Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Leak Reveals Design, Report Claims
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — the successor may look very similar.
A new leak from Android Headlines shows renders of the folding phone and it seems to be near-identical in measurements to the current Pixel 9 Pro Fold.
'The Pixel 10 Pro Fold is the spitting image of the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, and that's not necessarily a bad thing. After all, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold is simply stunning,' the report says.
Initially, the report said, 'We do expect it to be a bit thinner this year,' but later updated to give the exact dimensions, noting that in fact if these measurements are right, it will be slightly thicker or else the same.
'The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold will dimensions of about 155.2 x 150.4 x 5.3mm. That's slightly different than the Pixel 9 Pro Fold,' it said.
In a separate report the next day, Android Headlines qualified this. 'Now, the eagle-eyed readers here likely noticed that this makes the Pixel 10 Pro Fold thicker than the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. Don't read too much into that. Onleaks dimensions are typically close, but sometimes they are off by around 0.2mm. So, I would expect the Pixel 10 Pro Fold to have the same dimensions as the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, including the same 5.1mm thickness when unfolded,' it said.
Changes will be focused on the inside of the phone, it seems, with changes to the processor —Tensor G5 is predicted — and probably camera sensors for a start. Externally, it's likely there will be new colors in the range, too.
One other change is predicted, and it's a good one: 'Other sources have indicated that the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold will be offered at a lower price point this year. This stands in contrast to the pricing strategy for other phone makers this year, which will either maintain their current prices or become more expensive. Google's premium foldable device is expected to see a modest price reduction when it launches in August,' it's claimed.
However, that this prediction came before the introduction of tariffs for goods coming from outside the U.S., so this may not turn out to be accurate. More as we have it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is the Dip in Amazon Stock a Buying Opportunity, or Should Investors Run for the Hills?
Key Points Amazon reported strong Q2 results, led by strong growth at AWS and great operational efficiency in its e-commerce business. Investors were disappointed with its outlook, as investments will weigh on its profitability. The stock has historically performed well when Amazon invests heavily. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › While Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) crushed second-quarter earnings expectations, the company's cautious outlook sent shares spiraling lower. The drop sent the shares into negative territory on the year, as of this writing. Let's take a closer look at the e-commerce giant's latest results and guidance to see if this dip is a buying opportunity or if investors should run for the hills. Outlook spooks investors Amazon's cloud computing business, Amazon Web Services (AWS), is the company's largest segment by profitability and its fastest-growing. In the quarter, the segment grew its revenue by 17.5% to $30.9 billion, while operating income rose 10% to $10.2 billion. That was above the $30.8 billion revenue consensus, as compiled by StreetAccount, but trailed the growth of Microsoft's Azure and Alphabet's Google cloud. Amazon continues to be the market share leader in the cloud computing space and is investing heavily there. However, like others in the space, it is seeing constraints with demand exceeding capacity. Meanwhile, the company highlighted its custom artificial intelligence (AI) chips as having an edge in price performance. Amazon is leaning into the next wave of AI innovation: AI agents. While interest in AI agents is surging, many companies either lack the tools to build them or struggle to safely deploy them in production. To address that, Amazon introduced Strands -- an open-source framework for building AI agents -- and Agentcore, a secure, serverless environment to run them at scale. It's also rolling out AWS Transform, a specialized AI agent designed to help customers modernize legacy systems like mainframes and accelerate cloud migrations. On the consumer side of its business, Amazon's North America sales jumped 11% to $100.1 billion, while international sales climbed 16%, or 11% in constant currencies, to $36.8 billion. Operating income for its North America segment surged 47% to $7.5 billion, while its international segment posted operating income of $1.5 billion versus $0.3 billion a year ago. Advertising services continue to be a growth driver, as revenue soared 23% to $15.7 billion, driven by its sponsored ad business. That was ahead of the $14.9 billion analyst consensus, as compiled by StreetAccount. Third-party seller services revenue rose by 11% to $40.3 billion, while online store revenue climbed by 11% to $61.5 billion. Physical stores, such as Whole Foods and Amazon Fresh, saw sales grow by 7% to $5.6 billion. Subscription services revenue, meanwhile, jumped 12% to $12.2 billion. Overall, Amazon's revenue climbed by 13% to $167.7 billion, which came in well above the $162.1 billion analyst consensus, as compiled by London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG). Adjusted earnings per share climbed 33% to $1.68, which was also well ahead of analyst expectations of $1.33. Looking ahead, Amazon forecast Q3 revenue to be between $174 billion and $179.5 billion, representing 10% to 13% growth. Meanwhile, it guided for operating income to be between $15.5 billion to $20.5 billion compared to $17.4 billion a year ago. Analysts were looking for operating income of $19.5 billion (StreetAccount) on revenue of $173.1 billion (LSEG). Should investors buy the dip? Amazon has been nicely growing its revenue, led by AWS and its sponsored ad business. However, a just as important -- if not more important -- part of the story has been the operational efficiency it has seen in its e-commerce business. That showed up in Q2 via its e-commerce operating income, but investors were disappointed with its operating income guidance. The company is investing heavily in AI infrastructure for AWS, which is leading to some higher depreciation costs. At the end of the day, this investment is needed and will benefit the company, although it will weigh on profitability in the near term. Turning to valuation, the stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of about 34 times 2025 analyst estimates and 29 times 2026 estimates. That's a historically attractive valuation for the stock, and Amazon has often performed well when it invests heavily. As such, I'd use this pullback as a buying opportunity. Should you buy stock in Amazon right now? Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has positions in Alphabet. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is the Dip in Amazon Stock a Buying Opportunity, or Should Investors Run for the Hills? was originally published by The Motley Fool
New York Times
35 minutes ago
- New York Times
So Long to Tech's Dream Job
When Rachel Grey started working at Google as a software engineer in 2007, it was a good time to be a Noogler, or what the search giant called new employees. At a two-week orientation at Google's headquarters in Mountain View, Calif., Ms. Grey discovered a utopia of perks. The company's cafeterias served steak and shrimp, kitchens were stocked with fresh juices and gyms offered free workout classes. Workers received stock grants on top of their salaries, a 50 percent match on their retirement contributions and a Christmas bonus that came in the form of $1,000 tucked in an envelope. What also made an impression on Ms. Grey during orientation was that Google revealed how many machines were in its data centers. 'I saw how transparent things were in the company,' she said about the normally hush-hush information. Over the years, though, her experience changed as she became a software engineering manager. The Christmas bonus shrank. Employees were no longer provided a fire hose of corporate information. The company abandoned a pledge that its artificial intelligence would not be used for weapons. The budget for promotions dried up, pressuring Ms. Grey to lower performance ratings, which she said was 'stunningly painful.' In April, just shy of 18 years, the 48-year-old quit what was once her dream job. Life for workers at Silicon Valley's biggest tech companies is different. Very different. Gone are the days when Google, Apple, Meta and Netflix were the dream destinations for tech workers, offering fat salaries, lush corporate campuses and say-anything, do-anything cultures. Now the behemoth firms have aged into large bureaucracies. While many of them still provide free food and pay well, they have little compunction cutting jobs, ordering mandatory office attendance and clamping down on employee debate. It's the shut up and grind era, workers said. 'Tech could still be best in terms of free lunch and a high salary,' Ms. Grey said, but 'the level of fear has gone way up.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Business Insider
35 minutes ago
- Business Insider
The cofounder of Wiz, Google's $32 billion acquisition target, says vibe coding must be met with 'vibe security'
When Google agreed to buy Israeli-American cloud security firm Wiz earlier this year, making for the search giant's largest acquisition, it threw a $32 billion bucket of water on the idea that the mega-deal drought was here to stay. In March, Google agreed to acquire the five-year-old startup at an all-cash price roughly equal to Iceland's gross domestic product last year, pending regulatory sign-off. The acquisition now stands as an early litmus test of the Trump administration's willingness to green-light pricey Big Tech mergers and acquisitions. For Wiz cofounder and chief technology officer Ami Luttwak, the moment feels like déjà‑vu— the same founding team sold its last outfit, Adallom, to Microsoft in 2015. Founded in March of 2020, Wiz crash-landed in a pandemic that yanked workloads out of on-prem server racks and thrust them into the cloud almost overnight. The crew pivoted from network exposure to cloud security and says that within 18 months, it was posting $100 million in annual recurring revenue. Now the company finds itself riding an even wilder wave. The ability of artificial intelligence to write code has turned every developer into a feature factory. However, Luttwak says the proliferation of new attack surfaces leaves most security teams overwhelmed and outnumbered. Luttwak's answer? If builders can " vibe-code" an app in an hour, security has to vibe right alongside. In an interview at Business Insider's headquarters in New York City, we asked Luttwak about building a company through a pandemic, a new tech paradigm, and making cloud security part of an engineer's workflow. He declined to answer any questions about Google's planned acquisition. This Q&A has been edited for clarity and length. This is pretty much the same team between your first startup and Wiz? It is the same team, basically. The team is what makes the company and defines how it operates. It's not the specific direction or idea. When we left Microsoft, we didn't know what we wanted to build. We just said, 'We have a chance to get back together, so let's do it.' We started in networking, then COVID hit, and no one wanted to talk about a future network architecture. It was all about, 'How can you help me now?' We had to pivot, but we like to pivot. That's the fun of startups — to find real problems, not the theoretical problems you think exist. Cloud security at the time was already a mature market. There were hundreds of solutions in the market. It's like when you go to a concert, the crowd is full, and you say, 'I got here too late, there's no way I can get close to the stage.' But in reality, none of the solutions actually solved the real problem. The market existed to help customers securely manage the cloud, but what companies actually needed was security for everything they had in the cloud. In the first year, we got to $14 million in annual recurring revenue, which was 10 times what we expected. Wiz grew as part of a mad dash of companies moving to the cloud. How does the disruption of the pandemic compare to what's happening now with artificial intelligence? We were remote first. We could hire any candidate we wanted. We could get any customer we wanted. This really helped us in the sense that the big companies had no advantage over us. The pandemic accelerated stuff. AI changes stuff. We must forget everything we've done until now and approach security very differently. The reason is simple: Everyone can build very fast. I'm talking a hundred times as fast as before. It's not just the number of applications increasing — it's the number of people in the company who can build stuff. The history of security in the enterprise was much more centralized. 'You want to build something? Come to me. I will tell you what to do.' That's approaching it like a building inspector. In today's world, a builder can " vibe code" something in one hour. And there are hundreds of developers to every one security person. The challenge for us is making security teams and developers work together when the business pushes them to move fast. Engineers clash with security. They say, 'I don't have time for it. I'll deal with it later.' It's second-class, but it's also boring. If you want to build an application, you think about how cool it will be. Are you thinking about security? We say security has to be democratized — self-service. We simplify the complexity so anyone can own security. If you build it, you have to own it. It doesn't scale any other way. We need to find a way as an industry to allow you to vibe code, but also vibe security while you do it. How do you do that? It has to be designed so it's easy to use. The iPhone was nice to use — it wasn't just about the features. You have to enable anyone to use the features that, before, you needed to be an expert. You probably see some of the same challenges with hiring— pitching talent to do boring, but impactful work. How has your pitch to candidates evolved through the years? I don't have to explain to technical people why cyber is cool. There's good and bad, and we are the people who find the problem before the bad guy comes. We're just five years old, although I admit there is a challenge around people saying, 'you're not a startup anymore.' I tell them, I'm forty-something. You decide if you're young or not. I feel like we're still a startup. What are you hearing from customers lately? I'm trying to cope with two different pressures. Some customers expect us to use AI to be smarter, and some are so afraid of the risks that they say in our contracts, 'do not use it at all.' We have a lot of discussions with customers. I try to tell them there's no way I can commit to that. There's a chance a support email will come, and a summary will run. We are a highly regulated entity, but we are also expected to run very fast. The challenge is: how can we leverage AI internally without putting data or customers at risk? I've read about how much code AI writes at Google or Microsoft, and it seems like showboating. We don't know the real impact on productivity yet, that's the truth. The amount of code being generated doesn't really mean that you can take away strong engineers from complex systems. We are starting to build different pipelines: an internal flow for employees and an external flow for the product. Support automation is a whole team we're now building that connects to sensitive systems and does very complex analysis. So, you accelerated during the pandemic. You're now riding the AI wave. Do you worry about an AI-native generation of cloud security startups coming to eat your lunch? Every company on the face of the earth feels there is a risk to its business. If they feel safe, they're probably even less safe. AI is only as smart as the data that you give it. Our advantage is that we understand your environment better than anyone. We are like Google Maps. You have a lot of layers: traffic, satellite, and businesses. You need all the layers to ask how long it is going to take me to get to the restaurant. We have all the layers. We understand the code, the network, the identity, the secrets, the applications, the malware, and the exposure. So we have the data. Now, for us, it's all about enabling the security teams to use the data in an AI-friendly way.
