bentzin, an associate professor of instruction at The University of Texas at Austin's McCombs School of Business. As the sitting president, Trump appoints leadership for the Federal Communications Commission - and the family's new phone venture exists under this regulatory authority.
All of this sets Trump Mobile apart from other big names that have recently ventured into the wireless business. Still, its launch arrives as a growing number of celebrities tap into this space.
Just last week, actors Jason Bateman, Sean Hayes and Will Arnett launched SmartLess Mobile, a name that mirrors the trio's "SmartLess" podcast. Now live across the contiguous U.S. and Puerto Rico, SmartLess Mobile runs on
T-Mobile
's 5G Network.
Another wireless provider with ties to fame is
Mint Mobile
. While not launched by celebrities, Ryan Reynolds purchased an ownership stake in Mint in 2019. Mint's parent, the Ka'ena Corporation, was later acquired by T-Mobile in a deal worth up to $1.35 billion.
Beyond names of famous people, well-known brands that weren't traditionally in the phone business have also got in on the action over the years - particuarly outside of the U.S., Forrester Research senior analyst Octavio Garcia Granados notes. He points to Walmart's "Bait" mobile plan in Mexico, for example, as well as Italian soccer club AC Milan launching its own mobile SIM cards for fans.
"The MVNO market is not new," said Granados. "What's new is the development on how it's consumed and the (ease) for brands to launch such plans."
MVNOs have also emerged outside of high-profile brands or launch teams. Bentzin points to Straight Talk and Cricket - which are now owned by Verizon and
AT&T
, respectively. Still, traditional celebrity endorsements are common across the board. And in recent years, "influencer marketing" has been "the fastest growing area of advertising and promotion," he notes.
What are these cell services offering? Why were they launched?
For Trump Mobile, the pitch seems to be all about having an "all-American service" while also tapping into the fan base of the president.
The company noted Monday that it chose to unveil Trump Mobile on the 10th anniversary of Trump launching "his historic presidential campaign." The name given to its flagship offer, The 47 Plan, and the $47.45 monthly fee make reference to the president's two terms. And a mock-up of the planned gold phone on the company's website shows Trump's "Make America Great" slogan on the front screen.
According to the company, Trump Mobile's 47 Plan will include unlimited calls, texts and data through partner carriers, as well as free roadside assistance and telehealth services. It also says the new phone, called the "T1 Phone," will be available for $499 in August - but notes that this device won't be designed or made by Trump Mobile. Still, the company emphasized that these phones will be built in the U.S.
Experts have since shared skepticism about that being possible in two months. And beyond the future T1 Phone, others stress that a monthly cell service fee of just under $50 is pricey compared to other MVNO options today.
"It's not actual lower pricing. It's really trading on the fan base, if you will, of Trump," said Bentzin.
SmartLess Mobile and Mint Mobile, of course, don't carry these same political ties. And the wireless plans offered by both boast less expensive offerings.
T-Mobile-owned Mint advertises "flexible, buy-in-bulk" plans that range from $15 to $30 a month. Each option includes unlimited talk and text nationwide, but vary depending on plan length and data amount. Mint, founded in 2016, says it started "because we'd had enough of the wireless industry's games" - and promises to help consumers avoid hidden fees.
SmartLess Mobile's plans also start at $15 a month. Depending on the data amount purchased, that base fee can rise to $30 - but all of its plans similarly offer unlimited talk and text using T-Mobile's network. When launching last week, SmartLess underlined that its goal is to help people stop paying for the data they don't use, noting that the majority of data used by consumers today happens over Wi-Fi.
"Seriously, if your phone bill knew how often you're on Wi-Fi, it would be embarrassed," Hayes said in a statement for SmartLess Mobile's June 10 launch.
What's the demand?
MVNOs have proven to be attractive acquisitions to big wireless carriers over the years. But whether or not the star factor promises significant demand has yet to be seen for the market's most recent entrants.
For the more established Mint Mobile, Reynolds' investment is a success story. The 25% stake that the actor reportedly owned in 2023, when the company announced that it would be acquired by T-Mobile, was estimated to give him a personal windfall of over $300 million in cash and stock. And since that deal closed, Reynolds has remained in his creative role for Mint and as the face of many campaigns - helping the brand continue to attract new customers.
It's no surprise that the potential of such business returns might attract other celebrities to make similar investments, Bentzin notes. Still, newer ventures are untested. And "as the market becomes more crowded, it could be harder and harder to pick off individual consumers," he added.
Beyond a high-profile name, quality of service and what consumers can afford is also critical.
"The competition battleground here is brand and price," Bentzin said.
Still, if the marketing is right and product meets consumer needs, experts like Garcia Granados note that MVNOs can be a profitable business, for both the brands that start them and the telecommunications giants - like T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T - offering this "wholesale" access to their infrastructure.
As a result, he said, such high-profile ventures become "a catalyst for others to follow."
(AP Business Writer Bernard Condon contributed to this report from New York.)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Spain Says NATO Spat Didn't Prompt Exclusion From Ukraine Talks
Spain Says NATO Spat Didn't Prompt Exclusion From Ukraine Talks

Mint

time34 minutes ago

  • Mint

Spain Says NATO Spat Didn't Prompt Exclusion From Ukraine Talks

Spain's top diplomat dismissed a suggestion that the nation's failure to commit to a revised NATO spending target was the reason for its absence from this week's talks to discuss Russia's war on Ukraine. 'Spain is a very committed ally,' Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares said Tuesday in an interview with Bloomberg TV. He said he'd received no indication that failure to commit to the NATO goal was in any way linked to Spain's omission from Monday's meeting in Washington between European leaders, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and US President Donald Trump. The gathering was seen as a win for western allies attempting to steer Trump away from a quick deal at Ukraine's expense — something that appeared more likely after he met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska last week. US and European officials will immediately work on providing Ukraine with robust security guarantees to help bolster the country's armed forces, people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg Tuesday. The aim is to prevent Russia demanding restrictions on the size of Kyiv's military as part of a future agreement to end the war, the people said. In his Bloomberg TV interview, Albares said reinforcing Ukraine's army is the best security guarantee available given 'the reality on the ground.' 'That's what we are doing: providing military equipment to make sure that the Ukrainian army is capable of guaranteeing sovereignty and territorial integrity,' he added. 'We need a ceasefire first of all,' he said, at the same time cautioning that 'Russia has given no sign of being in good faith engaged in real conversation for a just and lasting peace.' In June, Spain raised hackles among some NATO allies by seeking an exemption from the military alliance's new target of committing 5% of gross domestic product to defense. Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez's government argued that its spending plans are sufficient to meet NATO needs. Trump subsequently threatened Spain with tariffs twice as high as the rest of the European Union, but hasn't followed through. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Intel's CEO Draws Support for Revival From SoftBank, Trump
Intel's CEO Draws Support for Revival From SoftBank, Trump

Mint

time36 minutes ago

  • Mint

Intel's CEO Draws Support for Revival From SoftBank, Trump

Less than two weeks after President Donald Trump called for the ouster of Intel Corp.'s Lip-Bu Tan, the company's chief executive officer has a shot at securing billions of dollars in fresh capital that could help him turn around the troubled US chipmaker. The Trump administration is in discussions to take a stake of about 10% in Intel, possibly by converting grants made to the company under the US Chips and Science Act into equity, according to people familiar with the matter. That could allow Intel to tap about $10 billion in capital as Tan works out a strategy for revival. In another surprise, SoftBank Group Corp. agreed to take a $2 billion stake in Intel, as the Japanese company seeks a broader role in the artificial intelligence boom. Founder Masayoshi Son already owns a majority stake in chipmaker Arm Holdings Plc and has laid plans to compete with Nvidia Corp. in AI chips. Intel's chipmaking skills could help SoftBank manufacture chips to run — and possibly train — AI models like ChatGPT. Intel shares rose about 7% in pre-market trading on Tuesday. SoftBank's own stock price fell 4% in Tokyo. Earlier this month, Tan's hold on his CEO role looked precarious after Trump called on him to resign over alleged conflicts of interest. Yet the executive quickly visited Trump at the White House to clear the air, with the president then praising the Intel CEO for his career success and 'amazing story.' That set the stage for the government's possible investment, which would make the US the chipmaker's largest shareholder. The federal government is considering an investment that, under one scenario, would involve converting some or all of the $10.9 billion in grants the company had won under the Chips Act, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the information is confidential. The company can also draw on up to $11 billion in loans under the 2022 law. The grant money, which was originally designed to be disbursed over time as Intel meets project milestones, is roughly enough to pay for the targeted holding. At Intel's current market value, a 10% stake in the chipmaker would be worth around $10.5 billion. The exact size of the stake, as well as whether the White House chooses to move ahead with the plan, is still in flux, the people said. White House spokesman Kush Desai declined to comment on the specifics of the discussions, saying only that no deal is official until it's announced by the administration. The Commerce Department, which oversees the Chips Act, also declined to comment. Intel didn't respond to a request for comment. SoftBank's investment is another unconventional bet on Tan's ability to revive Intel's fortunes. The Japanese company announced its plan to buy new shares at $23 a share, a small discount to Intel's last close. Son has ambitions to design an energy-efficient AI chip through what he calls the 'Izanagi' project to compete with Nvidia's products, though that has yet to translate into a marketable product. Son held talks with Intel's chief executive about buying the company's contract chipmaking business before agreeing to make the $2 billion investment, the Financial Times reported, citing people familiar with the talks. The investment doesn't preclude a bigger deal for that part of Intel's business, the newspaper said. A big question is whether a government holding and SoftBank's vote of confidence would help reinvigorate Intel's business. The tech pioneer has fallen behind Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. in contract chipmaking and Nvidia Corp. in chip design, missing out on a boom in spending on artificial intelligence. Last week, Intel's stock had its biggest one-week rally since February, after the initial news of the government's possible investment. Tan, who served on SoftBank's board for two years, is seeking a turnaround. But his efforts have largely been focused on cutting costs and eliminating jobs. Intel will add large-scale manufacturing capacity only once customers are committed to using its more advanced production techniques, Tan said last month, sparking concern among investors that the company may be bowing out of the race for semiconductor leadership. The Trump administration is particularly focused on shoring up Intel's sprawling project in Ohio, the home state of Vice President JD Vance. Intel has repeatedly delayed the anticipated opening of that site, which the company originally envisioned as the world's biggest semiconductor facility. Beyond Intel, the White House official also floated the possibility that the administration could convert other Chips Act awards into equity stakes. It's not clear whether that idea has gained traction broadly within the administration or whether officials have broached the possibility with any companies that could be affected. The Chips Act set aside $39 billion in manufacturing grants — plus loans and tax credits — to revitalize the American semiconductor industry after decades of production shifting to Asia. Using Chips Act money for an Intel stake would mean the chipmaker isn't necessarily getting a bigger government infusion than expected — possibly just one that's on a faster timeline. As is the case for all Chips Act winners, Intel's award was designed as a reimbursement, with the grant money split into tranches tied to specific project benchmarks. Intel had received $2.2 billion of its award as of January. It's unclear whether that amount would be included in the possible equity stake, whether the company has received additional disbursements of its award since Trump took office, and on what schedule Intel would receive money under a possible equity stake. While TSMC and South Korea's Samsung Electronics Co. are expanding their US operations with Chips Act support, having an American company like Intel building cutting-edge chips on domestic soil has been a priority for both the Trump and Biden administrations. Biden officials, for example, tried to get companies like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. to consider using Intel as a manufacturing partner, and also explored long-shot ideas like a tie-up between Intel and GlobalFoundries Inc. Earlier this year, Trump's team held early-stage conversations with TSMC about potentially operating Intel's factories — an arrangement from which TSMC has backed away. Trump officials have also internally floated the prospect of seeking an Intel investment from the United Arab Emirates. It's unclear whether either of those approaches has progressed much past a thought exercise. Washington has become more aggressive in strategic sectors. The Trump administration's secured an agreement to receive a 15% cut of AI chip sales to China and took a so-called golden share in United States Steel Corp. as part of a deal to clear its sale to a Japanese rival. That's while the Defense Department announced a plan that would make it the largest shareholder in US rare-earth producer MP Materials Corp. The US government and the Japanese tech conglomerate both see the potential for a turnaround at Intel, although each likely values different parts of the business. For the Trump administration, a recovery of the chipmaker's manufacturing prowess would help win jobs and voters. For SoftBank, Intel's chip design operations beckon with the promise of high margins. With assistance from Brody Ford, Ville Heiskanen, Ryan Gould, Josh Wingrove, Min Jeong Lee and Edwin Chan.

‘India profiteering from Russian oil, China is different': Top US official ahead of tariff deadline
‘India profiteering from Russian oil, China is different': Top US official ahead of tariff deadline

Hindustan Times

time43 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘India profiteering from Russian oil, China is different': Top US official ahead of tariff deadline

As Trump's tariff deadline for India nears, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Tuesday that New Delhi was 'profiteering' and 'making billions' from its purchases of Russian oil. As Trump's tariff deadline for India nears, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Tuesday that New Delhi was 'profiteering' and 'making billions' from its purchases of Russian oil. (AFP) In an interview with CNBC, Bessent said India had made huge profits on the sale of Russian oil during the war in Ukraine. "This ... Indian arbitrage - buying cheap Russian oil, reselling it as product has just sprung during the war - which is unacceptable," he said. The US official further added that India's purchase of Russian oil has been benefiting 'India's richest families.' Speaking to CNBC, Bessent defended US' move to not put tariffs on China for its purchase of Russian oil as Beijing as 'diversified oil imports and so its situation is different.' This is a developing story…

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store