Turkey's Halkbank Asks US Supreme Court to Toss Out Criminal Case
In an appeal docketed at the high court Wednesday, Halkbank contended it is protected from prosecution by sovereign immunity. The filing follows a federal appeals court ruling in October rejecting Halkbank's arguments.
Prosecutors allege that Halkbank helped free up $20 billion of restricted Iranian funds and helped launder at least $1 billion through the US financial system.
The appeal centers on an issue the Supreme Court left open in 2023, when it said Halkbank wasn't protected by a 1976 federal statute that confers immunity on foreign governments in many circumstances. The high court said that law applies only to civil lawsuits, not criminal prosecutions.
The bank now contends it is immune under what is known as 'common law,' the judge-made set of legal rules that sometimes apply when no statute governs.
'No court in history has ever criminally tried the instrumentality of another co-equal sovereign — even in cases involving commercial conduct,' Halkbank argued in its appeal.
Halkbank's appeal is an 'uphill climb unlikely to succeed,' Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein said in April. He said the bank's best bet is likely to be a settlement with the Trump administration at a potential cost of $1 billion to $2 billion.
Depending on how quickly the Justice Department files a brief in response, the high court might not say whether it will hear the appeal until its new term starts in October.
The case is Turkiye Halk Bankasi v. United States, 24-1144.
With assistance from Bob Van Voris.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
19 minutes ago
- Hans India
Oracle Lays Off 10% of India Workforce Amid Trump Talks and OpenAI Partnership
Oracle, one of the world's largest software companies, has initiated a significant round of layoffs in India, affecting nearly 10 percent of its workforce. The move comes just days after Oracle CEO Larry Wilson's high-profile meeting with US President Donald Trump and the company's landmark deal with OpenAI, sparking widespread speculation about the underlying motives behind the restructuring. 1. India Takes the Biggest Hit India has long been one of Oracle's most important bases, employing close to 28,824 people across cities like Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Pune, Noida, and Mumbai. According to reports, around one in ten employees in the country have lost their jobs, with teams in software development, cloud services, and customer support among the hardest hit. Many employees were reportedly caught off guard, receiving little clarity about severance packages or future opportunities. Oracle has described the decision as part of a global 'restructuring exercise,' but the sheer scale of job losses has raised concerns within the Indian tech industry. 2. Timing Raises Questions The layoffs follow closely on the heels of Oracle chief Larry Wilson's meeting with President Trump at the White House. According to people familiar with the discussion, the talks centered around domestic hiring, national data security, and strategic technology partnerships. Soon after, Oracle announced a major deal with OpenAI, under which large-scale AI data processing will now shift to Oracle's infrastructure. Industry observers believe the restructuring may be part of a broader strategy to align more resources with the US market, echoing Trump's push for reduced offshoring and less reliance on H-1B visas. 3. Global Cuts, Not Just India While India has been among the worst hit, the layoffs are not limited to the region. Reports suggest employees in the United States, Canada, and Mexico have also faced job cuts. In Seattle alone, more than 150 employees have been told their positions are no longer required. Mexico could reportedly see job losses on a scale similar to India. Employees in several other regions have been asked to attend undisclosed meetings, fueling concerns about an even wider global downsizing. 4. AI Boom Reshaping Tech Giants The move also reflects a broader industry trend. With the AI race accelerating, tech companies are diverting billions toward data centers and advanced computing power while trimming headcount elsewhere. Microsoft has already cut 15,000 jobs this year, while Amazon and Meta have taken similar measures. For Oracle, the OpenAI partnership—tied to the ambitious 'Stargate' project worth nearly $500 billion alongside SoftBank—demands enormous investment, including an estimated 4.5 gigawatts of data center capacity in the US. Analysts say such capital-heavy commitments are forcing Oracle to reconsider its global workforce structure. 5. Impact on India's Long-Term Role Oracle has been deeply embedded in India for more than two decades, leveraging the country's talent pool for software development, customer support, and its expanding cloud business. The company even extended operations into Tier-II and Tier-III cities such as Jaipur, Bhopal, and Thiruvananthapuram under its geo-expansion strategy. However, the latest round of cuts could deal a blow to employee morale and raise doubts about Oracle's long-term hiring in India. At the same time, the company continues to hire selectively in the US, suggesting a strategic shift in focus rather than a complete hiring freeze.
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
C Raja Mohan writes: India should be cautious about Trump reaching out to Russia, China and Europe
Will the guns in Ukraine finally fall silent? A ceasefire may no longer be on the table, but Donald Trump is pressing for a full-fledged peace settlement rather than a temporary pause. His peace diplomacy, though fraught with risks, is making headway. Any accord will demand wrenching territorial concessions from Kyiv, which has fought valiantly against Moscow's invasion, and more limited demands from Russia on Ukraine's post-war arrangements. Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, followed by talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders in Washington, has set the stage for a trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin, and Zelenskyy in the coming weeks. A breakthrough may be possible. Behind the scenes, Trump's relentless pressure tactics — on all parties — have underwritten his diplomacy. In promoting peace in Ukraine, Trump is attempting nothing less than a reset of America's relations with Europe, Russia, and China. For years, Trump has demanded that Europe shoulder more of its own defence burden. Under his pressure, NATO allies have pledged to raise military spending to nearly 5 per cent of their GDP. Whether these promises are kept — and whether they translate into credible military capacity — remains to be seen. For now, Europe remains heavily dependent on the US for security. That dependence has left Europe with little say in shaping peace. European leaders have been reduced to pleading with Trump to improve the terms for Ukraine. They have agreed to lead security guarantees for Kyiv, with the US as a backstop, and to spend $100 billion on American arms for Ukraine. For Trump, peace is also business. One outcome of peace in Ukraine is a gradual reset in US-Russia ties. Trump has long signalled his desire for a productive partnership with Moscow. Despite repeated attacks from Washington's establishment — branding him a 'Russian asset' — he has persisted. Putin has reciprocated, invoking historic bonds and pointing to possibilities for cooperation. This is not without precedent. Washington and Moscow have alternated between confrontation and cooperation for decades. In World War II, the US allied with Joseph Stalin to defeat Nazi Germany, supplying Moscow with massive 'Lend-Lease' aid. During his Alaska visit, Putin paid homage to the pilots who ferried aid across the Alaska–Siberia air bridge. The 1970s détente produced arms control agreements and joint initiatives in space and regional security. The Soviet collapse opened another decade of close partnership before ties soured in the late 2000s. For Putin, the question is less about ideology and more about the terms of accommodation. Russia seeks dignity and equality in any settlement. In Alaska, Trump offered just that — public respect and hints of deeper economic cooperation. If Washington reopens the door to Moscow, parts of Europe may follow. Russian energy remains attractive to European industry, and Russian markets still beckon exporters. Should the thaw hold, expect Moscow's rhetoric to shift — from 'building a post-American order' to working with Washington in managing global stability, a familiar theme from the 1970s and 1990s. Russia relishes its identity as a great power and its presumed role as America's 'co-equal' in world affairs. Trump's interest in Russia is not purely sentimental. Within his circle, some argue that separating Moscow from Beijing should be a key US goal. Others insist that peace in Europe is essential for focusing on China in Asia. Trump himself hinted at this after the Alaska summit, calling Russia and China 'natural enemies' and blaming the Biden administration for driving Moscow into Beijing's arms — an argument that resonates in Delhi too. This has revived talk of a 'reverse Kissinger'. In the 1970s, Henry Kissinger opened relations with China to counter the Soviet Union. Today, some in Washington dream of flipping Russia to contain China. The analogy is flawed. Unlike then, Moscow and Beijing today are bound in a 'no-limits' partnership, underpinned by strategic, economic, and technological ties. Expecting a sudden break is unrealistic. Still, Trump's outreach could give both Washington and Moscow more room to manoeuvre in dealing with China's growing power. Trump, however, is not eager to abandon China. He seeks a deal there as well. His reluctance to impose secondary sanctions on Chinese purchases of Russian oil and his repeated praise for Xi Jinping suggest a bigger initiative may be brewing. Speculation is rife that Trump could travel to Beijing in late October, between the ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur and APEC in Seoul. China, too, wants a deal that legitimises its status as America's equal. Like Russia, Beijing does not seek perpetual confrontation with Washington. The issue is not ideological incompatibility but the terms of accommodation. Trump's parallel manoeuvres with Moscow and Beijing recall another Kissinger maxim: Washington should always strive to have better relations with other great powers than they do with one another. Trump seems intent on precisely that. For India, these shifts pose sobering choices. A 'reverse Kissinger' could leave the major powers enjoying warmer ties with one another than with Delhi. If Trump succeeds in resetting relations with both Moscow and Beijing, India risks being marginalised in the evolving global balance. Delhi must therefore reboot ties with all major powers — the US, Europe, Russia, and China. It must avoid slipping into permanent conflict with its neighbours, which only invites more meddling by the great powers. India must back diplomacy with long-overdue economic reform and renewed domestic political unity on key national issues. Without internal strength, foreign policy agility will be of little use in managing the current turbulence of great-power politics. The writer is contributing editor on international affairs for The Indian Express
The Hindu
19 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Opposition's VP nominee Justice Sudershan Reddy headed expert panel on Telangana's caste survey
INDIA Bloc's candidate for the upcoming Vice-President elections, retired Supreme Court Judge Balakrishna Sudershan Reddy, eminent legal luminary, headed an 11-member Independent Expert Working Group that had analysed and interpreted the data collected during the Socio, Economic, Education, Employment, Political and Caste Survey 2024 (SEEEPC survey) conducted by the Telangana government. Telangana Congress leaders surprised too An All India Congress Committee (AICC) leader from Telangana said the contribution of Justice Reddy in vetting the survey had brought him into close contact with the Congress leadership in the Centre. A top Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee (TPCC) leader told The Hindu that the role of Justice Reddy in submitting its recommendations of the Expert Group coupled with his roots in South India had worked in his favour as the Vice-President candidate. 'The choice is surprising to the Telangana Congress leaders also,' the leader mentioned. The State government led by A. Revanth Reddy had successfully completed the socio-economic and caste survey launched in November 2024 and completed it in a record time to gather detailed data on caste, education, employment, income and political engagement and made it public in February 2025. The report formed the basis for the government's pitch for 42% quota for Backward Classes (BC) in local bodies polls, which subsequently echoed across the country with the Congress taking up a campaign. In fact, the Mr. Revanth Reddy had referred to how the Expert Group led by Justice Sudershan Reddy had praised the survey as scientific, authentic, and reliable, and a potential model for the rest of the country. The expert group felt that the methodology adopted was thorough and exemplary. It recommended to use the data to fine-tune existing welfare schemes and design future policies focused on upliftment of weaker sections, and bridging inequalities. The findings, which were tabled in both the Houses of Telangana Legislature, were later referred to the working Group headed by Justice Sudershan Reddy. The group headed by the former Supreme Court Judge was tasked with studying and interpreting the extensive data. Farmer's family to legal profession Justice Sudershan Reddy was born on 8th July, 1946, at Akula Mylaram of Kandakur mandal in Rangareddy district. He hails from an agricultural family. He studied in Hyderabad and graduated in Law from Osmania University. His legal career spans more than five decades. After competing Law in 1971, Justice Reddy joined the office of a senior Advocate K. Pratap Reddy handling cases in the City Civil Court and gradually moving in to fight cases in the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. He rose to become the Judge of High Court of Andhra Pradesh in 1995 and went on to head the Guwahati High Court as Chief Justice. In 2007, he was appointed as Judge of Supreme Court of India and retired in 2011. Irrigation Minister N. Uttam Kumar Reddy took to X (formerly Twitter) appealing to all Telugu parties to support the candidature of Justice Sudarshan Reddy, a distinguished jurist, in the upcoming Vice President electionS.
